Home Blog Page 6965

Ex post festum

0

It was the Monday after Christmas,

And all through my house,

Every creature was ailing, even my Malibu mouse.

The adult toys were all broken, their batteries dead;

I’m sure Santa was passed out, with ice on his head.

Christmas wrapping and ribbons covered my floor

My wife sound asleep continued to snore.

And I in my new boxers and clothing from Deans’,

Went into the family room and started to clean.

When out on the lawn there arose such a clatter,

I sprang from the sofa to see what was the matter.

Away to the window I flew like a flash,

I tore open the curtains, and threw up the sash.

When what to my wondering eyes should appear,

But a red, white and blue truck with an oversized mirror.

The operator was smiling, so lively and grand,

The patches on his jacket said “U.S. Postman.”

With a handful of holiday bills, he grinned like a fox

Then quickly he stuffed them into my mailbox.

Bill after bill, after bill, after bill, they still came.

Warbling and shouting he called them by name:

Now Macy’s, here is Structures’, now Penny’s and Sears

Here is Robinson’s, Sax’s, Target and Cheer’s.

To the tip of the limit, every store, every mall,

Now charge away, charge away, charge away all!

He yelled and he whistled as he completed his work.

He filled up my mailbox box, and then turned with a jerk.

He sprang to his truck and drove down the PCH road,

Driving much faster with just half a load.

Then I heard him exclaim with a holiday jeer,

Enjoy what you got you’ll be paying all year!

Isn’t that the truth.

Tom Fakehany

Council postpones Streisand decision

0

After receiving a last-minute letter from Barbra Streisand requesting a postponement, and seeing about 20 people wanting to speak, the City Council Monday night allowed public comment but continued a decision on plans for her Point Dume home until next month.

The Planning Commission earlier approved the megastar’s 11,000-plus-square-foot project, including a two-story, 28-foot-high house, a detached garage and two basements. Streisand’s representative at the meeting, Jamie Harnish, said the basements were needed to inventory her memorabilia for the Smithsonian.

The council still must to decide whether Streisand and her husband, James Brolin, were granted special waivers to allow overbuilding on a small lot and reducing setbacks from an Environmentally Sensitive Habitat Area on a primary coastal bluff.

Streisand’s letter asked for the postponement until an unspecified date so she and Brolin could meet with neighbors, explore their concerns and “set straight some misperceptions about what kind of structure we would like to build.” The couple would then “move ahead after communication has worked its wonders and achieved consensus.” [See Letters to the Editor for the full text of the letter.]

The council, responding to charges of favoritism for celebrities, as well as jibes from the audience about the upcoming municipal election in April, postponed the agenda item until Feb. 28.

The structure would be set back 75 feet from the bluff’s edge. Ordinarily, development on blufftop property must be kept 100 feet from coastal scrub. The beach below the bluff is the only one in Point Dume owned by residents of the neighboring street.

Next-door neighbors Eric and Cheryl Jacobson, who appealed the Planning Commission decision twice last year, told the council they were concerned with the magnitude of the proposed development and the extent of departure from neighborhood standards.

“This application has been approved even though it exceeds the property development and design standards for size, as it pertains to neighborhood standards, by 232 percent,” Eric Jacobson said. “[P]erhaps most importantly, the setback for an Environmentally Sensitive Habitat Area was unnecessarily waived … . I’m also alarmed at what appears to be a preferential application of the property development and design standards for this particular project.

“One of the things I’ve noticed during the planning process for this project is that I feel we are involved in a shell game,” Jacobson continued. “This project is disguised as a single-family residential home when, in fact, it is truly a large entertainment facility posing as a two-bedroom house where much of the uncounted bulk is underground or in the single stories that rise 26 feet in height.”

Other neighbors, including Denise Ferris, claim the commercial nature of some of Streisand’s activities (such as interviews and editing) has caused excessive traffic. “Because of the cul de sac, every car has to make a right turn,” Ferris said. “The TV crews and caterers are endangering our children and animals.”

Overwatering is endangering bluff stability, council members were told. Dusty Peak, a 40-year resident and avid surfer, said water from the bluffs falls on him and offered to show the city where Johnny Carson’s lights fell down.

Mari Stanley, who lives within 500 feet of the Brolins, claims water from the area was flowing onto her property and called for an investigation of the watering bills. She also claims the neighborhood beach was used illegally when it was photographed for the record jacket for Streisand’s “Higher Ground” CD, and that Streisand’s film “The Mirror Has Two Faces” was edited on Streisand’s property.

Stanley also said Streisand’s staff repeatedly ignored requests to slow down their driving.

She also said the Brolin house was “not a residence but a storage facility.”

Before Streisand’s letter promising never to donate the home to a “state organization” was read into the record, Ramirez Canyon Homeowner Association President Ruth White called for people to protest possible California Coastal Commission approval today (Thursday) of the Ramirez Canyon Public Park. Streisand donated that 22-acre site to The Santa Monica Mountains Conservancy seven years ago.

Students try new form of ‘sitting in’

0

The City Council has probably never looked younger or fitter than it did Friday. Still, debates were emphatic and positions were held as staunchly as always.

Youth-in-Government Day brought Malibu High School students from the government classes of teachers Adam Panish and Harry Keiley together with various city government officials. After meeting at City Hall individually with their assigned mentors, the students role played in a mock City Council meeting.

City Treasurer Pete Lippman hosted student Mike Seider in preparation for Seider’s presentation to the mock council. After recounting a brief history of the city, Lippman explained to Seider the responsibilities of a treasurer and city auditor.

“When people talk about investments, the first thing they talk about is yield,” Lippman said. “That’s third for us. First is safety, second is liquidity.”

Several conference rooms away, Planning Commissioners Ken Kearsley and Ed Lipnick were tussling with the political intransigence of students Angalika Oatway and Robin Baltrushes, while Drew Purvis was coaching Jules Neale on issues faced by Building & Safety.

Baltrushes and Oatway held fast to building “nothing” on the land known as the Chili Cook-Off site, at the corner of Webb Way and PCH. Purvis gently explained, “In a city, you can’t have zero commercial development.”

“Let’s say it’s your property. What would you do with it?” Lipnick continued. Requesting clarification, Baltrushes wondered, “Where would you have the Chili Cook-off?” Lipnick agreed to find another place for it and re-posed his question. Baltrushes acceded to only a park on the site.

Kearsley quizzed Oatway in preparation for her appearance before the mock council, and she snapped back with the correct answers.

“So, do you think you have an idea of what we do?” Kearsley asked Oatway. “Oh, yeah!” she enthused.

After the individual mentoring sessions, the students were bussed to the Michael Landon Center for the mock council session. Those students paired with council members sat with their mentors, along with students Jesse Erwin in the city clerk’s spot and Daniel Geren sitting in for the city manager.

The mock council members heard from those students role playing as various city personnel, posing questions and then voting on the proposed agenda items.

The council heard an appeal from a Planning Commission decision denying a request to build a larger-than-allowable home. After intense questioning by student Jordan Tabak, the mock council unanimously approved the commission’s decision.

A decision on a cable franchise permit agreement was not so easily reached by the mock council. After a 2-to-2 roll call vote, student Chihara Aoki seemed torn at having to break the tie. Her mentor, Mayor Carolyn Van Horn, quickly noted, “That’s what it feels like,” then sympathetically urged a decision.

For approval of the city’s investment policy, the day’s city treasurer introduced his report to the mock council, Lippman seated beside him. Student Greg Williams, mentored by Councilman Walt Keller, questioned the criteria used. Without prompting from Lippman, Seider listed safety, liquidity and yield. Lippman seemed pleased at the lesson taught, and Seider seemed pleased at the unanimous approval by the mock council.

Other student participants included: Alex Betuel, Julie Platner, Jussie Smollet, Kelly Hine, Shauna Bass, Christopher Marsolek, Forest Howlett, Julie Repp, Jennifer Barrett, Jamie Olsafsky and Brittany Turek.

The idea for the day had been proposed to the City Council by Councilman Tom Hasse. It was coordinated by the Parks & Recreation Department and assisted by Malibu High School staff. “I think the kids learned something, and so did we,” said Hasse. Said Parks & Recreation Supervisor Marilyn Stern, next year she will plan for a full day, allowing for more individual time with the mentors and a longer council session, this year’s council having run well over its allotted time.

Coastal to review Steisand Center use permit

0

Ramirez Canyon residents say they’re fed up with the Santa Monica Mountains Conservancy and they aren’t going to take it any more.

The homeowners plan to descend en masse on the California Coastal Commission meeting today (Thursday) to try to convince the panel to deny the conservancy’s application for more intense commercial use of the Streisand Center.

The secluded residential property, with its five houses, was donated to the conservancy by Barbra Steisand in 1993 with the stipulation that it be used as a think tank for environmental studies.

But after the conservancy moved its offices from Solstice Canyon onto the Streisand property, things have taken a different course, residents say, and intense use of the center for fund-raising is severely compromising the fragile environment of the canyon and creating safety issues on its narrow road.

Recognizing there might be multiple problems with the site, shortly after the conservancy took over the property, the state Finance Department issued a memorandum stating state funds could not be used to support the facility, said attorney Mindy Sheps, a Ramirez Canyon resident.

“The conservancy’s take on that was they needed to generate money from the site to support themselves,” Sheps said. “They realized early on they couldn’t afford to run it as a small think tank. They should have recognized they had a white elephant and sold the property.”

The conservancy applied to the Coastal Commission for “after-the-fact” approval to convert the five single-family residences into offices and to operate a commercial enterprise on the property.

Coastal’s staff submitted its recommendations in October for the panel to consider at its November meeting. Staff recommendations included: restricting all functions to 40 participants or less, no more than 72 such events annually; requiring the conservancy to transport guests in no more than seven vans to the site from sufficient private offsite parking (excluding the Winding Way Trailhead lot); and improving the septic systems and submitting a revised plan for the adequate immediate evacuation of all assembled guests.

Coastal then exercised its one-time right to postpone the scheduled November hearing, allowing the conservancy to submit an amendment to its Coastal Permit Application Dec. 8 (one year after its original application), asking for the right to hold 365 small (40 guests or less) events; 365 commercial special events (with 150-200 participants); 260 canyon and guided tours (40 or less); to convert its six residential lots to a public park and implement a Recreational Transit Program.

Coastal staff issued a revised report Dec. 22. Residents say they were appalled to learn of the staff’s reversal and of the escalation in the proposed use of the property.

Staff countered it now has more information regarding health and safety issues, such as fire and septic capacity. The center, however, does not meet even minimum county fire requirements for public events, and the septic system, which the conservancy acknowledged was woefully inadequate even for residential purposes, has not been improved.

“Regrettably, the conservancy has been aware, since at least 1994, that its septic systems leached into the adjacent blue-line stream,” said Sheps. The conservancy, in its amended application, says it will install three portable toilets.

The larger issue, opponents say, is the Revised Staff Report failure to discuss Coastal Act Section 30250, which requires that: “commercial development be located within, contiguous with, or in close proximity to existing developed areas able to accommodate it.”

“The commission would never approve this use if an ordinary developer were the applicant because commercial uses are too intense for this rural-residential environment and the risks too great,” said Sheps, who estimates the new plan would generate 168,500 vehicle trips per year more than the number generated by the property’s five single-family homes.

In an attempt to put the project in context, Sheps notes as the property is zoned for one house per five acres, the project exceeds by 840 percent the intensity of use permitted under Malibu’s zoning code and Malibu’s land use plan.

In the absence of a Local Coastal Plan — Malibu has never completed its plan though a city commission, chaired by Lucile Keller, has been working on a Local Coastal Plan for years — applications go to the Coastal Commission.

Ruth White, president of the Ramirez Canyon Homeowners Association, said the group has filed a lawsuit against the conservancy for “overburdening the road.” She said conservancy Executive Director Joe Edmiston requested postponement of the coastal hearing. “Around Christmas time, he called his rubber-stamp board to a meeting on the creation of a new Ramirez Canyon Park. Nobody asked us if we wanted to be a park.” Edmiston was unavailable for comment as of press time Tuesday.

Four’s without accompaniment

0

“We don’t balk at weird noises,” says Amy Bob Engelhardt of the vocal a cappella quartet, The Bobs, appearing Saturday at Pepperdine’s Smothers Theatre.

“Stylistically, we know no bounds. Or, as Matthew Bob says, we leave no style unturned.”

They sing all-vocal cover tunes, including songs by Jimi Hendrix, The Beatles, Talking Heads, They Might Be Giants and Louis Jordan. And what evening is complete without “Disco Inferno?”

“It’s not set up as bass, baritone, tenor and whatever it is that I am,” Engelhardt says. “We take it from an instrumental approach and not a vocal approach. We ask, ‘Who can get that guitar lick?'”

They perform “Caravan” as a horn section. “Joe Bob is particularly skilled at this,” says Engelhardt. “He was originally a trumpet player. And a drummer. He’s adept at this. And at vocal guitar.”

Engelhardt is the newcomer to The Bobs, which currently also stars Joe Bob Finetti, Richard Bob Greene and Matthew Bob Stull. They call themselves The Bobs, however, for the anagram for a dog show term, “best of breed.” Stull and Greene formed the troupe in 1981 with another singer, as New Wave A Capella. “That was the Zeitgeist,” Engelhardt says.

Only Engelhardt and Finetti live in Los Angeles. So the foursome rehearses right before gigs, or, if they must learn new material, they rotate among their home towns. Or, they brush up on the road.

“We do a lot of workshops for kids, seminars and master classes,” she says. “They ask, ‘When do you rehearse?’ We say, ‘You’re watching it.'”

At school workshops, they work on vocals and performance technique with choral students, the instrumental aspects of their vocalizing with other students. It’s an excuse to make evil noises in class, she notes. She insists the show is clean, even though the group was banned in Moses Lake, Wash., resulting from a misunderstanding by its city council of a song — about tolerance.

Greene writes most of the group’s original material. “Inspiration can come from anyplace,” Engelhardt says. “You find such odd things in your daily life, and originals come from the depths of Richard’s wide subconscious.

“As far as gigs go, it’s probably the most challenging. Not only musically is it the most difficult. The Bobs ‘live’ are a mix of a concert, performance art, stand-up comedy and improv. Anything goes. We’re not scripted. We play off the audience constantly.” At one performance, the group passed a hat holding 80 song titles and let the audience choose.

Currently, The Bobs are collaborating with a San Francisco-based monologist, Josh Kornbluth. Engelhardt describes the work as an “educational, possibly fictional lecture/demonstration that goes horribly and hilariously wrong; it’s brilliant and sweaty and digresses a lot.” With a working title, “The History of Vocal Music: Survival of the Loudest,” it stretches from cavemen to Peaches & Herb.

Engelhardt was raised in musical theater. “I was always the geek in the chorus,” she recalls, standing in the back row and critiquing or correcting her fellow singers. She studied at Syracuse University and was working in musicals when she “dumped classical” and returned to music school, at Berklee in Boston, studying pop, rock and jazz.

After working in radio promotion and tour support for a Hollywood agency managing rock stars, she returned to singing in sessions and met Finelli on the set of “Seinfeld.” At his prompting, she auditioned for The Bobs.

“We hit it off immediately,” she recalls. “It was insane. It was Kismet. We were cracking each other up right and left.” They work well together, she says, because they have a healthy respect for one another and they are “willing to look ridiculous at the drop of a hat.”

While she can adeptly read music, she prepared more by listening to the group. “And I’m damned glad I had classical training,” she adds. “The breath support alone is worth the price of a college education.”

At 70 to 100 shows per year, she says, she earns a comfortable living while being able to maintain a home life. She is married to a screenwriter, and she writes music for his works, as well as for live theater.

She considers her fellow Bobs as “older brothers who are insane.” Finelli, a graduate of Gonzaga University as a trumpet major, sang with Bobby McFerrin’s Voicestra. Greene, who was a bass player, as well as the group’s bass voice, may be best known for his commercial voice-over singing of the words, “fall into the Gap” — a commercial he fell into when he was engineering the sound and the singer hired for the job couldn’t get it right. Stull was a San Francisco-based actor with a sideline in singing telegrams when he co-founded The Bobs.

The company tours for long weekends or, at most, two weeks, with occasional one-month tours of Europe. Although much of Europe speaks English, she says, the group is popular because anyone can “get” their musical ideas. And even though the audience speaks English, she likes to try out their languages during the show, bringing out phrase books and attempting miscellaneous phrases.

On tour, upon entering a new city, the four scout for the nearest Starbucks. Engelhardt admits to two addictions, e-mail and nail biting.

The group’s website, www.bobs.com, includes such items as “Bob Tales” — Engelhardt’s recounting of tours, from Europe to Iowa — and “goofy but accurate” company biographies.

The Bobs appear Saturday, 8 p.m., at Pepperdine University’s Smothers Bob Theatre. $25. Tel. 456.4522, fax 456.4556 or TicketBobMaster 213.365.3500.

Wall now free of "stalking" charges

0

James Brolin and Barbra Streisand had a bad day Monday. Deputy District Attorney Martin Herscovitz, head of the Malibu office, declined to file a criminal complaint against Wendell Ivar Wall, 28, a photographer and neighbor of the Brolins on Point Dume, who had been arrested over the weekend and initially charged with violation of the Penal Code 646.9 (stalking).

Bail, originally set at $150,000, was raised by the bail commissioner to $1 million, but, after review, the district attorney’s spokesperson said no case would be filed.

“There is lack of evidence of a credible threat, so we’re rejecting the case on the grounds of insufficient evidence,” it was reported. The D.A.’s rejection also indicated Streisand and Brolin were not desirous of prosecution of the case.

The initial police report, immediately following the incident, describes Wall as allegedly following Brolin and his wife frequently and indicates the Brolins felt the situation was getting more and more threatening.

According to the police report, the Brolins left a car dealership in Thousand Oaks, noticed they were being followed and attempted to evade the follower. They exited the freeway at Liberty Canyon and headed for the sheriff’s station. They said the pursuing vehicle turned away. They later saw Wall on PCH and flagged down a patrol car.

Gene Wall, the father of Wendell Wall, who lives with his son near the Brolins, said, in an interview at the City Council meeting Sunday night, his son is a photojournalist and never accosted the Brolins. He charged the Sheriff’s Department was overzealous and had a vendetta against him and his son because of a case several years ago in which he obtained a $600,000-plus judgment against the county because of some improper conduct by the Sheriff’s Department.

Later that day, the City Council continued to Feb. 28 its decision on an appeal of a Planning Commission vote approving a proposed demolition and construction project of the Brolins’ home.

Planners reject "Napa-nization" of Malibu

0

To make it easier for people to know how to use their property, and to avoid confrontations like the firestorm over Barbra Streisand’s plans to enlarge her home, the Malibu Planning Commission Saturday started finalizing the city’s 6-year-old “Interim” Zoning Ordinance.

In other action, the commission decided to allocate money in the city’s two-year budget to hire planning consultants Crawford, Multari & Clark to draft the final ordinance. Handing the commissioners a booklet and memo on current zoning districts, lot development criteria and permitted standards, Planning Director Craig Ewing said the commission’s decisions on the residential, commercial and institutional zones would be the first step in finalizing the ordinance.

The commissioners took about an hour to refine permission standards for residential neighborhoods. In the process of deciding whether people violate restrictions because they don’t know about them (as Commissioner Charleen Kabrin said) or whether people circumvent the system (as Ewing said), the commissioners found out from local landscape architect Bruce Meeks that homeowners are grading hillsides for vineyards.

In what Vice Chair Ed Lipnick described as rejection of the “Napa-nization of Malibu,” the commissioners noted crops such as grapes may be grown in backyards, subject to neighborhood standards and planning director review.

Commissioners were divided on how much to include in the ordinance.

“One of the advantages of a fuzzy definition is that if you don’t specify it, it becomes a nuisance issue,” said Ewing, referring to whether a boa constrictor or a ferret should be defined as a domestic animal. “Animals continue to be an issue in this town, especially barking dogs, roosters and wild peacocks. We want to be clear what our values are. Whether animals are a nuisance is something we could play with.”

“If it’s left over from county days, then leave it,” said Andrew Stern “I want to be sure you are not taking the country out of the city.”

“That means, we’ll have to come down on every issue,” said Kabrin.

Chairman Ken Kearsley wanted to know how to deal with the issue of vineyards in single-family zones. “Do we want to allow it when the Coastal Act doesn’t?” he asked.

“People come out here for their independence,” said Stern. “I suspect 50 percent will be in violation with the vineyards.”

“Are they destroying environmentally sensitive habitats to do it?” retorted Kearsley.

“It’s already happening, people are grading hillsides and removing coastal vegetation,” said Meeks.

“We are in a conflict,” said Kabrin. “There’s an increasing interest in vineyards. I don’t think anyone realizes you need a coastal permit to do it.”

The commissioners’ conflicts illustrated what two Malibu architects say about the dangers inherent in having politicians without the appropriate education make design and engineering decisions. Ed Niles, who sits on the newly created Architects and Engineers Committee, and Ron Goldman, who served on the task force that created the city’s General Plan, told The Malibu Times the immense amount of discretion ultimately given to the city is a two-edged sword.

“People don’t understand how this ordinance affects their lives,” said Niles. A buyer finds out that he or she can’t do anything without involving property owners within 500-1000 feet who receive notice of property improvement plans. This planning notification is not required in coastal cities like Santa Monica or San Diego, Niles added.

The process obviously has political overtones because it gives the ability to capture the vote of existing landowners rather than new ones, Niles continued. People moved here to be free of restrictions. It’s a problem that should be solved by property owners, not used as a political weapon by government to satisfy those who presently live here, he said.

An All-Star brouhaha

0

I did not want to be in the center of a controversy regarding the boys AYSO U-12 soccer team.

However, after reading the article in the Surfside News, I feel I must respond to some of the inaccurate facts that were printed. It appears from the article that I selected the team and called all the players without the proper authority. This is absolutely not true.

If Kevin Driscoll, our Malibu AYSO commissioner, will sift through his selective memory, he will recall that we had a face-to-face meeting at the Bluffs Park, on Tuesday, Nov. 30, a full week after the team nominations (which are submitted by the division coaches) and four days after the final team selection by Lee Gywn, division director, and myself.

At our meeting, Kevin expressed reservations about two of the players chosen for All-Stars. At the end of the meeting his words to me were: “If you don’t hear from me or anyone else by tonight, consider the team to be final.”

I did not hear from anyone that night, but just to be sure, I waited until Thursday before making the phone calls to the players and their parents.

When this team was picked it was done with a specific formation in mind. I wanted to play a 4-4-2 system which is, goal keeper, four defensers, four mid-fielders and two strikers. I believe this system is the best one to play regarding the level of opposition which Malibu encounters in All-Star play.

Consequently, each player was chosen to play a certain position which I felt would utilize their talents to the fullest. Why would I pick a team that was “unbalanced?” As head coach, I would want the best team available.

Unfortunately, our players had to be subject to adult in-fighting and politicizing. Subsequent to the selection of this team, people whose children were not picked pressured our commissioner into staging an after-the-fact “try-out” for the team. The All-Star team has never been selected in this way — maybe it is something to include in future seasons, but this was entirely an after-the-fact thing, and doubtful in authenticity, and certain players were not notified of this “try-out.”

As head coach I was not even notified, this being perhaps understandable due to my unavailability owing to family illness. However, it would certainly be expected that our team’s assistant coach participate, and he was not notified. What kind of a “try-out” is that?

In six years of coaching AYSO soccer here in Malibu, I’ve had the privilege of coaching two previous All-Star teams plus the last two years of coaching divisional championships that also won their area playoffs, and represented Malibu in sectional playoffs. So I feel that I have the experience that goes with coaching an All-Star team. I have spoken to the boys that were replaced, to let each of them know they deserved 100 percent to be chosen. It was done on merit alone.

Michael Doyle

Making it work

0

I must protest this cutting of the so-called “Dynix” librarian.

1. This is not an unfilled position. Emily Cable, retired elementary library coordinator, and I have filled it for the last two years. Since I have used up the amount the State Teachers Retirement System says I can earn, Carol Kim, Samohi librarian on maternity leave, has taken it over. Emily Cable is still doing it.

2. “Dynix” librarian is a misnomer. While I was at Samohi, I added this to my duties, as did the librarians at John Adams Middle School and Malibu High School. To facilitate this, the district hired a full-time librarian who could serve as our substitute while we went out to schools new to the Dynix Scholar System (the online library system we use) to install programs and train staff at elementary and secondary schools. The district hired this “floating librarian” so our school libraries would not suffer from a string of nonlibrary media teacher substitutes who did not know how to further the information literacy skills we were teaching.

3. I also served as “system administrator,” the person who deals with system security issues, troubleshooting, upgrading, and overall management of the software part of the system. This is usually a full-time position in other library jurisdictions or school district.

4. Meantime, through tax overrides funding (another is due to come up next fall), it became possible to purchase Dynix Scholar site licenses for all the schools in the district. This means adding the library collections of all the schools to the Union catalog, a catalog that now encompasses all the titles of all the books in all the schools.

5. Bringing the rest of the schools into the system meant massive training of elementary library coordinators and massive inputting of their holdings (book titles).

6. All of this was done by full-time librarians and elementary library coordinators who were not only managing their own libraries and library programs but also improving access for 11,000 students and their teachers to the combined collections of all the libraries.

7. Most library systems (public and academic) and school districts would have two full time professional librarians to fulfill these functions: systems administration along with the training and coaching of professional and nonprofessional staff; and a supervising professional librarian for elementary school libraries.

8. Without this position, the elementary library coordinators and all people new to the library staffs of all schools have no one to train them and no one to turn to with problems and troubleshooting. The system, while user friendly, still needs to be taught. Checking out books and cataloging may look like a simple operation, but it is not automatic and people need to learn the procedures.

9. Tens of thousands of dollars have been spent putting this system into place and making it operational. Partly this came about because voters in the school district put libraries and technology at the top of the list as a reason for taxing themselves through a tax override. The District Advisory Committee on Instructional Technology has supported it. It seems very foolish not to keep the position that makes it work.

Mary I. Purucker, library consultant

Term limits sparks reform

0

Term limits on elected public officials are not a new idea. Term limits are as old as the American Republic, beginning with our first president, George Washington. He understood the value of what was then called “rotation in office” if the new representative democracy was to survive.

For 144 years thereafter, Washington’s successors as president upheld his two-term tradition. In 1951, the U.S. Congress and the states wrote Washington’s tradition into law as the 22nd Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

Today, at the state level, 20 states, including California, have placed term limits on their governors and state legislators. Lifetime politicians are finally being forced out — either to run for another public office or to return to the private sector.

On the municipal level, legally enacted term limits were started in Indiana in 1851. As of 1995, 2,890 local governments in the U.S. had enacted term limits. These local governments include New York City, Los Angeles, San Francisco and San Diego. Smaller California cities have adopted term limits as well, including Cypress, Dana Point, Los Altos, Palo Alto, Redondo Beach and Seal Beach.

The power of incumbent elected officials has grown even stronger during the past century. Constant news media publicity of elected officials as well as a time-tested fund-raising network of donors makes it almost impossible to defeat incumbents.

Term limits, coupled with real campaign finance reform, levels the playing field and makes elections fair and competitive. Term limits will help put power back where it belongs — in the hands of Malibu voters.

Tom Hasse, city councilmember

Jeff Kramer, former mayor and city councilmember

John Harlow, former mayor and city councilmember

Sherman Baylin, local business owner and chair of Malibu Citizens for Term Limits.