Home Blog Page 6980

The ‘Bu-Man Show

0

This week, we’re holding workshops on the Malibu Civic Center Specific Plan. We’re going to hear about our town’s future. What do we want our town to be? Whom do we want to live here? What do we want it to look like?

Think about the possibility of a town center with small, narrow streets. A limited amount of traffic. Charming little clusters of homes. Small stores around a little town square and park. No tourists. No outsiders. Racial harmony. Friendly neighbors. No homeless. No poverty. No discord. A town where calamity is banished. All sitting on a balmy ocean. And then add the sound of waves lapping at the shore. And in the background, marvelous sunsets.

Sound perfect? Sound like the ideal beachside community? Sound like Malibu?

If you want to know what that kind of community would really be like, don’t waste your time going to the city workshops. Instead, take yourself down to the Malibu Theatre and see a very funny, very disturbing movie, ‘The Truman Show.’

Set in themythical town of Seahaven Island (actually a real seaside town in Florida), the movie is about a make-believe world that’s really a TV set for the world’s highest-rated show, The Truman Show. Jim Carrey plays the star of the TV show, but he doesn’t know it. Everyone in his life is an actor except him, but he doesn’t know it. Everything in his world is controlled, but he doesn’t know it. Whatever he does is followed by 5,000 cameras. He’s totally secure and totally without a life.

The movie is a farce. But how farcical is it really? Look around us. There are lots of Seahaven Islands.

Everywhere you look, there are walled communities. Private police forces. Surveillance cameras. Someone watching to make sure that our lives are protected and isolated from risk. Like Truman, people are afraid to go outside of their walls, and they certainly don’t want anyone else to come in.

Let’s not create a Seahaven Island in the center of Malibu.

I’d like to offer a few proposals.

That we consider some diversity in our community. Age diversity. Income diversity. Racial diversity.

That we get away from the total dependence on the automobile and design a Civic Center where people can live, work, eat, walk, sit at a cafe, go to a movie and maybe a play, and create a town that’s really a town and not a suburb with a few shops for necessities and some overpriced T-shirt shops.

We ought to have a town center with a place for the senior citizens to go and children to play and teen-agers to hang out and the rest of us to just walk around and look. We ought to have a park in the Civic Center.

We ought to have a town center with some way to handle sewage other then septic systems, because it’s become apparent to all of us that in the town center, the septics are all failing. They’re old and tired, and it’s getting too crowded for them to work effectively anymore. We don’t need a scientific study to tell us that. Just follow your nose any weekend afternoon.

In order to get some of these things, we’ve got to let go of the 1940s and the 1950s, when we isolated residential from commercial, got into our cars, separated the ages and ended up with many communities that are sterile, automobile-centered and empty at night.

We’ve got a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity coming our way to make our town what we want it to be. Let’s not blow it by opting for some cold, guarded, homogeneous hodgepodge, designed by a committee to try and make everybody happy and in the end probably not pleasing anyone.

Four times a dad, by choice

0

Marty Warner seems like your ordinary actor. A life in the business, kids in the business, even a home on the beach. He says he has four kids, the last two are 10 years old. “Twins?” one asks politely. “No. My kids are all adopted,” he answers. Suddenly, he’s no mere mortal.

“Yeah, we’re crazy,” he says, but then adds, “It was the best thing I ever did.”

His daughter Zoe most recently appeared in Malibu writer/director Alice Champlin’s “Random Acts of Evil,” and also appeared on “MAD TV.” “She’s not booking anything lately,” says dad. His elder son, Flynn, 15, has appeared on a series for Nickelodeon. Reno, 12, and Teal, 10, share the family business and the penchant for unusual names.

The kids are home-schooled. “We were running around so much,” says dad of the different schools and sports. He makes sure they have outdoor time: “My idea of the beach used to be lying in bed, listening to it. Then we had kids, and now we’ve got to go out.”

He has been married, “for longer than most people,” to photographer Susan Warner. The family lives in Malibu but keeps an apartment in Hollywood “for the 9 a.m. rehearsal calls.”

Born in Brooklyn, he says, “I was there until I could get on the subway by myself. [My family was] nice, but they weren’t very creative.” He lived in the east village and worked in a bookstore, into which walked Susan. “We talked about how we didn’t have to talk about things,” he reports. They were married six months later.

On Father’s Day, Warner will be starring in “My Client’s a Lunatic.” To prepare for his role as plaintiff’s attorney, he says he has observed attorneys in court. He also says he understands women. “Claudia’s husband in the play didn’t even know why she was making such a big deal. But I was right there from the beginning.

“Growing up in New York helps me with that,” he says. “Meeting all sorts of people, being nice to them, caring.” He terms his wife his best friend and equal.

He won the role thanks to his daughter, Zoe. She was auditioning at The Bitter Truth Theatre for Champlin. Audition notices were posted around the theater. Bitter Truth producer Leslie deBeauvais told him he missed the audition but invited him to the callbacks.

“I’ve never done so many words,” says the actor. “I thrive on film and TV — go in, do it, that’s the end of it. This is mondo words.” Warner is paired with Jillian McWhirter in an alternating cast, appearing every other performance through the play’s run.

He wouldn’t mind being more successful, but not just for the money. “If I had more money,” he says, “I guess I’d adopt more kids.” He does not understand how those with inordinate wealth can say they don’t know how to spend their money. “People should take time off, look for something and give it away,” he says. “I’d like to be able to set that example.”

What would he probably like for Father’s Day? “I’m looking for a really good agent,” he says.

“My Client’s a Lunatic” appears Sundays at 1 p.m., through July 26, at The Bitter Truth Theatre, 11050 Magnolia Blvd., North Hollywood. Telephone 818/766-9702.

Goo . . .

Parked in Paradise

0

Re the human interest story on the front page of your June 11 issue (“Powerless in Paradise” by Kim Devore), Mrs. Booth has managed to park her trailer, her three children and her horse in the middle of what was once the location of a lovely home with a pool and, not mentioned in your article, a panoramic ocean view. This was once a very desirable piece of property.

Mrs. Booth has been there well over the time allotted for a building permit to run its course. From your article, it appears that she has neither the resources nor the intention of building a home on this burnout lot. Yet, without the most basic permit she has been allowed to continue to live there in her trailer with her young children and her animals.

I am writing in support of the city of Malibu. My understanding is that trailer permits in neighborhoods designated for traditionally constructed houses are given to property owners who are in the process of building their homes. Those of us who have built in Malibu know that there are many hoops to jump through but the building regulations established by our city are there for a reason. Ultimately these regulations protect the integrity of our neighborhoods. They protect the safety, health conditions, environment and the investment that homeowners make in their property. No homeowner should be forced to have a trailer parked alongside their home indefinitely. Particularly one that is not meeting the minimum requirements set by our community standards.

I just wonder how the neighborhood in Thousand Oaks where Mrs. Booth used to live in a 6,000 square foot home would feel if she were living in her trailer there today. I even question if Mrs. Booth, would be pleased. Of course, it would not be tolerated by the city of Thousand Oaks. Why should it be acceptable in Malibu!

Keep Malibu A Paradise

Commission faces setbacks, votes for ease

0

The Planning Commission is working to make the process of building or modifying a home easier and less costly by allowing more flexibility in front-yard setbacks.

Commissioners voted Monday to recommend to the City Council a plan that would allow the planning staff to grant minor modifications to front-yard setbacks of up to 50 percent. Currently, a modification of only 20 percent is allowed. The idea is to streamline the process for property owners and to make it less expensive. “They’ll be able to get relief from front setbacks at lower costs and with a simpler burden of proof,” said Planning Director Craig Ewing.

Presently, to get a front setback reduction of more than 20 percent, a zoning variance is required. To get such a variance, a hardship must be established. That means a property owner must prove there is an unusual size, shape or characteristic of the property that makes it difficult to comply with the existing setback line. When applying for a minor modification, the owner need only show it is “compatible with the neighborhood,” said Ewing.

Ewing said the plan, if adopted by the City Council, would provide the greatest benefit to property owners in existing, established neighborhoods. Notice to the neighbors would still be required and neighbors would have the right of appeal to the Planning Commission. “It provides more flexibility,” said Ewing. “It’s still the community’s decision to decide how much relief and leeway they want to grant to property owners and what the rules should be for new development.”

In other business, the commission considered a request by a property owner who had been ordered, by the commission, to remove part of a building that encroaches on the adjacent property owner’s land. The commission had approved a tentative parcel map for the conversion of a 10-unit apartment building on Pacific Coast Highway into four condominium units. A portion of the building, built in 1954, encroaches on the adjacent property. The commission ordered the removal of the encroaching part of the building before the map could be recorded. Because removal of the building would be costly, the property owner is asking the commission to make that condition more flexible. He wants the option of a lot line adjustment.

“That encroachment has existed ever since the building was built in 1954,” said Allen Block, who represents the applicant. Block said his client has filed a lawsuit asking for an exclusive easement. He said he is hopeful the courts will grant the easement or redraw the property line. The owner also asked for the expiration date of the map to be extended for one year to allow for the time it will take for the matter to be settled.

Stephen Preston, who owns the adjacent property, said he offered to sell the land under the encroachment for the same price he paid. He said the building owner refused. “He came last year and got an extension and we just went backwards on the thing,” Preston said.

“I don’t see any forward motion or movement since last year,” said Commissioner Jo Ruggles. “I’m sorry this can’t be mutually agreed upon. . . . It’s in court and it really doesn’t matter what we say.”

“To go against it would be in effect to decide the case in Mr. Preston’s favor,” said Commissioner Ed Lipnick.

The commissioners voted in favor of the request.

The commission also heard a request for a variance to allow conversion of a three-unit apartment building on Malibu Road to a four-unit condominium and for a reduction in the required number of off-site parking spaces for the project.

“This situation exists up and down Malibu Road and I don’t believe that it would be fair to not allow my property the same privilege that’s allowed up and down the road,” said property owner Andy Gombiner. Attorney Richard Scott cited the Brian Fox variance as setting a precedent. “Off-site parking has been a rationale for approving variances for reduced parking in the city,” he said.

The planning staff had opposed the request, stating that the site is not physically suitable for the proposed density of development and that the design of the development could cause serious public health hazards because the additional parking demand would force cars to be parked off site, causing a further overcrowding of the road. Lipnick said he supported the staff’s decision because, “There is no off-site parking directly across from the subject property.” Lipnick said road shifting prevents parking on part of the street.

Staff also recommended that the request to convert from three units to four be denied. According to the staff report, “The granting of the variance could be detrimental to the public interest safety, health or welfare and it may be detrimental or injurious to the property or improvements in the same vicinity.” The report stated there were no hardships or exceptional characteristics applicable to the property and that the granting of the variance would constitute a special privilege to the property owner.

The commission voted to uphold the recommendations of the staff.

Rosie revived

0

We were moved and yet disgusted to read the letter by Rosie the dog. Rosie, you should be giving that animal vigilante lots of licks because in my opinion they may have just saved your life. Would you rather be picked up by a shovel on PCH where you have been splattered by a vehicle, or an animal vigilante (who has devoted their life to animals).

Based on Rosie’s letter, we have come to the overwhelming conclusion that Rosie’s human is really clueless. We regularly stop for animals out on a jaunt. That is because someone who loves them might be looking for them and they are potentially endangered by automobiles. Many of these animals have no identification tags and we are faced with the choice of taking on yet another dog ourselves, delivering them over the hill to the pound where they will be killed if not claimed or adopted, continue to let them roam further endangering their lives, or take them to a local animal vigilante for safe keeping until the owner can be located or the animal can be placed in a loving home.

Regarding Rosie’s puppies, we kindly ask anyone who allows their dog to have puppies, purebred or not, to visit any animal shelter. Walk through and look into the eyes of these precious, loving animals as they make eye contact with you almost piercing your soul. They want a loving home desperately and for each person who passes them by, it brings them closer to an unfortunate end. Tell us if you honestly believe that having your friends adopt your pups instead of one these poor dogs in our overcrowded shelters is the right and humane thing to do. If you still think so, try watching as a confused dog receives an injection that closes their eyes to this world for the last time and there are no more tail wags and licks and smiles. There is also overwhelming evidence that spaying and neutering protects animals from many diseases as well as may prolong their lives!

Rosie, we are very happy that you love your human, but you have a few very important things to teach them. You should not be allowed to wander on your own. You must have ID tags to avoid unfortunate incidents. Post flyers around the area where you live when you are missing. Finally, you should help save the lives of your friends by not having puppies. You and your human should be eternally grateful to the animal vigilante who just may have saved your life and prevented your pups from being orphans. I hope in some way you can understand the plight of those who devote their lives to and love animals.

Jack Anthony and Christie Carr

Sound matters

0

I would like to congratulate James Digby for being an aware human and not just “poo-pooing” the booming noise he and his wife have been hearing.

I would suggest that Mr. Digby call and write the Coastal Commission regarding this as well as the Naval Air Warfare Center Weapons Division at Point Mugu. I wrote the following letter to Point Mugu which mentions some of the current sound testings they are now doing. I encourage as many people as possible to constantly write, call, e-mail the Navy regarding this, as well as congress people, newspapers, etc.

Oh, and by the way, it is not good for the fish! — or our fragile ecosystem! Thanks for your awareness James Digby — please follow through and try to get others involved!

Naval Air Warfare Center Weapons Division

Point Mugu Sea Range EIS

521 Ninth Street

Point Mugu, Ca. 93042-5001

Attn: Cora Fields

Fax: 805-989-0143

Dear Ms. Fields:

Several weeks ago I wrote and faxed to you protesting the missile testing that was scheduled to take place at various sites in the Point Mugu and San Nicholas island area. I now am writing regarding the U.S. Navy beginning to activate its low frequency active sonar project (LFA) in the same locations!

Perhaps this might give me illusion that it is less menacing, however, according to the Navy’s own research, high intensity sound testing has caused permanent damage to human test subjects. Moreover, these waters are migration paths for whales and other creatures; plus the fact that these tests don’t just stay in one area but travel our oceans for miles and miles. It is an unconscionable act! We all share this planet together — life is cause and effect. The effect of these tests is catastrophic! We all have our function on this planet — think of the consequences in disturbing this balance!

We must protect our earth and the inhabitants of the oceans. As I stated in my last letter, America should be an example to the rest of the world — and protect all species by stopping all such devastating testings! We all live here together — the U.S. Navy is made up of people — please use your own integrity! I feel that we still have the opportunity to enter the 21st century with the balanced wisdom of aware human beings — protecting all the creatures of this planet! We all must protect our oceans, our earth, our universe! Please stop testing now!

Alessandra DeClario, Ph. D.

Business license proposal sparks debate

0

Bucking a nationwide trend towards working at home, the city has proposed requiring writers, artists and others who work at home to get business licenses.

With city officials in the dark about the number and variety of home-based businesses in Malibu, city staff, in conjunction with the Business Roundtable, is studying a licensing requirement for all businesses operating in Malibu, as a way of keeping track of commercial activity in residential areas.

Currently, the only licensed businesses in the city — restaurants, service stations and retailers who sell liquor — are licensed by the county.

City officials usually only learn of a home-based business if it is the kind that generates a high volume of commercial traffic and, consequently, neighbors complaining of a violation of zoning laws. At that stage, enforcing the zoning ordinance is more difficult. “By then,” said City Manager Harry Peacock, “the owner of the business can say, ‘I didn’t know I was violating the zoning laws. You’re taking away my livelihood. You’re starving my kids.’ “

If businesses were required to secure a license before setting up shop, then those planning to operate from their home would know if their business would run afoul of the zoning laws before they established its location.

A subcommittee of the Business Roundtable is studying what type of a license program it would recommend to the city. At the very least, the subcommittee plans to recommend that the city take over the licensing of those businesses the county currently regulates.

Mark Olson, chair of the subcommittee and past president of the Malibu Chamber of Commerce, said that if the city chooses to implement a business license fee for all businesses, he would recommend a nominal fee for most, and a different fee schedule for businesses that require more regulation, like contractors.

The city would adopt a business license program only if it could generate enough fees to cover the cost of administering the program. With recommended annual fees of $50 and exemptions for nonprofit organizations and businesses making less than $5,000 a year, the 1,300-or-so Malibu businesses may not be sufficient to make the program viable. But even with limited fees of $50, some members of the roundtable took issue with the notion of having to pay any money for a business license. “We’re talking about creating new fees that could snowball out of control,” said Kathryn Yarnell. “This is a whole new level of government, just to police business.”

×