Home Blog Page 7060

Editor in the soup

    0

    Arnold, you and I will always have views that are miles apart on just about everything and there is nothing wrong with that. But when you say Jo Ruggles and all the people who live in mobile homes live in homes that look like “converted Campbell soup cans,” you have gone tooooo far. You have maligned and discriminated against a lot of nice people who live in mobile homes, besides me and my friend, Jo Ruggles. Not all of us opt for the vicarious experience of living in an expensive hillside home area among the “rich and famous,” but we still have the constitutional right to enjoy living, working and volunteering in Malibu.

    I would guess it did not occur to you (typical) to verify your facts when you placed Jo Ruggles’ home in the lower section of Paradise Cove. I would guess from this misstatement you haven’t the slightest idea where her house is, what it looks like, or who does live in the lower section of Paradise Cove, or in what. Did it occur to you to verify the accuracy of the alleged remarks attributed to Jo by the L.A. times or were you too interested in giving a “gotcha” to your favorite protagonist?

    By the way, does your insulting comparison maligning my friend Jo Ruggles and all mobile-home owners, apply to your favorite candidate, “Mayor” Jeff Jennings, who lives in one of these “converted Campbell soup cans” just like “those people,” as you and your elitist friends like to refer to us? Are you aware that Richard Scott, whose letter appeared in last week’s issue of your tabloid and who has the same ability to distort facts about mobile-home issues that you have, also lives in a “converted Campbell soup can” in, believe it or not, Paradise Cove?

    I thought about inviting you to see my 2,000-plus-square-foot “converted Campbell soup can” to change your mindset, but I decided it would probably be a waste of time.

    Mmmmm, good.

    Ruby Fader

    Dense brush along Kanan Corridor heightens fire threat to west Malibu communities

    0

    Spared by the fires of recent years and now densely packed with dried brush, the hills along Kanan Road are this season’s primary passageway for a potential wildfire burning from inland to the sea. Consequently, Malibu-based L.A. County fire officials are keeping a close eye on those hills, which they call the “Kanan Corridor.”

    Uncontained fires originating in or near the Kanan Corridor have, because of wind patterns, historically threatened Malibu Park, Trancas Canyon and Broad Beach.

    “We’ve had fires out at the western end [October 1993], in Topanga [November 1993] and the Calabasas fire [October 1996] ” said Cliff Sybert, a county fire battalion chief. “Kanan has the oldest brush and the oldest dead material.”

    Fire officials have set controlled fires along Kanan Road to create buffer zones against rapidly-moving wildfires. “Any fuel we can remove slows the fire down,” said Sybert.

    The prescribed burns, some as large as 100 acres, were conducted in the early morning hours on five occasions in August.

    The National Park Service and the county are also coordinating a prescribed burn in Zuma Canyon, planned for later this month. Charlie Whitman, a prescribed-burn technician with the park service, said the controlled burn there was held off until September because the moisture level in the canyon’s lush plant life was too high from the heavy rains earlier this year.

    “The moisture level is down finally,” said Whitman. “El Nino, on the whole, did create a higher live fuel moisture.”

    The prescribed burns are set only under the strictest air quality and weather conditions. The AQMD will not permit the burns if the air is too smoggy, and fire officials will not conduct a controlled fire if wind speeds are too high or if the moisture level in the marine layer is too low.

    In addition to the prescribed burns, the fire department’s brush clearance unit inspected more than 2,000 properties to ensure that owners have removed brush from within 200 feet of their homes. Sybert said a few property owners refused to clear the brush themselves. Those landowners were fined $400 for the cost of county workers removing the brush, and their cases were referred to the city attorney’s office. City Attorney Christi Hogin is on vacation and could not be reached for comment.

    See related story, “Life and Arts”

    Snake got it, says Whooo?

    0

    It is still unclear how the owl wound up with a gopher snake wrapped around it. As owls and snakes share a taste for rodents, they could have had a dispute over breakfast — jockeying for position on the food chain.

    On the other hand, owls have been known to eat snakes, so it’s possible this owl tried to bite off more than it could chew, so to speak. Gopher snakes, unlike rattlesnakes which are pit vipers, are not poisonous, so their only defense against predatory birds is to constrict, wrap their coils around the attacker and squeeze.

    In any case, last Thursday morning, Marlon Peyton, who manages the Fauna Foundation animal rescue facility above Las Flores Canyon, came upon what he at first took to be a dead owl. “I was feeding the goats and the pigs when I saw the bird,” he said. “I thought it was dead, then I got closer and saw the snake. I asked Richard to give me a shovel. I couldn’t see what kind of snake it was.”

    Volunteer Richard Semenowicz, who has a particular affection for owls, came along and saw the snake coiled around the owl. “We touched the snake with a shovel, and then we could see it wasn’t a rattlesnake. It moved away into the bushes.

    “The owl was in shock. Then I saw she moved a little bit,” he said. “We netted it and called the wildlife rescue.”

    Rebecca Dmytryk came and took the owl to the California Wildlife Center in Malibu Canyon. From there it went to Conejo Valley Veterinary Hospital, where it rooms with another bird rescued the week before.

    “It looked like it was going to be all right,” Dmytryk said.

    Semenowicz’s theory is that the owl was hunting for rats or mice and that the snake was doing the same thing. Whether one of them had actually caught a rodent and the other tried to take it away is still a mystery. Peyton said he thinks the owl may have tried to grab the snake, not realizing how long it was.

    “It was three-and-a-half feet long at least,” Semenowicz said. “The owl was a mottled gray and quite big with beautiful eyes. I’m an owl lover. I live up the hill and we see owls here all the time. I hear them talking.”

    Well, the other owls certainly have something to talk about now. Trouble is, without an avian interpreter, no one is likely to find out whooo attacked whom.

    Caught on video

      0

      Though not currently a resident of Malibu I must voice my shock and dismay at the Road Worriers seemingly below cost video produced for their cause. Whatever merit their committee had is gravely undermined and overshadowed by their callous, indeed scandalous manipulation of the democratic process.

      I think there should be a recall and another election. It’s bad enough that this type of sleaze occurs on national and state levels; but you must draw the line at the local level.

      Vive democracy! Censure to the oligarchy!

      Michael McTague

      Caltrans nixes third lane on PCH

      0

      It’s a question that has been on the mind of every Malibu motorist since the summer began: When will we see the opening of that long-awaited, temporary third lane on PCH? The answer is — we won’t.

      With many residents ready to blow their gaskets, the second question is: How long will we be down to just two lanes? That answer — a lot longer than expected, possibly into next year.

      Caltrans has nixed the idea of adding an additional lane to accommodate rush-hour traffic, citing further delays in its hillside grading project at Las Flores. “It’s pretty much a definite decision,” says Caltrans spokeswoman Margie Tiritilli. “What we’re trying to do is get the work done as quickly as possible.”

      Said City Manager Harry Peacock, “The downside of opening a third lane is slowing down the project in the rainy season.”

      In addition to restricting the work space for construction crews and their equipment, reconfiguration to accommodate a third lane could prove potentially dangerous. “It’s a matter of safety,” explained Assistant Resident Engineer Edmond Matevosian. “We cannot remove those sea trains [cargo containers] until the majority of the dirt is gone.”

      Caltrans says the work has reached the halfway mark, with approximately 173,000 cubic yards of dirt cleared as of last week and another 170,000 cubic yards yet to go. Even so, removing all the dirt and debris is only part of the project. The area will have to be given proper drainage, as well as erosion control. Plans for a pair of concrete retaining walls have yet to be finalized.

      Even though the work continues daily, a completion date could be months away. Everything from a rough patch of terrain to an afternoon rain shower could postpone the project. For that reason, there are no easy estimates. “Optimistically,” says Matevosian, “end of December — optimistically. Realistically — mid-February.”

      The assistant engineer, however, did have some good news to report. According to soil testers and engineering assessments, the hillside has stabilized. One bluff-top property, it appears, will also be spared. There had been some discussion about the removal of another home on Sierks Way and the purchase of an adjacent vacant lot, but that may not be necessary. “They’ll stay,” he said. Two homes that were coming close to the point of collapse were purchased and demolished by Caltrans earlier this year.

      Mammoth traffic jams, meantime, have become as familiar to Malibu as the dolphins and the high tide. On Sunday afternoon, campers and convertibles, motorcycles and MTA buses spent another day idling in the summer sun. The squeeze after Big Rock created a standstill that stretched back to Topanga, and there seems to be no end in sight. With luck and cooperation from Mother Nature, it could be over by the end of the year. Without luck and cooperation, we could be inching toward the millennium on a very rocky road.

      Pole politics

        0

        Dear Mary,

        I cannot resist the temptation to respond to your problems as described in The Malibu Times Aug. 13 edition, mostly because we seem to share the same misery, in a way.

        It may be of some comfort to know that when compared to my efforts to be heard by anyone, you have managed to do so. Congratulations are in order, but you have been given the same snow job from Edison that I have had to live with for 25 years, the article implies that I do not exist, another lie?

        When I bought my home there were two high-tension lines over the house, a year later, two telephone lines were installed, 10 feet above my roof, without my permission to do so (and without title rights).

        Next, three cable lines and telephone lines directly in front of my house. Next, extending the height of a pole to add more lines with two tees, and the addition of a large transformer. All visibly destroying any view that I once had.

        There are so many lines attached to one pole, the pole is bending under the strain, and that pole supports the high-voltage lines over my house.

        They do not permit any camouflage for me, they are up here two and three times a year cutting everything down that gets near a pole. And in doing so, have gone through my roof, causing me to replace same, and then they deny!

        I live in a prison of telephone poles and California Edison knows it, and they also know that they have reduced my property value to zero. I have no view left, and no one cares, no one.

        Doris K. Janis

        Farewell Malibu

          0

          After 24 happy years in Malibu, my wife and I are packing up and moving to Leisure World in Laguna Hills. This is a voluntary action on our part and has not been caused by all the unrest that has been our history since we’ve become a city.

          In that regard, let me say that I’ve been an activist for those who have been for slow growth in Malibu. I’ve been accused by the opposition of being part of the “show business” mafia. I’ve been called all sorts of names in “Letters to the Editor” by those who disagreed with my position. Even that was all right. I just considered the source.

          However, I don’t want to leave with a bad taste in my mouth. I met a lot of wonderful people over the years and to all of them I want to thank them for having the best interest of Malibu in their hearts.

          They at least tried to do their best for all of Malibu. To my buddy Walt Keller, Carolyn Van Horn, Joan House, Tom Hasse and Harry Barovsky, I want to say that I appreciate all of your efforts. Your job isn’t easy, but at least you were noticed by those you were elected to serve.

          Even with fires, slides, quakes, “Pacific Closed Highway” and all of the other troubles we’ve run into, they all pale compared to the beauty of Malibu. We’re going to miss it but we’re looking forward to Laguna and making a new home there.

          So again, to all of you, we want to wish you all well and we know that we leave Malibu in good hands. To a happy future.

          Lynne and Bill Egar

          ×