Home Blog Page 7063

Gallops and Mazurkas

0

One might think the only link between classical music and horseback riding is the horsehair in string players’ bows.

Not so. Pianist and composer Carter Larsen will play a gala concert July 25 at Smothers Theatre to benefit the 25-year-old Pepperdine University Equestrian Education Center. “Those people are as serious about what they’re doing — and classical riding is an art — as I am about what I’m doing. They’re dedicated and enlightened people,” he says.

Larsen currently lives and works in Malibu, but his connection to the equestrian center arose in London, where he was studying piano with Ruth Nye, wife of Ross Nye, head of Pepperdine’s exchange program in London. Larsen was introduced to Cheryl Wyllie, head of the dressage program at the university. Jim Wyllie, Cheryl’s father, founded the center when Pepperdine moved to Malibu in 1972 — one of the first physical education programs available to the students.

Now, the center seeks to raise $150,000 to modernize the stables, tack room and ring at the 26-horse center, as well as to build an indoor arena. “We’re obviously not going to raise it in one night,” says Larsen, “but the concert will kick off the fund- raising drive.”

Silver tickets at $50 per person include a reception and silent auction prior to the concert; gold tickets at $100 include premium theater seating and a post-concert dessert party at Granita.

Born and raised in San Francisco, Larsen composed in his teens, then studied composition under John Adams at the San Francisco Conservatory. He was “keen” on piano when he was young, but says, “If you had asked me when I was 10, I would have said I wanted to be a scientist.” As the youngest composing student at the Aspen music festival, he says, “That’s when it started for me. That’s also when I got my taste for the mountains in the summer.” Larsen owns a home in Gstaad, Switzerland.

Post-conservatory, he studied piano with Peter Feuchtwanger in London, where required reading was “Zen and the Art of Archery” in order to unlearn bad musical habits.

Larsen found popularity in London, staying for 18 years. “They really appreciate all this music there,” he says. “But they don’t know anything about film.” The English say they like his music, Larsen notes, but once they are told the writing is contemporary, “they switch off.”

Larsen has performed as a soloist with The Royal Philharmonic and London Symphony orchestras and has recorded the classical repertoire, as well as his own works. He recently made his conducting debut with the Harrow Symphony Orchestra in “Swan Lake,” but modestly says, “An opera conductor is the real thing.” Larsen conducts by memory, a feat he claims only 20 percent of conductors care to attempt.

The London Philharmonic has played his film music, with Larsen soloing, to coincide with the release of his films and soundtrack albums. “I have no doubt that if Mozart were alive, he would be writing film music,” Larsen says. “His greatest music was his operas. That’s the nearest equivalent we have today.” He contends that contemporary film music relies on computers, thus requiring very little musicianship. He explains, “Music began with the voice. The piano is designed on the vibration of strings, which is the same as the vocal cords. When you get away from that, it’s not human.” He strives to write music that people want to listen to.

He composed, scored and served as music supervisor for the films “Scarecrow” and “Pierced Heart.” Currently, he is writing a score based on Beethoven’s Seventh Symphony, which he hopes will establish Beethoven’s longevity over the century. “I see it as a way of reaching a larger audience with the music. I see that as a responsibility.

“If you’re to go back to the 19th century, all the pianists also were composers. So I’m a throwback to the last century. That tradition has been killed by the homogenization and the pigeonholing of 20th century musicians. The performer is separate from a composer, and the composer is separate from the audience and performer. There’s no direct link between the person composing the music and the audience.”

Larsen favors European concert halls. “American halls are dryer,” he claims. “The music can’t breathe, and that has an effect on you, but a seasoned performer can play in different halls and immediately change for the acoustics. The mistake musicians make is thinking, ‘It’s a big hall, I have to bang around.’ I’m from a school that delineates the voices, where subtlety is an important part of the music.”

The difference between American and European musicians is expression, according to Larsen. “American recordings are more concerned with the technical — striving for perfection.” He says he focuses on expression. “That’s from being a composer.”

His examples return to Liszt: “He was the equivalent of some huge rock star. He had the equivalent popularity of more than Princess Diana. The advent of pop culture blew classical out the window. But classical also did that itself by alienating audiences. Pop music was born because nobody wanted to listen to the stuff everyone else was writing.”

His Pepperdine program should include Rachmaninoff’s Prelude in G sharp, Chopin’s Fantasia in f, Saint-Sans’ Mazurka in g (which Larsen says he rediscovered while researching through archives in Austria) and Liszt’s Venezia e Napoli, as well as a few of Larsen’s compositions.

Carter Larsen appears in recital July 25 to benefit the Pepperdine University Equestrian Education Center, reception and silent auction 6:30 p.m., concert at 8 p.m., at Smothers Theatre, Pepperdine University; post-performance reception follows. Telephone 310/456-4546.

We’ve Lost a Beach

0

There’s a beach in western Malibu

Where the Law must not apply;

And where those who live adjacent,

Are disgusted — they decry!

For here, their children cannot play,

Nor walk along the beach;

Because of nudie bodies,

And contortions, none dare speak.

It seems a beach named Matador

Is plagued by those who come;

To romp and play, in other ways,

Than simply soaking sun.

And yet the Law seems not applied,

To end this perverse scene —

It’s been going on a long, long time,

With nothing done between.

We’ve lost a beach, that’s out of reach,

For our family and friends —

Is it because the Law does not apply?

Or just a local trend?

H. Emmett Finch

Outside counsel, inside cable occupy council agenda

0

In a move that surprised many, City Attorney Christi Hogin told the Malibu City Council she was withdrawing her request to hire an attorney to investigate alleged violations of the city’s election code.

Last month, Hogin asked the council to approve an agreement with Roger Brown, a lawyer with extensive experience in local government and politics. Staff supported his hiring, but council members Carolyn Van Horn and Walt Keller asked Hogin to answer certain questions. When the matter came up again Monday, Hogin said she was no longer asking to hire Brown. She told the council she had reconsidered whether he was the best person for the task. She also stated the Road Worriers, the Political Action Committee named in the allegations, had filed an amended report that may clear up some of the allegations.

When she made her announcement, people in the audience asked why. Even though no action would be taken, the council decided to hear testimony from the 18 citizens who had filled out cards to speak on the issue. Many were affiliated with the Road Worriers.

“This City Council should not go along with this kind of political hatchet job,” said attorney Frank Angel, who called the investigation a “sinister crusade.”

“Give these people a public apology,” said Gene Wood. “This is a community that doesn’t need this kind of ugly discussion.”

Instead of unity, “I’m hearing more divisiveness,” said Marissa Coughlan, who spoke in defense of the investigation. Coughlan also said she heard a threat against the city attorney.

Some residents said they felt the city should not be involved with the allegations at all; rather, they should be handled by the state’s Fair Political Practices Commission. “We regulate campaign contributions,” said Hogin. “That is simply not done by the state.” Hogin said it was possible to violate the city ordinance without violating state law.

Hogin said she would utilize other sources, possibly the Sheriff’s Department, in her investigation. She said the city did not have a contract with the District Attorney’s office to prosecute city code violations.

In other business, the council approved a Rate Order for Falcon Cablevision. Consultants provided analysis of accounting records supplied by Falcon and told council members the study found Falcon was overcharging by $2.14 on its basic service and by $1.12 on its wire maintenance. The consultants recommended the council move forward with an adjustment of the cable provider’s rates, stating if the council took no action, the city could lose any potential refunds.

During public comment, residents voiced their concerns and complaints about Falcon. “Please take action tonight,” said Marilynn Santman. “I think it’s imperative.” Santman told the council that residents of Thousand Oaks pay $40 a month and have more than 200 channels from which to choose.

Efrom Fader said his rates went up 18 percent in 1996 when the industry average rose only 9 percent.

Nidia Birenbaum, a local producer and actress who uses the community access channel, told the council she is frequently asked if she works for the cable company. “What I hear is how high the rates are and how lousy the service is,” Birenbaum said.

Her husband, attorney Sam Birenbaum, told the council Malibu and Stanford, Conn., pay the highest rate for cable in the nation. As an example, he said Malibu residents were charged $10 more than the rest of the nation for the most recent Mike Tyson fight.

Susan Booker, regional manager for Falcon Cable, confirmed that the company received the Rate Order today (Thursday). “We haven’t had a chance to review it,” she said. “If we do appeal it, it will be up to the FCC to decide.” She indicated Falcon Cable will respond to the order within seven days.

Councilman Tom Hasse asked if anyone representing Falcon was in the audience. No one responded. “I think that actually speaks volumes about the services provided,” he said.

The Rate Order proposal passed with a vote of 5-0. Falcon will have seven days from that action in which to submit its own calculations. “We’re going to go into their books,” said Councilman Harry Barovsky. “We will have the meetings. We will hear what you have to say. This is just the first step in a series of steps.”

Also at the meeting, the council drafted an official definition for the word “deck”: “An open porch or platform projecting from a structure or freestanding of which the surface area is used to move or stand on.”

In March, the council denied a variance request by a Malibu Road resident who had plans to construct a platform that would extend 3-1/2 feet beyond the stringline. The matter went to court, which ruled a definition of deck must be established and applied to the case.

Planning staff had recommended the following definition: “Deck – A platform with a minimum depth of 5 (five) feet, used for outdoor activities such as sitting, barbecuing, parties, etc. A deck may be attached to a structure or free-standing. Where a platform does not exceed a depth of five (5) feet, the deck shall be the deepest portion of the platform.”

In his staff report, Planning Director Craig Ewing stated that, under the current rules, the platform proposed for the Malibu Road location is considered a deck. Under the proposed definition, the platform would be excluded and a more projecting corner would be used for the stringline.

Barovsky said a platform of less that four feet does not constitute a deck at the beach.

Mayor Joan House suggested going beyond the staff’s minimum depth recommendation and setting it at 6-1/2 feet. “People always say ‘Come over and sit on my deck.’ They don’t say ‘Come over and stand on my deck,'” House said.

“I have a problem with defining the size, picking out a number,” said Van Horn. “I think that’s arbitrary and I think it’s going to lead to further extension of the stringline.” Keller also said he would not support it.

Hasse offered an amendment to the proposal that eliminated staff’s definition and included his, without a depth requirement.

Keller, Van Horn and Hasse voted in favor of the amended resolution, House and Barovsky opposed it. The definition will be sent to the court this week for review.

The council also voted to table a proposed ordinance that would amend the city’s motorized water craft regulations to prohibit launching of small motorized vessels from the private beaches near Surfrider Beach. The proposed ordinance was introduced because of safety concerns and slated to be adopted on its second reading Monday night. Instead, it was tabled when the new lifeguard said he did not support it. The matter will not be put on another agenda unless requested by a council member.

Making strides

0

As a breast cancer survivor, I joined over 9,000 Southlanders at Griffith Park on June 14 to participate in the American Cancer Society’s Making Strides Against Breast Cancer pledge walk. I was proud to be a member of the team from Reach to Recovery who joined the throngs raising over $800,000 for the fight against breast cancer.

I dream that we all see the day when no woman will ever have to face the horror of this disease.The groundswell of support on June 14 brought us closer to the realization of this dream. I feel a bond of gratitude to every single strider and all of the pledge supporters, and to all of my wonderful and caring sponsors who contributed over $15,000.

Everyone’s extraordinary commitment to the American Cancer Society’s groundbreaking breast cancer research and local education and patient service programs has made a difference. I urge anyone with outstanding pledges to send them in so that this critical work can continue. Together we have taken a giant step toward a world free from breast cancer.

Sandra Coopersmith

Deconstructing Tom

0

Politics in Malibu is a lousy way to get things done. Malibu politicians are, like God’s infinite mercy, a last resort. Politics and ethics were the central topic of conversation among the guests at the Malibu Navy League July Fourth weekend dinner party held at the state of California’s Adamson House at Malibu State Beach. Assembling at my table for this 26th Captain’s Reception, a.k.a. John Payne’s 60th birthday party, were Tom and Harriet Rogers adjacent to Bob and Mary Rubenstein. This event was held out-of-doors, so it was meaningful that the Malibu weather was remarkable and the vista of sunbathers sunning and surfers surfing was a classic Malibu photo opportunity. Malibu’s outstanding climate serves to remind us that tourism is the foremost possession that our community has to sell. My wife, Ann Marie, was deliberating on the ethics of some lawyer or another, when queries among the table mates (mates the operative nautical term here) turned to the following trivia I’d like to bestow upon you. If lawyers are disbarred and clergymen defrocked, then doesn’t it follow that electricians can be delighted, musicians denoted, cowboys deranged, models deposed and dry cleaners depressed? Other Malibu Navy Leaguers at neighboring tables suggested that laundry workers could be decreased, eventually becoming depleted! Even more imposing your bed maker could be debunked, baseball players could be debased (Bob Ryan suggested this one), landscapers deflowered, bulldozer operators degraded (George Wing recommended this link), organ donors delivered, software engineers deprogrammed, underwear salesman debriefed, and even musical composers will eventually decompose.

On a more decided note though, dear Editor, the assemblage resolved that perhaps Malibuites could hope that local politicians would be devoted.

Tom Fakehany

Conservancy’s sister agency hit with $6 million judgment

0

On the heels of losing $1 million in public funds and a parcel of land through foreclosure last month, the Santa Monica Mountains Conservancy was hit in a separate action with a $6 million judgment against the Mountains Recreation and Conservation Authority (MRCA), the purchasing arm of the conservancy, for failing to pay off a promissory note. Both actions come at a time when the state Legislature is considering expanding the authority of the conservancy to include the entire Los Angeles and San Gabriel River basins, despite claims of critics of the conservancy that the state agency is misusing public funds.

The $6 million court judgment involved the sale of a promissory note to the MRCA, a joint powers agency in which the conservancy has a controlling interest. The note was secured by two trust deeds on property in the Brentwood section of the Santa Monica Mountains, upon which the conservancy anticipated foreclosing.

The MRCA paid for the note by issuing its own unsecured note. The principal on that note, approximately $6 million, became due in January. Rather than pay the principal, the MRCA filed suit against the company that had sold the secured note, Tucker Land Co., claiming breach of contract.

But Beverly Hills Superior Court Judge Irving Shimer ruled in February that the state agency had breached the contract by not paying off the note.

In a separate motion, the conservancy argued it had no contractual obligations altogether, but, in June, Shimer ruled that it could not escape its obligations, and he awarded Tucker the amount owed on the note, plus attorneys’ fees.

Laurie Collins, staff attorney for the conservancy, said the agency has filed an appeal in the case.

If the conservancy does not prevail on its appeal, it has indicated Tucker will not be able to execute on the $6 million judgment. According to a brief filed in the lawsuit, attorneys for the MRCA argued that Tucker will not be able to collect the judgment because the MRCA “has only limited funds for its operations, certainly insufficient to pay against any judgment.”

“That’s a terrible way for a government entity to talk,” said Alvin Kaufer, attorney for Tucker. “Hopefully, a federal court won’t allow that to be the law.”

Collins would not comment on the conservancy’s assertion in the brief that the judgment is not collectable.

Peter Wolf, chairman of Tucker, said he supports the aims of the conservancy, but he faults their business practices.

It is, he said, “quite distressing for us that we signed a contract in good faith, and we thought we could take back an unsecured note from the government.”

Wolf said he could not understand why the MRCA would argue that the judgment is not collectible. “Why are they allowed to enter into a contract?” he asked. “Are they above the law?”

The judgment follows the conservancy’s loss of a parcel near Malibu Canyon Road in June through foreclosure, also the result of the conservancy’s failure to pay off the balance due on a promissory note. Through the foreclosure, the conservancy lost the $1 million down payment it paid to the owners of the parcel, funds which were made available by Proposition A, approved by voters in 1992 and 1996.

Bill Pending in Legislature

The state Senate, in April, approved a bill, sponsored by Sen. Tom Hayden, that would add the watersheds of the L.A. and San Gabriel rivers, and their tributaries, to the zone within which the conservancy may acquire parkland to protect it from development.

The conservancy’s original mission was limited to the Santa Monica Mountains, but gradually, over the years, the zone has expanded to include the other hills and mountains that border the San Fernando Valley.

Hayden’s bill would extend the boundaries of the conservancy to the nonmountainous and highly urbanized areas near the two rivers.

The bill glided easily through the Senate and passed there on a vote of 21 to 12, but before the Assembly’s Natural Resources Committee it met with opposition from critics of the conservancy and 39 cities and local agencies within the conservancy’s zone, including Malibu.

Opponents say they do not object to the restoration of the rivers, but rather to any enhanced authority for the conservancy and its longtime executive director, Joseph Edmiston. Opponents also say they have long-standing concerns about the lack of oversight of the conservancy and what they say is mismanagement of public funds.

Malibu City Manager Harry Peacock wrote, in a letter to Assemblywoman Debra Bowen, chair of the Natural Resources Committee, that Malibu residents have related to him “and members of the City Council a string of broken promises relating to the activities of the conservancy, especially in terms of its acquisition, operation and use of the Streisand Center.” Peacock added, “Residents feel that there has been a gross abuse of authority by the Director [Edmiston], that there is little or no oversight responsibility being exercised nor is there any body of elected officials to turn to for a redress of the problems which have been visited upon them by the Conservancy and its Director.”

Conservancy critic Patricia Bell Hearst of the Federation of Hillside and Canyon Associations said she, too, is concerned about the fiscal management of the conservancy and the power of Edmiston, who, she said, “is accountable to no one.”

The bill failed in a vote in committee, but it is scheduled for reconsideration.

Similar bills are pending if Hayden’s bill goes down to defeat.

“If those politicians are smart, they’re going to drop those bills like a hot potato too,” said Hearst.

Martinis

0

Martinis are trouble.

Though they help me mingle,

After two I see double,

After three I act single.

Bill Dowey

×