Home Blog Page 6960

Shoot litterbugs, not deer

0

This is in response to the Jan. 20 letter from Jefferson Wagner, “Trash talk that helps.” His comments in his letter brought tears to my eyes. I, too, clean up the canyon road where I live and have been known to complain to anyone who will stand still long enough to listen, “I am mystified why many people visit Malibu for its beauty and leave their trash behind.”

Malibu is a magical, wondrous, incredible place to live, which is why so many want to move here, but once ensconced they decide they are not happy and want to change it. If they didn’t do their homework before moving to Malibu and find it’s not desirous to live under these rural conditions then leave it and live somewhere that already suits your wants and needs and leave it to people who want to live under these conditions.

As for the young deer shot in the side with an arrow, obviously for sport and fund, let’s do something about this. Whey should hunting be legal in our area? We the people need to take back control of the governmental laws that are made and change the for the betterment of all. Malibu is worth saving. Let us band together and fight for her.

Linda Joslynn

If he had a hammer

0

To those who don’t believe that the Malibu Zoning Code doesn’t need some changes, here’s a summary of the bizarre experience I had at the Zoning Department. This story is not written for amusement but to alert the people who live in Malibu that we are all under a financial uzi with the Zoning Department and its latest penalties. This could happen to anyone in the city who wants to do even a minor repair to their home.

I recently went down to the planning counter to ask about what would be required if I wanted to expand a bathroom in my 40-year-old, four-bedroom house. With a straight face, the young man behind the counter told me that I would need to get a complete geology report ($6,000), structural engineering drawings and other reports ($3,000), and pay application and inspection fees ($1,500).

As if spending $10,500 in studies and fees for a 100-square-foot addition wasn’t enough, then he told me that, of course, all of my property would have to be brought up to code. I live on three acres that are not visible to the road nor neighbors and the home was not built with a two-car garage. I said, “You mean I would have to build a two-car garage?” He said yes and that it would have to be a minimum of 600 square feet. Of course that would require a geology report, structural plans etc., and would probably cost in the range of $50,000. And I’m sure I’d have to remove my front security gate and build a new one because the old one is outside the newer setback ($10,000 with plans and fees).

Now I am looking at spending at least $70,000 before I even lift a hammer to my bathroom. But the worst part of it is that when the inspector comes to see what needs to be brought up to code, I’m sure he’ll find a dozen or more items that have been fine for 40 years but that he thinks need to be upgraded. Now if it turns out that I don’t feel like writing a check for $70,000 for the new garage, new gate as well as thousands of dollars for upgrades (including maybe a new driveway), the inspector will cite me for at least a dozen misdemeanor violations and start fining me $1,000 for each one or $12,000 a day. It won’t take long at that rate for the city to take all my equity in the house. You better start calling your City Council member because it’s only a matter of time before this happens to you. They should change the law so that if you want to repair an item in your house they should leave the rest of the property alone.

Name withheld on request

Environment for all

0

The first settlers of Malibu were the native Americans called Chumash. They co-existed with wildlife — animals and fowl. They subsisted on seafood from an ocean which was a source of pure abundance. They, along with most native peoples, believed in temporary dwellings, living in a community, sharing and taking care of each other, young and old. Take care of Mother Earth, this is a temporary life in preparation for the spirit world. In other words heaven and Earth are combined.

In year 2000, so much of what was in the beginning is gone. Most of the wildlife are now endangered species, with dwindling habitat. The ocean is used as a toilet for millions of people, Malibu Creek used as a sewer pipe, emptying into the Malibu Lagoon, a cesspool.

We now have wealthy individuals and institutions that declare themselves “environmentalists,” but they are not thinking “ecosystem” but more like “me system.” I volunteered at an institute which was created to focus on our fragile environment but all I met were “marketing people,” intent on raising large sums of money for the purpose of maintaining offices in what was a complex of five beautiful homes of an extremely wealthy entertainer. Not much thought or care was shown to the families whose neighborhood was disrupted which seemed so insensitive.

Year 2000 in Malibu brings a climate of criminalization of the poor and moderate-income folks.

Where is Malibu’s state-mandated low-income housing? And I’m not talking about a bedroom renting for $1,000 a month or a guest house renting for $2,500 a month. I mean decent housing for long-term Malibu residents — families with children.

Is there any compassion in our community for families who are concerned with the basic necessities of life: food, clothing and shelter. Many are suffering.

To those who say they care about the environment I must say, “Actions speak louder than words.” It’s time we cared for all living things in our community.

Valerie Sklarevsky

Highlights of the Point Dume Headlands Settlement

0

Parking Spaces. Ten parking spaces, including two disabled accessible, on Cliffside Drive. Eight are to be in the public right of way on the inland side. The location of the two disabled accessible spaces is to be determined by State Parks. The boulders are to be removed and construction of a fence around the preserve is to begin by December 2000. The city is to pay for removal of the boulders and construction of the parking spaces. California State Parks will pay for the fence.

Nature Bus. Beginning June 2000, a shuttle bus called the “Nature Bus” will operate between Westward Beach and the preserve seven days a week during the summer, and on weekends and holidays the rest of the year. The city estimates it will pay $50,000 a year for the Nature Bus.

Preserve Staffing and Visitor Services. State parks will provide a ranger who will support the state’s volunteer docent program, ensure public safety and protect the natural and cultural resources.

Management Plan. State Parks will prepare a management plan for the restoration, renovation and enhancement of the preserve. The carrying capacity of the preserve will be addressed. There will be a public hearing on the draft management plan March 2.

Preserve Access Study. Using information developed during the management plan, the city is to commission and pay for a transportation access study.

Coastal Commission Reimbursement. The commission will reimburse the city for $40,000 – $100,000 of its construction and signage expenses.

Council hears its last quarterly report

0

Every quarter, the City Council meets with staff to review where they’ve been in the last quarter and where they’re going in the next. With the City Council election looming in early April and three challengers running against three incumbents, the Jan. 26 meeting was probably the last of the current council.

Dominating the meeting were major staff departures. Five of the eight departmental reports included references to staff vacancies. The city will be seeking a new city manager, a new city attorney and a new planning director among others.

City Manager Harry Peacock, who last week announced his retirement effective July 17, reviewed a timetable for the recruitment and selection of his replacement. Peacock has been with the city for three years. Councilman Tom Hasse indicated both he and Councilman Harry Barovsky had tried to dissuade Peacock from retiring, but after 30-plus years in the trenches, Peacock seemed to have made up his mind to retire.

Councilman Walt Keller wanted the panel to consider, in the closed session of Monday’s meeting, appointment of an in-house employee to the position of city manager. The city attorney indicated the panel could not make that kind of decision in closed session although they could review performance of a particular employee in closed session.

Also in Monday’s closed session, the council was to interview city attorney candidates. Los Angeles attorney Richard Terzian has been serving as interim city attorney since Christi Hogin resigned last summer.

Planning Director Craig Ewing, who has been with the city two years, last week submitted his resignation, effective Feb. 11, to accept a position of community development director for the Northern California city of Lafayette. He reviewed his department’s accomplishments. They included:

  • Completion of a draft Local Coastal Program Land Use Plan (now being reviewed by the staff of the California Coastal Commission);
  • Drafting a Hillside Management Plan. The council did not support it but did form a new committee of architects and engineers to review it.
  • Drafting a “how to” planning procedures book for the public. It went to the council in December but the council has not given approval to distribute it.
  • A draft wetlands delineation report, which has been submitted to the Army Corps of Engineers for review.
  • Drafting specific changes to the Interim Zoning Ordinance regarding front setbacks, institutional uses, parking standards and modifications of variances.

Other staff vacancies include:

A Parks and Recreation supervisor to replace Paul Adams, who last week was promoted to Parks and Recreation director. Adams, who has worked for the city a number of years, had been supervisor since December, when veteran director Catherine Walter resigned; and

A deputy city clerk to fill the position recently vacated by Shelly Petrelli. City Clerk Virginia Bloom reported the job description for her deputy does not include the requirement for the two-year certification she has.

Environmental and Building Safety

In response to the last City Council meeting, where a number of people testified about selective code enforcement, Mayor Carolyn Van Horn, Joan House, Hasse and Keller voted to hold an educational workshop on code enforcement Feb. 10. [See sidebar on Code Enforcement for a list of subjects to be discussed and a categorization of open cases.]

Environmental and building safety official Vic Peterson told the quarterly meeting he is considering requesting higher fees for records maintenance, private sewage disposal systems permits, and grading and drainage. He also reported the department had issued a record number of 832 new building permits in 1999.

Public amenities formula

The council also wrestled with calculating the value of public amenities. The city needs to determine the value of public benefits to know what it should expect in return for granting an increase in Floor Area Ratio (FAR) beyond the standard limits contained in the General Plan.

The council unanimously voted to accept the objective value calculation models Peacock suggested: value of the land, avoided cost of development and added economic return. The council will also consider the subjective value of the percentage of added value/benefit the city requires in order to grant the FAR bonus.

Dial-A-Ride

The council adopted Administrative Service Director William Thomas’ recommendations to contract with Malibu Yellow Cab at fixed rates for Malibu residents who use the city’s Dial-A-Ride taxi service. Services to be provided will include the city, medical facilities in Santa Monica, West Los Angeles and Woodland Hills. Cost of the contract is expected to be $138,500, $9,000 below last year’s costs and about $13,000 less than the city receives from Proposition A and Proposition C funding programs.

Under the new program, the city is to give riders written rules for use. The city will also continue negotiating with the county for accommodation of noncity residents.

Litigation

The city is involved in 12 pending court cases.

Voting early, not often

0

California moved its date for the primary election to March 7 so that we would play a greater role in selecting the candidates for the November election. Of course, the important thing is that we have a sizable election turnout so that we have a fair and representative election.

In addition to selecting the candidates for the party, we will be voting on 20 propositions that are of tremendous importance to everyone of us. For example, we will be voting on five bond issues, which if passed will provide state money for things that we need right here in Malibu. Our leaders are very aware of how important these bond measures are to us and certainly will urge us to vote yes.

As usual in these elections the efforts to convince us how to vote are already going full strength. Unfortunately, the propaganda often is full of half-truths and false innuendoes so that it behooves the voter to study the voter pamphlet carefully so as not to be confused by the blatant efforts to confuse rather than to inform us. We are a well-educated electorate so it is up to us to educate ourselves on the issues and to vote intelligently.

Of course, the first thing is to be sure you are registered to vote, and people who have moved need to reregister. The registration deadline is Feb. 8.

With the primary election coming so early it means we do have to move faster than usual. Please be sure to register, study the election material and vote — and vote wisely.

Dorothy Green,

member,

League of Women Voters

Make room for doggy

0

I wanted to thank Ms. Thorp for sharing her feelings regarding the issue of dogs in State Parks [Jan. 27 issue, “Doggedly enjoying the beach.”] The perspective I would like to share comes from 25 years of experience in State Parks and a lifelong association with various family pets including the two whippets that currently reside at our residence.

For the record I feel that we are very responsive to the needs of our park visitors. California State Parks provides the only public beaches in the area that are open to leashed dogs. Contrary to Ms. Thorp’s letter we are not increasing our restrictions on dogs. Currently dogs are allowed at Leo Carrillo State Beach (with the exception of the sandy beach and tide pool area between Tower 1 and Tower 3), Staircase Beach, County Line Beach, Sycamore Cove, Thornhill Broome Beach and Mugu Beach. Actually, Point Dume Preserve and the Pocket Beaches are the only local state holdings that prohibit dogs. The impression that State Parks is becoming more restrictive is not accurate. Since 1989 we have opened many beaches that had previously been closed to dogs. On a statewide basis we continue to provide more opportunities for leashed dogs. State Parks in Big Sur and Santa Cruz that were previously off limits to dogs are now open. Another positive response to dog owners was the director’s action to eliminate the dog day use fee at the beginning of this year.

The designation of public land as a State Park implies that all natural features are protected. Consequently, we have tried to establish reasonable regulations and policies to protect our natural resources while respecting the rights of our visitors to have a quality recreational experience. Our State Parks are special places. The limits we have established are prudent actions that insure the protection of park visitors, wildlife and other natural features.

Dogs have a significant impact on park resources and the experiences of other park visitors. There is no correlation between individual rights and conscious disregard for the law. I have witnessed the depredation of sea lions at Point Dume, listened to concerned mothers scream when their child was approached by an aggressive unleashed dog and watched as a child’s meticulous sandcastle construction was ruined by a wayward canine. I have had peaceful walks with my own dogs aborted by the threats of other unleashed dogs. Based on these and many other complaints, our staff has made a strong effort to seek compliance regarding our existing regulations. These regulations have been in effect for many years. In an effort to get the word out my staff circulated a press release to over 50 media contacts in December explaining our current regulations regarding dogs and announcing the abolition of day use fees associated with dogs.

I agree that dog owners need a special place where their dogs can run off leash. State Parks are not the appropriate alternative. Realizing this, many cities have taken the initiative and established dog parks (“bark parks”), perhaps the time is right for Malibu to follow suit.

Hayden W Sohm, Malibu sector superintendent

California State Parks

Sheriff’s deputies to assist with jetliner salvage

0

Local sheriff’s deputies will be assisting federal agencies in retrieving debris from the Alaska Airlines jetliner that crashed Monday off Port Hueneme, an official said.

Since high winds are expected in the next few days, deputies will probably be instrumental in retrieving debris, liaising between lifeguards who sight the debris and the command post on the Channel Islands responsible for salvage, said Sgt. Cally Barrier of the Malibu/Lost Hills Sheriff’s Station.

The command post is shared by the U. S. Coast Guard, responsible for salvaging everything on top of the water, and the U.S. Navy, which is sending divers.

The sheriffs do not anticipate retrieving bodies, Barrier said.

Planning Department customer always right, council says

0

People applying for Planning Department approval for any “structure” on their property, even a prefabricated storage shed or a fence, should have a much easier time getting the permit, the City Council said Monday.

Applicants and the community, which includes Realtors and the applicants’ neighbors who are notified of any development, will also be given more information about the planning process so they can save time and money.

The moves arise from a two-month audit of the Planning Department by City Treasurer Pete Lippman requested by the council as part of its goals of permit streamlining and improved relations with city service users.

Audit and response

Lippman’s November report was based on the theory of Total Quality Management, meant to provide organizations with a systematic striving for customer satisfaction. He noted as his first “condition” that permitees consider the process very complicated and view the staff as not well trained in assisting completion of the process. To change the organizational culture from regulatory (“iron fist”) to partnership oriented (“velvet glove”), customer satisfaction should become a priority, Lippman said.

Planning Director Craig Ewing responded in November and again Monday by saying the audit definition of the “customer” was limited to the person at the public counter. The Planning Department also considered “customers” to include phone calls, appointments, conferences and written correspondence with city commissions and committees, applicants, neighbors, interest groups and the media.

Ewing said the audit did not investigate the regulations themselves, how they implement the council’s objectives and how they direct the staff’s actions. Additionally, it takes new planning staff about a year of full-time work to become trained in the complexities of the city’s laws, Ewing said.

Ewing, who has been with the city two years and who has resigned, effective Feb. 14, is the department’s most senior staffer.

“Do words in the audit such as ‘compromise’ and ‘creative alternatives’ accurately describe the proper values for the building and planning staff? Do these words reflect the council’s preferences?” Ewing asked.

“In the past, the council has stated that development in Malibu must be controlled, restricted and, in some cases, discouraged. If the council wishes to allow compromise and staff involvement in creative alternatives, new questions are raised: In what ways is staff to compromise with developers? How should staff offer creative alternatives, especially if it fosters new development?

“I believe the whole purpose of our regulatory system is to implement the values of the council,” Ewing said. “The report needs to state its own assumptions regarding development more openly, so the council can better understand and evaluate its recommendations.”

The council Monday reviewed the audit report, Ewing’s responding memorandum and City Manager Harry Peacock’s analysis of the two documents.

Among the short-term improvements are:

  • Immediately distributing copies of Ewing’s 8-1/2 x 14-inch, color-copy booklet called “Planning Department Zoning Clearance Procedures” to applicants and the Malibu Association of Realtors. The booklet has flow charts and explanatory text. Advertising availability on Channel 15.
  • Producing a video taking a person through the development process. Airing the tape on the city’s Channel 15, and advertising that it is available.
  • The Planning Department counter will be open one night a week. There will be a person there to troubleshoot and answer questions.
  • Offering pre-application consultation, and advertising the pre-application process.
  • Offering a customer feed-back form and prompt departmental response.
  • Putting the permit process on-line.
  • Having greater customer service and interdepartmental training for the Planning, Building and Safety, and Environmental departments. In this way, the applicant would get consistent information from all departments.
  • Developing a sign-up system in the lobby.

The short-range, pilot-project improvements are made to fulfill Lippman’s and Peacock’s overlapping recommendations.

In addition, on Councilman Tom Hasse’s motion, the council unanimously voted to consider hiring additional Planning Department staff for fiscal year 2000-2001.

Councilwoman Joan House also emphasized the need for constant staff improvement and empowerment, part of Lippman’s first recommendation.

No code of conduct

0

Apparently the issues of grandfathering and code enforcement have hit a nerve with the entire City Council at last week’s meeting. I believe the City Council responded to the crowd of citizens in the audience in a well-rehearsed impolite and negative manner.

They should be ashamed of their behavior.

Name withheld on request