Home Blog Page 6853

Permanent no-parking zone considered for La Costa neighborhood

0

A vote on a proposal to ban parking on one side of certain streets in the La Costa area has been temporarily put on hold.

At its March 21 meeting, the city’s Public Safety Commission briefly discussed the issue but then continued the hearing to its April 18 meeting, citing the need to visit the neighborhood and hear from the local fire chief.

The commission will vote to recommend a proposal for a permanent no-parking zone on one side of the street in the La Costa area. The affected streets would be the south side of Calle Del Barco, Paseo Hildalgo, Paseo Portola, Paseo Serra and Rambla Orienta.

A temporary zone already exists, said Chuck Bergson, public works director, but “most people park on the hillside and not the oceanside, due to few driveways on the oceanside. It’s not a strict rule.”

Several homes in the area are under construction, thus adding more trucks, vans and other work-related vehicles during the daytime. “With all of the construction going on, we do have to go up there and enforce it,” said Bergson.

Fire department regulations call for a minimum 20-foot-wide clearance in order for fire trucks to drive through. When the roads are absent of parked cars, the width measures anywhere from 26 to 32 feet, says Bergson. With cars parked on both sides of the road, it’s nearly impossible for them to squeeze through.

“The residents can’t get out and the fire and city people can’t get in,” said Bergson. “We’re still going to try to keep the fire access up there. The fire department said they could not get access to some of the streets.”

However, Ryan Embree, a member of the city’s Public Safety Commission, argues that when some of La Costa’s homes burned down in 1993, nobody notified the city that fire trucks could not get to their homes.

Embree said that no notice was sent to the area residents about the temporary parking restrictions and the March 21 meeting. “It was very bizarre. [The city] just put these temporary stakes up to indicate no parking,” he said.

Bill Stump, of Rambla Vista, said that while he favors the city adopting the restrictions, no notices were mailed to La Costa homeowners.

Of a handful of residents who attended the March 21 meeting, most were in favor of a proposal to establish a permanent no-parking zone. However, Joan Levine, who owns two houses on Rambla Vista, said she opposes the restrictions and calls it “a new issue” since the street widths have not changed since the 1950s, when she moved into the neighborhood.

Claire Douglas, who lives on Paseo Serra, favors the parking restrictions because of current hassels in the delivery of mail, bottled water and packages, and the pick-up of recyclables.

Joel Landson, who lives along Pacific Coast Highway, said that while he’s not a La Costa resident, he visits the area and when cars are parked on both sides of the road it’s too hard to pass between them.

At the conclusion of the meeting, the commission voted to recommend that the city issue notices of the April 18 meeting to all La Costa parcel owners. It also agreed to ask Interim City Manager Christi Hogin to approve a shuttle-operated site visit for the commission, Bergson and the sheriff.

“We want a drive-around chance to see the area,” said Embree.

City Council terminates city attorney’s contract

0

The Malibu City Council voted 3 to 2 to terminate City Attorney Steven Amerikaner’s contract and replace him with Christi Hogin, current interim city manager, in a special meeting early Monday morning .

This unusually quick governmental move, which was only placed on an agenda on Friday afternoon, produced three actions by the council:

  • The law firm Jenkins & Hogin was selected to provided the city’s legal services. The firm is owned by Michael Jenkins (Christi Hogin’s husband) and Hogin.
  • Interim City Manager Christi Hogin’s contract is extended until June 1, when she will take the position of city attorney.
  • A new assistant city manager position was created.

The 3-2 vote, separated Councilmembers Sharon Barov-sky, Jeff Jennings and Ken Kearsley from Mayor Tom Hasse and Mayor Pro Tem Joan House, both of whom were not pleased with the process taken in the sudden decision.

The short notification process also created discontentment in the ranks of the opposition, specifically among supporters of the old Carolyn Van Horn/Walt Keller council.

“The short notice and the coincidental proximity of the weekend when City Hall is closed makes it difficult, if not impossible to get information on the subjects and be able to express intelligent views prior to the actual meeting,” said Efrom Fader, president of the Malibu Township Council, in a letter addressed to the council.

“They acted pretty fast,” said Art London. “I question from a public viewpoint how people can go to a meeting like that.

“You’re dealing with two major office holders and it is decided without public input,” he said.

The councilmembers who supported the actions defended the process, indicating that personnel matters were discussed in closed session three times before and the decisions needed to be made quickly since the interim city manager contract expired on March 21.

“Occasionally you have to put politics aside and vote for what you think is the right thing and pray that it’s right,” said Councilmember Barovsky, about the actions taken on Monday.

The decision to switch the city’s law firm from Hatch & Parent to Jenkins & Hogin, thereby assigning Hogin as the new city attorney, was a cost-saving measure for the city, said Kearsley.

“The city is bleeding money for legal services. The costs have gone up 50 percent because the last council voted a very capable but costly attorney,” said Kearsley, who is a businessman.

“I don’t know what information they are relying on because I never got that information,” said Mayor Hasse.

“Instead, they awarded a rather lucrative contract to the law firm of Hogin & Jenkins without a competitive bid.”

However, according to Jennings’ figures, the first year with Hogin as city attorney will save up to half a million dollars in legal fees.

“I have no doubt it will end up being a much more economical arrangement than what we have now,” said Jennings, in support of the actions.

“On top of that, Hogin is almost finished writing the LCP [Local Coastal Plan]. We had a bid to do that work for $150,000 and she did it as part of her job for the city,” said Kearsley.

“What’s the rush?” asked Hasse. “To award a $216,000 yearly contract which covers legal services only, not legal cases that will cost an extra $195 per hour if a case goes to litigation on top of the legal services fee?

“The bottom line to me,” said Hasse, “is that I was not given information that supports that agreement. If Hogin & Jenkins believe they can provide services for less then Hatch & Parent, then we should get an RFP [Request For Proposal] and compare with other firms.”

The mayor is not happy about the short notification process for the special meeting, either.

“It’s a very bad way to run a city government,” he said.

House supported extending the interim city manager’s contract until June, but she did not support the other actions.

“There was no staff report, no financial comparison,” said House. “The legality of the whole situation was not assessed.

“In view of the fact that they creamed lobbyist Jim Dantona and they had a lot to say about other contracts, there was no information on this,” she added.

Moreover, Hasse feels that the sudden termination was not fair to Amerikaner, who was not given an opportunity to compete.

“He was not given a chance. He was there for less than a year and though his evaluation was good, there was a concern about the cost, but he was not given the chance to put cost in line,” said Hasse.

Additionally, Hasse opposes the creation of a new position, “because it’s not the interim city manager’s job to find her replacement, it’s the council’s job.

“She has created a position that will eventually become the city manager when she leaves, and she will recommend to us who takes the job.”

The council should put a notice in a professional journal and find somebody that way, explained Hasse.

“All other cities do this all the time,” he said.

The position of assistant city manager was created with hopes of keeping City Hall running smoothly during the transition period until the city decides on a permanent city manager, said councilmembers.

“One thing we all know about Christi [Hogin],” said Jennings, “she will get the work done. I have no doubt it will end up being a much more economical arrangement than what we have now.

“Hogin will handle most of the attorney work and Michael [Jenkins] will provide backup. He is one of the most prominent attorneys in this field.”

Mai the journey continue

    0

    I recently received a note from Sister Mai, the Buddhist nun who came through Malibu two weeks ago and stayed during the rain before continuing on her peace walk and journey up the California coast.

    She wrote, “It is people that I meet who help to inspire the walk — we can all do our part in the world to make it a better place. So, many thanks. ….

    “The walk so far has been wonderful. Continue to meet all sorts of weird and kind folks — the only thing I can complain of is sore feet. I’m making sure to rest adequately this time — last year in France I tended to overdo it. The ocean makes for extremely powerful company — its presence undeniable. Some days it is calming and soothing, other days livening and inspirational. The simplicity of life itself and all its wonders never cease to amaze me. Every day continues to be a new challenge…

    “Please send my love to Oscar and the guys [at the Labor Exchange] and a big kiss to Casper [the dog].”

    The postmark was from Santa Barbara, where she is earning survival money by dog sitting.

    Mona Loo

    ‘Times’ chooses new ‘Bu movie guru

      0

      There must have been a leak. An insider must have gotten hold of all the Oscar ballots some late night last week. This shadow insider must have ducked into a heavily guarded Academy of Motion Pictures vault, snatched up those prized, crimson-ribboned envelopes, and let the information out into the world.

      Either that, or this year’s gala was simply a predictable affair with statues going strictly to fan favorites. Because it seems the world, including Malibu, knew beforehand who the mysterious and closed-lip Academy would tap with Oscar last Sunday evening.

      In The Malibu Times’ Oscar ballot contest, in which readers could take their guess at who would “win,” the nominee receiving the most votes was, in almost every category, the same one the Academy placed in the winners circle.

      Lynne Masri, Malibuite and official Malibu Times Movie Guru, must have been paying close attention. She correctly predicted 11 out of 15 winners — though, oddly, she missed best movie, best actor and best screenplay. Masri topped more than 100 other guessers, who sent in ballots from as far away as Cote St. Luc, Canada and New York City. The average score was 10 correct, but one shot-in-the-dark guesser managed to get only two right. For her astuteness, Masri wins 10 free passes to the New Malibu Theatre.

      The categories with the highest amount of successful predictions were best actress (Julia Roberts), cinematography (“Crouching Tiger”), and best makeup (“The Grinch”). The slots most often missed by ‘Bu-ites were best supporting actress (Marcia Gay Harden, whose win for her role in “Pollock” supplied one of the few surprises of the evening) and best film editing (“Traffic”).

      Every single ‘Bu-ballot predicted that Roberts would claim best actress for her performance in the real-life-hero role in “Erin Brockovich.” Of course Roberts did, in fact, go home with Oscar on Sunday. And even way before the four-minute acceptance speech there never seemed to be any doubt in the matter. Perhaps the dead giveaway was when one network’s pre-show announcer asked her colleague, hours before the show began, why it had taken Julia Roberts so long to finally win an Academy Award.

      “Gladiator” took just about every statue that ‘Bu-ites predicted it would. A moody Russell Crowe accepted his award for best actor, and the effects-laden period epic stormed off with the best-picture statue.

      Maybe the hottest and most closely watched category was that of best director. The talk of the banquet — the one-time knight of independent film and now Hollywood’s hottest captain, Steven Soderbergh — came to the show with two invitations (Best Director nominations for “Erin Brockovich” and “Traffic”), as the first director to get two nods in the same year since 1938. Ang Lee, director of “Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon,” had won the Directors Guild of America award in the category earlier in the month. And Ridley Scott helmed the massive fan fave “Gladiator.”

      While it looked as if Soderbergh had an advantage by holding two out of the five slots, his double nomination more likely hurt him by splitting votes for him between two movies. Academy members couldn’t simply vote for Soderbergh; they had to pick one of his movies. And to win, the double nominee had to pull in more votes on one movie than Lee or Scott did on theirs. Soderbergh did just that to win Oscar for “Traffic,” which also brought Steve Gaghan a statue for best adapted screenplay.

      Host Steve Martin, citing the format change from “and the winner is” to “the Oscar goes to,” noted that, of course, this cannot be considered a competition. But if it were, the category for best supporting actor was probably as great a rout as that of best actress. “Traffic’s” golden boy, Benicio Del Toro, hailed as the Latin Brando, breezed to the podium to grab the award that presumably will go right next to his new Screen Actors Guild statue of the same class.

      And for the future? Keep an eye on Hollywood goldie girl Kate Hudson, who floated into the Shrine Auditorium as gracefully and as confidently as she played Penny Lane in “Almost Famous,” a role that garnered her a Golden Globe award.

      Speaking up on teens

        0

        Re: “Why teens are troubled” letters to the editor, March 22. Thank you, Richard Schaefer, for speaking up about the reasons children are killing each other in this country. Your letter covered all the things that need to be recognized as a whole: hate music, divorce, drugs, violent movies, sexualized TV programs, violent video games, both parents working long hours, and you even had the courage to bring up two subjects in our liberal and secularized society, one accepted and one taboo: abortion and God. Thank you for having the strength to speak up about those two subjects that quite often cause backlash by those who support one and have banished the other.

        Thank you for writing this letter; it needed to be said.

        Alethea Guthrie

        Governor of Illinois to address Malibu lawyers

        0

        George Ryan, governor of Illinois, will be the keynote speaker at the April 5 meeting of the Malibu Bar Association. The meeting is being held at the Mission Club (the recently renovated old Malibu Court-house on PCH) and is open to the public.

        Ryan, a Republican, declared a moratorium last year on executions in Illinois after a series of articles by a Chicago Tribune investigative reporting team, and a study by Northwestern University’s law and journalism schools, showed major irregularities in Illinois’ death-penalty process. Since the reinstatement of the death penalty in Illinois, 13 people on death row have been exonerated and 12 others have been executed.

        Ryan, who supports the death penalty, decided in a very controversial and highly courageous move that he would stop executions until a special commission he empanelled finishes its investigation and announces its findings. In the interim, the governor has said that “Until I can be sure that everyone sentenced to death in Illinois is truly guilty, until I can be sure to a moral certainty that no innocent person is facing a lethal injection, no one will meet that fate.”

        Call the Malibu Bar Association at 589.9662 for reservations. Because a large turnout is expected, reservations are a must. It is possible there may be no tickets left by the evening of the event.

        Deluged with a barrage of adverb abuse

          0

          There’s a scene in “Finding Forrester” (a marvelous film starring Sean Connery, inexplicably ignored by Academy Award nominators) where young Jamal chides his pompous English professor for misusing the word farther. Here, here! How many copy editors have let that one slip by — so often that further seems to appear everywhere, even when farther would be the correct choice.

          I was taught that farther is an adverb and as such may modify a verb, an adjective or another adverb, and should be used only to denote distance. Further, on the other hand, was a verb meaning “to promote”: He did that to further his own agenda. To say “He saw a sign further up the road” is clearly incorrect, but is now common in everyday usage and, unfortunately, in much popular writing.

          Incorrect usage has become so common as to appear in newer dictionaries, some of which include further as a second definition (after more distant) for farther. In this way, an editor once changed my use of the word stanch, a verb meaning to stem the flow, to staunch, an adjective meaning solid or strong, as in: “He was a staunch supporter of liberal causes.” Computer spell checks permit both stanch and staunch but grammar programs don’t seem to know the difference.

          Those same computer programs are responsible for probably half of the misused words found in print these days. Hence the confusion over affect (the verb) and effect (the noun), and ensure and insure. Prudential will insure your home if you ensure the premiums are paid on time (oh, please, not in a timely manner). I’ve had computers change aesthetics to anesthetics, the rationale for which escapes me. The computer, of course, is not rational.

          Don’t get me wrong. I’m all for using more colorful speech, even making up new words, as long as their meaning is clear. I have used inumerate as an adjective to describe a person (myself) who is inept at arithmetic (better by far than “mathematically challenged”). But an editor allowed the computer to change it to enumerate (a verb meaning to count), which made the sentence nonsensical.

          We have news readers, politicians, bureaucrats, computer nerds and, yes, educators to thank for most of this. Particularly those who view obfuscation as high art. They think they’ve failed if someone doesn’t say: What does that mean?

          Language in this country also is degraded in direct proportion to the quality of what comes from the White House. If our leader uses fractured syntax, the trickle-down theory affects every bulletin released by his aides and, ultimately, the reporters who cover the administration. If you hear it said wrong enough times, it will begin to sound right.

          Belligerent (which once applied only to nations or states) now replaces hostile or pugnacious for someone picking a fight. Reticent (habitually silent or taciturn) often is misused for someone who is reluctant; liable (legally responsible) routinely replaces likely as a prediction; less modifies plural as well as single nouns instead of fewer. A crossword puzzle even used prone (lying face down) as the answer to recumbent, instead of supine (flat on one’s back). Prostrate can mean either side up, but that didn’t fit either.

          A story in the morning paper used barrage as a verb: Napster has encouraged people to barrage legislators with e-mails. Those folks should bombard legislators with a barrage of e-mail. These days they could also inundate them with a deluge of e-mail — those words once referred exclusively to water but now can mean a barrage of just about anything.

          We have technology to thank for my least-favorite verb, interact, derived from the perfectly ordinary noun interaction, formerly the parlance of scientists. Why do the techies always have to turn good nouns into bad verbs? When a teacher tells me how my grandson interacts with other children, I gag. Whatever happened to “Plays well with others”?

          And when did we all start using adverbs in place of adjectives, the worst cases being shortly and hopefully, which completely distort the meaning of what’s being said.

          When the nurse says to me, “The doctor will see you shortly,” I assume my HMO has decreased the time allowed for office visits from 15 minutes to eight, or maybe just three. “Hopefully, it won’t be too long,” she adds. Who is hoping what here? I’m hoping I’ll get my 15 minutes with the M.D. (instead of the nurse practitioner), and that I won’t have to wait forever. So while I might stare hopefully at my watch or at the door, there’s no way it can be hopefully not too long. With any luck at all, it will just be soon and not too short.

          Getting lowdown on guns

            0

            Your article (March 8) reported interview data with school administration only. I believe that this article was one-sided and did not report the full picture for the students and parents. Your article was clearly not accurate and not fully truthful.

            To remedy this reporting, I believe you should interview students and parents to report properly on this subject. You should choose an adequate number in each category (call parents in the school handbook (30 percent), ask students in each grade (30 percent), interview teachers in every grade (30 percent), ask the Jteam — the sheriff juvenile team — to assess a number of questions. Of primary importance might be:

            1. If you knew of a student or friend who had possession of a gun, what would you do?

            2. Who do you feel you should tell? How and when would you tell? Do you feel you could tell someone and when would you tell? Is there a phone number to call or a place to leave a note, if you wanted to tell? Do you feel safe in telling so that you would not feel like a “squealer”?

            3. How would you decide to tell and why? Why would you not tell?

            4. Do you know of a friend who has a gun?

            5. Do you feel safe reporting or sharing information about your friends who you think might be “at risk”? Would you want to report issues about guns, drug use or other concerns? Do you want to ask for advice for your friends or about how to handle advice for your friends?

            You may find your survey exposes critical information in direct opposition to the belief, which our school administration believes to be true, and which you reported in your article to be true. This survey information may prove to be vitally important to necessary changes which our administration needs to make, yet believes may not be necessary or critical.

            Gail S. Copley

            Malibu blacked out

            0

            A power blackout rolled through sections of Malibu on March 19 at 3:30 p.m. The outage was part of one of the “rolling” blackouts that have been affecting various communities throughout the state during California’s current power crisis. So, how often can we expect to go without power?

            Rolling blackouts will occur “whenever the state declares that we’re in a power emergency and there’s not enough power in the state for customers,” said Mark Olson, regional manager of west side cities for Southern California Edison.

            A rolling blackout is “predetermined in an emergency plan,” Olson continued, and affects “small sections that will be out for about an hour.” Olson explained that blackouts are “randomly dispersed throughout the community.” During a power emergency, various communities linked to the state’s power grid are chosen at random, and then areas within those communities are blacked out for about an hour, Olson said.

            There is always a potential for power to go out in a small section of a community whenever there’s an emergency, he added.

            There’s no accurate way to predict what areas will be hit by an outage at any particular time. “The state might not let us know beforehand,” Olson said, “because they might not know.” Besides, he pointed out, “For security reasons, the state doesn’t want to announce in advance where a blackout might occur.”

            The City of Malibu has no plans for dealing with emergencies that might arise during a blackout. The distribution of power isn’t up to the city, points out Hap Holmwood, emergency preparedness coordinator for the city — and neither is law enforcement.

            “The only concern that we observe is that the sheriffs have to deal with traffic,” said Holmwood. “Other than that, there’s not much the city can do. It’s out of the city’s hands.”

            The Sheriff’s Department already has plans in place for dealing with blackout-induced traffic snarls.

            The department has “identified key signals that need to be manned by deputies” when power is out, said sheriff’s Lt. Thom Bradstock at the Lost Hills substation. Deputies “prioritize” problem intersections, but leave intersections alone where there is “not a high volume of cross traffic.”

            Bradstock reminds the public that motorists are “required to stop [at a nonfunctioning traffic light] as if it were a flashing red light,” and take turns passing through the intersection. A flashing red light is the same as a stop sign.

            He was optimistic that, as summer approaches, and with it more power outages, the “public will become more familiar with procedures” and that traffic will move relatively smoothly.

            ×