Home Blog Page 6978

Stringline rule draws new points

0

Vowing not to resign from her position with Malibu’s telecommunications commission, Nidia Birenbaum appeared at Monday’s City Council meeting to declare she had done nothing wrong.

“I did everything in my power to be a very good commissioner,” she said, contending Councilman Tom Hasse’s ultimatum that she resign stemmed from her unwillingness to cooperate in a scheme to discourage Mayor Carolyn Van Horn and Councilman Walt Keller from running for office.

“I am not a back-stabber,” she declared. “I don’t play games. I say it like it is.”

“I don’t work for you, Hasse!” she said. “This is not your baby. This is not your project.” She described her tenure as aimed at securing both an educational channel and a communications channel. But she lamented the city is left now “with a few thousand dollars in equipment and a government channel controlled by Hasse.”

Referring to City Manager Harry Peacock, she said, “I suffered verbal abuse from this man.” Alluding to a shouting match that led to the firing, she said Peacock “needed Prozac. Indeed, he was out of control.”

Attorney Sam Birenbaum followed his wife to the podium, repeating his earlier accusations concerning a missing tape that would have revealed the level of Peacock’s “tirade.” “There’s still a mystery about this incident that hasn’t been resolved,” he said, discounting the explanation that the tape ran out before the incident. “I would submit the tape did, or does, exist and is being suppressed.”

Warning that Hasse had never denied the truth of the conversations, including a telephone call, Birenbaum urged the firing was a “stab-in-the-back” and a “snake in the grass.”

“I would like to bring the truth out of the closet,” he said, “If you cannot be honest about yourself, then how can you be honest with other people.”

Microsoft: The winner we love to hate

0

Arnold G. York/Publisher

They say Americans love a winner. Well, at least Gen. Patton said so, or at least actor George C. Scott pretending to be Patton said so in a movie. But if it’s true, and I think it is, why do we all seem to hate the biggest winners of our time, Bill Gates and Microsoft?

If you think we don’t worship winning in this country, I challenge you to remember the name of the guys who finished second. Try to rattle off the names of the losing vice presidential candidates. Heck, I can hardly remember the names of the losing presidential candidates.

So why is everyone after the No. 1 winner and computer nerd of our time and his equally nerdish brethren as if they’ve committed some horrendous crime?

After all, didn’t they do everything they were supposed to and didn’t they do it spectacularly? It’s Horatio Alger come alive. They started in a garage, practically without any capital, and in less than 30 years have become the richest corporation in America and Gates probably the richest man in the world.

They practically created an industry — more than that, an age, the information age — something that didn’t exist before. They changed the way we look at the world, brought incredible wealth to this country, gave America, and with it California, a commanding position above this computerized world and smashed the competition. Instead of garlands, they’ll probably next be looking at a grand jury. What’s going on here ?

Let’s not kid ourselves about what they’ve done. Ten or 20 years ago, it was the equipment that counted. It was the manufacturers that were king. That wasn’t just American manufacturers. There were German manufacturers, Italian manufacturers and, most importantly, Japanese manufacturers, and the Japanese were winning. The rising sun was definitely rising. Praises of Japanese goods, Japanese quality control and Japanese management were in every business magazine. They gobbled up the consumer electronics industry and were on their way to getting control of the computer industry. Then came Microsoft, which realized what all of the big players didn’t — the future wasn’t in hardware but in software. With a combination of foresight, aggressiveness, ruthlessness and Lord knows what else, there was this little American company that kept swimming around in the fish tank filled with sharks, and somehow it was the sharks that kept getting eaten. Today, the information age is an American age, conducted in English, and the money is rolling in. The rest of the world wasn’t exactly happy about this new American age. They all fought it: the Japanese, the French, the Italians and the Germans tried to block this American domination of the information age, but they all lost, and probably a principal reason they lost was Microsoft. When it began, the others had smarter people, better technologies, government subsidies, and much more wealth, but Microsoft was quicker, more nimble and maybe more ruthless, and ultimately it ate them all.

Yet, despite all that, they find themselves in court being called a monopoly. When the judge’s findings came down, the sense I had from the interviews was that the people at Microsoft, from Gates down to the kid on the shipping dock, were all equally puzzled. What did they do wrong?

The answer to that simple question is really very complicated, because our attitudes are really very complex. We all worship success, but it also makes us angry, perhaps envious and certainly uneasy. When a single company, like Microsoft, becomes as big as the government, when we begin to get a sense there is no check and there is no balance, Americans get more than uneasy, and things begin to happen. Attorneys general start getting very aggressive. Grand juries start looking. Ultimately, political things happen.

Once Gates and Microsoft get over their initial reaction, which is to circle the wagons and fight back with everything, I’m sure cooler heads will prevail.

Microsoft will weather this storm, but to do it they’re going to have to do a few things.

They’re going to have to eat a little crow.

They’re going to have to do a major mea culpa.

They’re going to have to stop trying to grab up all the chips on the table even when they can.

Most of all, Bill Gates is going to have to give away a lot of his money.

And they’re going to have to do it even though they don’t believe any of it is fair, and maybe they’re right, but they’re going to have to do it anyway because if they don’t they will be devoured.

How sweet it is

0

Thank you to the parents and children of the Malibu schools for donating your extra Halloween candy. This year we collected 574 pounds.

We collected:174 pounds from Webster School, 127 pounds from Calmont School, 113 pounds from Point Dume School, 110 pounds from Juan Cabrillo School and 50 pounds from Malibu Jewish Center.

The candy was donated to the Westside Food Bank and Para Los Ninos. Thank you all for helping me with my Bat Mitzvah project.

Whitney Androlia

Coastal Land Conservancy raises funds for land

0

The Malibu Coastal Land Conservancy, headed by Gil Segel and including many from the No-Growth side of the Malibu Slow-Growth Movement, served notice Saturday night that despite Segel’s battle with the state Fair Political Practices Commission, the organization was not giving up without a fight. The conservancy’s stated goal is to get much of Malibu’s remaining undeveloped land into trust hands. That land includes much of the Civic Center area, particularly the Chili Cook-off site, the area around Trancas and the Trancas market, the property along Pacific Coast Highway in the Point Dume area between Heathercliff and Portshead, the Crummer property alongside Bluffs Park and shoreline property along LeChuza beach.

As part of that acquisition plan, the trust held a fund-raiser at the Adamson house. A 250-plus turnout raised more than $250,000, according to Segel, which, for any Malibu charity, is a sizable amount. The cash needed to buy some of the Malibu land, however, may run into the millions, according to rough valuations by local Realtors. It is reported that Malibu Bay Co. holdings alone total almost $76 million.

Nevertheless, the trust seems undaunted by the size of the task, and the organization formed a year ago as a nonprofit, public benefit corporation dedicated to the preservation of open space and environmentally sensitive land in Malibu. Its Board of Directors consists of Segel, Treasurer Ozzie Silna, Secretary Marcia Hanscom (executive director of the Wetlands Action Network) and Frank Angel, Graeme Clifford, Betty Hayman, Cara Fox, Norma Levy, Remy O’Neill, Bob Purvey and Leo Ziffren.

“I got to experience in my heart the beauty that is Malibu,” said Segel in welcoming remarks at the fund-raiser. “Our responsibility is to preserve the beauty and to have parks for us and our children.”

The conservancy wants to acquire property from sellers at fair prices, he said. In a post-party interview with The Malibu Times, Segel said appraisals are planned.

The conservancy’s Internet site, www.coastalland.com, says the immediate goal is “citizen action to work toward public acquisition of the entire Malibu Wetland, and to educate everyone on the important link between wetlands and cleaner coastal waters.”

The conservancy’s brochure says the conservancy, among other things, wants to receive gifts of land, secure and maintain conservation easements, work with local government to secure land for community recreational needs, and seek grants for purchase, management and restoration of open space.

The $250,000 raised is to be used for full-time administration, Segel said in the interview. “This gives us the crucial seed money to administer our plans for acquiring land. It also reinforces the awareness of the federal, state and private institutions and individuals that this is a serious and supported endeavor.”

To some extent, the conservancy goals parallel those of the City Council, which is negotiating land use and development agreements with local property owners. The lease with Jack Schultz for the recently opened “Papa Jack’s” Skateboard Park in the Civic Center is one example; another is the $150,000 flood mitigation grant the city received from the Federal Emergency Management Agency in July. According to David Fukutomi, FEMA’s public education representative, who was at the fund-raiser, the grant is a stepping stone to acquiring wetlands with government money. Part of the money would be used as a consulting fee in applying for the additional monies, Segel said in the interview.

City Council Members Tom Hasse and Joan House, serving on the ad hoc committee negotiating land use agreements with property owners, said at the party they wish the agency success. “I would love to see these properties preserved,” Hasse said, noting that some development applications would shortly be heard by the Planning Commission. “The ad hoc committee is pursing the legal, practical way to achieve as much as we possibly can. If the conservancy can raise enough money in time, it’s for the benefit of all.”

Turkey Perceptions

0

Tell me, Mr. Turkey,

Don’t you feel afraid

When you hear us talking

About the plans we’ve made?

Can’t you hear us telling

How we’re going to eat

Cranberries and stuffing

With our turkey meat?

Turkey, heed my warning

Better fly away

Or you will be sorry

On Thanksgiving Day.

Malibuite, I heard your warning

About Thanksgiving Day

Fear I not it is your City Council

That had better fly away.

Can’t they hear your elders

Telling the needs of Seniors gray

Or can’t they heed parents yelling

Our kids lack a safe site to play.

So thank you for your forewarning

But on Thanksgiving I shall stay

For it is not on me there will be dining

Come next Election Day.

Tom Fakehany

Drive to succeed

0

Nichola Taub slips into the driver’s seat and turns the ignition switch. “You want to look in back of you and turn the wheel,” says Robert Stahl, calmly and quietly.

She checks the rear-view mirror and starts to back out of the parking lot below Stahl’s Dollar Driving School office and classroom.

“We’re going to hit the white pole there,” Stahl says, still calm and quiet. “Thaaat’s OK. Very well done.”

“Thank you,” says Taub, calmly and quietly.

We are about to turn right onto Pacific Coast Highway. Stahl quotes, “The Vehicle Code says you must, not you may, signal before turning.”

We head for Malibu Canyon Road. “Nichola has a nice handle on her lane control,” he says of the Louisville High School student. “On breaking and acceleration control she’s a little ahead of schedule.”

To Taub, he asks, “What do you see up ahead?”

“A car pulling out.”

“Are you going to let her in?” he encourages. She slows and the grateful driver waves to her.

“What does the yellow light mean?” Stahl quizzes.

“Slow down,” she answers.

“Slow down if you can,” he corrects her.

We enter the curves of Malibu Canyon. “This is her second lesson,” he announces proudly. “She never drove before the day before yesterday.”

Stahl says he takes students to more urban areas after the student begins to dominate the vehicle. He also recommends they spend more than the minimum requirement of a supervised six hours behind the wheel. “It’s grossly inadequate,” he says. “It was established in the ’40s.”

“What do you see?” he asks her. “A guy turning left.” “You don’t want to insist on the right of way, but you do want to take the right of way when it’s yours,” he says.

The ride through the canyon looks daunting. Stahl says Dollar Driving has won the National Safety Council’s Safest Driving School’s Fleet Award five years in a row. Where’s the dual steering wheel? Stahl says it gives a false sense of security. To whom?

He reminds Taub to look left and right at every intersection along the canyon. “In the Malibu area, you go for so many miles without an intersection, you forget to look.

“Seventy percent of all car accidents are rear-end collisions,” he reports. “One of the things we teach them in class is keeping a very safe following distance. By keeping this more-than-adequate space, we are always in a position to slow down slowly.”

We’re nearing the 101 Freeway. “Have we done the freeway yet?” he asks Taub. “No,” she says. “Let’s try,” he tells her. She gasps.

“I wasn’t nervous my first day because there wasn’t a lot of traffic,” she says. We’re on the freeway, and he suggests a lane change. “Center mirror, side mirror, look over shoulder,” he instructs, and she eases into the next lane. “Now back off from the van to give yourself a good driving distance. Look at all the idiots,” he says.

“The road is paved with idiots,” Taub repeats from his class.

“They learn that one,” says Stahl. He points to other drivers. “Could they get any closer? They’re unbelievable. If they only knew they’re accidents waiting to happen.”

Now on a surface street, “It’s a more difficult environment for the driver,” Stahl says. “Thirty percent of car accidents occur at intersections.” We near an intersection. “Look left, right,” he says, even though we have the right of way.

“PCH is the most dangerous highway in the USA, from Sunset to Trancas,” he says. “It has unique characteristics. There is a long community that sits smack on the highway. It attracts people from all over Southern California who have never been here. There are also an enormous number of foreigners who are going to pull over without thinking just to look. There is also a lot of drinking related to beach activities.”

He says some of his students’ parents ask him to write a contract for the young drivers. In it, the teens promise not to turn left across PCH unless at a traffic signal.

In the next intersection, Taub changes lanes. “It is legal to make lane changes in the intersection, however, it is not necessarily the smartest thing. You might get a ticket for an unsafe lane change, but not an illegal one.”

Back on the freeway, he emphasizes a correct following distance again. “In my generation, we were taught car lengths. But cars were boats then. The advent of compact cars changed that. The ‘Smith System’ started teaching a two- to three-second following distance. We take a fixed object. When the car in front of us passes it, we start counting.” Stahl recommends three to four seconds.

“Back off,” he suddenly warns Taub. “He’s going to cut you off.”

Stahl muses, “Most people, especially teen-agers, from the day they get licensed, have nothing truly compelling them to improve their defensive skills. The only thing that turns that around is an accident or a ticket — which are forms of education.”

He stops to quiz Taub again. “What is the difference between an accident and a crash?”

“Fault,” she says. “We watched a really good video on that.”

“A whole life can end in a second,” says Stahl. “We try to get through to the students in every way we can. We watch blood-and-guts-on-the-floor videos and we see how serious accidents and death and legal repercussions affect whole communities.

“I’ve always been challenged by — Stop! Behind the white line! — the fact that after they get their license, it’s downhill. At my school we do several things. I want something to stick.

“We require them to write an essay in class about loss — life, freedom, mobility. To graduate from class, they have to hand it in. Then, I require them to keep a copy in the glove compartment of their car so they remember how fleeting life is.

“The essays are tremendous. The stuff they have written should be put in a book. I have 70, 80 gems by now.”

Stahl says in addition to teaching teens to drive, he lectures corporate clients. He also teaches refresher and update courses to senior drivers. “They learned how to drive 40 years ago,” he says. “It takes 12 to 18 hours to rehabilitate them.”

Stahl says, with all the driving he does, he still enjoys it. “It doesn’t put me in a state of anxiety because I drive in a comfort zone. I don’t let the students put themselves in a situation that would cause anxiety to themselves or to me.”

Portable classroom risks

0

My husband Larry and I were recently made aware of a study (reported last May in the L.A. Times) which cites schoolroom toxin risks for students in prefabricated buildings. The study found a child’s lifetime risk of cancer may be two to three times higher than federally accepted levels because of formaldehyde and other chemicals used in construction, according to Bill Walker, the California Director of the Environmental Working Group. Inadequate ventilation contributes to the problem according to the nonprofit group which is calling for greater regulations over the industries that make portable classrooms.

Because newly constructed portable classrooms were installed at Juan Cabrillo and Webster Elementary School this fall (and our daughter attends third grade in one of the classrooms at Juan Cabrillo), we were obviously concerned after reading this report.

We contacted Art Cohen, assistant superintendent of the Santa Monica/Malibu School District, who assured us that these new buildings had adequate ventilation systems and that the teachers had been instructed in proper ventilation techniques which include keeping the windows and doors open. We were very surprised to learn that the buildings were “tested” a couple of weeks ago. Why weren’t we — the parents — told about any of this? Why are the buildings being tested now, when students are fully occupying them? CTL Environmental Services in Harbor City is the company hired by the district to test the portable buildings. When Larry called with his concerns citing another EPA study that he had just read about on the Web, he was told, “don’t believe the EPA — we’re sure the buildings are fine,” this from an independent testing group? Who are we to believe? We were not surprised to learn that, according to CTL, the test result (released Nov. 5) was a “negative” finding. We learned, by the way, that testing occurred under the best conditions — with the windows and doors wide open. What level of toxins are our children being exposed to when they walk into class on a Monday morning? Art Cohen said the smell (and they really mean smell) is comparable to a new car smell. Well first of all, most people aren’t in their cars eight hours a day like the kids in those classrooms, and one’s nose in a smelly car is only a couple of inches from a window!

Ellen Aasletten, a facilities planning official with the state education department, was quoted in Sunday’s L.A. Times as saying: “We just don’t know what’s harmful in the air quality — for example which amounts of formaldehyde and other toxins might be harmful.” Great question, state education department! Here’s a better one: Why are our children and teachers being subjected to an environment we’re not positive is safe? Look at what’s happening in the L.A. Unified School District with schools being shut down due to asbestos problems because crucial precautions weren’t taken.

What toxins are being emitted from those portable classrooms and at what levels? Are there acceptable levels — and what are they? How do our schools rank with the norm? Can we have an independent analysis – or must we rely on a company, under contract by the district, that told us in advance they “weren’t going to find anything!”

Both Pat Cairns and Phil Cott, principals of Juan Cabrillo and Webster, are very sympathetic to our concerns and are doing their best to get answers for us but they are educators, not scientists, and this is certainly out of their line of expertise. Cott told me he hopes “we all learn a lesson from this.” What’s the lesson? I certainly don’t want to recklessly wave a red flag, nor do I want to read a report 10 years from now citing new evidence about these buildings and children’s exposure to them because we weren’t asking the right questions today. The district needs to be more forthcoming about this issue.

Lori Gray

Neighbors challenge Streisand plan facts

0

In his appeal filed with the Malibu City Council, longtime Zumirez Drive resident Eric Jacobson claims his neighbors — Barbra Streisand and James Brolin — used false or misleading data to secure approval of the Planning Commission for their new home. Jacobson contended, in his Oct. 25 papers, Streisand’s representatives gave inaccurate assurances that the planned blufftop home on Point Dume met the “two-thirds rule” for a residence with an elevation in excess of 18 feet. The rule requires that the second story be no more than two-thirds the square footage of the ground floor.

Describing Point Dume and Zumirez Drive as a unique and distinct neighborhood, Jacobson noted the 41 property owners have a deeded ownership in the beach. He warned the effort of planning officials to divorce the Streisand property from its environs is “an absurd and transparent effort to justify greater height, bulk and square footage than would normally be allowed” for the neighborhood.

Taking the square footage of homes within 500 feet of the Streisand proposal, Jacobson said the entertainer’s home would be 400 percent of the average, which now stands at 2584 square feet per acre. He concluded city staffers have ignored Malibu’s general plan and its commitment to discourage “mansionization.”

Jacobson’s appeal also scored the Planning Commission for dropping conditions set by the Environmental Review Board that would have lumped the 4,426-square-foot basement in the total square footage allowed on the site. The condition was linked to creation of a setback from coastal scrub, designated as an Environmentally Sensitive Habitat Area.

The appeal warned that a basement of this size so near the bluff creates an unnecessary risk to fellow homeowners as members of the beach association. “The fact that water is now running year around from the base of these bluffs should alert us,” said Jacobson, “that it is unreasonable to increase the density of allowed development. Any approval of this basement should be contingent on the applicant’s providing a surety bond in favor of the city of Malibu and Malibu Riviera One property owners.”

Jacobson told The Malibu Times Streisand is attempting to “push the envelope” to secure too large a building on what is already the smallest lot on the street. He accused the city staff of selectively choosing beachfront areas with larger homes as a way to achieve a result. Such a mammoth structure will give “a destabilizing effect to the bluff,” he said.

On the two-thirds rule, Jacobson said if the information furnished the Planning Commission is found to be false and misleading, he will request that the costs of his appeal be refunded. So far, the fees for filing an appeal are up to $2,000, he said.

Ron Goldman, the architect who drew up the original plans for the house but is no longer part of the project, told The Malibu Times the house initially complied with the two-thirds rule, but that the current architect has made changes to the second floor which may have taken it out of compliance. He asserted a city staffer misspoke in explaining the rule at the Oct. 18 hearing and failed to acknowledge that a structure in excess of 18 feet but comprising a single room from floor to ceiling will nonetheless be counted as two stories. The rule, he said, is designed to achieve a modulation of the roof line and to reduce the mass of the house.

Condos approved for beach site

0

Eight condominium units adjacent to Las Flores Creek between Pacific Coast Highway and the ocean were approved Monday by the Planning Commission, 4-1 (Charleen Kabrin opposed). The two new structures will each contain four units.

City planners urged approval of the project, which sits on land between Duke’s Malibu restaurant and the Union 76 Station, and noted the construction includes a widening of a culvert that carries water under the highway to the ocean. The widening of the channel increases the space for floodwaters to drain into the sea. The developer will be allowed to construct parking space that will jut over the widened area of the culvert.

Commissioner Ken Kearsley dubbed the project a “win-win situation” for the city. The alternative, he said, is a hotel and restaurant with increased car traffic.

In moving for approval of the project, Kearsley described the narrow channel as a traditional headache. “We’re not doing it for them,” he declared in referring to the developer. “We’re doing it for the people up Las Flores.” He pegged the widening of the channel as a $200,000 benefit to the city. “What we’re getting is relief for our brothers and sisters up creek…. Don’t reject this, you guys.”

Architect Schuyler Brown said he has worked on the project for some three years, and the outcome is lower than the required height for the site. The project beautifies a blighted lot, he added.

Commissioner Ed Lipnick secured a condition that the two parcels of land between the restaurant and the gas station be treated as one for all condominium documents, and that there be one condominium board.

The east parcel will contain 23 parking spaces, even though 15 would be required for the site. The “extra” spaces would be used by the second, more westerly structure.

Commissioner Jo Ruggles objected to the construction of a 14-foot wall along the property line with the gas station. She secured approval of an eight- to nine-foot wall to be screened with plantings.

Charleen Kabrin unsuccessfully sought a continuance for further study when she claimed the parties had never previously explained parking would extend over the widened flood control project. She asked for an alternate parking scheme with a conventional channel.

Webster gets the job done at Career Day

0

What do you want to be when you grow up? That question was on the minds of Webster Elementary students last month, after parents came to share their life and work experiences during Career Day.

“I talked a little about my career,” said Andrea Palmer, who runs a temporary personnel service in South Central Los Angeles, “but when they actually started listening was when I started talking about integrity, friendship and manners — how you treat your fellow workers. I think they could relate to those concepts because they’re using them now in school.”

The kids also had an easy time relating to the job of Scott Pease, a video game producer and husband of a Webster teacher. “I had a lot of fun just talking to them and sharing their enthusiasm,” said Pease. He hopes the kids learned that work can be fun. “It’s fun to have a job you enjoy every day,” Pease said. But, he noted the students seemed more interested in the product than the process. “They all wanted to know the secrets of the game.”

This was Webster’s first career day, and it was no accident that it took place during the school district’s “Red Ribbon Week.” For one week each year, the school is decorated with bright red ribbons, and the students make pledges to remain drug free. “It was planned that way because our focus in red ribbon week is not just about staying away from drugs. Every year we try to focus on the positive. It’s about making healthy choices for our minds and bodies,” said Jackie Williams, Webster parent and coordinator of this year’s Red Ribbon Week.

The career day participants were “examples of making good choices,” said Webster Principal Phil Cott. “Live your dreams and make a good life,” is the message Cott says he hopes came through.

Career day speakers included doctors, dentists, actors, firefighters and even a park ranger. Webster mom Suzanne Adams has had many careers, including professional fund raising, running a kennel and teaching ballroom dancing. Adams said the focus of her talk was on keeping a positive attitude to accomplish your goals. “I hope that they feel work can be different things to different people. Joy can be included into your job. It’s really an important thing to have passion in their lives.” What does Adams consider her most important job? “First and foremost, I’m a mom,” she said.

Many Webster parents have put their careers on hold to focus on their families. Those parents had been left off the original agenda but, during the planning stages, they made it clear they wanted to be represented. “It wasn’t what I was thinking,” said Cott, “but I quickly realized that wasn’t what they wanted to hear.” Cott added to the speaker’s list past PTA president Colleen O’Beirne Brydon, who listed her career as homemaker and PTA representative.

“I think it’s very important that this group is represented,” said Williams, “because, no matter what we choose to do for our careers, most of us are going to be parents. We have to factor that in while we’re thinking about careers.”