Home Blog Page 6886

No boxing gloves needed

0

Your publisher’s columns are always entertaining, although they usually must be read with an understanding that very few facts upon which you base your opinions are accurate. The divisiveness this week’s column intends to foment deserves a response so that Malibu residents have the record straight.

When describing a meeting at Serra Retreat to discuss the possibility of the community working together on a bond measure that would help purchase open space now slated for development, you stated that the meeting was attended by “the most improbable group of people, many who are seldom in the same room together without their boxing gloves on.” Then you include me in the list of those who attended.

While I did not attend this meeting and can, therefore, not confirm the attendance of any of the others you list, I can say that absolutely your premise about the boxing gloves is completely off the mark. Laure Stern and Dierdre Roney, two of those mentioned as attendees on the list, have been in the same room with me on several occasions, as we all belong to the Malibu Youth Coalition, which is dedicated to working together to support the young people in our community and their needs. We have never had any need for boxing gloves, and, in fact, Laure Stern and I also worked in harmony on a successful solution for the Point Dume Natural Preserve and its management. There are several others on your list of “attendees” at the meeting who I know have worked together in successful collaborations in this community.

While I could not attend the meeting about the bond measure, I would have been quite happy to be in the same room with all of the people your column mentions were in attendance, and I assure you that none of us would have though about boxing gloves. We have much more in common than you might think — all being dedicated to preserving the quality of life in our community.

The divisiveness that has been spread in this community has only been so incited by the Malibu Bay Company, its agents, and your newspaper. Hope springs eternal that the bitterness that is stirred up during elections and debates about issues crucial to the future of Malibu will end.

However, given the high stakes, tremendous profits and personal gains to be made by both the Malibu Bay Company (MBC) and your newspaper by increased advertising from the businesses MBC would need to lure to their proposed developments, it would seem we can expect more of the same. Let’s hope at least that this warning will remind us all to be cautious of such devious manipulation.

Marcia Hanscom

I’m no terror, terrier says

0

You can imagine my surprise when, using The Malibu Times for my daily doggie toilette (quite appropriately, it seems), I glanced down to see my own face being used as the very example of canine ferociousness. And, to make a bad rap worse, you captioned this untruthful, unflattering portrait with the phrase “Would you trust this dog?” You call yourself journalists! Well, you got it wrong yet again!

For the sake of setting the record straight, the one fact you got right was my name: Mr. Wizard. If you had cared to ask, you would have learned that I am known as the friendliest Terrier in the Agoura Animal Shelter and the most trustworthy!

Your writer should have known that when the modicum of privacy available to one in such an establishment is invaded by a stranger pointing a flash camera in one’s face, one might appear to be a wee bit irritated (who wouldn’t be).

The only real thing a dog owns is his reputation and you have besmirched mine.

Now, instead of the Malibu family of my dreams, good citizens who would provide me with every canine comfort in exchange for my loyalty and love, I am being vetted by strange hairless young men with angry eyes and tattoos.

You will be hearing from my attorneys.

Mr. Wizard

Agoura Animal Shelter

(As dictated to Karen Portugal York)

P.S. I enclose another photo which more clearly reflects my gentle and amiable disposition. I’m still available to an appropriately well bred Malibu family who may arrange an appointment by calling 818-991-0071. (Business hours, please).

Initiative campaign costs spiral in 2000

0

A famous California politician once said that “money is the mother’s milk of politics.” What is true in Sacramento appears to be equally true in Malibu. While many people may feel money should not sway political outcomes, supporters and opponents of Proposition N (the City Council’s proposition), Proposition O (the advisory ballot on the $15 million bond issue) and Proposition P (Malibu Right-to-Vote on-Development Initiative) spent a large amount of money for and against their propositions.

Mayor Tom Hasse’s language was even stronger. “It’s obscene,” he said, and it’s why he believes it is time to put limits on how much anyone can contribute to initiatives in Malibu.

The biggest spender was the Malibu Bay Company, which spent $197,225 cumulatively for the year 2000 on the initiatives, (Yes on Proposition N and No on Proposition P).

Prop. P supporters also spent a significant amount of money to push their cause to the 9,000 or so registered Malibu voters, of which less than 5,000 voted during the November elections. Yes on P supporters spent $76,271.74, and still have an outstanding debt, according to their filings.

Currently, a City Council subcommittee, composed of Councilmember Jeff Jennings and Hasse, is looking into ways to control ballot measure costs.

“It’s like a war, each side escalates and it never ends, so you need campaign finance,” said Hasse. “This situation is not unique to Malibu. It is an ongoing debate at the national level in Washington D.C.”

There are already limitations on what a candidate for City Council can receive from any one person — $100. However, the limitations don’t apply to ballot propositions.

Contributors are required to file disclosure documents with the city clerk relating to campaign expenses.

Since 1996, “any group that has a campaign account open is required to file a bi-annual campaign disclosure document,” said Virginia Bloom, city clerk.

The figures on the accompanying chart below cover the last six months of the year 2000, and include expenditures for ballot propositions in November 2000, the City Council campaign in November 2000, and the earlier City Council race in April 2000. November 2000 council candidate Robert Roy van de Hoek’s report is not included because he has not turned in the documents yet, said Bloom.

Wayne Wilcox: Photographer, motel owner

0

Longtime Malibu resident Wayne Wilcox, original owner of the Malibu Riviera Motel, died Wednesday.

Wilcox was born Feb. 21, 1921 in Jerricho Springs, Missouri. He met his wife, Helen, in Hollywood, Calif., and the two were married in February of 1946. A year later, the two moved to Malibu where they broke ground for a motel. (See sidebar.)

Wayne chronicled Malibu history over the years, opening his photography studio in 1954. The studio was in operation until 1994. Wilcox focused on portrait photograph;, however, he also photographed landscapes. One of his photos, of the Point Dume area, hangs in the Bank of America building on Malibu Road, and was published in The Malibu Times in its 21st Anniversary Edition in 1967.

Wilcox suffered from Parkinson’s for the past 10 years.

He is survived by his wife, Helen, and sons, Gary and Bob Wilcox, as well as grandchildren.

No memorial service will take place.

Bitching about dogs on beach

0

In response to the recent letters regarding dogs in Malibu, as beach resident for the past 20 years on west Malibu Road, I can report that the beach is overrun with dogs. The feces they leave, after chasing away birds and seals disturbing the peace and quiet, with loud persistent barking while endangering children and others, is testament to the irresponsibility and disrespect shown by their law breaking owners. The beach is not a toilet for canines despite the ignorant dog lovers’ desire that it should be their dogs’ outhouse.

The dogs are let loose in the morning to roam and dump and pee on tide-clean sand and to invade neighbors’ yards trampling through gardens. They trot down the beach and wander from their lease-carrying (not using them) owners, and when they approach other dogs, they either engage in terrifying territorial clashes or promiscuous sniffing and humping in public, while their human companions scream for dear life or just scream their names hoping for heeling obedience. They gallop barking at seagulls, sandpipers, terns, pelicans, plovers, seals, surfers and anything else that moves, acting as if they were indigenous and all the other elegant creatures that inhabit the shoreline are invaders that need to be cleared out or killed. They run in packs when a few “neighbors” walk at the same time. They leave piles of poop you cannot avoid stepping in walking barefooted.

I’ve seen children playing in the sand with poop and pee in it. They get knocked over and terrorized by galloping dogs. I’ve often laid on my back while stretching at the tide line before surfing, watching the sky and taking in fresh nourishment of the sight, sound and smell of waves in quiet contemplation just to have some barking, saliva spewing, hair shedding, wet-nosed dog poke its snout in my face then kick sand in my eyes as I shoo it away while its owners walk by with a stupid grin on their face saying, “Isn’t Fido cute.”

The bottom line is that the dog owners who use the beach for their dogs’ potty and pleasure disrespect others, disrespect the natural habitat, disrespect the peace and quiet and disrespect the law. They call anyone who objects “uptight” or “intolerant” trying to point blame instead of realizing they care more about their pets than kids or people or even delightful birds and animals that have lived along the shore forever and are such an integral part of its nature that make it so unique and beautiful (why walk there?).

Take your dogs to some park of some other dog dump run to do their business and socialize with others of similar likes. The beach is not your pets’ toilet. It is illegal (with good reasons) to have them on the beach (unless they are tied up on your own property) and I will call animal control (and encourage others) each and every time I see one being “walked” and also ask Sgt. Barrier of the Sheriff’s Department beach patrol to enforce the law (she does so gladly) and make you pay large fines as criminals until you learn respect and how to be a decent citizen and neighbor in Malibu. Beware of dog (non-lover).

Sam Birenbaum

Schools reap rewards for performance

0

Local area schools are in the money with recent Governor Performance Award (GPA) funds distributed to schools that have met the state’s benchmark for their Academic Performance Index (API) growth targets.

API scores were released in January, and all three Malibu elementary and the middle/high schools met or exceeded statewide standards.

Malibu High School exceeded their target of 794 by five points (799). The school received an award of $70,158. With an additional $32,000 in site block grant money supplementing the award, many departments have submitted their wish lists in recent weeks.

“[We’ve] known the money was coming,” said Principal Mike Matthews, “so we’ve been working for three months” on the reviewing process to decide how the money will be spent.

Each school’s site governance council decides how to spend the unrestricted funds, which will then be ratified by the local governing board.

The GPA is a competitive program based on the API and the award program is intended for schoolwide usage. It is awarded on a per pupil basis, with the current year’s program funded at $63 per student enrolled.

Requests from the various departments at Malibu High range from a pool cover, a timer for the track and physical education programs, to technological supplies for classrooms, additional science equipment, and funds to restructure the counseling office to avail more space for more counselors.

Of the elementary schools, Juan Cabrillo received $22,352, Point Dume, $17,666, and Webster $28,620.

While the rewards help the schools out, pressure exists each year to exceed last year’s target.

“We’re doing very well,” said Matthews. “We have to keep improving. [It’s] a lot of pressure.”

Matthews said he has mixed feelings about increased pressure for accountability from schools and teachers, resulting in increased testing.

“In the past, I’ve been told by teachers and parents, ‘We’re not going to change our teaching methods, we’re going to continue to see how we do,’ ” said Matthews. “This year, for the first time, we will spend time teaching to the test. It’s not a good thing, as far as I’m concerned. Learning is a lot more complex than one test score shows.”

Cheerleader article booed

0

When I met with you last week, I requested a rebuttal article regarding the MHS cheerleading squad. It appears now your reporter, Laura Tate, is gathering information with the intent of just “balancing things out.” For the record, the cheerleading coaches were not fired because it was reported Ceillia and I were allegedly permitting mistreatment and making negative comments about a special ed cheerleader. These allegations are ridiculous and false. The article published was written by a student at Malibu High School who appears to be influenced by gossip and rumors which, unfortunately, she tends to think is “hot news.”

We developed an award-winning, competitive program and are very saddened by Mr. Matthews’ decision to terminate us. This does not come from poor leadership and lack of devotion to the school and community. The cheerleading squad were equally devastated by Matthews’ sudden decision which they felt came from nowhere. We have met with Superintendent Neil Schmidt and the SMMUSD Advisory Committee because we feel the real travesty here is the effect Mr. Matthews’ untimely decision has had on the squad. Mr. Matthews did not have a qualified coach in place to immediately take over this program, midseason, just when the squad was planning to get ready for the basketball season, to perform at the Pro Bowl in Hawaii, (for the second time), and prepare for competitions. A replacement coach, unfamiliar with High School cheerleading and the routines, which included very technical stunts, was not hired until the end of January. By this time, it was too late for the squad, something I think Mr. Matthews was aware of. The nine girl squad consisted of five seniors, who have now been deprived of many wonderful experiences and opportunities, which they now cannot get back. The other four girls who were new to the squad this year were anxious to participate in these first time opportunities for them.

They have all been cheated and that seems very unfair. It is my position that we were fired for political reasons, unrelated to conduct, which is still being investigated. According to your reporter, the 2000-2001 season has now come to a close. Your reporter fails to realize that it was really just beginning for the squad. Cheerleading is not just about cheering at football games.

Your reporter, Laura Tate, has not been particularly pleasant to the people she has interviewed from our side. It is clear that she favors Perrie Briskin and probably made the decision to publish her one-sided smear in your newspaper. We therefore request that we be allowed to fully respond in our own unfiltered article. To deny us this, would further add to the injustice.

Barbara Mills

Heard around town

0

Ozzie Silna, the Daddy Warbucks of the last City Council election, having contributed substantial monies in support of Proposition P (the Right-to-Vote on Development Initiative), apparently has decided to give it another try.

Recently, he pulled together a meeting, at Serra Retreat, of the most improbable group of people, many who are seldom in the same room together without their boxing gloves on. The attendees included many from the Malibu Coastal Land Conservancy and its supporters, including Gil Segal, Steve Uhring, Frank Basso, Sam Hall Kaplan, Patt Healy, Marcia Hanscom (of Wetlands Action Network) and former Councilmember Carolyn Van Horn, who apparently is coming out of retirement. Others attending were Jo Fogg, president of the Malibu Senior Citizen’s Club, Georgianna McBurney, Laure Stern, Laureen Sills, Dierdre Roney, (education & recreation groups), Ann Payne, and several others.

Silna apparently has hopes of putting a political group together in support of a public bond issue to raise money for land purchases. The plan is to try and raise $15 million in a bond, or perhaps even more, to purchase vacant land with hopes that there will be federal and state grants to match the money raised. Many, apparently, were in agreement with raising the money through a bond issue, but it was also apparent to some at the meeting that there were some major disagreements as to where the money would go. They did seem to narrow it down to three priorities; ball fields, a multipurpose community center, and open space/wetlands, but this is only the beginning and as the saying goes, “The devil is in the details.”

There is a potential deal, now in the discussion stages, to try and work something out over Bluffs Park. The state wants their land back and the ball fields moved. The city, which is already desperately short of ball fields, wants, replacement ball fields. Roy Crummer, the landowner who owns a substantial hunk of the bluff alongside the state’s land, wants to build seven or eight single-family residences on his bluff land. The Malibu Road people are worried about irrigation water running down from the ball fields and destabilizing the bluff, and the California Coastal Commission doesn’t want any land taken away from visitor serving uses.

That’s a lot of players and a lot of conflicting agendas to put around one negotiating table. Mayor Tom Hasse and Mayor Pro Tem Joan House are negotiating for the city and reports are they seem to be getting closer to a deal.

Malibu Pier reconstruction is rolling ahead pretty much on schedule and they expect to finish Phase 2, which consists of most of the structural aspects of the rehabilitation, by the end of this month, according to Hayden Sohm, State Parks and Recreation top guy.

The pier will be open from March until about the end of the summer when Phase 3 of the reconstruction will begin. Interim work will also continue during the summer. In Phase 3, work will continue on the buildings, principally the old Alice’s Restaurant site, and if all goes well, all work will be completed and a new restaurant in place by mid-2002.

A public meeting will take place concerning the pier, which is tentatively scheduled for March 7. The project, not unexpectedly, is coming in at about $1,000,000 above what was originally estimated. This appears to be fairly typical of historical rehabilitations, which inevitably run into septic, asbestos, lead paint or other hazardous materials types of problems. The state has already put $2.2 million into the rehabilitation and, before it’s all over, they expect costs to run as high as $4.3 million, perhaps more. Ironically, the costs are what some original pier experts said it would be years ago.

The next hunk of dollars will probably come from the county, which has $2.9 million in Prop A bond funds that were originally committed to the project by former Supervisor Ed Edema a number of years ago. Another $800,000 in bond funds will come from the City of Malibu. These deals are not quite done deals yet, because the county and the city are looking for assurances that the pier will be maintained by the state, even in bad economic times. But most people involved feel that, ultimately, details can be worked out with Supervisor Zev Yaroslavsky and the City of Malibu.

Malibu Stage goes before council for grant

0

The Malibu Stage Company will go before the City Council at its next meeting, Monday night, to request a release of $50,000 of a $75,000 grant that was originally approved by the council in 1999.

The stipulations of the original grant were that it be a one-time grant only and that the company match the funds with donations and contributions from subscribers.

At a September 1999 council meeting, Malibu Stage Artistic Director Charles Marowitz requested a release of grant funds, but it was without the approval of Malibu Stage board members, several other members charged. Immediately after Marowitz made his request, Larry Berkholder, former Malibu Stage treasurer and board member, and former President David Weintraub, went before the council to request that the grant be frozen while the company reorganized.

The council froze the funds and requested that the company provide a financial report prior to any further moneys being released.

The Malibu Stage Company is now coming back before the council offering a financial report that is a two years old and a tax return for the fiscal year 1999-2000. They also have submitted a list of contributions from 1999 to 2000, an estimated budget for the 2001 production year and a proposal for a joint-operating agreement with the Point Dume Community Services District.

The Malibu Stage Company received $53,521 in revenue, including $15,000 in contributions and $34,742 from production and performances, according to the 1999-2000 tax return. They were left with a operating deficit of $15,018 in February of 2000, after total expenses of $68,539.

Certified Public Accountant S. David Abrishamian was hired by Malibu Stage to complete the financial statement, which is now being offered to the council in support of the company’s plea for the release of the additional funds. In a cover letter submitted with the financial report, Abrishamian wrote: “Management has elected to omit substantially all of the disclosures ordinarily included in financial statements. If the omitted disclosures were included in the financial statements, they might influence the users conclusions about the organizations assets, net assets, support, revenues and expenses.”

Attorney/CPA, Norm Goodman, consulted by The Malibu Times, said that financial statement is basically a “regurgitation of a client’s record put in a CPA’s format.

“You can’t put as much prudence on these financial statements as you can in an audit,” said Goodman.

In a letter to the council, current Malibu Stage Chair Geoffrey Ortiz wrote that the board anticipates a 2001 budget deficit of more than $2,300. The board plans to make up this deficit with co-productions and their downtime rental revenues.

According to Ortiz, Clark and James Cowan, owners of the property, gave approval of the proposed plan to work with the Point Dume Community Services District to bring in and share downtime rental revenues they book.

Controversy rages over dismissal, coaches insist their firing was political

0

Laura Tate/Editor

Two former Malibu High School coaches, upset and angered by recent news articles about their dismissal from the cheerleading team, have contacted The Malibu Times, firing off letters, threatening lawsuits, and making demands for apologies.

The articles that ran in The Malibu Times last week and in the Surfside News in early December, reported that Ceillia Whiteford and Barbara Mills, both Malibu residents, were dismissed as coaches of the MHS team because of allegedly permitting mistreatment of a special needs student on the cheerleading squad. The student is legally blind and deaf.

In an earlier interview, Whiteford said that she and Mills were told by Malibu High Principal Mike Matthews that they were being dismissed because of several incidents where the special needs student was verbally abused by other squad members. Matthews reportedly said that the dismissal was not based on one incident, but a series of events dating back to a year ago. It was also reported that the Junior Varsity Squad quit the cheerleading team a year ago because of problems with the coaches.

Both Mills and Whiteford, in recent telephone interviews, vehemently deny the allegations. Whiteford, Mills, and Whiteford’s husband, David Schwerdtmann, all told the Times that they believe the two were fired because of political reasons.

“I think it’s political,” said Mills. “I think the parent [of the special needs student] was very upset. The program was becoming very demanding. I think she went to the district and demanded an interpreter. As Matthews put it, he had to do something. I think he knew that by getting rid of the coaches he got rid of the program.”

Schwerdtmann said he believes that the cost of providing interpreters for the student would have been too expensive, therefore, Matthews solved the problem by firing the coaches, therefore dismantling the team.

Asked how he came to this conclusion, Schwerdtmann said, “If you put all this stuff together that’s going on in this situation, that’s the conclusion.”

Mills wrote that she and Whiteford have met with Santa Monica-Malibu Unified School District Superintendent Neil Schmidt and the district advisory committee about their dismissal.

Matthews, in earlier news reports, said he was legally restricted from commenting on the matter. Schmidt released a statement saying he could not comment because it was a personnel matter. It has been reported that a lawsuit has been filed against the school district in connection with the special needs student.

Whiteford said that a week before they were fired, Matthews had told her that students had been coming into his office, saying that some of the girls were being brutal to the special needs student.

“It is absolutely ridiculous that we would allow this treatment,” said Mills. “As a parent, coach and an advisor, I don’t like the implication.”

Mills wrote in a letter to the Times that when she and Whiteford took the special needs student onto the squad, they did so “out of kindness” and “as a charitable act.”

“There were never any negative comments made by Ceillia and I, or any other cheerleader, about [her],” wrote Mills.

“I did not know what they were talking about,” said Whiteford, in a telephone interview. “I had not seen anything happen.”

Whiteford later added that she did remember an incident where another cheerleader had yelled at the special needs student. Whiteford said the incident occurred at a football game in September, a month and a half prior to her dismissal by Matthews. She said she was not present when the incident occurred, but was informed of it by a special education teacher.

Both Mills and Whiteford said they believe the article in the Times was biased because the reporter’s sister was on the JV team that quit last year. Mills also wrote in a letter to the Times that she believes the editor handling the article favors the reporter and probably made the decision to publish the “one-sided smear” in the Times. (See Opinion, page 4.)

“What upsets me is that this girl writes a letter about the whole thing and basically bashes us,” Mills. “She is the sister of a team member, I do feel that this has an influence on her.”

Mills wrote a letter and left it on the doorstep of the reporter, last Friday, in which she said: “Your defamatory article contained many untrue statements that were known by you to be untrue and were clearly meant to defame me in the eyes of the Malibu community. You succeeded in your mission.”

Mills also demanded a retraction and an apology in writing through the Times and the News and threatened to sue for defamation of character. She also requested that she be allowed to respond with her own “unfiltered article.”

As far as reasons why the JV squad quit, both Mills and Whiteford said they do not know why they did.

Several JV team members in a collective interview said they quit because of “poor leadership.” The girls had quit the cheerleading squad after a trip to Hawaii where the entire squad competed against other teams.

Whiteford said that when the group returned from Hawaii, she and Mills had a meeting with Matthews to go over budgeting items. She said Brian Banducci, athletics director for Malibu High, was present. She said she was told that it was reported that she and Mills had acted inappropriately during the trip to Hawaii. However, Whiteford said it was the JV girls who were out of hand. She said the girls have been a disciplinary problem, not wanting to follow rules. According to Whiteford, several of the JV girls had “disappeared” one morning, not informing the coaches of their whereabouts. They had gone to breakfast, she said.

However, she said it was normal “teenager” behavior that occurred, and did not mention the girls’ behavior to Matthews.

Mills concurred with Whiteford about the girls’ behavior during the trip.

After the meeting with Matthews and Banducci, Whiteford said she came out with a list of rules for the girls to follow. It was after this that the girls quit the team, giving no reason, said Whiteford.

“The worst part of it, is that I loved these girls,” she said. “They’re 14, what they did was no different than what any girl had done in the three years I’ve been coaching.”

“It was a shock to us, after all the fundraising, that all the girls said they were quitting,” said Mills. (Mills and Whiteford said they conducted fundraisers to enable the JV squad to accompany the Varsity squad on the Hawaii trip.)

Mills, Whiteford and Schwerdtmann said several of the girls on the remaining squad went before the Sports and Physical Education District Advisory Committee last week to express their dissappointment that they were left midseason without a coach.

Mills’ husband, John Mills, said: “The bottom line is, the fact that, for whatever reason, he [Matthews] summarily dismissed the coaches for the team who worked together for four years … when they were dismissed there were no backup coaches. The girls accomplished a lot of positive stuff that’s getting dragged through the mud. I think the girls were discriminated against.”

“There are five senior on that squad,” said Schwerdtmann. “They’ll never get their time back.”