Home Blog Page 7015

Falcon soars its last

0

Four or five months from now, when Malibuites turn on their television sets, no longer will Falcon Communications cable service greet them as it has since the mid-’80s. On May 26, Falcon, founded in 1975, and Charter Communications, headquartered in St. Louis, announced an agreement in which Charter will buy Falcon and its million nationwide subscribers for some $3.6 billion in cash and stock. With the acquisition, Charter becomes the nation’s fourth-largest cable operator.

So what does the change portend for the 15,000 Falcon subscribers in the Malibu/Calabasas area, a mere drop in Charter’s bucket of 5.5 million customers? Well, for one thing, Malibu will be a little more involved with Charter owner (and Microsoft Corp. co-founder) Paul Allen’s vision of a wired world, interconnected global network. What that means to the man and woman on the beach is a potential for a host of new services, including Internet access and interactive TV delivered by cable wires.

To achieve his vision, Allen, a billionaire who owns the former Rock Hudson Beverly Hills estate, the Seattle Seahawks and the Portland Trail Blazers, and has a big stake in Dreamworks SKG, has been on a “buying frenzy” (to quote the Los Angeles Times). Acquired by Allen in 1998, Charter was ranked that year as the eighth-fastest growing company in the United States by INC. magazine. They also have a good reputation; also in 1998, Charter’s quality of service was ranked by its customers as among the top three companies in the industry according to a J.D. Powers & Associates survey.

“Paul Allen and Marc Nathanson [CEO of Falcon who will become vice chairman of Charter] are both committed to bringing advanced services to non-urban areas,” said Art Maulsby, Falcon’s PR director. “Just because you live in a small town or rural area doesn’t mean the quality or breadth of your services should be any less advanced.”

Although Charter plans to begin upgrading its systems in Pasadena and the San Fernando Valley this year, and Long Beach and Riverside in 2000, much of Malibu’s system is already in pretty good shape to move into Allen’s brave new wired world. “Malibu is already an upgraded system,” Maulsby said. “Actually, it’s a hybrid system with some digital wiring — not all fiber optics yet — and some analog wiring. It may be delayed a few months, but the system will allow the launching of Internet access.”

But what about telephone service, one of the services the cable giant MediaOne (itself the target of AT&T whose 46 percent stake in Falcon will be sold to Charter) is offering as an incentive as it rewires its Los Angeles territories? “Telephone is another thing,” Maulsby said. “It has to be interactive capable because it’s two way. We want to get Internet up and running before telephone.” As far as changes in Pay-Per-View services (PPV), Maulsby sees none, nor could he predict, at this stage in the transition (it takes time to get franchise consent from the communities), if subscription rates would change.

“Charter is known for having smooth acquisitions and for its smooth transitions,” Maulsby added. “They don’t shake up things. Any changes are well-thought out and have very little disruption to customer.”

Recognizing Remy

0

I have known slow growth activist Remy O’Neill for many years. She is a person of the utmost integrity, with a strong ethical core and impeccable values.

Remy’s political involvement has been focused on protecting Malibu from massive development and insufferable gridlock, which would occur with the election of only three council people sympathetic to the overdevelopment of Malibu.

Malibu, be grateful to have a Remy O’Neill in your midst.

Patt Healy

Bringing up Tia … and Shoshone, Trixie, Jake …

0

Kris Sandahl drove from Malibu to Oceanside Friday to get her new puppy. She didn’t get pick of the litter, didn’t even get to name it herself. And what’s more, she only gets to keep it for one year.

Tia, an 8-week-old female Golden Lab mix, did come with a red leash and a flashy yellow cape designating her status as a Canine Companion in training.

Playful, friendly, curious, Tia will spend the next 12 months with Sandahl, developing some of the traits she will need to aid her eventual owner, who probably lives in a wheelchair.

Call it Socializing 101. How to deal fearlessly with shopping carts, traffic, bus and airplane travel, and things that go bump in the night. And how to harness the natural instinct to retrieve and then deliver an object, not just to the general vicinity, but exactly into the hand or, for quadriplegics, mouth to mouth. But first, of course, she must learn to subjugate instinctive puppy behavior: chewing, digging, sniffing and chasing everything that moves.

Sandahl, who grew up with a lot of dogs around because her family bred and raised Shelties, says her friends are asking how she could possibly raise a puppy and then give it up?

“I think it will be bittersweet,” she says. “But the joy of being able to help someone else will help with the parting.”

Julie Shular knows all about the parting. In a few days, she will turn in Shoshone, her fourth Canine Companion, a black Lab who grew from a 3-month-old puppy last May to a substantial, 95-pound adult.

Shoshone will join three dogs matriculating in a ceremony in Santa Rosa, where he will then begin a 6-month, “Operant Conditioning” course of advanced training. He will be evaluated by the participant coordinator and trainers for temperament and other characteristics to match him up with a suitable applicant. That is, if he graduates.

“It’s hard to give them up, but the hardest thing is when they call and say, ‘Your dog’s not going to make it,'” Shular said. “You have a sense of failure, that it’s the end of the road. There’s a certain pride in being able to say, ‘I raised four dogs and they all made it,’ but they don’t all make it.”

Of candidates for all kinds of canine assistant programs, only about 45 percent graduate and are placed. Whatever the reason the dog is deemed unsuitable, the person who raised it has the first chance to get the dog back.

It’s often not that the dog is a total washout, but rather that it is just not suitable for a particular kind of work.

“My friend has a release dog that’s now doing Search and Rescue,” Shular said. “Other dogs can do therapy — going to hospitals, nursing homes or shelters for battered women and children.”

Jake, a golden retriever that Shular raised, was released and returned to her.

“I’m glad to have him back,” she said. “They said he was too much of a one-person dog.”

Shular blames some of Jake’s problems on his picky appetite. “Their training is based on food-reward, and he’s not a good eater anyway. He really doesn’t care about food.”

Canine Companions International has a category of placement where the dog is assigned to a facility rather than to one person. Shular’s second dog, Trixie, a female golden retriever, was working for a grade-school teacher when she developed a medical problem that caused her to limp.

She needed surgery, so Shular took her back for recovery. “Even though she was sound after the surgery, wheelchair work was too strenuous for her.”

But there’s usually a right place for such dogs, given their exceptional temperament and training. Trixie is now kind of a poster dog for CCI and accompanies the organization’s spokesman, author Dean Koontz, on public-relations trips. Koontz, a staunch supporter of CCI for 20 years, learned about the organization while researching a book that had a character who needed a canine companion.

“I gave her to Koontz to be a CCI ambassador,” Shular said.

Unlike her other dogs, Shoshone is an eager eater. “He would dive into the food bowl,” she said. “And he was brave about water from the first time at the beach.”

During the socializing process, the dogs must learn to use all forms of travel: planes, trains, buses, even boats. “You have mishaps, but most people are really understanding,” Shular said.

At one time, the dogs were taught to go on escalators; they no longer do because of the safety factor and because people in wheelchairs can’t use escalators anyway. Shular recounts trying to coax Trixie onto an escalator in a department store, but the dog was too frightened. “Pretty soon the store manager came by and asked if it would help to turn the escalator off. She did, and of course Trixie got right on and walked up. Then the manager turned it back on, and when Trixie got on it, all the shoppers cheered.”

For Sandahl, having a friend in Malibu who has been through this training is a real help.

“Julie has been wonderful. She’s the main reason I went with Canine Companions,” she said. “There’s a lot to learn. The philosophy changes over time. I always used choke chains, but now it’s discouraged, it’s a last resort.” The preferred leads are now Halti or Gentle Leader, a nylon strap that goes around the nose as well as the neck.

“I was very active in obedience training and showing,” Sandahl said. “I missed having puppies around, but I didn’t want to be a breeder. This was the perfect solution.”

Sandahl, a music teacher at Juan Cabrillo, is looking forward to taking Tia to school. “I thought it would be neat for the kids to experience.”

Shular says that at 8 weeks of age, the puppy’s brain is fully developed, so you can start to teach them anything. “But they have a short attention span,” she adds. “And there’s a stage when they learn different things. If you can prevent them from learning those things, like eating the cat’s food, if they grow out of the phase without doing it, then they never will.” Shular advises putting lids on trash cans and waste baskets, spraying Bitter Apple on table legs, plants, slippers, anything they might chew. And make every effort to prevent them from taking food off a table or the floor. “If they get something good and they have nothing better to do, they’ll try again. Food success costs you 10 times.”

“Tia is special,” Sandahl said. “She never walked on a leash before and she doesn’t fight it at all. And she isn’t intimidated by loud sounds … or big dogs,” she said, noticing Tia investigating Shoshone, who outstouts her by about 85 pounds and remains completely aloof to her sniffing. “She gets distracted, but she isn’t fearful.”

Shular gives Sandahl tips on everything from marketing to housebreaking.

“They told me to take her out every hour, maybe every two hours at night,” Sandahl said. “The first night I got her home, it was raining and I was standing out there, telling her to hurry, and I thought what did I get myself into?”

She said her husband works at home and is willing to help. “When I’m teaching, he’s taking care of it. Later, when she’s older, I’ll take her to school with me.”

Along with the yellow cape, puppy raisers are give an I.D. card that allows them to take their charges places other dogs are not allowed.

“When I travel, I get a photo laminated to a card that fits in the dog’s cape,” Shular said.

“Bus drivers are usually good,” she said. “And we took 15 dogs, 30 people, to Catalina on the boat. And not one got seasick.”

“I’ve taken mine on the KLON Blues Caravan,” Shular said. “I usually call the clubs ahead so they’re expecting us.”

Shular says there are also many fringe benefits to raising puppies that no one tells you about. “My first one showed me how to slow down, how to live in the moment, notice clouds, walk barefoot in the grass.”

And people smile at your dog.

Sandahl said, “My husband said his face hurt from smiling so much all weekend.”

Shular said she likes to keep a diary, a “baby book” for the person who gets the dog, that it helps them make a connection with their new friend, to understand the dog’s progress in overcoming its fears.

And the sorrow of parting, well, that just goes with the joy of helping someone less fortunate.

“One dog that makes someone independent, the love you give that dog ripples out to everyone.”

Sandahl added, “What a gift, to be able to do this.”

Onward, O’Neill!

0

Malibu’s resistance movement has always been about saving a way of life. It began long ago with successful efforts to stop a growth inducing sewering effort. Next we defeated a planned freeway that would have destroyed beautiful Malibu Canyon. Then there were the fights we won against a developer instigated water system boondoggle, the proposed nuclear plant on an earthquake fault in Coral Canyon and a second sewering attempt. Earlier activists like Remy O’Neill and the Road Worriers defeated all of these growth-inducing impositions. And clearly the motivation for this resistance is not venal. Slow growthers, preservationists, and the sustainability side anticipate no financial gain from working to save what’s special about Malibu.

When you look at the famous satellite image of Los Angeles, Malibu is the only coastal area that is still fairly natural. Malibu’s slow growth activists are why we still have horses, mules, llamas, spreading oak trees, soaring hawks, bobcats, fragrant sage, free running streams, deer, mountain lions, spring wildflowers, starry night skies, and yes that magnificent four footed rodent muncher our Native American sisters and brothers called God’s dog. While we see evidence all around us that Malibu’s bureaucracies have not fully appreciated these values, we know that the majority who voted for our present City Council members were hoping to save what’s special.

Isn’t it interesting that until we created our own city, our defenses against unbridled growth never engendered a witch-hunt? Now, don’t get me wrong, Fair election practices and campaign finance controls are essential to the democratic process; but this whole affair seems very strange. If I understand correctly, three people wrote checks amounting to a total of $500 instead of $300. 0n each check two contributors were named, and a required legal phrase was omitted. Even though one legal phrase was omitted on each of three checks, how could that $200 alleged infraction engender months of costly investigation, scandal mongering and brouhaha?

Why was a Kenneth Starr-style investigation required for such picayune omissions? Why were we left to imagine much more serious violations? Who would think that a citizen informing the electorate regarding campaign issues might end up with as much as $5,000 in fines and 2-1/2 years in jail — over $200 in contributions that were reported as to source, but without the words “through an intermediary?” How much are taxpayers forking over for what must be a costly legal proceeding? And what is the civil rights violating court action against Joanne and Gil Segel costing the taxpayer? Will we ever know? Further, we might ask why the city that quakes at the very thought of developer lawsuits would lay itself open to potential damages awarded from countersuits charging malicious prosecution of its citizens? And why has this sort of action never occurred in past elections where irregularities were observed?

In all the years I have known Remy O’Neill, I have observed that integrity is her hallmark, and persistence in the face of challenge is her way of life. “When we get lemons, we make lemonade,” is the quote that best describes the Remy way. Those who now gleefully glory in Malibu’s prosecution of Remy O’Neill and the Road Worriers, imagining that slow growth proponents will be discouraged from further advocacy are baying at the moon.

Howard Steinman

Treading a fine line

0

Malibu will not have to pay a $5,700 fine levied by the Regional Water Quality Control Board for delays in submitting a work plan addressing septic system performance and pollution in Malibu Lagoon.

City Attorney Christi Hogin called it a “victory” when the five-member board voted unanimously to rescind the fine, averting a possible legal battle with the city.

The fine, which could have been as much as $130,000 — or $1,000 for each day the city exceeded the deadline for filing the work plan — was considered by the city to be more unfair than excessive.

“Fines are for polluters,” said Hogin after the ruling Friday. “The city has been cooperating with the board to answer the question of why the lagoon is polluted.”

In fact, a study released in February by UCLA scientists raised more questions than answers regarding possible sources of high levels of bacteria and nitrates in lower Malibu Creek and Lagoon. Everything from the Tapia Water Reclamation Facility to hikers and homeless encampments, livestock and even ducks were cited.

When the sand berm separating the lagoon from the surf zone is breached, the toxic soup flows out onto the beach, and surfers complain of numerous health problems, including rashes, eye and ear infections, and respiratory and intestinal symptoms. Surfrider Beach routinely is graded “F” by environmental watchdog organization Heal the Bay, based on water samples taken daily and weekly.

But the water board has blamed much of the pollution on malfunctioning septic systems adjacent to the creek and lagoon and along Malibu’s entire coastline.

The city began its own investigation of septics in the Cross Creek area, where engineers have yet to make a “hydraulic connection.”

City officials have also promoted installation of on-site wastewater treatment plants to replace failing septics and for new and substantially renovated homes.

Some of the older systems, serving multifamily and commercial properties originally permitted by Los Angeles County, have already been replaced with the new, computer-monitored designs, which engineers say virtually eliminate “daylighting” or polluted runoff.

Some of the systems produce treated wastewater suitable for sub-irrigation, the quality of which, experts say, equals or exceeds that of reclaimed water sold by Tapia for irrigation.

The water board notified the city last June that it would have to produce a plan by July, then extended the deadline to September. City officials said they wanted to wait for the release of the UCLA study, which they hoped would provide more scientific information and possibly pinpoint the sources of pollution.

After the board voted to rescind the fine, Hogin said, “The board embraced our spirit of cooperation over the objections of its staff.”

A bill that would set statewide standards for septic performance in the coastal zone has passed the state Assembly and is on its way to the Senate. While the city supports the intent of AB 885, it opposes specific language in the bill relating to acceptable pollution levels.

Parents tell school board, ‘More for the arts’

0

Before parents said a word at last Thursday’s Board of Education meeting, you knew they wanted more resources for the arts. The multipurpose room of Juan Cabrillo Elementary School was filled with the music of the school’s student orchestra. And after the orchestra performed “Pollywoddle Doodle,” “Can Can,” “Pink Panther,” and “Rock Around the Clock,” half the audience left.

Heather Anderson, outgoing president of the Juan Cabrillo PTSA, brought home the point even more. She noted that out of the $100,000 the organization raised for the classroom, $14,000 had been budgeted for art instruction once a month and $10,000 for singing and music theory instruction once a week. Referring to the recent visit of animator Faith Hubley to Malibu schools, Anderson noted: “This is exactly the art experience we are committed to bring to our students.” Pointing around the room festooned with Diego Rivera- and Frida Kahlo-like murals created by students, she said, “Art should be part of every student’s life.”

Anderson made requests for next year. Gratefully acknowledging the board’s $5,000 grant for a fourth- and fifth-grade music teacher, Anderson asked if a similar contribution could be made for the 1999-2000 school year. “As you can tell, this district takes the arts very seriously,” she said. “Don’t let our children slip through the gaps.”

The board’s District’s Fine Arts Advisory Committee, mandated to assess how current district fine arts programs match up to national standards of arts education, asked for broader measures. Besides recommending that the district hire additional staff, the committee urged the board to adopt a “fine arts facilities policy” in order to ensure the health and safety of students enrolled in fine arts classes. Committee Chair Zina Josephs of Malibu, referring to the committee’s 70-page report, noted that classrooms are too small, highly educated staff move furniture and there is inadequate safe storage. Much to Malibu board representative Todd Hess’ frustration, the three pages of committee recommendations came without a price tag. “Has the DAC attempted to cost these requests?” he asked. “Although this is helpful, we will be fortunate if we have any money this year. Requests for people and classrooms come to $2.5 million. I’m concerned that you realize the difference between theory and reality.”

“No, because we didn’t know how much you have,” Josephs replied. “You can understand that we wanted to show you what we need. We understand that you have to tell us how much you have.”

Other board members were more encouraging. “There are safety issues we have to deal with,” Brenda Gottfried said. “We have to find pockets of money.” Dorothy Chapman thought the requests would be appropriate for Proposition X, the 1994 city/county legislation allowing levy of a parcel tax. The board’s next meeting, June 3, will include a public hearing and adoption of a resolution to increase the tax. “We must be concerned for the future, not just one year,” she said.

In other action, the board unanimously approved the purchase of 14 additional modular school classrooms, two units each of which will go to Juan Cabrillo and Webster elementary schools.