Home Blog Page 6930

Funding for school music, arts, nursing programs still on the block

0

School board members continued to grapple last week with unpopular options for balancing the district’s 2000-2001 budget.

Facing a significant shortfall, the Santa Monica-Malibu Unified School District must trim “nonessential” programs or boost enrollment of “permitted” students, those who live outside the district.

PTA representatives have proposed joint budget sessions with the school board, its staff and the city councils of Santa Monica and Malibu. “The Santa Monica City Council has stated their commitment to partner,” said Rick Gates, PTA Council president. “They’re waiting to be asked by this board to the dance. You need to send a clear message, as a board, that you support PTA’s call for joint meetings.” Gates is slated to appear at the Feb. 14 Malibu City Council meeting.

The PTA announced its position on four measures to appear on the upcoming ballot: Supports Proposition 14, the Library Bond measure; and Proposition 26, School Bonds (simple majority); Opposes Proposition 21, Juvenile Crime, and Proposition 28, Repeal of Tobacco Surtax (Proposition 10).

The board also responded to parents of Special Education students, including Judy Pace from Malibu High School, who made a video presentation to the board and urged approval of a contract with Therapy West in Santa Monica to provide physical and occupational therapy for special education students. The board voted unanimously to approve the contract and also a contract for Malibu High School with Sylvan Learning Center for reading and math tutoring support for “underperforming” students.

Funding for the district’s Fine Arts programs was cut last year, and further reductions are proposed for the 2000-01 school year. The Advisory Committee on the Fine Arts presented a detailed list of those cuts and probable ramifications. Those targeting the district’s celebrated music program provoked strong opposition from parents and teachers. These reductions include Extra Duty Units (teachers’ pay for after-school rehearsal time), music aides at middle schools, transportation for the Samohi Marching Band (members already pay fees of more than $100 per year), and reorganizing the elementary instrumental music program by using a different “delivery system.” A committee member’s aside: “We don’t know what this means and, frankly, are afraid to ask.” The report notes, “Music programs are extremely sensitive to long-run damage by seemingly minor budgetary reductions because the programs (and hence, student competencies) build from elementary all the way through high school. If staff and programs are cut, when you go to restart them, they will take many years to restore.”

An item to replace school nurses with health clerks would save the district $190,000 but would compromise ongoing health education, screening/assessments and routine medical/health services. Nurse Melissa Casarez, who serves Webster Elementary, said, “One way I can promote the health and safety of our children is to identify the students who are at high risk for experiencing a life-threatening asthmatic episode before it is too late.” Asthma, she noted, is the leading serious chronic illness among children and relates to the district’s attendance and enrollment issues. “Asthma accounts for 10 million lost school days annually in the U.S. and is the leading cause of school absenteeism attributed to chronic conditions.”

California public schools are funded by the state on the basis of Average Daily Attendance (ADA).

The budget process relies on projected enrollment figures for the upcoming school year, which are often lower than the actual number of students attending after the beginning of the fall semester.

Enrollment projections for the 2000-2001 school year indicate the district can expect to enroll 12,156 pupils: 5,339 elementary, 2,946 middle school, 3,835 high school and 36 independent study pupils. This projection represents 12 pupils more than were enrolled during the second school month of 1999-00. Staff presented a 10-year comparison of enrollment projections with the actual second month enrollments, showing the margin of accuracy between 1 and 2 percent.

“Most times, we are accurate. We are generally conservative but we got caught this time,” said Assistant Superintendent Art Cohen. “We need another 300 to 400 permitted students.”

Further budget discussion and public comment was scheduled for Wednesday, from 4 to 7 p.m., in the board room of the district offices in Santa Monica and Feb. 15 in Malibu. Call 450.8338.

Vicky Newman contributed to this story.

Planners adopt stringline definition

0

Planning Commissioners seemed overjoyed to adopt a method of applying the stringline rule suggested by local developer and engineer Norm Haynie.

After a 1-1/2 hour discussion highlighted by a presentation by former mayor John Harlow, and a plea by Malibu Road resident Elliot Megdal — “Whatever you decide, make it concise and nonpolitical” — the averaging method suggested by Haynie won out over the one suggested by Malibu architect Ron Goldman. Goldman’s memo to the commission suggests his method would not have solved all problems.

Haynie’s formula includes “only portions of the deck that are located seaward of the most seaward 25 percent of the home.” Planning Director Craig Ewing had noted Coastal Commission policy weighs the majority of the deck more than its little pieces. In response, Haynie said, “The Coastal Commission is very big on protecting public views but ignores protecting private views.”

“We have been looking for a solution to have parity and equity. Every decision we have made has been discretionary,” said Commissioner Jo Ruggles. “This is the first concept using math that is fair and equitable. This solves most problems we run into.”

The commissioners voted unanimously to use Draft Local Coastal Plan Policy 396 (as modified in several Planning Commission meetings) as the basis of the definition of the stringline.

The commissioners then voted 4-1 in favor of incorporating Haynie’s calculations into that policy. Commissioner Charleen Kabrin said she wanted calculation examples to take in more scenarios than the four presented by Haynie. “I would need to see it tested in different examples to see if it would be equitable,” she said. “Some beaches are curved, and the tide line drifts. I just know how many exceptions there are.”

Assistant Planner Glenn Michitsch is to bring back to the commission the finally revised definition, and Haynie is to bring back more calculation scenarios.

According to the Haynie formula, the “average seaward extension” of a deck (the average distance from the street right-of-way to the seaward edge of the deck) shall be calculated for each of the two nearest beach homes to the left and right of the subject parcel. There will be four average distances for the four existing beach homes.

The four average distances will be added together and then divided by four to establish the “Permissible Seaward Extension” of the deck. There are two exceptions (if any of the four homes has an Average Seaward Deck Extension more than 10 percent greater or more than 10 percent shorter than the Permissible Seaward Extension) and alternative calculations for those exceptions.

Procedural history

This rule of thumb for determining how far beachfront homes and decks can extend seaward had been a problem since cityhood. The goals of the stringline are to develop an absolute limit to seaward-encroaching development on beachfront lots, to prevent development from “leapfrogging” further seaward than the existing development pattern and to allow reasonable development consistent with existing development patterns, says the staff report.

Based on information provided to the City Council by its Land Use Subcommittee, the council initiated a zone text amendment Sept. 13, the staff report continues. Following a Nov. 1 public workshop discussing applications of the rule and discussion of three alternatives brought back by staff to the Nov. 15 public hearing, the Planning Commission approved three motions.

One involved adopting a modified version of Draft Local Coastal Program Policy 396 as a base for defining the rule.

A second motion involved removing the hardship (variance) provision from the rule.

The third integrated the phrases “except for Beachfront on Beachfront lots” into Section 9.3.02(A) and Section 9.03.02(B) of the Zoning Ordinance. This rectified the problem of the ordinance allowing fences, pools, overhangs and other structures to extend beyond the stringline.

The Nov. 15 motions addressed problems in applying the rule, but did not resolve the main problem of where to draw the stringline, the staff report says. The motions and staff’s suggestion of a “tiered-review” process were discussed at a Dec. 6 public hearing, but no further action was taken on the zone text amendment.

Two options for drawing the stringline have been presented, said the staff report: adopting LCP Policy 396 as approved, and modifying it to define a stringline as “a line drawn between the furthest seaward corner of the adjacent house or deck.”

A Dec. 11 letter to the commission from Commissioner Andrew Stern recommended more refinement of LCP Policy 396 to address “unusual corners.”

Pro school choice

    0

    I can understand how people can get emotional over such weighty issues as roof heights, overzealous zoning enforcement, and crowing roosters — but the discussion about our responsibilities as parents for our children’s education should not take place in hyperbolic rhetoric but rather with an earnest, frank discussion of the situation. Wafting Spam aside, Mr. Gates and Ms. Roney point out in their letters last week that it is “shameful” for California to spend so little on its children’s education, and that we shouldn’t “allow a small group of property owners to render null and void the wishes of the majority.” Perhaps a quick look at the facts will guide us to a better understanding of the problem.

    First, California is one of 13 states which require a supermajority (+66 percent) of voters to decide bond and other taxation issues. It only required a simple majority 50.1 percent to pass this law. Was that “rendering null and void the will of the majority?” Most adult citizens pay for education, even renters — through rental costs passed on to them. Secondly, we may be shocked to learn this but as a nation, the United States spends more money per pupil than all but two other nations (Austria and Switzerland). Furthermore, we outspend England by 31 percent, France by 13 percent and Japan by 33 percent, yet would we say that for all this expense our children are better educated? Total spending in United States schools rose 200 percent from 1960 to 1992, yet would we say that our children now learn twice as much?

    It seems like nearly every day the Los Angeles Times prints an article about waste, fraud and incompetence perpetrated by the local school district. The teachers are not deciding to build classrooms on toxic waste sites, government bureaucrats are — and they are the very same unaccountable minions who have driven a once respected school system into the near chaos it now lies in. A Realtor friend of mine always cautions not to throw good money after bad — or in Far Eastern parlance, a fish rots from the head. I am quite happy that we have a two-thirds majority vote in place to keep these bureaucrats reigned in, and I would love to see more accountability for the colossal mistakes they make with our money. We don’t need to give them more money — we need to entertain a new educational funding paradigm.

    If there is any villain here, it has to be viewed as the tyranny of the state monopoly on education and spending. When government–run school systems are forced to be competitive, they become responsive. It’s amazing what just a few experiments in parental school choice have yielded nationwide. Parents are listened to, and kids learn more. As a taxpayer, I am fed up with this government monopoly on schools and school tax revenues. We pay the fees, we should decide where our money is spent — on schools for our kids that deliver what we pay for, not schools which statist elites say we must continue to support, unthinkingly. We owe our kids a permanent fix to the educational problem, not ever larger and costly Band–Aid remedies. Opponents of school choice fear parental independence on this issue — not because it won’t work but because it will.

    Bruce Schultz

    Barbara Barsocchini

    0

    Malibu residents who have been treated for Lyme disease have Barbara Barsocchini to thank for the attention and recognition they received from their doctors. Notoriously difficult to diagnose, the disease was rarely reported to public health authorities, and, as late as 1998, most doctors maintained the disease did not exist anywhere in Los Angeles County.

    Barsocchini knew better, having suffered for years with debilitating symptoms misdiagnosed as everything from arthritis to chronic fatigue syndrome. When she finally received the correct treatment, she made it her personal mission to educate other Malibu residents to the threat of the tick-borne disease and to get the attention of state and county health officials. It was a struggle.

    While the disease was recognized to exist on the East Coast (it was named for the Connecticut county where it was first discovered in this country), doctors in California, particularly in the southern counties, refused to acknowledge its presence. There was even a backlash in the medical community against doctors who made the diagnosis on clinical evaluation in spite of blood tests that were admittedly often inaccurate.

    Barsocchini, who lives with her husband, architect Michael Barsocchini, and their two children in the Malibu Knolls area, has devoted the last five years of her life to helping those who have suffered from the long-term effects of the disease to get effective treatment, and to inform pet owners and hikers how to protect themselves from the ticks that carry the disease. State and county health agencies now confirm Lyme disease is one of the fastest growing infectious diseases in the state, and have launched education campaigns for prevention and treatment.

    Bill and Lisa Curtis

    In a comparatively short period of time Bill and Lisa Curtis have made a major impact on Malibu by taking a leadership role in our community, our schools and our recreation. Individually and through Bill’s company, CurtCo Publishing, and its affiliate, Malibu Post & Production, an audio video post-production facility serving the entertainment, Internet and technology-based education industries, they have generously contributed to local schools: the computer lab at Pt. Dume Marine Science Elementary School; outfitting several other Malibu public schools with computers and bringing in their company personnel to install and set up the systems; helping to finance the sports scoreboard at MHS and several other athletic support ventures.

    They are more than passive contributors. Lisa has served as 1998-1999 PTA president at Pt. Dume school, vice-president for Cultural Arts, and as a classroom volunteer, she has brought her guitar and taught music to the fourth- and fifth grades. She also was the former president of St. Luke’s Lutheran Church in Woodland Hills.

    With their three children, Danny, Jenny and Chelsea, attending Malibu schools, the Curtises are deeply committed to quality public education.

    Both Bill and Lisa are originally from the East Coast — Lisa from Glenrock, N. J., and Bill from Garden City, Long Island. He began in advertising with Bozell & Jacobs and Benton & Bowles but soon gravitated to publishing and, since 1982, when he founded CurtCo, has launched 25 magazines individually and in partnerships. He and Freedom Communications continue as partners in CurtCo e-Media Ventures and the development of smalloffice.com, an interactive Web site serving small business and home office entrepreneurs.

    Beverly Hammond

    A Malibu resident of 23 years, Beverly Hammond lives in the Point Dume home built by her late husband. Her son, a UC Berkeley grad, currently lives in Japan working as a computer software developer with Cambridge Technology Partners. Her daughter is a junior at UCLA studying design and computer animation. “We’ve now become the little computer family.”

    She was secretary of the original study committee in 1990 for Malibu High School, co-wrote with Jeff Jennings the group’s report to the school board and was an active leader in overcoming opposition from board members, who worried about a brain drain and defection of athletes from Samohi.

    Her son had graduated from Samohi, and her daughter, an eighth-grader when MHS opened, chose to go there because she wanted a more diverse environment, Hammond said. “I think we can be very proud of our school district, its fine teachers and students at both high schools. MHS has a broader multicultural experience than they would have expected. It’s been a benefit to the district as a whole. It has exceeded our vision.”

    The year MHS was established, she taught journalism and was advisor for the school’s first yearbook and first newspaper. At the same time, she had started Image Maker Publishing, which produced “Malibu’s Cooking Again,” a fund-raiser for survivors of the 1993 wildfire, and a calendar, “Fire Storm,” using photos from freelance photographers that was distributed to firefighters.

    For the last two years, she has published the Chamber of Commerce Business Directory. As chamber president, she says her primary goal this year is to get the board focused on projects like redoing its Web site and improving communications with members.

    As president of the Point Dume Community Services District board, which has run the Community Center for the last 16 years, Hammond is working with the city on the establishment of a new community center.

    “I’m afraid it’s been very busy,” she said. “My goal for the near future is to do some cutting back after my present commitments are over.”

    Doug Himmelfarb

    For years, it sat lonely and abandoned — the old Malibu courthouse — surrounded by highway rubbish, dead plants and broken windows. But slowly, plank by plank and brick by brick, this local landmark was lovingly restored to its former glory. Palms and geraniums were planted, aging wrought iron was replaced and colorful replicas of Adamson House tiles were laid. No detail was overlooked, from the recreation of the famed Malibu Potteries Persian rug in the entrance to the sweet ceramic inset of a California friar.

    For old timers and residents of nearby Rambla Vista, it was like watching a dying loved one bounce back to life. More importantly, it is a major milestone in the preservation of Malibu’s minuscule and rapidly vanishing heritage. The revival is due, in large part, to Doug Himmelfarb. He worked long hours to restore the aging structure with the help of Ruth and Ella Hirschfield, whose father built the courthouse in 1933. “They became a very important part of the restoration project and helped me every step of the way,” Himmelfarb explains. “They were instrumental in helping me make it the best it could be.”

    Now that the place is back in top shape, Himmelfarb wants to transform it into a private club, which he envisions as an elegant spot for special events and upscale banquets. “We are very proud of it,” Himmelfarb explains. “We’ve got authentic light fixtures, mahogany doors, bronze work, period furniture and chandeliers.” He describes his Mission Club as a warm and inviting place with sophistication and style.

    Plans are also underway to revitalize the building’s sister structure next door. The site once occupied by Georgio’s restaurant will reopen as La Costa Court, Malibu’s newest eatery. “Together, we’ve made it what it should have been long ago,” he says. In completing the project, he has also restored the spirit and the style of Malibu’s past, beautified a shabby stretch of highway and salvaged a precious piece of yesteryear. For that we owe him a great deal of thanks.

    Steven Ravaglioli and Bonnie Lockrem

    Steven Ravaglioli and Bonnie Lockrem, husband and wife, teach music at Malibu’s three public elementary schools, traveling up and down PCH each day. Luckily, they are teaching as a team this year. Each teaches string and wind instruments.

    Both are also adjunct professors at Pepperdine. Both are active with the Malibu Optimist Club. He joined at age 26. “It’s an important part of my life,” he says. “Those guys mentored me and supported me.” He is one of the club’s past double-distinguished presidents.

    She received a 1988 Optimist’s award for excellence in commitment to the youth of the community. “It helped me realize the community was not only deserving but appreciative.”

    Their many students have performed before the community, from Little League games to Stairway of the Stars, from school assemblies to Malibu’s many club meetings.

    Lockrem was raised in San Diego. She attended USC, earning a bachelor’s degree in music and a master’s in music education. After a few years with the L.A. Unified School District, she came to Malibu, “when no one else in the Santa Monica-Malibu district wanted to drive that far” — and stayed.

    The program at the time was small, she recalls, but the parents were very invested. She branched out from elementary school to Malibu Park Junior High to coordinating the districtwide performance, Stairway of the Stars, to coordinating the district elementary music program for eight years.

    Ravaglioli was born in San Francisco and also attended USC, receiving his bachelor’s degree in business, later earning a master’s in music education.

    He holds a real estate broker’s license, and his company, SR Realty, has bought and sold real estate locally since 1986. He has played trumpet professionally with various groups, occasionally with the Pepperdine Community Orchestra.

    Students from 20 years ago call them. Many are now professionals, some are even music educators.

    Kristin Reynolds

    Kristin Reynolds, founding president of the advocacy group PARCS (People Achieving Recreation and Community Services), has been in the “recreation business” most of her life.

    A native of Brentwood, Reynolds came to Malibu when she attended Pepperdine. She had also met a wonderful “partner,” a friend’s horse named Joe Joe, whom she rode everywhere. “That’s how I grew to love Malibu.”

    Along the way, she also met her husband, Bill, who had lived here most of his life and also rode horses.

    With a degree in leisure science, Reynolds had worked for the cities of Los Angeles and Santa Monica and the Conejo Valley, and taught physical education at Our Lady of Malibu School before becoming the first director of the Malibu Community Center. She worked there 15 years, completely renovating the programs and the site.

    “That opened the door to the community movement,” she says.

    PARCS was formed in 1998, when the City Council voted to disband the informal study group that had been investigating Malibu’s parks and recreational needs, and to form instead a five-member, council-appointed commission

    “We wanted to bring together senior citizens, Little League, AYSO, all the groups so they could have their own voice,” she said. The group, whose mission is to find permanent space for active and passive recreation in the city for all ages, now has more than 1,000 individual endorsements.

    Last week, PARCS presented the Parks and Recreation Commission with a land survey. Monday, Reynolds presented the City Council with the mail-in component of the city’s Parks Master Plan the council had requested.

    PARCS will now be working toward a compatible relationship with the State of California on the long-term use of Bluffs Park, which has overwhelming support from the community.

    Reynolds says working with Malibu-based Justice for Homicide Victims showed her people don’t give recreation enough importance in their lives. “If these criminals had been involved in recreation, this never would have happened,” she said. “Play resolves conflict, it blows the carbon out of the engine and restores the soul. It makes better people.”

    Jack Schultz

    Jack Schultz is a man profoundly grateful for his personal and financial success. “I like what I’m doing,” he says of the family business and donation of use of prime land for a park.

    The man who helped create Papa Jack’s Skateboard Park in the Civic Center is a child of the Depression. Like Kirk Douglas, with whom he shares the same birthday, his early jobs were in the iron and metal junkyard business.

    Schultz met his wife of 63 years, Pearl, in Echo Park. He was an acrobat, working out on bars and rings in the park. By the time Jack and Pearl got married, he was in the glass-container supply business, working with the company for about 15 years.

    In the late ’30s, Schultz started getting interested in real estate. He went to the Hall of Records and looked for “tax sale” property and found a very old, “grown-over” house, which he bought for $1,350. He told his friends, “I’ll buy you hot dogs if you help me clean up the place,” and they did. He leased it out until the state condemned it to build the Hollywood Freeway and paid Schultz “considerably more” than he paid for it.

    Schultz has continued to follow that pattern with subsequent properties. “I upgraded each time,” he says.

    Today Schultz has a family-run property development company, J&P Enterprises. Daughters Harlene and Marsha help run the business.

    After living in Malibu for 30 years, he says, “I love the people and the camaraderie of the small community,” noting how he meets friends several times a week. “Taverna Tony’s is like Rick’s, everybody goes there,” referring to the classic film “Casablanca.”

    He decided to donate use of the land because he knew the problems the skateboarders were having. “If we have something to give, we do,” Schultz said. “My wife and I feel very good about that.”

    Nidra Winger

    She came to Malibu in the early 1970s, a Valley girl from Van Nuys, to watch her then boyfriend surf. She thought she’d stay until he got out of the water. Now, 25-plus years later, he’s long gone, but she stayed to live, work and marry in Malibu and became an active community leader.

    Nidra Winger Maus, as those who have worked with her know, is a pint-sized dynamo who is now the executive director of the Malibu Community Center and a leader in the fight to preserve the center. As more of its meeting rooms are converted to classrooms because of growing student enrollment, the center can no longer supply space for seniors and teens, exercise and dance facilities and Malibu’s long-established AA meetings.

    Winger came to the center after many years of public service involvement as a leader of the Kiwanis Club, one of a pioneering group of women who became club members in 1987, when state law mandated women be admitted to formerly all-male service clubs. She became the club’s first woman president, in 1993-94, and chaired the Chili Cook-off for several years. Kiwanis’ major fund-raiser, the event annually contributes close to $100,000 to local charities.

    Winger was also a musician, played the flute, and an artisan, working as a seamstress for Jackie’s Leatherwaves since 1975.

    She was a board member of the American Heart Association Malibu Chapter throughout the 1990s and served as its chair for two terms.

    Currently, Winger is involved in the recently created Malibu Youth Coalition, which brings services, support and activities to Malibu’s growing youth and teen-age population.

    Michael Zakian, Ph.D.

    Michael Zakian, Ph.D., is director of the Frederick R. Weisman Museum of Art at Pepperdine University.

    He was selected to receive the Dolphin Award for his role in arts outreach to local and inner-city schools, assisting with tours, bus-in programs and children’s art workshops.

    But the curator says, “I’d like to correct that,” generously emphasizing the work others at Pepperdine have done to bring children in, particularly the efforts of Marnie Mitze, director of Center for the Arts. Says Zakian, “My biggest contribution to Malibu has been a series of exhibitions focusing on Malibu art and artists.”

    In 1998, he curated “Historic Landscapes of Malibu,” which focused on works painted in Malibu that date back to 1897. In 1999, he organized “On Location in Malibu,” for which he invited members of California’s oldest art association, the California Art Club, to paint their interpretations of Malibu. Currently on exhibit is “John Register: A Retrospective,” about the late Point Dume artist.

    For a future exhibition, he is considering “Malibu Collects,” in which he hopes to borrow selected works from the many art collectors living in Malibu.

    He says he was notified of his Dolphin Award by a member of the California Art Club, “who has a very strong Russian accent, who called me on his cell phone with a very bad connection while driving to San Francisco. How did he hear about it on his way to San Francisco?”

    The New York City native studied art history at Columbia University and received his M.A. and Ph.D. from Rutgers. Before coming to Pepperdine, he held curatorial positions at the Palm Springs Desert Museum, from 1986 to 1995.

    He is engaged to Lia Skidmore, owner of Skidmore Contemporary Art in the Malibu Country Mart.

    Whose recycling is it?

      0

      Last Monday as I scurried a bit late to put out the trash, greenery and recycling cans I came upon a Latin gentleman going through the neighborhood diving for aluminum cans.

      Since the system is paid for with receipts from the raw recycling, isn’t this theft? In Spanish — he spoke no English — I politely asked him to not go through the trash.

      Does anyone have a definitive policy on this “who owns the recycling” issue. I’m a little uncomfortable with strangers prowling the neighborhood under any guise.

      Marshall Thompson

      The code blues

        0

        After a few protest gatherings and a demonstration at the City Council meeting and a series of stories, columns and editorial cartoons in The Malibu Times about the problems with the city’s code enforcement policy, they’re finally going to do something. They, being the council, are going to have what they call an “educational workshop” to explain exactly what they’re doing, and why it’s really very fair and, my guess is, why it’s really very good for us, and probably why we should take our medicine and stop bellyaching since they really know best. Now, the idea of having a meeting to explain it all is really a pretty good one, but it’s also a classic illustration of just exactly what’s wrong with our city government.

        It’s based on a fundamentally incorrect assumption that once they give us their version of the facts, and do it in a forum they can control, where they dictate the agenda and keep it away from the rabble-rousers (one guess who they think that is), we will, of course, see their wisdom, which to them is self-evident.

        I know this because I spent several hours watching their quarterly meeting where they talked about what happened at the last City Council meeting and then planned the upcoming meeting, slated for the evening of Feb. 10, to enlighten us all. At that quarterly meeting, the council members, namely Walt Keller, Carolyn Van Horn and Joan House, congratulated the code enforcement crew on how they handled themselves at the last contentious City Council meeting. Tom Hasse said nothing, and Harry Barovsky was absent.

        I watched them on cable and I walked away feeling very uneasy and not quite sure why. But Karen, who I drafted to watch the meeting with me, much against her will I might add, cut right through to the core. What she observed is not what they did but what they didn’t do. They never said, nor ever considered, a couple of simple questions.

        What is it that these people are so upset about and is there any reason for them to be so upset?

        It’s as if it never even crossed their radar that maybe, just maybe, there possibly could be something even slightly wrong with their zoning code or their code enforcement process, and maybe they ought to take a hard look at it, perhaps declare a temporary moratorium, and get some independent, unbiased people to take a look at it and not just rely on staff.

        The code enforcement staff, namely Vic Peterson and Gail Sumpter, were apprehensive that this “educational workshop” will turn into an exercise in staff bashing, which is not an unreasonable concern. I must tell you Vic Peterson is a pretty good guy. He’s conscientious, and he tries to be fair and even occasionally compassionate, which I know some people find hard to believe because with his gruff manner and shaved head he looks a bit like an extra on the “Sopranos.” But he wears the blinders that many city staff wear, that blocks them from seeing maybe the people have something intelligent to say that might help to solve the problem. That’s why, if you run an “educational workshop,” where you’re going to tell them, as opposed to an event, where you’re going to listen to them, you’re doomed to failure.

        There is still time before the workshop to agree to do as much listening as talking. That’s why it’s really important people attend this meeting. This council has always counted noses, and if you don’t show up they figure you don’t care so why should they.

        We, the citizens of Malibu, can change the code enforcement policies of our city. My judgment is Hasse and Barovsky will listen, as will Joan House once she overcomes her need to be agreeable and just go along. As for Keller and Van Horn, well my views on them are well-known, and you might just as well be talking to the wall. I also think we should expect to hear from the challengers, John Wall, Ken Kearsley and Jeff Jennings, and how they feel about the code enforcement issue because in April, we’re going to have to make some choices.

        I hope to see you at the meeting.

        P.S. As long as we’re going to have the city prosecutor present, perhaps he’ll deign to explain to us what happened in the prosecution of Remy O’Neill for allegedly violating the campaign ordinance. Why was it thrown out of court? Why wasn’t it appealed by the city? Was Remy right? Was the prosecution political? Do we owe her an apology, or what? We have a right to know, and she has a right to know. I know they probably could take away my Bar card for suggesting maybe lawyering is not quite the priesthood the city prosecutors seem to believe it is, and if we are to trust the system is fair, then perhaps they owe us some explanations.

        Shoot litterbugs, not deer

          0

          This is in response to the Jan. 20 letter from Jefferson Wagner, “Trash talk that helps.” His comments in his letter brought tears to my eyes. I, too, clean up the canyon road where I live and have been known to complain to anyone who will stand still long enough to listen, “I am mystified why many people visit Malibu for its beauty and leave their trash behind.”

          Malibu is a magical, wondrous, incredible place to live, which is why so many want to move here, but once ensconced they decide they are not happy and want to change it. If they didn’t do their homework before moving to Malibu and find it’s not desirous to live under these rural conditions then leave it and live somewhere that already suits your wants and needs and leave it to people who want to live under these conditions.

          As for the young deer shot in the side with an arrow, obviously for sport and fund, let’s do something about this. Whey should hunting be legal in our area? We the people need to take back control of the governmental laws that are made and change the for the betterment of all. Malibu is worth saving. Let us band together and fight for her.

          Linda Joslynn

          If he had a hammer

            0

            To those who don’t believe that the Malibu Zoning Code doesn’t need some changes, here’s a summary of the bizarre experience I had at the Zoning Department. This story is not written for amusement but to alert the people who live in Malibu that we are all under a financial uzi with the Zoning Department and its latest penalties. This could happen to anyone in the city who wants to do even a minor repair to their home.

            I recently went down to the planning counter to ask about what would be required if I wanted to expand a bathroom in my 40-year-old, four-bedroom house. With a straight face, the young man behind the counter told me that I would need to get a complete geology report ($6,000), structural engineering drawings and other reports ($3,000), and pay application and inspection fees ($1,500).

            As if spending $10,500 in studies and fees for a 100-square-foot addition wasn’t enough, then he told me that, of course, all of my property would have to be brought up to code. I live on three acres that are not visible to the road nor neighbors and the home was not built with a two-car garage. I said, “You mean I would have to build a two-car garage?” He said yes and that it would have to be a minimum of 600 square feet. Of course that would require a geology report, structural plans etc., and would probably cost in the range of $50,000. And I’m sure I’d have to remove my front security gate and build a new one because the old one is outside the newer setback ($10,000 with plans and fees).

            Now I am looking at spending at least $70,000 before I even lift a hammer to my bathroom. But the worst part of it is that when the inspector comes to see what needs to be brought up to code, I’m sure he’ll find a dozen or more items that have been fine for 40 years but that he thinks need to be upgraded. Now if it turns out that I don’t feel like writing a check for $70,000 for the new garage, new gate as well as thousands of dollars for upgrades (including maybe a new driveway), the inspector will cite me for at least a dozen misdemeanor violations and start fining me $1,000 for each one or $12,000 a day. It won’t take long at that rate for the city to take all my equity in the house. You better start calling your City Council member because it’s only a matter of time before this happens to you. They should change the law so that if you want to repair an item in your house they should leave the rest of the property alone.

            Name withheld on request

            Environment for all

              0

              The first settlers of Malibu were the native Americans called Chumash. They co-existed with wildlife — animals and fowl. They subsisted on seafood from an ocean which was a source of pure abundance. They, along with most native peoples, believed in temporary dwellings, living in a community, sharing and taking care of each other, young and old. Take care of Mother Earth, this is a temporary life in preparation for the spirit world. In other words heaven and Earth are combined.

              In year 2000, so much of what was in the beginning is gone. Most of the wildlife are now endangered species, with dwindling habitat. The ocean is used as a toilet for millions of people, Malibu Creek used as a sewer pipe, emptying into the Malibu Lagoon, a cesspool.

              We now have wealthy individuals and institutions that declare themselves “environmentalists,” but they are not thinking “ecosystem” but more like “me system.” I volunteered at an institute which was created to focus on our fragile environment but all I met were “marketing people,” intent on raising large sums of money for the purpose of maintaining offices in what was a complex of five beautiful homes of an extremely wealthy entertainer. Not much thought or care was shown to the families whose neighborhood was disrupted which seemed so insensitive.

              Year 2000 in Malibu brings a climate of criminalization of the poor and moderate-income folks.

              Where is Malibu’s state-mandated low-income housing? And I’m not talking about a bedroom renting for $1,000 a month or a guest house renting for $2,500 a month. I mean decent housing for long-term Malibu residents — families with children.

              Is there any compassion in our community for families who are concerned with the basic necessities of life: food, clothing and shelter. Many are suffering.

              To those who say they care about the environment I must say, “Actions speak louder than words.” It’s time we cared for all living things in our community.

              Valerie Sklarevsky

              Highlights of the Point Dume Headlands Settlement

              0

              Parking Spaces. Ten parking spaces, including two disabled accessible, on Cliffside Drive. Eight are to be in the public right of way on the inland side. The location of the two disabled accessible spaces is to be determined by State Parks. The boulders are to be removed and construction of a fence around the preserve is to begin by December 2000. The city is to pay for removal of the boulders and construction of the parking spaces. California State Parks will pay for the fence.

              Nature Bus. Beginning June 2000, a shuttle bus called the “Nature Bus” will operate between Westward Beach and the preserve seven days a week during the summer, and on weekends and holidays the rest of the year. The city estimates it will pay $50,000 a year for the Nature Bus.

              Preserve Staffing and Visitor Services. State parks will provide a ranger who will support the state’s volunteer docent program, ensure public safety and protect the natural and cultural resources.

              Management Plan. State Parks will prepare a management plan for the restoration, renovation and enhancement of the preserve. The carrying capacity of the preserve will be addressed. There will be a public hearing on the draft management plan March 2.

              Preserve Access Study. Using information developed during the management plan, the city is to commission and pay for a transportation access study.

              Coastal Commission Reimbursement. The commission will reimburse the city for $40,000 – $100,000 of its construction and signage expenses.

              ×