Home Blog Page 6946

Coastal Commission tackles feuding beach neighbors, drivebys and Joe Edmiston’s appetites

0

An Opinion

An ornate ballroom of the Queen Mary, sitting majestically alongside a Long Beach pier, was a fitting venue last week for the Coastal Commission’s illustration of its interpretation of the doctrine of noblesse oblige.

The agenda was filled with Malibu. The first early morning battle was between the Ramirez Canyon neighbors and the Santa Monica Mountains Conservancy, a fiefdom ruled by Joe Edmiston, who wants to turn the former Streisand Center, a multi-building complex at the end of very rural and narrow Ramirez Canyon Road, into a venue for weddings and bar mitzvahs, to raise bucks for his many purposes. Edmiston — who looks like a large cuddly bearded panda bear, which disguises his voracious polar bear appetites — gobbles up land in the name of the public good, in this case to the accompanying hosannas of a very compliant Coastal Commission, seemingly content to play 12 little happy dwarfs to Edmiston’s Snow White.

Technically, the Coastal Commission holds its meetings in public, takes input and makes decisions in the light of day for all the world to see. Sometimes it actually works that way and there is a real discussion, but unfortunately that wasn’t the case here. This thing was so wired it was almost embarrassing to be in the same room with that group trying so hard to pretend that somehow this was a public process.

What Edmiston wanted, and the commission was obviously pleased to grant, was a coastal bill giving him virtual carte blanche to crank out as much money as he can from the former Streisand Center by holding as many 200-person events as time, space and the catering market would allow. It wasn’t just the guests, it was also caterers, the waiters and a variety of other support people, all for the purpose of raising enough money to support this white elephant that Edmiston had originally accepted from Streisand for a highly acclaimed and never-to-happen think tank for environmental scholars from all over the world. Once the upkeep bills began to roll in and the realization hit that the conservancy had been saddled with a very large turkey, Edmiston sought to convert it to a catering hall. Although initially rebuffed by coastal staff, he seemed able to satisfy their very finicky appetite not by decreasing the size of his project, as one might expect, but by turning it into a public park and then substantially increasing the size of the project. Accessible, of course, only by one very narrow, windy, private road.

Edmiston got everything he wanted, 12 to 0. Not only did the citizens of Malibu get royally hosed — they now have a catering hall in a location that is so profoundly inappropriate for its intended use that one could question the sanity of this decision. They also got a series of very sanctimonious lectures from several commissioners who went to great lengths to point out that rich white folk are not going to be able to keep the mountains to themselves anymore, and it was our own damn fault for never passing a Local Coastal Plan and thereby taking this matter out of their greedy, greeny little hands. So, tough. And on that last point I must admit they’re probably right.

But Edmiston was just the warm up on the fight card compared to the main event. That came much later in the afternoon, long after I left the scene, so what I’m relating is second hand.

This was a battle of Olympian proportions between Eli Broad, one of L.A.’s most prominent, and from what I’ve heard, not terribly beloved billionaires, and Nancy Daly Riordan, the wife of L.A. Mayor Richard Riordan and the ex-wife of Daly (of Daly/Semel of Warner Brothers). It seems that Broad and Riordan each own some lots on Carbon beach, and they want to tear down the old houses and build three new larger houses. In keeping with a more recent Malibu beachlot tradition that seems to say the less a beach house will be used, the larger the house has to be, they of course want to build their houses practically lot line to lot line.

Enter the Coastal Commission, which says, we don’t want a solid line of houses blocking the public viewshed, so you have to give us a 20-foot-wide view corridor (on each of three lots) so people can see the ocean as they drive by. Now, one might well wonder why the Coastal Commission thinks a 20-foot view between houses glimpsed by someone traveling 50 mph is so important. Consider that it takes a little less then one-third of a second to drive by the opening.

Nevertheless, there is something to be said for not having wall-to-wall houses along the beach, and thereby came the solution. Broad/Riordan suggested that instead of modifying their own proposed houses, they would instead buy a lot down the beach, and donate it as open space for the public to enjoy. That sounded fine to the commissioners, and the deal was soon consummated. It only needed the official imprimatur of a majority of the Coastal Commission to make it a done deal. So, in near record time, it was on the agenda.

Now, down the beach where the new public beach was to go, and on a rather bad corner of the highway, almost all would agree, the locals, as you might expect, were less then overjoyed. They viewed this less as an act of public altruism by Broad/Riordan and more as slipping the not-so-nice stuff over onto your neighbor’s lot. They determined to fight back. So they gathered — Freddie Fields, Lou Adler, Peg Yorkin and Ginny Mancini, and a number of their equally influential neighbors — and what they found was that this thing was greased, that tiny little Sacramento fingers were all over it, and it sailed through 12-zip. They, of course, immediately reached for their lawyers, and the Coastal Commission, perhaps in acknowlegement of the hard political realities, said if the beach dedication failed because some court blocks it, Broad/Riordan could instead pay $1 million into a fund for use in obtaining some other beach access, which means that’s probably the way it’s ultimately going to go.

So if you happen to be in the neighborhood someday, I highly recommend the Coastal Commission meetings for a really cheap day’s entertainment, kind of like environmental Kabuki theater.

Whale of a gesture

0

I would like to suggest that it’s time for us in Malibu to “walk our talk” when we say we love and care for our dolphin and whale neighbors.

Recently, President Zedillo, in Mexico, turned down a lucrative deal to develop San Ignacio Lagoon, where the whales that migrate past Malibu twice a year go to give birth. For centuries that lagoon has been a safe place for their babies to be born and begin their lives. But that safety was threatened. Surely, Mexico needs the money and the jobs that would have come with development. It was a difficult and courageous decision on the part of President Zedillo.

Please write to him to acknowledge the importance of his decision and to thank him: President Ernesto Zedillo, Palacio National, Patio E Honor PB, Mexico City, Mexico DS 06067.

Brenda Norman

Take back your creek

0

As exemplified by our successful efforts to prohibit dry-weather discharges from April 15 to Nov. 15 from the Tapia Sewage Treatment Plant, our successful Stream Team volunteer monitoring program, and our numerous successful research and advocacy projects to protect water quality in Malibu Lagoon and Surfrider beach, Heal the Bay is tremendously concerned about the health of the Malibu Creek watershed. We can not understand why the city does not become more proactive on initiating restoration efforts in the lower watershed.

The city has not attempted to purchase the proposed Malibu Self-Storage Facility along the banks of the creek despite the fact that $1 million from County Proposition A has been available for linear park development for over five years. In fact, the City Council approved the Malibu Self-Storage Project despite strong objections from the Malibu Environmental Review Board and Heal the Bay.

Also, the city has not fought to remove the hideous, rock rip-rap along the banks of the creek next to Cross-Creek Plaza. Not only is the rip-rap an eyesore, but it has eliminated local riparian vegetation and pollutant removal efficacy that the creek had in that area. The rip-rap should be removed and replaced with bioengineered stream banks with native vegetation as soon as possible. The rip-rap was added to the creek during the El Nino to protect the plaza, but a careful bioengineered solution could provide equal flood control with the added value of improving the ecology and aesthetics of the lower watershed.

With the passage of Propositions 12 and 13 and the existence of Proposition A funds, we strongly urge the city to take back the creek by using available funding sources to restore degraded habitats and provide sorely needed buffer zones and flood control.

Mark Abramson,

Stream Team program manager and longtime Malibu resident

Continue conciliation

0

We have lost a real statesman and conciliator with the recent demise of Councilman Harry Barovsky. He was a true visionary for Malibu, and he will be missed enormously. I loved his wry sense of humor, his impatience with the pursuit of minutiae by some fellow council members and his burning desire to get to the point.

I trust that his loss will not cause a scramble for power by anyone on the council. With the municipal election around the corner, I think the City Council should proceed slowly with any attempt to fill the open council seat by appointment. The council that is elected on April 11, 2000, should be the one that makes the appointment to replace our beloved Councilman Harry Barovsky.

I suggest a moderate appointment such as Emily Harlow would fit the bill, and it would continue the tradition of Councilman Harry Barovsky.

J. Patrick Maginnis

Stage Reviews — "Ferdydurke" and "A Streetcar Named Desire"

0

From the land that gave birth to Copernicus, Chopin, Curie and the maternal side of my family also comes a production of “Ferdydurke,” from the novel by the reputed cult hero Witold Gombrowicz, at Santa Monica’s City Garage.

The hardworking performers in this production from Poland seem exquisitely trained — in acting, physical comedy and English as a second language. Their bodies take a beating, often self-inflicted, in this 90-minute romp through several nightmarish vignettes of life.

Describable as Mr. Bean meets Kafka, it shows man at his most comically repulsive. In the first scene, a bellowing teacher beseeches his three students to learn Latin because it teaches clarity of thought, precision of expression, as well as the art of war. The boys are bored and would rather engage in their own sophomoric antics of warlike aggression.

Despite the route imposed on the script — a theatrical version in Polish from the original novel, adapted into an English version, “freely based on a new translation of the novel, to be published” — language was not the source of this evening’s problems.

More incomprehensible was the audience this production gathered. Anyone who has been to opening night at a “smaller” theater knows about the claques — the friends and family of the actors, or even the director, who indulge in raucous, fake laughter to let the less intelligent members of the audience know we’re seeing a comedy.

Although the run at City Garage offered Polish-language nights, half this particular audience was Polish speaking. Next to me were two of the few taped-off seats in the house, usually reserved for VIPs, and these were taken by a Polish-speaking couple.

During the play, our “hero” put pantyhose on his head, and the Poles howled. Two sets of hairy male legs gave the impression of copulating bodies, and the Poles roared.

They didn’t laugh at the metaphoric references to classical literature. They didn’t seem troubled by the tragic morass the characters couldn’t escape. They instead began their hollow laughter the instant the lights rose on the performers.

After the play’s strangely abrupt conclusion, I started to exit the theater, having neither laughed during the performance nor cheered wildly during bows, when my neighbor grabbed my elbow and hissed, “You have no class.”

For having sat through an evening of listening to grown men expel air from various orifices, pick their noses and display the byproduct to the audience, and raise school desks by the sheer anatomical force of their sexual excitement, I can understand his harsh appraisal.

Meanwhile, may I suggest to theater claques the world over: Play a laugh track and save your throats.

For Tennessee Williams’ “A Streetcar Named Desire,” Deaf West Theatre production creates a deaf quarter of New Orleans, into which a hearing Blanche Dubois comes to visit her deaf sister, Stella, married to a deaf Stanley, whose poker buddies include a deaf Mitch. There’s no pretending the characters are hearing; they just live in a deaf world, and except for one line in Williams’ original script, it works perfectly.

Here is ensemble acting at its epitome. There are no small actors, even in the bit parts. Signing actors are voiced over by hearing actors who speak the lines. The speaking actors work carefully, allowing signing to begin early enough for the physical reaction of the deaf actor to culminate at the point to be emphasized.

Suanne Spoke is the speaking and signing Blanche, in an intense, complex portrayal. Terrylene is the signing Stella, a glowing actor of natural reactions; she is voiced by Maureen Davis. Troy M. Kotsur is the signing Stanley, voiced by a keenly attentive John Ireland. Bob Hiltermann is gentle as the ultimately disappointed Mitch, voiced by Phil Di Pietro.

The actors never merely face each other to sign. Directed by Deborah LaVine, they watch each other in mirrors, or peek out of the corners of their eyes, or momentarily turn away for an appropriate reason, as we expect to see in hearing theater. Instead of listening at the door as Williams’ stage directions suggest, the characters peek at one another through the screen door or kitchen window.

Leave it to theater of the deaf to offer a lesson in sound design. Production Coordinator and Sound Designer Bill O’Brien makes the floor of the theater reverberate from recorded music and vibrate when the streetcar passes by, so hearing-impaired audience members know what we hear. Not to worry, the sound is not too loud.

An onstage trumpet player entertains during the brief scene changes, deftly executed by the actors.

Set Designer Robert Steinberg and Lighting Designer Ken Booth make the place look humid, even if the theater’s air conditioning cools the audience.

Not incidentally, the sight lines of the theater are superb, with steeply raked seating that offers a clear, floor-to-second-story view of the stage.

One might prefer an interpretation of the play laden with sexual tension, foreboding and darkly passionate, from the moment Stanley and Blanche spot each other. None of this permeates Deaf West’s version of the play, even though Stanley still utters the famous line, “We’ve had this date with each other from the beginning.”

Further, this Stanley and Stella are the cutest couple, loving and happy, except for a few slips of the tongue and fist by Stanley, and he seems delighted to have Blanche room with them. This Blanche is not the least frail, nor does she seem crazy. Yet she evokes a visceral reaction at the play’s end because her fate seems so unfair.

It is also a plausible interpretation if one considers it is the intrusion of the hearing world into the Kowalski home that shatters their peace.

“A Streetcar Named Desire” plays through this weekend, at Deaf West Theatre, 5112 Lankershim Blvd., North Hollywood. For schedule, telephone 818.762.2773; GTY No. 818.762.2787.

Seniors out in the cold

0

I read with interest “Candidates Priorities,” Mar. 16 issue.

Jeff Jennings did casually mention a senior community center but not one candidate was interested in a seniors retirement or assisted living center. And yet the City Council has been sitting on two such proposals for three years, one by Pepperdine University and one by Malibu Bay Co., and nothing has been accomplished.

In the meantime, seniors who have lived in Malibu for as long as 40 years have been forced to seek such help elsewhere, e.g., Camarillo, Ventura and Santa Monica, and there are more seniors seeking assisted living elsewhere. But wait, when City Council members are ready for such accommodation, we’ll see the fur fly and Malibu retirement facilities will jump up out of nowhere.

There is so much tension among city residents, I am surprised that someone hasn’t formed a petition to oust all the City Council and go back to being part of the county. Walter Keller will not have to worry about Deane Dana anyway.

E. Reta Templeman

Harry’s helping hands

0

Members and supporters of the Labor Exchange want to thank the Malibu City Council for voting to continue financial aid for this program. It was very impressive listening to members of the Malibu community stand up at the council meeting and explain the importance and needed acceptance of the Labor Exchange. Malibu has found that we need these workers as much as the workers need us.

It was sad to see the vacant chair at this council meeting. Harry Barovsky was a major supporter of the Labor Exchange along with several other worthwhile causes. Many a rainy night during the winter of El Nino, Harry was down at the center helping to find shelter for the workers. Harry will be missed by so many of us

Dorothy Green

Base basis

0

(The following letter was sent to Councilman Walt Keller)

I am writing to you regarding your recent letter about Bluffs Park in Malibu. I certainly share your concern for needed recreational ballfields and other facilities in Malibu. Please remember that California State Parks has always taken a cooperative approach to these issues in working within the city. Examples are renewal of the contract for operation of the ballfields and support of renovations and improvements.

At the same time I have been very clear that the ballfields at Bluffs Park are temporary. State Parks purchased this land specifically for coastal viewshed and access and resource preservation. The ballfields are located in the prime viewshed, in an area that State Parks is considering for a joint visitor center with the National Park Service (NPS). Co-locating with the ballfields would not work since the size and topography of the park do not allow additional development outside the present footprint, and the already congested parking and weekend recreational use would conflict with our needs.

Having said that, our joint plans with NPS are obviously not shelf ready. Until we are prepared to move forward and as long as a good-faith effort to find an alternative site is being made, I see no problem with providing the city with a short-term extension. As I have offered in the past, I am ready and willing to assist you in searching for alternatives in any way I can.

As you note, I have been instrumental in settling the city’s disagreement with the Coastal Commission over the issues at Point Dume. I have devoted a considerable amount of my time and that of my staff to this issue. I have committed nearly $300,000 to improvements to meet the city’s concerns and have added a full-time staff position to patrol and protect this park and develop a docent program. This has saved the city hundreds of thousands of dollars, which would have been spent if litigation continued.

Walt, I am grateful for the invaluable assistance you provided on the Point Dume issue. If we can work together as well on the Bluffs issue, I think we’ll be able to arrive at an early and satisfactory result. In the meantime, “Play Ball!”

Rusty Areias, director,

California State Parks

Bottom line on condos

0

This is in response to Patt Healy’s (Malibu Coalition for slow growth) letter to the editor, dated April 6, regarding the 38 condominiums currently under construction on six acres at Lunita Bailard located in the Trancas area of West Malibu.

She wrote “For the record, there was never a proposal for six houses before the City Council for its approval. This is pure propaganda.”

The minutes (page 12 and 13, Section 5), and videotape (Count Timer #4250 and #4445) of the September 13, 1995, City Council Meeting reflect her participation and following action by the City Council.

Stanley Lamport, representing the First Los Angeles Bank, owner of the property, “… an RR-5 designation with a specific plan overlay would leave the bank no choice but to go with a condominium project. He would prefer an RR-1 designation and would be happy with an RR-2.” (Page 12)

“Mayor Pro Tem Harlow moved to redesignate the Preferred Financial property from RR-5 to RR-2. There was no second to the motion.” (Page 13)

That’s how we got 38 condominiums instead of three homes at Lunita Bailard.

John Harlow