Home Blog Page 7025

New skateboardpark gets wheels

0

Simultaneously imparting a major quality-of-life improvement for Malibu’s youth and easing a nagging frustration for the owners of local shopping centers, the City Council Monday unanimously approved plans for a 10,000-square-foot skateboard park on Cross Creek Road. The new park, located just north of Civic Center Way, is scheduled to open this summer.

City officials are hoping the new facility will replace shopping center parking lots as the training ground for the jumps and maneuvers favored by Malibu’s skateboarding fanatics.

After a state law went into effect last year reducing the risks of liability for operating public skate parks, the city made arrangements to build one behind City Hall. But the plans were scrapped when underground contamination was discovered on the site.

Since then, local resident Jack Schultz, owner of the lot where the new park will be located, approached the city with an offer to use his property without charge. The city will have access to the property for an initial two-year term followed by renewals on an annual basis. Parks and Recreation officials plan to charge a $2 admission fee to the park, which will be named Papa Jack’s in honor of Schultz’s generosity.

A volunteer committee of youth and adult skateboarders designed the park, complete with ramps once used for a movie set. Malibu Paving Company has agreed to pave the park at cost.

Members of the committee came to Monday’s meeting to show support for the project.

“It will take us off the streets and out of the parking lots,” said Blake Mills, who along with his father, John, has played pivotal roles in keeping the project alive.

The council needed no arm twisting, however, and approved the construction of the skate park with little debate.

In other matters, the council unanimously approved part of a new traffic and pedestrian safety plan for Juan Cabrillo Elementary and Malibu High schools. The plan was prepared after a series of accidents in front of the schools, most recently when a 4-year-old girl was struck and injured by a car last year.

The improvements include the painting of three crosswalks and the creation of restricted parking zones on both the north and south side of Morning View Drive. Future improvements not currently budgeted include a sidewalk on the south side of Morning View Drive.

In budget negotiations in July, the council plans to allocate funds to employ two crossing guards starting in the next school year, despite protestations by Mayor Walt Keller that high school students should volunteer to do the job instead.

Pat Cairns, principal of Juan Cabrillo, told Keller she would prefer that the students stay in class. Besides, she added, drivers are more likely to heed the signals of adult crossing guards.

But Keller argued, without any visible support from the other council members, that because he had worked as a crossing guard when he was 14 years old, high school students today should also be capable of performing that duty.

“You must have been some 14-year-old,” Cairns jokingly responded. “Anyway, where were the Suburbans then?”

Fresh fish

0

**Pepperdine University Associate Professor of Biology Karen Martin specializes in the study of Leuresthes tenuis — grunion.

Q: How does one become a grunion professor?

A: It just happens, it’s not something you plan. I like to work on animals I can find easily, and these are the easiest.

The field biologists at Pepperdine like to work on local species. We like to take our students out in the field.

Q: Let’s start with the basics. What are grunion?

A: Grunion are a species of silver-sides fish, found only in Southern California. They love to surf, and they come in on sandy beaches following high tides after a new or full moon. They come in for spawning. That’s called a grunion run. They’re the only fish I know that spawn out of water.

Q: “Spawn.” That’s a polite word for . . . ?

A: When fish want to be together in a special way.

It’s hard not to enjoy working with grunion. They’re a great fish.

I tried to start working with them 10 years ago. I didn’t have the timing down. I started again four years ago. Now we have the timing down.

Q: What does it mean to “study” them?

A: I don’t like to get wet, so the fish come to me. We either collect the fish or we collect the eggs, and we study them.

They lay their eggs where the eggs won’t get wet until they’re ready to hatch. From a biologist’s standpoint, that’s really interesting.

One of the things we study is the way the metabolism of the eggs develops out of water. They don’t have a specific set time, the way most eggs do. They wait for the surf to come back up and wash them out to sea.

It’s like a space capsule. It’s enclosed. There’s no way to get in more food or for the animal to move around. Yet they have to keep metabolizing.

You find it increases until the 10th day, when it is ready to hatch. It keeps that relatively high metabolism for up to an additional four to five weeks, waiting for that trigger.

Q: When can we see them run?

A: For example, they ran on March 20. High tide was 5-1/2 feet above. Then it falls off until after the next new moon. The grunion are waiting for the highest highs and lowest lows.

If you want a fancy, new word: syzygy. It’s when the sun and moon are aligned — the highest high tides and the lowest low tides.

Q: If I’m having difficulty conceptualizing this, how do the grunion figure it out?

A: Fish are really smart. I don’t know how. I don’t think anybody really does.

A lot of animals are on cycles. There is a big movement of the ocean, so it’s easy to understand. But they respond in a pretty precise way. It’s about an hour to an hour-and-a-half window.

Q: Do they talk to each other?

A: They are schooling fish, so they are able to communicate in the sense that they school together.

Q: When is the next run?

A: The night of May 3 at 11:10 or the night of May 4 at 11:45.

I think this is the reason grunion are not studied much. It’s pretty labor intensive. You don’t know that they’re going to be there.

They do this only in the spring, from late March to mid-July, two or three nights after every new and full moon. But some runs are better than others.

Q: Where in Malibu can we see them run?

A: They find a sandy beach with a nice, long, slow wave approach, not necessarily a good surfing beach. The fish actually ride in on the waves.

Q: Why isn’t this a more exact science?

A: They’re like any animal. You think you understand the animal, but . . . .

Rain or storms change the pattern of waves. Sometimes it’s a lovely night, and they don’t show up.

The problem is that there’s a large population of fish, and not all are spawning.

Q: Are these questions you pursue?

A: No, they’re too hard for me. I pursue questions I can answer.

I’m actually a physiologist. So I study their metabolism — the eggs out of water and how adults can be active out of water, yet they’re fish.

Q: Do you recommend the life of a scientist?

A: It’s a different kind of creativity, but scientists must be creative, and they must be original, and they must produce interesting material constantly in such a way that their colleagues accept it.

In some ways it’s like being a poet. If you’re driven, do it. If you have a burning curiosity about the subject, study it. But it’s not easy, and you’re not going to get rich.

Q: But you can stay up late and watch fish.

A: I also study intertidal fish. Part of the reason I got involved in grunion is that low tides are at 5 or 6 in the morning. If you ask a college student if they’d rather stay up ’til 11 or 12 or get up at 5 or 6, a lot will say they’d rather stay up late.

Q: Have you produced that interesting material?

A: [She fishes for a copy of her new book, “Intertidal Fishes — Life in Two Worlds,” Academic Press, 1999, which she co-edited.]

Everything you would want to know about fish is in this book.

Q: Grilled or sauted?

A: People ask me if you can eat a grunion. I say, ‘Yes, but don’t bother.’

Q: Where did you do your studies?

A: University of Oklahoma for undergraduate. It’s pretty far from the ocean. It was covered by an ocean during the Cretaceous period.

I came out here to UCLA to do my graduate work. That’s where I started working on fish.

Then I went to University of Washington at Friday Harbor Labs in the San Juan Islands in Puget Sound for a one-year, post-doctoral fellowship.

My main focus has been fish out of water, which is a metaphor.

Q: For?

A: I suppose for someone like me doing something like this.

Q: Do you catch the grunion?

A: We can only catch the fish with our hands. You have to give the fish a fighting chance, or else it is illegal. Also, it is illegal to catch them in April or May. After May, adults 16 and older can catch them only if they have a fishing license.

My recommendation is: Catch them, look at them and throw them back. You can’t eat them and they don’t live in captivity.

Q: May we discuss delicate matters? What does spawning look like?

A: The female digs tail-first into the sand. The males seem to cue on her movement, so they’ll find her. One or more males may surround a female. They just release their milt.

Q: Pardon?

A: Milt. The sperm.

The eggs are bright orange and full of yolk.

Q: So you can bring the kids?

A: Kids love these things.

Dress warmly and wait. If you go out about the time of the high tide, you see a few fish coming up at first. They might come out for one wave and then be washed back.

If you’re lucky, the numbers might increase.

They’ll be in a narrow band, so you have to get right down to the waterline. They will come in on one of the larger waves, and the fish will remain on the sand to spawn.

The next big wave, the fish will wash right out.

That’s why you have to stay there and be patient. Another wave, another batch of fish will come.

On a good run, you can hear the flopping on the beach. It sounds like popcorn popping.

Q: Any recommended beaches?

A: No, because I don’t want them to be loved too much. The problem with any living thing is that you see a lot of them so you think they are not very valuable. I’m very happy to have people come and watch if they don’t bother the fish.

They’re a coastal fish. They’re exposed to whatever’s coming out of Malibu Lagoon. If the sand is polluted too, the eggs are being exposed to the pollution as well. We don’t want the grunion to have the additional pressure of being caught.

Q: What does your family think when you come home after midnight, smelling of fish?

A: Both of my sons have come out with me. My husband is very supportive, but he has to go to work early in the morning.

It’s the best job. It beats working.

Light on the subject

0

Kim Devore’s amusing and interesting article re the ancient Albatross referred to my visit to the venerable Malibu landmark quoting me: “Retired Judge John Merrick only went there to see the lights.” This requires amplification.

I was a member of a three-man party commissioned by the Township Council to investigate a complaint voiced by the property owners on the hillside across from the Albatross. It seems that the Albatross had a World War II searchlight in its front yard, which, when lighted, was automatically and continuously rotated 360 degrees, with its powerful beam periodically sweeping the Malibu heavens and intermittently shining into the windows and homes of the hillside residents.

In my negotiating with owner Mrs. Burnett, it developed that she owned a fleet of these searchlights and rented them out for automobile, market openings, motion picture movie previews, etc., and she envisioned positioning her lights along Pacific Coast Highway pointing the way to the Malibu Albatross.

Fortunately, she never carried out that plan, and she compromised over the Albatross searchlight by merely turning it on at night and locked in a stationary position pointing at the Malibu heavens and an occasional airplane, not intruding on the serenity of her hillside neighbors. And we successful negotiators got the hell out of there before Mrs. B. could deliver any salty adieus.

John J. Merrick,

judge, retired

In other business . . .

0

The council unanimously approved the formation of a Trails Master Plan Advisory Committee. The committee will help plan the restoration and building of trails throughout the city. Applications for the l0-member committee are available from the city clerk. Each council person will appoint two members.

The council, on a 5-0 vote, also approved an amendment to the General Plan modifying the designated land use for the former site of the Windsail restaurant. The site will now be zoned for multifamily residential use.

Ode to an original woman

0

I write in regard to the article on the Albatross [“From no-tell motel to costly condos in one history lesson,” April 22 issue].

I worked at that infamous hotel/restaurant for Eloise Burnett (your Louise Barnett) from June 17, 1973 until it closed down two months later.

I had just come by Trailways bus to Southern California from a small town in Pennsylvania. I was 24, but I was still wet behind the ears.

I saw Eloise’s help wanted ad in the L.A. Times: “Restaurant-Bar, live-in, no car,” and it gave the address on PCH.

I walked from Santa Monica all the way to Malibu (there was no bus service then), and applied. She hired me right there, to wait on tables for dining customers, mix and serve drinks and clean the rooms upstairs — everything. I was one of about six motley “drifter-type’ men, mostly young, who made up her staff.

At that point there were no women working there at all.

Judge Merrick was right that Eloise “was an old gal with a very salty tongue.” She put on a gruff and callous exterior, because she knew she had to be tough to survive. But more than once she came to my defense when the other guys bullied me.

“For protection” Eloise was forever accompanied by a German Shepherd she called “Bach II” (its predecessor’s name having been “Bach”). And the atmosphere of the lobby of the Albatross was punctually pierced by the cries of a resident great pure-white cockatoo with flowing head-feathers, which Eloise only occasionally let perch on her shoulder and feed sunflower seeds.

Most of us hired help slept outside the building in a metal utility shack on the concrete desk, and it was cold! But she’d let us use the vacant upstairs rooms to take long hot showers any time we wanted. She put us through our paces and made us work for pay and our keep, but she was liberal with time off and staples like house food.

In the 1960 Columbia film “Strangers When We Met,” to which you alluded, one can see how the building was unusually designed to look like an oversized yacht, even to the extent of having brass-framed portholes for windows. In the first scene that shows the interior, Kirk Douglas sits at the long, studded brass-topped bar, a glass-encased old-fashioned gold-colored fire extinguisher behind him; he then walks toward the cocktail deck before a huge brass swordfish suspended over the wall-length stone fireplace. All these legendary fixtures were still in place, when I was there.

I was asked several times by male guests in whispered confidence if it was a brothel, but I had no evidence of any kind that it ever was, and told them so.

When she finally closed the place, Eloise Burnett moved up into one of the canyons (I won’t say which), and lived there on a several-acre lot in a spacious trailer, while she authorized the beginning of construction on a big house. She took three of us, “her boys,” with her up there, and paid us a little to help clear the brush and rocks off the lot. I slept in a small addendum to the trailer.

But after a week and a half of this, I finally decided to get a real job, and walked down the canyon, and out of the life of one of the most unique and original women I’ve ever had the privilege to know.

I heard she completed the house, and enjoyed it for about eight years before she died. That would be about 1981 or 1982.

The thing I remember most fondly about my time at the Albatross was being able to listen to the incredible selection of hit songs on the colorfully lit up grand Seaborg Jukebox that sat in state on the Hawaiian-motif glass-enclosed cocktail lounge, while I served people their drinks on a Saturday night. There were beautiful renditions of tunes on the bill, by the likes of Dean Martin, Andy Williams and John Gary. Many are rare or unattainable today thanks to LPs being replaced by CDs. And almost half the jukebox was filled with Frank Sinatra’s singles.

As I proudly wore a long-sleeved white dress shirt, and a mod ’70s black bow tie (Eloise liked that tie), I served the bourbon-and-soda and the brandy Alexander to, respectively, a middle-aged man and a woman awfully young and pretty to be his wife; and outside under the exterior lights, the waves — I can still hear their thunder — splashed way up and dotted the glass with droplets.

The middle-aged man leaned way over to me and pressed a $20 bill into my hand and said simply, “Play Sinatra.” I did gladly. And he and his date were there a long, long time.

Dennis Keith Klopp

To walk the walk

0

Would you like to give people in wheelchairs the chance to stand again?

If so, please contact your state assemblyman or woman right away, and express your opinion on Assembly Bill 750, the Roman Reed Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) Research Bill.

The doctors gave us no hope. “You’ll never walk again, never close your fingers, never be able to father a child,” our son was told. When our insurance cut off his therapy, saying further improvement was not likely, it took two safety belts to keep our son from sliding off the wheelchair. He literally could not lift his own hand.

But with the aid of advanced research, medication and therapy, we were able to bring back the muscles on the backs of his arms. Now, instead of having to be picked up and carried, he could transfer himself from bed to chair — even drive an adapted truck.

Today, Roman attends college at U.C. Berkeley, where he also works; and he is the father of a beautiful baby boy. Research helped him, and there is more help on the way.

Research is the answer to that great dream. Assembly Bill 750, the Roman Reed Spinal Cord Injury Research Bill, offers a painless way to permanently fund that research. Modeled after New York’s unanimously passed Richter Bill, AB 750 puts a $15 surcharge onto speeding tickets and other traffic violations. That money will go to spinal cord injury research for cure. Car crash, by the way, is the No. 1 cause of spinal cord injury.

We need your help. As my son Roman puts it, “Please take a stand — so everybody can.”

Stand with us. Contact your state assemblyman or woman. Support Assembly Bill 750, the Roman Reed Spinal Cord Injury Research Bill.

Don C. Reed

chairperson,

Californians for Cure

The FPPC strikes back

0

You may remember where we left the story last week. Gil Segel, our hero or villain — depending on whom you ask or which newspaper you read — is headed for court Friday to try to block the California Fair Political Practices Commission from taking his statement under oath or having a look at the bank records of his group, “Malibu Citizens for Less Traffic on Pacific Coast Highway” (MLCT).

Inquiring minds are beginning to wonder what could conceivably be in his head or in those records that is so sensitive, but that answer may come Friday in the courtroom of Superior Court Judge Robert O’Brien, in downtown Los Angeles.

The papers filed by the state in support of its position give us a peek at what might be in there.

To recap, apparently just before the last City Council election there were several newspaper ads placed in the Malibu Surfside News. Their gravamen were all pretty much the same — that there is too much traffic on PCH and it’s pretty much all Jeff Jennings’ fault because Lord knows he loves traffic and votes for it at every opportunity.

The ads explained that Jennings voted for nine projects that Walt Keller and Carolyn Van Horn opposed. Four of the ads were placed by MCLT (supposedly an educational group, which meant if it really was an educational group, it could collect money without limit and also keep the names of its donors secret). Those four ads looked remarkably similar to several of the other ads that seemed to advocate defeating Jeff Jennings, and the state obviously believed that this was no coincidence and launched an investigation of possible campaign chicanery.

Here are here accusations the state made in its recently filed court documents:

It accuses MCLT of running so-called educational ads where “most of the information . . . was either patently false or very misleading.”

It accuses the group of manipulating the rules so that, “It appears that this ‘misinformation’ was carefully crafted into those four ads weeks before the April 14 election in an attempt to avoid the City’s $100 contribution limits and the Act’s reporting requirements.”

The state accuses the group of being somewhat less than forthcoming about the activities of the group and persons associated with the group. Apparently, the group’s counsel has repeatedly refused to have witnesses answer any questions on the grounds of the members’ rights of privacy, which is the reason the state says the subpoenas should issue.

It accuses the group of being less than cooperative in the investigation, arguing, “FPPC investigator Richard McSherry made attempts to personally serve Mr. Segel in Malibu but was unsuccessful. Thereafter the subpoenas were given to Jeffrie Madland, a paralegal employed by the city of Malibu [who incidentally works for the Malibu city attorney Christi Hogin] who made several attempts to serve Mr. Segel at his home and office. Ms. Madland eventually served Mr. Segel at the Malibu city offices.”

It accuses Segel and MCLT of collecting money from people who believed it was for a political purpose — to support Tom Hasse’s candidacy, which, if true, would definitely be a “No No” since it was an educational group and not allowed to collect campaign money.

Two new, prominent names emerge in the papers filed with the court. One is Jack Roth, president of an advertising agency, who initially told the commission investigation he had given a check for Tom Hasse’s campaign at the request of his neighbor Gil Segel, which turned out to be a $500 check to “Malibu Citizens.”

Another was movie producer Robert Chartoff. According to the state’s brief, “[I]n early in spring of 1998, Gil or Joanne Segel solicited a check from him and spoke to him about the campaign and Tom Hasse. He declined to give further information about the Segels who he said were his friends, but he voluntarily agreed to provide Investigator McSherry with a copy of the check. Mr. Chartoff later retracted this offer and subpoenas were issued. When interviewed under subpoena, Mr. Chartoff stated that the check dated February 18, 1998 was for $500 and was made out to MCLT. He stated that Gil Segel told him the money was for a committee he was forming to deal with traffic problems on PCH and that he was going to place advertisements in the newspaper. Mr. Chartoff further stated that following Mr. McSherry’s first visit in September 1998, he called Gil Segel who said that Mr. Chartoff did not have to give the check to Mr. McSherry and that Mr. Segel preferred that he not do so. On the date of the subpoenaed testimony, Mr. Chartoff called Mr. Segel who said to ‘go ahead and give them the check.’ Mr. Chartoff provide a copy of his $500 check written to MCLT.”

The FPPC summed up the thrust of its argument as follows, and I quote directly from their court documents: “There are several connections between the MCLT [Malibu Citizens for Less Traffic], Gil Segel, Joanne Segel, Road Worriers, Remy O’Neill, Carolyn Van Horn and Walt Keller in their efforts to defeat incumbent Mayor Jeff Jennings and elect Tom Hasse. The connections appear in the use of the same theme and specific words in the six ads placed in the MSN [Malibu Surfside News], as well as in the Road Worriers video, the Jack Lemmon letter, and the anonymous ads of John Benton, Paul Beck and Brian Fox.”

I called the group’s attorney, Brad Hertz, and left a message requesting a copy of his court filings and any statement, if he chose to make one. As we went to press Tuesday afternoon, Hertz called back to say his documents had been filed with the court and the Malibu City Attorney and they were pretty much self-explanatory. Unfortunately, the documents were not available at press time.

P.S. Coincidentally, the City Council has scheduled another performance evaluation of City Attorney Christi Hogin for this Friday at 2 p.m. in closed session. This is the sixth or seventh evaluation, it’s hard to remember exactly how many, since last November, with apparently no end in sight.

Arnold’s column would be going here

0

We gave AGY the week off. Are we the best staff, or what?