Home Blog Page 7033

Pollsters find their calling in parks bond

0

The City Council Monday approved a set of questions for an opinion poll that will be conducted next week to find out whether voters would support a bond measure for parks, ball fields and the restoration of wetlands.

The telephone poll will be conducted in the early evening hours of Nov. 14. About 400 randomly selected, registered voters will be interviewed for approximately 15 minutes.

The survey questions deal largely with a possible $30 million bond measure on next year’s ballot and the increased taxes that will be used to pay off the bond.

The city would like to know whether residents are willing to pay higher taxes in order to purchase property for the creation of parks and recreation space, and the restoration of wetlands. The properties in which the council is most keenly interested, the Chili Cook-Off site and the parcel in the Civic Center west of Stuart Ranch Road, are slated for development by the Malibu Bay Company.

Poll participants will hear either the arguments for or against the possible measure, and they will be asked to judge the arguments’ strengths and weaknesses. Participants will also be asked whether they would support, as an alternative to the bond measure, developers donating park land to the city in return for the right to develop their property at a higher density.

The council members had planned to also ask Point Dume residents their opinion of speed tables, but Councilman Harry Barovsky led an effort to have those questions removed from the survey. The potential development in the city and the possible acquisition of open space “is the single most important issue the city is going to face now, and in the future,” he said.

In other matters, the council awarded grants to three nonprofit organizations in the community. The Malibu Stage Company received $24,000 to assist with finishing the construction of its theater near Point Dume. The California Wildlife Center was awarded $10,000 for a hospital to treat injured wild animals, and the Malibu Agricultural Project’s Cornucopia Farms received $5,000 to pay for administrative expenses as it works to establish an organic garden and farmers’ market.

During the discussion, Councilwoman Carolyn Van Horn disclosed, to the apparent surprise of her colleagues and city staff, that she is vice president of the Malibu Agricultural Project. She asked City Attorney Christi Hogin whether she should recuse herself from the vote on the grants. Hogin said that Van Horn should not participate in any discussion on the matter, and she suggested Van Horn leave the dais.

“Mere membership in a community group is not a problem, but being on the board of one does create a problem,” Hogin said.

During public comment, resident Marissa Coughlin said she felt the city had not widely publicized the availability of grants for nonprofit organizations, and she asked the city to better publicize the next time grants are available.

“I’m concerned that council members are only approaching certain groups with that information,” she said.

The council also named its appointments for the new city commissions. The new commissioners are listed below. The council member who appointed the commissioner is indicated in parentheses.

Public Safety Commissioners:

Ryan Embree (Councilman Tom Hasse)

Edward Albert (Van Horn)

Carol Randall (Barovsky)

Dan Hillman (Mayor Pro Tem Walt Keller)

Alan Carson (Mayor Joan House)

Telecommunications Commissioners:

Nidia Birenbaum (Hasse)

Patricia Hart (Van Horn)

Georgianna McBurney (Barovsky)

Efrom Fader (Keller)

No appointment yet (House)

Public Works Commissioners:

Libby Sparks Lippman (Hasse)

John Wall (Van Horn)

Don Wallace (Barovsky)

Frank Basso (Keller)

No appointment yet (House)

Parks and Recreation Commissioners:

Dermot Stoker (Hasse)

Sam Kaplan (Van Horn)

No appointment yet (Barovksy)

Ted Bale (Keller)

No appointment yet (House)

Valuing the vote

0

Tuesday, Nov. 3, was a particularly wonderful day to be an elementary school principal in Malibu. The voters in Santa Monica and Malibu once again overwhelmingly passed a bond issue that will help us serve our students and their families in the manner that they deserve. The four public schools in Malibu will also be able to offer new and improved facilities to the entire community. On behalf of everyone associated with Webster Elementary School, the other schools in Malibu, and the rest of our school district, I thank you.

For the teachers, the classroom aides, the custodians, the office staff and all of the other people who work in our schools, this vote has great significance. We see it as an expression of the community’s belief in the work we do every day. We try to work together with each family in the best interests of each child. We try to be open to suggestions and be flexible while at the same time establishing and enforcing high standards. We try very hard to work with groups and individuals in the community while asking for their support. These are all complex tasks and we understand that we will not always be perceived as positively as we would like. When the public has an opportunity to vote on indebting themselves to benefit our schools, we recognize that this will only happen if most people have confidence in the job we are doing.

At the same time, the vote for Proposition X reminds us of the high expectations our community has for its schools. Only the best is good enough for parents in Malibu. We wouldn’t want it any other way. We are committed to providing our students and our community with a genuine return on their investment in us.

I had the opportunity to make phone calls to a number of you in the weeks before the election and I want to apologize to the people whom we bothered during dinner or even during the World Series. I had many very enjoyable conversations, particularly with retired folks living in the Point Dume Club. It was so gratifying to hear so many people with grown children state unequivocally that the school bond was the most important issue on the ballot. In Malibu, maybe we are one of the few places where people are thoughtful enough to listen to the wisdom of our elders.

Again, to all of you who voted for Proposition X, thank you. We will do everything we can to continue to be worthy of your confidence in us.

Philip Cott

principal, Webster School

Help Hondurans

0

We have received a desperate plea for cash donations from the Los Angeles Honduran consulate, Vivian Panting. Truckloads of food and medical supplies sit in Los Angeles storage facilities waiting to be shipped. Chartering a 727 costs upwards of $170,000. Commercial airlines are not going to the area. The Chiquita Banana Company has offered to ship relief goods to Central America from Miami, but how do the goods get to Miami? There is a great deal of confusion and political variables that compound the disaster.

We have been working with the Honduran consulate for the past week. She is overwhelmed with the reality that “my people are dying.” The Hondurans have been the hardest hit country in Central America, where 9000 persons have perished, 13,000 are missing, and 80 percent of the country and farmlands have been destroyed.

Negotiations are taking place between the four Central American countries involved, Honduras, Nicaragua, Guatemala, and El Salvador to divide the donations on a per need basis. Some of the high profile and highly efficient groups such as “Project USA” as seen on KCET’s “Life and Times” are focusing exclusively on Nicaragua. That is why we want to do what we can for the Honduran relief effort. We are a totally volunteer effort working directly with the Honduran Consulate — 100 percent of the funds we collect will go directly to them to be used to deliver emergency relief to Honduras.

If you can, please act now with a tax-deductible contribution to “Earth Trust Fund” (designate for Honduran Emergency Relief) and mail to: Earth Trust Foundation/Honduras, P.O. Box 6022 Malibu, CA 90264. (Please note 90264 is correct.) Cash or check donations can also be left at the Mail Boxes, Etc. next to the Malibu Hughes Market.

If you have questions or would like to help distribute flyers (or have a friend with a 727), call Valerie at 310-457-5202, Mona at 310-457-1614, or Oscar at his VM – 213-690-1841 now.

Thank you for reading this appeal.

Valerie Sklarevsky

Mona Loo

Oscar Mondragon

What should they know and when should they know it?

0

Whether sex education and sexuality is taught in Malibu public schools is not an issue. Parents, teachers and students all seem to agree they want such instruction. They do not flinch at discussion of body parts and how they work. What has triggered intense and often emotional debate is how much and how soon, and, in particular, who is qualified to teach?

Author Suzi Landolphi’s one-hour “Sexplanations” for high school students, and a scaled-down version for grades 6 to 8, has now been viewed by parents, a few student leaders, church leaders, health professionals and teachers. Parents of Malibu High School and Middle School students have been encouraged to see the presentation and participate in discussions about it before signing consent forms for their children to attend the voluntary assembly.

MHS Principal Mike Matthews proposed to the school’s Site Governance Council before its Nov. 4 meeting (with copies of the proposal sent to parents) that Landolphi’s presentation would be shown after school Nov. 13 for high school and Nov. 10 for middle school, with late buses provided for students who chose to attend. He also proposed that after the assemblies, psychologists, counselors and health professionals would be available to answer questions; that students could attend only if one parent had attended one of Landolphi’s presentations; that the presentations be video taped and available for sale at cost to parents to help in discussions with their children; and that the school would immediately begin work on improving its comprehensive sexual education program.

The Governance Council, which includes students, parents and faculty and is chaired by Laure Stern, last week heard statements from parents on the proposed compromises. About 40 parents, who were allowed one minute to speak, also turned in printed copies of their remarks. Most seemed to want Landolphi’s presentation, although there has been strong opposition from some who say Landolphi misrepresented her credentials and has made so many changes, or deletions, that it now will last only 45 minutes, and parents who saw the first versions will not know what their children will see.

The ASB president, a senior, said he is strongly in favor of Landolphi’s presentation and objected to the onsite counseling. “There is a war and an epidemic going on,” he said. “We don’t need to be debriefed as though this was a bombing or shooting on campus.”

School board member Todd Hess weighed in with a letter to Matthews saying he has “great reservations about the Sexplanation program. . . .I believe there is implied and overt endorsement of sexual activity in the program and therefore by you, by the school and by the district.”

The council voted to go ahead with the presentation, but reportedly did not further discuss content at that meeting. It is scheduled to be shown at assemblies during school hours the first full week in December.

The way things are

0

I am writing in response to your “Conservancy Counters Ramirez Protests” article of Oct. 22, 1998. As a 20-year Ramirez Canyon resident, some facts and clarification regarding the conservancy’s response are in order.

1) Ms. Soghor states, “The real nuisance is the protesters. . . .” The neighborhood has staged one peaceful protest, no weddings have ever been disrupted and no threats have been made.

2) Ms. Collins states, “The center has not done anything differently since its opening . . . . nothing has changed except the neighbors’ behavior.” The center has done nothing except to continue to not comply with coastal rules and zoning laws. The have increased the use of our road exponentially. They have filled vans full of their catered guests and party equipment, tables, caterers, film crews, lighting, musicians, etc. to the point where legitimate neighbors who wish to take a walk on their road (this is our sidewalk) with their children or dogs cannot do so for the speeding traffic (people and dogs have been hit by speeding conservancy traffic), noise, congestion and continuous smell of diesel fuel. One van driver said he alone had made 35 trips for one event at the Streisand Center and had carried more than 200 people into a wedding; the conservancy denies any misuse by saying only 15 vans are used without telling actual numbers of trips each van takes. We are still waiting to get the real figures, which they have delayed providing us. They advertise our private road on websites for weddings, sales of T-shirts, film shoots, etc. We do not have a moment’s peace for the barrage of conservancy activity and looky-loos.

Our neighborhood is sick and tired of this continual onslaught all day and all night. Fifteen-foot trucks idle in front of our houses after midnight; the sheer size has broken some of our ancient oak trees and one of our bridges, and the constant loud noise late into the evenings of bands playing is incredible. To call them about the noise during an event is to reach an answering machine; they simply disregard the neighborhood altogether.

3) Coastal Commissioner John Hisserich states that with respect to compliance with laws regulating commercial activities, “Any enforcement action is an extremely low priority.” Why is it that if we want to move a fence or add a carport we need coastal approval, but when a fellow state agency, the Santa Monica Mountains Conservancy, changes the entire character of a sensitive habitat into that of a convention center, it is a “low priority”? Wasn’t the Coastal Commission designed to protect our environment? The facts are that the SMMC is breaking the law! They have not done what any resident would be required to do — follow zoning and obey coastal regulations. The fact is that our neighborhood is paying for the SMMC to maintain their offices (into which they moved secretly at night) in a compound that is way beyond their means; they are ruining our environment to do so. This is not a set of buildings used in any environmental way, for study or conservancy purposes — its sole use is to house the offices of the conservancy elite and their attorneys. What happened to the agency that was supposed to preserve the environment? Why does one of the most sensitive beautiful quiet habitats in rural Malibu have to be demolished to support Mr. Edmiston having his, and his affiliates, offices in Barbra Streisand’s home?

Lotte Cherin

Too much, too soon

0

I attended the introduction to Sexplanations intended for the junior high school students last Thursday night. While I think the intent is positive, making young people aware of the dangers of “sex,” and parts of the program dealing with the emotional and peer pressure problems of teen-agers is beneficial, I strongly believe that the subject material for 11- and 12-year-old girls is not age appropriate.

After the Thursday night sessions, I spoke to my daughter (12 years old) about the class and what she knew. She knew of the class and definitely does not want to go. It is a subject that she is not interested in yet. What I found out is that she has learned in fourth and fifth grade the details of “how babies get made” but she has no idea of the details of sex that your speaker is going to discuss and she is not interested in them at this time.

Age appropriate may cover a big range of children and therefore the subject can be all over the map. My daughter is not ready for understanding the sensitive areas of a man’s penis and that she actually has a clitoris that can be stimulated to orgasm to give her great joy. My wife is European and grew up in a very open and liberal home. She was surprised to see people wearing tops at the beach when she first came here. She is teaching our children a lot of this European freedom about body, mind and soul. Yet the Sexplanation class is something she does not feel comfortable about for our daughter at this time.

Has the “Big O” come to the Malibu Junior High? It is enough that women and men have to spend so much of their time trying to figure out how to have great orgasms. It is incredible that our school system thinks that this is a subject that our 11- and 12-year-old daughters should be educated on and to start to worry about. The instructor was so enthusiastic of the great pleasure orgasms can give a girl or boy and how healthy it is. Our children will surely ask why as loving parents we have not discussed orgasms with them before since they are so healthy to little children.

And since the high school program will go into greater details on masturbation, oral sex and as the literature says, the correct way of putting your fingers inside of yourself, this information will surely filter down to the junior high students. These subjects are not “age appropriate” for our 11- and 12-year-old children. Creating an environment where the parents can discuss this information, at the appropriate time with their children is positive. This on campus Sexplanations seminar in sexual awareness takes the responsibility away from the parents. Possibly some parents welcome the opportunity to have someone else do the job for them. Fine, however this should then occur in an afternoon workshop not during regular school hours.

I believe some of this material may be age appropriate for high school students who are definitely more interested in this subject. However, I believe the really essential point is completely being missed. Teenagers do things because they want to be loved, they want to fit in, they want to be part of the in group, and because of peer pressure. The idea they are making decisions on who to sleep with because of having an orgasm is ridiculous. 11- and 12-year-old girls are not out to satisfy their sexual longings and find out how to satisfy their sexual urges. They are worried about getting their first menstrual period! It may be the boys who want to experiment and they are trying any number of methods to convince the girls to go “all the way” with them or to just let them “touch” them.

By making this part of the junior high school program, you are condoning and approving of this behavior. You are pushing many children into information they are not ready for or do not want. Do they have to be protected from their classmates, who are so knowledgeable and after them to have sex. I do not know. I do know that the school is giving them information on how to sexually please themselves before they are even dating. This is definitely not age appropriate.

Before any program like this is approved for our children it should have had much more parent input on the content. It was announced and it was presented as a “done deal.” It was set and now we have the choice to send our children or not. However a lot of children that do not want go or their parents do not want them to go, will feel very awkward about this. Why, do I ask, is this necessary? Peer pressure is already going around the school of who is going and who is not. And if you do not go, you will hear about it from your friends or be teased about it from others.

This class should be given only after school for those who want to attend either by themselves or with their parents. Then the parents can discuss it with their children and build the positive communication that we all believe is the key to solving some of these problems.

Unless the course content is changed to be more appropriate for our children, I am firmly against this material being presented at Malibu schools.

Nick Bassill

Rebuilding the neighborhood

0

The fifth anniversary this week of the most devastating fire in Malibu’s history marks a milestone for those survivors who have rebuilt and for those who could not.

Driven by 60-mile-per-hour Santa Anas, the firestorm raced in from the Valley, tore through the Santa Monica Mountains and down to Pacific Coast Highway in a matter of hours. When it was over, three people were dead and 350 homes were destroyed.

Connie Cornett stood in the parking lot of the old Sea Lion restaurant (now Duke’s) on that windy afternoon and watched her possessions go up in smoke. Cornett and her husband, Fred, lost everything, including a prized $45,000 piano and family treasures. “100 percent,” she says of the loss. “We started from scratch.” The Cornetts rebuilt their home on Las Flores Mesa and returned 2 1/2 years ago. For them, the fire seems like ancient history, and they have gone on with their lives. “We’re very happy to be back,” Cornett says. “We don’t really dwell on it.”

On Rambla Vista, Zane Meckler shared a similar experience when flames jumped over to his street. As the neighborhood burned, Meckler raced inside to grab what he could. There wasn’t much. “We lost everything but our cat and a few miscellaneous papers,” he recalls. Giving up on Malibu crossed his mind, but not for long. “My wife came up afterwards. She looked at the panoramic views and said, ‘We’ve got to rebuild.” Like the Cornetts, Meckler and his wife, Lisette, spent about two years trying to get their lives back together.

But even after five years, there are plenty of painful reminders. There is the ghostly presence of lone chimneys and exposed foundations where houses used to be. Malibu Presbyterian Church pastor Dr. David Worth assisted many families who lost their homes. Not all of them decided to rebuild. “For me, that was one of the hardest things,” he recalls. “The number of people who left the community.” Still, Worth says, he is very proud of the way everyone in the city pulled together during a terrible crisis. “We had synagogues, churches, service clubs and schools all working as one.”

Within the city limits, 268 homes were destroyed by the fire. Building applications have been submitted for 186 of those properties, 167 permits have been issued and 118 have passed their final inspection. That still leaves more than 80 homes unaccounted for. According to Building and Safety Services Technician Donna Niemeyer, the property owners have apparently decided to sell or quit. “There’s no activity on those at all,” she says.

While the 1993 disaster seems like a distant memory for some, fire concerns are never far away. “You look at the brush all around,” Meckler observes, “That’s a real good indication that some people haven’t learned their lesson.” Vegetation management expert John Thomas agrees. “After a fire everyone is gung ho about clearance,” he says. “But people get more and more lax every year that goes by without one. It’s just human nature.”

Many residents know that a repeat performance is always a possibility. But even with the danger, they say it is part of living in Malibu. After 45 years, Cornett is not about to change her mind. “Some people think we’re crazy,” she says. “But we think we belong here.”

Brotherly love

0

Be nice to your waiter. You never know what talents are burning behind the courtesy and attentiveness.

Azdine Melliti and James Jude Courtney worked together at BeauRivage 15 years ago. Now, they have a prize-winning film, playing weekends in Santa Monica.

“Le Magique” tells the story of a 10-year-old Tunisian boy whose parents must move to France to find work. They leave him behind to mind the house. He wanders into the nearby city and discovers the movies — the magic — which becomes his obsession and ultimate salvation.

In actuality, the film is Melliti’s autobiography. He was not eager to relive those times, but was prompted by co-writer Nina Jo Baker.

It’s a sweet film, a tender celebration of humanity. Melliti complains: “There are so many movies out there that deal with the violence, the sex, the violence, the sex. I ask, ‘Do you want to leave a filthy place for your children and grandchildren?'”

Courtney quotes Erasmus: “‘Focus on the light, and the darkness will disappear by itself.’ We’re not out to change the world.”

Melliti adds, “If we can change just one or two . . .”

“Or just ourselves,” Courtney says.

S

They formed Melliti Brothers Productions with Melliti’s brother Faical, who sold his limousine business to help finance the film. He says, “Every day, my brother was waiting for phone calls. I was prepared to do something. So I sold my company. I said, ‘What the heck, let’s do it.’ I don’t regret it.”

Melliti remarks, “It’s funny how my baby brother — the one who was sleeping through the whole thing in the movie — was the one who helped me.”

Melliti sold his car. The brothers “maxed out” their credit cards. They’re temporarily housed at Courtney’s Santa Monica apartment. Their friend Christian La Croix wired funds to the production company, “and we still don’t have a contract with him,” says Melliti.

They publicize the film by handing out fliers. Melliti promised a few moviegoers a money-back guaranty on it. The response overwhelms them. During their first weekend showing, a man offered $50 worth of printing for their fliers.

Melliti says he is rejuvenated when people tell him they love his movie. “People are so starved for these kinds of movies,” he says. Some have seen it five times, many others two or three times. The audiences are very mixed, of all ages and types. “Even punks,” says Melliti. “Wow, punks loving the movie?”

His family in Paris has seen the film. Their response? “We don’t talk about it,” he says. The story is still too painful for them, a reminder of an intensely impoverished life in which decisions were based on survival, not love.

S

As his character, Deanie, reflects, young Melliti’s childhood desire was to be intelligent. “I struggled for many years with being told, ‘You’re not articulate enough,'” he says. “In France, I was silent for many years. I thought they were going to laugh at me. The same when I came to the United States. I had the same experience in acting classes — they told me I had the emotion but I sounded stupid.”

One of five brothers, he is self-educated. He learned to read, he says, “by being rude — a pain in the butt — asking people, ‘What is this letter? What is the sound of this?'”

When he arrived in the U.S., he applied for a job at McDonalds — and was rejected. With a French sense of style, he would apply for busboy jobs smartly dressed and carrying himself well, and was asked, “Table for one?” Potential employers here treated him better than he was treated in France, he says. “Here, when you apply for a job, they don’t ask you were you’re from. There, if you’re not French, they won’t give you a job.”

Melliti got his “break” through producer/director Karen Arthur, a customer at BeauRivage “At that time,” he recalls, “she was directing ‘Hart to Hart.’ And that’s how I got my SAG card. That night was her birthday, and we gave her really great service. She was touched. James and I, we would go out of our way to make people feel great.” He also made appearances in her productions of “Remington Steele” and “Cagney and Lacey.”

He came to the U.S. to be an actor but became disappointed by his roles — typecast as an Arab and playing terrorists, rapists and drug dealers. So he decided to create his own film work.

These days, he lives in Mammoth Lakes with his wife, Susan Hartunian, a surgeon, and their 4-year-old daughter, Najet.

S

Courtney was raised in Columbia, S.C., the eldest of seven boys. His Irish mother was told she could never have children. She prayed to St. Jude, and Courtney came along. Her physician said, “That’s nice, but it will never happen again.” She gave birth to six more boys.

“Everything my parents did was focused on getting us educations and keeping us solid,” he says.

As a result, or despite this, Courtney took hold of his father’s movie camera and made his first movie when he was 11, coincidentally at the same age Melliti made his first “movie” — drawings passed in front of a flashlight. “All my school projects were films,” Courtney says. “My mom would be the cameraman, my dad gave me an editing machine. We’d experiment with light.”

He notes that he and his brothers are entrepreneurial. “That’s because we felt secure. I think that comes from love and respect and a strong commitment to education.”

He attended the University of South Carolina, where he studied broadcast journalism. “Then I stayed to study everything that had to do with film,” he says. After touring the country on a motorcycle, he found Los Angeles. While at BeauRivage, he was hired for stunt work at Universal Studios. Then came acting jobs, including work in “When a Man Loves a Woman” and “Far and Away,” and television appearances in “Knotts Landing” and “General Hospital.”

He, too, started writing because he got tired of playing small roles. He continues working as a stuntman, he says, “to pay the bills,” doubling for Garibaldi on “Babylon 5.” He also studies aikido, as well as naturopathic medicine and contact reflex analysis, and he practices reiki (hands-on healing).

His mother was a peace activist in Belfast. In the U.S., she co-founded a program to bring Irish children — Protestant and Catholic — to summer camp. Now, Courtney and Melliti are working on a film about the IRA. “The idea,” Courtney says, “is to get past the place where we need to destroy.”

Of Melliti, he says, “He’s been a very generous friend to me. He’s my brother in the true sense of the word.”

S

It took the “brothers” five years to complete Le Magique.

To begin, Melliti placed an ad in the Tunisian newspaper looking for actors, and 100 people responded, all nonactors. The only character he could not seem to cast was Deanie. One day, one of the boys brought a friend. “I looked at the kid, and my heart started pounding,” Melliti says. Coincidentally, the child had also been abandoned by his parents.

“He brought a lot of emotion to the film,” says Courtney. Melliti adds, “And the boy who plays Caesar [Deanie’s best friend] too. His mom and dad are separated. He’s a computer genius. The boy who plays me is a writer; he writes children’s books.”

The young girl who plays Deanie’s love interest is Melliti’s niece. “In the movie, they’re supposed to love each other,” he says. “In reality, they hate each other. On the set, they were fighting. And in the movie, she’s supposed to hate Caesar, and they were great friends.”

Melliti worked with the kids for months, until he decided they were ready. They improvised, and Melliti wrote scenes for them.

“I wanted it to be fresh for the movie,” he says. “I developed a very close relationship with the actors. When it was time for a scene, I worked with each actor alone and brought the tone for whatever it was. I never wanted, per se, for them to do certain things. I never told them to cry. I told them, ‘Give me whatever you’re feeling, and I’ll buy it.’ I showed them the road, but I never told them . . . “

“. . . how to travel it,” Courtney says.

Melliti did not intend to act in his own movie. “I hired an actor, who never showed up to the set,” he says. He plays Caesar’s bitter, widowed father. “I had an hour to prepare. I was bigger than the other guy, and the pants didn’t fit.”

S

Of his work at BeauRivage, Melliti says, “It was one of my best experiences in L.A.” Says Courtney, “They were really great people. Martin Sheen.”

“Yeah. Martin Sheen,” says Melliti. “He’s a really great guy.”

“Leo Penn,” Courtney continues. “Larry Hagman.”

“Yeah,” Melliti says. “He was a really nice man.”

“Tipped a lot.”

“Yeah. So did Martin Sheen.”

“Le Magique” shows Saturdays and Sundays at 11 a.m. at the Laemmle Monica 4, 1332 Second Street, Santa Monica. Tel. 310/394- 9741.

Caltrans clears out, beats own deadline

0

After five months of dirt and drama, the iron curtain is coming down. On Monday, three days ahead of its projected deadline, Caltrans plans to reopen Pacific Coast Highway to four lanes and get Malibu moving again.

Cleaning up a massive landslide at Las Flores Canyon has been an on-going nightmare for residents, businesses, construction crews and law enforcement officials alike. Two homes were demolished, 300,000 cubic yards of dirt were hauled away and the entire hillside was reshaped.

Commuters sat through daily traffic jams that often stretched for miles. The situation proved especially frustrating for business owners. Between summer slides, construction work and the aftermath of El Nino, restaurants and retail stores saw their sales drop. Now, many of them are banding together with the Chamber of Commerce to send a different message — Malibu is back.

They plan to mark the occasion with fun, fanfare and appearances on the evening news. Everyone from celebrities to family pets have been invited to attend a ribbon-cutting ceremony, set for 9 a.m. in the parking lot at Duke’s.

Malibu businesses have paid for balloons and streamers, coffee and croissants, as well as hundreds of T-shirts that read, “Welcome to Malibu — the coast is clear.”

The group, which calls itself Destination Malibu, consists of BeauRivage, Casa Malibu, Duke’s Malibu, Fins, Geoffrey’s, The Godmother, Granita, Image Maker Publishing, La Salsa, Malibu Bay Co., Malibu Beach Inn, Malibu Country Inn, The Malibu Times, Marmalade, Moonshadows, Reel Inn and Taverna Tony.

Despite initial concerns that rain and construction problems could drag the $20-million project into the new year, the work is actually wrapping up two days ahead of schedule. Many locals are expected to turn up for the event, including Wolfgang Puck, David Foster and Kenny G.

According to Granita’s Jannis Swerman, this show of civic pride will demonstrate the need to keep our highways “safe, clear and operable for residents, children and businesses,” and to change Malibu’s disaster prone image into one of “a strong, small-town community working together.”

Childish support

0

How immature of the Malibu City Council to run an ad supporting one political candidate over another. No wonder no one seems to take the council seriously. I cannot recall in recent history where a governing body of a city or a state has ever run such an ad. What happens if the opposing candidate gets into office — how should they feel toward such a city? Ladies and gentlemen, “grow up,” this is not a high school race! Incidentally, I would have written this letter even if you supported Randy Hoffman.

Ron Lawrence

×