Home Blog Page 6998

Rescue units find selves at sea

0

On the very day the U.S. Coast Guard was searching for John F. Kennedy Jr.’s missing plane, Malibu’s real Baywatch — the nickname for the L.A. County Lifeguards (as well as their rescue boat) — may have taken nearly twice as long to rescue three victims of a freak sailing accident virtually in sight off their Zuma Beach headquarters.

That the boat’s passengers lived to tell the tale was, according to them, due more to luck and preparation than any action on the part of the lifeguards who, they say, initially greeted the alarm with nonchalance, or the sheriff’s office, which seemed inexplicably indifferent.

It was near-perfect sailing weather when, at 3:30 that Saturday afternoon, architect and Malibu resident David von Oeyen (a lifelong sailor), his son Geoffrey (a mainstay of the Stanford University sailing team) and Geoff’s girlfriend, Jyoti Bollman, launched the family’s 20-foot Tornado catamaran as they had for eight years, from a friend’s private beach near Victoria Point. As with his 15 earlier sails in July, not only did everyone wear wet suits and life jackets, David’s wife, Nancy, and his younger son, Andrew, remained on the beach as part of a “buddy system,” aware of where the trio were sailing and when they should be back.

“The wind was steady at 15-20 knots,” von Oeyen, vice commodore of the grandly named (but fairly modest with only 24 members) Malibu Yacht Club, recalls. “We were running fast, about 16 to 18 knots on the port tack about two miles offshore, when I felt a bump, and the entire front end of the starboard hull broke off. My first reaction was that we had hit a whale or a shark.” The catamaran immediately began to turn over as the hull filled with water; eventually all that remained above water was the port hull. On it, Geoff and Jyoti were perched; David, who, more than the danger of sharks, feared his added weight would sink their remaining hull, treaded water. “I looked at my watch,” he recalls. “It was 3:50.”

“I was reading,” Nancy recalls, “and looked out to see their sail every few minutes. Then it wasn’t there any more.” She waited five minutes and then ran to a neighbor’s house to sound the alarm. She knew something was wrong but was determined not to let her terror show. “This was my family,” Nancy recalls thinking. “What do I have to do? I figured if I acted calmly, they would take me seriously.”

Unfortunately, it seems that wasn’t the case, at least in the beginning. “I called Baywatch,” she says, “and they said to relax, that they’d probably turn up after a while, and may have rounded Point Dume and couldn’t be seen. I knew that was crazy because there is no way they could have gone that far from the time I last saw them until they disappeared.”

Five minutes after Nancy’s 4:05 call to the lifeguards (the time confirmed by the neighbor who dialed the number for her), she called the Lost Hills Sheriff’s station at the suggestion of the guard on Broad Beach. “I asked them to radio their helicopter which you always see flying up and down the coast and ask if the pilot would look for the boat out of his window. The woman who took the call identified herself as a deputy and said it wasn’t their domain and that I should call the lifeguards back and ask them to call the Coast Guard. I guess their domain is patrolling the beaches for dogs off their leashes, people drinking and nude sunbathers,” Nancy says. “Apparently looking for people in the water which, in this case could have been easily done, was less urgent.”

Sheriff’s Lieutenant Jim Glazar says there is no problem looking out the window and that they “do it all the time.” When asked to confirm the alarm, however, he said that the machine that taped all incoming calls had “eaten” everything between July 12 and 25 and thus there was no record. Later, Glazar said he had questioned the female deputy on duty that afternoon who remembered only a call about a jet ski and none about a missing catamaran. “Someone may have walked by, heard the phone ringing and answered it,” Glazar said. “If there was a mistake, we are very sorry. We are the public safety answering point. My people know how to handle that kind of call, but I can’t prove it.” Glazar subsequently advised that he had contacted the helicopter pilot and “absolutely confirmed” that neither he nor his assistant were flying their green-and-gold “bird” at any time July 17. “Perhaps they saw the Navy helicopter, which is dark green,” Glazar said.

Frustrated and frantic, Nancy drove first to Point Dume to see if she could see the boat, and then to the Zuma Beach Baywatch headquarters. According to Nancy, one of the six or seven lifeguards eating fruit and cookies when she arrived said, “We think we’ve found them.” “We talked about the search for JFK Jr. and that now it was happening to me,” she said. It was now past 5 p.m., an hour after Nancy had first alerted Baywatch. According to Nancy, it would be sometime longer before the lifeguards radioed that they had found people in the water and that the boat was “a total.” There were, incidentally, 90,000 people on the Malibu beaches that afternoon, of which an estimated 75,000 were on Zuma, according to lifeguard Captain Tom Viren. “We made nine rescues [of swimmers],” he said, “a busy day but not an extremely busy day.”

Although lifeguard Captain Nick Steers at Baywatch headquarters originally claimed there was no record of a call at 4:05 p.m. and that the alarm didn’t go out until Nancy arrived at Zuma at 5 p.m., Viren later said indeed a call was received “between 4 and 4:40” but the lifeguard who took the call (and claims that it was Mrs. von Oeyen who suggested the boat may have rounded Point Dume) failed to record it. “We started calling the guard stations from Surfrider Beach to Leo Carrillo, and asked if they could see a boat to try to pin down the location and start a search,” said Viren, “but all reported negative. When she arrived at 5 p.m., we told her we had located the boat with binoculars straight out from our headquarters and picked them up within 5 minutes.”

Not according to David: “It was 5:35 when they picked us up, and we only saw the Baywatch boat five minutes before that. They told us they didn’t see us until they were nearly upon us. Everyone sat on this for an hour or more, apparently because they didn’t believe Nancy.” In fact, Nancy believes no one took the alarm seriously until Andrew, who, around 4:40, seeing through binoculars that the Baywatch boat was still at Zuma Beach, called and demanded that they “do something!”

After piling the trio into the Baywatch boat — all shivering from their long exposure in 64- 65-degree water — the lifeguards attached a line to the crippled catamaran and towed it in, not to Broad Beach where the guards feared the wreck would endanger swimmers (there are very few) but to Paradise Cove. There they anchored it offshore where, the next day, David and his sons dismantled it underwater and hauled the remains onto another friend’s beach.

“It usually takes a tragedy for things like social ills or rescue services to be improved,” David said. “Well, thank God there was no tragedy here, but there could have been. A serious warning was treated with either nonchalance or indifference. Although we are thankful for the professionalism showed by the lifeguards when they finally picked us up, there is no question in my mind that if the various rescue services available — the lifeguards, the sheriff’s station, and perhaps the Coast Guard — were coordinated, we would have been rescued much faster. I think the emergency rescue system fell apart. I hope everyone takes this episode as a wake-up call.”

No trespassing

0

I wonder who it is? Some sneak in high places is trying to isolate Malibu, trying to cut us off from contact with the outside world so property values will decrease and then they can buy it cheap. Now PCH will be closed for a while every Wednesday and Thursday until Sept. 16. This is but the latest in a long list of indignities that we have had to bear:

1. PCH virtually closed for months as they fixed the slide at Las Flores. If they really wanted to they could have provided another lane by restricting parking on the ocean side of PCH.

2. At the same time the above was going on, the alternate around the slide through Topanga was periodically closed.

3. The slide on Kanan Dume, closing that road, took over a year to fix.

4. Sewer installation at Sunset and PCH.

5. Repaving PCH through Malibu in the middle of summer and taking a long time to do it. Friendly signs such as, “Traffic fines doubled in construction zone” were posted to placate the citizens. Added benefits were broken windshields due to debris.

6. Repaving PCH from Malibu north to the county line and closing two lanes to do it. Never mind that the center passing lane could be used for another lane.

7. Periodic lane closures for no apparent reason.

8. Malfunctioning traffic signals that are leisurely repaired.

9. There are probably more that I have forgotten.

I expect soon to see an announcement similar to this: Malibu, access denied. PCH will be closed periodically at random times and unspecified intervals for no specific reason. Traffic fines will be tripled and anyone attempting to avoid delays by choosing an alternate route will be severely punished.

Lawrence I. Ivey

One of us has to go

0

I have a new neighbor

And it’s not going well

She’s lean and she’s mean

She’s a neighbor from Hell!

My telephone rang

‘Twas her voice breathing hard

She had just seen “my” rat

It had come from my yard!

She knocked on my door

All puffin’ and wheezin’

My lilacs must go

They had started her sneezin’

My cat scratched her dog

Who was out roaming free

She had him stitched up

And sent us the fee.

I must admit that this terrible hellion

Is inspiring thoughts

That are most Machiavellian

I’m concocting a plan

For some fool-proof caper

To send her out packing

May the devil take her!

Geraldine Forer Spagnoli

Three sheeps to the wind

0

At first there were three quaint, if somewhat stoical, sheep gracing the barren field in the Civic Center.

The ram and two ewes, fashioned by French artist Francois Lalanne of bronze and cement, were installed in June as part of the Summer Sculpture Exhibition curated by Carl Schlosberg.

The trio hardly had time to get accustomed to their bleak surroundings — well, it isn’t a verdant meadow — when the ram was whisked off under cover of darkness June 18.

Schlosberg said he was devastated by the loss and hoped it was just a prank and the ram would be recovered. “I’ve never had anything stolen before,” he said, adding that no art collector would ever do such a thing. Sheriff’s deputies investigated the theft but found no clues and still have not made an arrest.

After the ram rip-off, Schlosberg enlisted the aid of artist Ed Benavente to fit the remaining sheep with cement shoes. So it seemed unlikely the two ewes could be stolen, but people did wonder when the pair went missing last week.

Schlosberg’s wife, Judy, assured The Malibu Times Monday the pair had not fallen to thieves.

“Carl sold them both to the same person,” she said. “He removed them last week.”

Schlosberg, who has obtained several pieces of public art for Malibu, said he was hoping at least one or two from this exhibition would be sold here. Sadly, Judy said, that will not be the case with the sheep, which were purchased by someone from outside the area. “I’m afraid they are not to stay in Malibu,” she said.

But there still might be a chance for Malibu to keep a sheep, if somehow the purloined ram was found, or if the perps had a change of heart and returned him one dark night.

Biz boom, rah!

0

Locals might not be thrilled about this summer’s bumper-to-bumper traffic on PCH, but local business owners couldn’t be happier. When it comes to the Malibu tourist trade, sunny means money. From Moonshadows to Taverna Tony, cash registers are ringing and the crowds are back.

“There’s no comparison,” said burgermeister Steve Wiley of Country Kitchen. “It’s probably double from what it was last year.

Ah, yes — the surf is up, the sun is shining and Caltrans trucks are few and far between. It’s a far cry from the gray El Nino skies and slide repair of last year. “I’m fatally a sunshine-only business,” explained Wiley, whose snack shop specializes in the chili dogs and BLTs that beach days were made for. “Last year, I just got the tradespeople and folks who came in for work. All the through traffic was gone.”

It’s the same story across the street at Duke’s, where diners wait in line for a table at the Barefoot Bar. “Last year, we had no left-turn lane because of the slide,” said manager Jeff Mayhew. “That just killed us.” Like Wiley, Mayhew describes the difference between this year and last year as “phenomenal.”

The slide repair had an especially devastating impact not only on Duke’s but also at another eatery that was just starting out — Tutto Bene. Now both restaurants seem to have recovered and their tables are full.

“This is the best year we have ever had in this location,” said Vassil Pertchinkov of Guido’s. “It’s been really great.”

Like the restaurants, local retailers also have a lot less to complain about this year. At Indiana Joan’s, shoppers spent their weekend snapping up Chinese silk robes and summer shifts. Stores like Malibu Bay Company and Atlantis have had a steady stream of customers even during the week. There have been a few overcast days, but the crowds of people eager to escape the searing heat in L.A. keep on coming.

Most local merchants seem to agree that business is way up. How much their sales increase remains to be seen. The real tally will be made Sept. 7, when they begin counting up their receipts from the annual summer finale on Labor Day.

Until then, Wiley can’t flip his beach burgers fast enough.

Fear and loathing in Malibu

0

In response to a letter from Mr. Mark Jackson titled “Brought to light” [Aug. 5], I wanted him to know that he is not the only one that has noticed the “discriminative activity in and around Malibu.”

The discrimination and racism I am talking about is happening right here at our very own Malibu High. The daughter of one of my live-in employees attends that school and was the victim of consistent racial slurs and various forms of discrimination during the school year. The girl I am speaking of is a lovely and intelligent individual who happens to be of Hispanic decent. Apparently, there is a group of little neo-Nazis who call themselves the “MLO” which stands for Malibu Locals Only. They purport to be interested in nothing more than protecting surf territory, but their viscous and racially hateful comments would indicate otherwise. This so-called “MLO” went so far as to threaten all the nonwhite students, telling them that “Malibu is for whites only” and that they were going to “send them (nonwhites) back to downtown L.A. where they belong.” This poor girl came home crying and her parents were terrified that something horrible would happen to them or their daughter. They were ready to leave town. I almost lost two faithful and irreplaceable employees because of these little racist jerks. When I heard about the whole thing, I asked the same question Mr. Jackson asked: “What is this, Alabama in the 1950s? or Malibu, Calif., in 1999?”

My husband wrote a letter to the principal of Malibu High, Matthews I think his name is, but he did not even have the courtesy to respond. Nobody wants to talk about it, but there is a real racist problem here. It is like a dirty little secret lurking under the surface here in politically correct Malibu. Well guess what folks? Racism is alive and well here in Malibu and just because no one wants to admit to it, that doesn’t mean it does not exist. The racist behavior that the kids at the junior high and high school are exhibiting is just a telltale sign that their parents are secretly racist as well. Children are not born to hate other human beings who happen to be unlike themselves, it is something they learn, usually at home.

Hopefully this letter will bring to light the fact that racism is going on in more Malibu locations than the public library. The discrimination described by Mr. Jackson and what was experienced by my employee’s daughter, is thoroughly and totally unacceptable. Granted, it is a free country and people have the right to think or say whatever they want, but in public establishments such as the library and the local high school, discrimination is not only repugnant, but illegal. This is Malibu 1999, not Alabama 1950.

Alexandria Gable

Water water everywhere and nary a drop . . .

0

While the East Coast is suffering the worst drought in recorded history, Malibu argues about where to put water it doesn’t need or want.

This is not virgin rainwater, however. It is preowned — water that has been used, treated (some say insufficiently) stored, sold and, in some cases, is not needed.

But disposing of unwanted water in a beachside community with high groundwater levels is a thorny issue. Underground aquifers are not an option.

Most of the wastewater from Pepperdine University and Malibu Country Estates is treated at the Malibu Mesa Wastewater Treatment Facility, at John Tyler Drive and PCH, which is operated by Los Angeles County Public Works under a permit from the Regional Water Quality Control Board.

Essentially, Pepperdine recycles its wastewater by irrigating its landscape, useful in summer and drought years, problematic in the average winter.

Since October 1981, the plant has had an emergency discharge permit for 200,000 gallons per day, the plant’s capacity, into Marie Canyon, says Brian Hooper, assistant division engineer with county Public Works. Marie Canyon empties onto the beach at Malibu Road and into Santa Monica Bay.

“We are applying for renewal of that discharge permit,” Hooper said. “We are not asking for an increase in volume.”

According to Winnie Jesena, chief of RWQCB’s Los Angeles Coastal Watershed Unit, “They are applying for renewal of that permit to discharge during the rainy season when their storage tanks are full.”

The Malibu Mesa plant treats raw sewage with biological disinfection to get it to reclaimed water quality, which it sends back to Pepperdine, Hooper said. Pepperdine also sends some of its raw sewage to the Tapia Reclamation Facility in Malibu Canyon for treatment and buys back reclaimed water for irrigation.

Pepperdine’s irrigation demand is listed at a maximum of 300,000 gallons a day. It can hold 12.4 million gallons in its two reservoirs on campus, which store treated water from the Malibu Mesa plant and some that is purchased from Tapia.

City Councilman Harry Barovsky said he has records showing Pepperdine receives about eight times more reclaimed water from Tapia than it sends for treatment. Records for 28 months in 1990 to 1992 show an average of 10,875 gallons of sewage received at Tapia and 87,107 gallons reclaimed water delivered to Pepperdine. “I have updated records that I’ve given to the city,” he said. “If they only took back what they shipped that would be a beginning of a solution.”

The inference is that Tapia is dumping its excess reclaimed water through Pepperdine into Marie Canyon.

“There is absolutely no connection between Malibu Mesa and Tapia,” Hooper said. “We receive no discharge from Tapia and we don’t send anything to Tapia.”

Digested sludge from Malibu Mesa is hauled to a Los Angeles collection facility and ultimately winds up at the Hyperion plant, Hooper said.

Sludge from Tapia goes to the Las Virgenes Water District’s composting facility in Malibu Canyon.

Barovsky, who lives on Malibu Road, said residents there are opposed to the dumping of more water onto the beach. “My concern is they want to send 200,000 gallons a day, that they could store and use for irrigation, down a geologically unstable canyon.”

Save Our Coast’s Mary Frampton, who opposes all discharges into the ocean on environmental grounds, agrees with Barovsky and has written letters to the RWQCB urging denial of the Malibu Mesa request.

The dichotomy is that Malibu Road residents have traditionally opposed irrigation of the hillsides above their properties — Pepperdine’s huge grass area, Country Estates lawns and Bluffs Park ball fields — as contributing to slope failures along Malibu Road. “We feel that irrigation has a tremendous effect on the geology of the bluffs,” Barovsky said. “We would like to see Pepperdine put in xeriscape, [native plants that require little irrigation].”

Tapia’s RWQCB permit for treating and selling wastewater allows discharge of unsold water into Malibu Creek except during the dry season, from May to October, when the Malibu Lagoon sand berm is closed. Tapia has just received permits to discharge unsold water into the Los Angeles River. That, Barovsky said, “is a good beginning.” Frampton agrees. “Malibu shouldn’t be a dumping ground for developments in the whole watershed.”

Malibu Mesa’s request, scheduled for consideration and public hearing by the RWQCB June 30, has been postponed to a future board meeting. Malibu residents may submit written opinions to the Regional Water Quality Control Board, Attention Carlos Urrunaga, 320 W. 4th St., Suite 200, Los Angeles, CA 90013.

Who’s for the kids?

0

Last week, it seemed like a large chunk of Malibu jammed itself into that little room at Bluffs Park, called the Michael Landon Center, to get in its two cents about future of Parks and Recreation in the city of Malibu, at a meeting called by the city and its park planning consultants. The council was there, the planning commission was there, representatives from the state were there and Sen. Tom Hayden, who generally couldn’t care less about Malibu, sent staff. Just about every sport and recreation activity, including AYSO and Little League, showed up to make sure they were in the loop. Normally, planning meetings like this draw a handful of people and profound disinterest, so what gives, I wondered. Why all this activity and intense political interest?

I had been hearing rumbles for a week or two about the meeting and about some very unhappy people who felt calling a meeting in early August, when many people are away on vacation, was an invitation for a bunch of no shows. They needn’t have worried, because it immediately was apparent that if they held this meeting at the top of Himalayas, they still would have filled the room.

The buzz had gotten so intense, I figured maybe it was worth a look. So I went down to sort of sniff the room and see how things were going to play out.

To put this into context, up to now, in the main, the majority of Malibu, or a least the voting majority, which is abut 40 percent of the roughly 9,000 registered voters, generally favored a policy that swung between permitting very little to permitting absolutely nothing. The policy usually worked because most people didn’t need anything from the city. All they wanted was to make sure nothing changed, at least very much.

Then, about eight or nine years ago, something began to happen and has continued to happen to today. What happened was that some of the old timers moved out, and they sold their homes to younger families, families that had young children, and, as I’m sure you’ve noticed, they are in the process of making even more babies. There were roughly 1,000 kids in Malibu in 1990, and now there are about 2,000 kids. These families need things like services, good schools, ballfields, teen centers and other recreation facilities. At the same time, all these additional kids have squeezed the seniors out of places like the community center, and now they also need a facility. Some of those seniors would also like to have the choice to go into some residential facility here in Malibu, so that growing older doesn’t have to mean leaving your community of many years, and now we see pressure to build something.

These demographic shifts, plus the fact that the new people are spending $1,000,000-plus for their homes, are what’s driving the changes in our communities. You see it in the people who are participating in the PTSAs. This is not your grandmother’s PTA. The president is likely to have an Ivy League law degree or an MBA, and these are people who are young, energetic and bright, and not likely to respond to the old adage, “Well, that’s not the way we do it in Malibu.” They know what they need from their city and what they don’t want. A parent related a story to me about how hard it is to get baseball field space for teams to practice. Somehow two teams were booked onto the same practice field at the same time. Nothing else was available and two coaches were arguing about which team got to use the field next. It got so heated with neither backing down that someone finally had to call the sheriff to come arbitrate the dispute while the two teams of kids stood by waiting to see who would win.

When that kind of need and confrontation occurs, you can be sure the local politicians are not far behind, which is why they were all at the meeting. They know this bruising battle is going to play out at the polls next year.

The two sides are already lining up. The Malibu Coastal Land Conservancy is on one side. This side is the traditional Malibu, “Nothing, no way, never” side that intends to make its stand in the Civic Center. This side wants a wetland, which equals no ballfields, and, perhaps, as the FEMA representative seemed to say, they even want to tear out of some of the already existing buildings around the area of the swings and beyond because some of that, they claim, is in a flood zone. Its champions are Carolyn Van Horn and Walt Keller, and some others of the Slow Growth Coalition.

Its members also all showed up at the planning meeting, along with some of their outside Ballona Wetlands allies to push the dialogue in the wetlands direction. But this time there were lots of parents pushing back, and it’s clear the battle lines have shifted. It’s no longer a two-sided battle.

The old political question, which they successfully used for the last few elections was, are you an environmentalist or a developer?

The new political question may be, are you for or against the kids?

Junk mailionairs

0

Have you ever noticed that corporations now put advertisements in with your monthly invoices? As if credit card statements aren’t distasteful enough, these enterprises have to cram junk mail in with your bills. I personally know Malibuites who get back at these companies. They put rubbish in with their checks when they mail them back, i.e., coffee grinds, banana peels, advertisements, city of Malibu proclamations. These Malibuites write, “Could you throw this junk away for me? Thank you.”

Tom Fakehany

Ed. note. Thanks for the headline suggestion, Tom.

The cock-up

0

It’s dark out, 3 a.m. My family hasn’t slept in a week. The neighbor’s roosters are crowing their roundelay. The peacocks are screaming and thumping across my roof. Although I know they have permits I’ll try one more time to shout them quiet. As I step out onto my new deck, I can’t see a thing. We received no permit for exterior lights. Oh, no! I’m falling off my deck! What’s that stench? Why’s it wet? Oh, just another septic failure, again. But thankfully I won’t drown because the Civic Center is now a floodplain/wetlands and my home (and Malibu) is safe.

Tomorrow morning my sleepless children won’t complain too much, their soccer games have been canceled — no playing fields. But that’s OK, we can park at the headlands. I’ll tell them Walt, Carolyn, Jo and Gil would say, “Malibu is special. Enjoy it the way it was. Take a hike, kids.”

P.S. Now that I’m awake, nightmares behind me, I thank The Malibu Times and Ms. Kraft for the front page coverage of Juan Cabrillo Elementary’s ’99 Stanford 9 scores. Congratulations, vindication, Cabrillo!

Candy Sindell