Home Blog Page 6865

Fond Farewell

0

I wish to thank the mayor, City Council, and all the citizens of Malibu for allowing me to be of service for the past 35 months.

During my term as your city clerk I’ve prepared and/or supervised the preparation of: 143 council agendas packages, 150 council minutes, 241 council resolutions, 49 ordinances, 4 council reorganizations, 2 city elections, more than 13 FPPC filing deadlines, 3 appreciation of service events, 3 council receptions, an initiative petition, and the tenth anniversary celebration, on top of the daily work routine.

While serving Malibu, I’ve worked with eight councilmembers including four mayors, three city managers, three city attorneys, three planning directors, three Public Works directors, two finance directors, two Parks & Recreation directions, one building official and more than 70 employees.

I’ve endured numerous uncompensated O.T. hours, infrequent however unbecoming treatment, have driven more than 116,500 round-trip miles, received three speeding tickets, been in two car accidents and one rock slide on PCH. I’ve learned a great deal from these experiences and, I’ve made several lifelong friendships along the way.

All in all, I’ve enjoyed the “Malibu way of life” while I was here. Thanks again for allowing me to serve you.

Virginia Bloom

‘Turn Off the TV Week’ turns on a burst of energy

0

Last week was National Turn Off the TV Week, which is designed to set kids pondering how much of their lives they’re wasting with their eyeballs glued to the tube.

A peripheral repercussion is that the specter of lost ad revenue strikes fear into the hearts of network executives, who launch a counterattack. The “suits” order additional previews of “all new” episodes of our favorite shows to be shown during tube turnoff week. I guess it must work, because nobody I talked to had a clue that TV was busted so children could abandon the couch, play outside, read and drive their parents crazy.

Some teachers ask students to account for how they spent their reclaimed time. Others stress reading and writing programs all week.

My grandson’s school celebrated something called “Young Authors Day” for which I was pressed into service as a reader. I chose “Coyote,” Gerald McDermott’s tale based on a Native American fable about how Blue Coyote had a nose for trouble and always found it. How he wanted to fly with the crows and how he became rude and boastful and the crows took back their feathers and let him fall back to earth. Three groups of first-, second- and third-graders listened wide-eyed and gape-mouthed, then offered their takes on how coyote got into so much trouble and if he learned anything. The consensus was he didn’t. Most of these kids have seen lots of coyotes and crows and saw the fine line between fact and fiction. That was fun.

My personal experience with Turn Off the TV Week was mixed. Certainly it was less traumatic than the news fast I attempted in honor of Andrew Weil’s “8 Weeks to Optimum Health,” but that’s another story.

One can turn off the TV and still get plenty of news, most of it more enlightening than the pap smeared across TV screens with “film at 11.”

News on National Public Radio is superb, in depth, serious, at times humorous and generally delivered by someone who knows what it is they’re saying instead of perky young news readers mispronouncing the names of world leaders. “All Things Considered,” “The California Report,” “The Washington Report,” “Our Ocean World” couldn’t be better. Fair and balanced coverage of stuff we care about sans car chases.

So in case my teacher wants to know how I spent my found time, here it goes.

Monday without the tube was easy. Monday TV is pretty lame, at least until you get to Charlie Rose, whose intelligent and funny interviews shine on KCET at about 11 p.m. and again at 3:30 p.m. the following day.

Instead of watching Jim Lehrer on KCET’s “News Hour,” I listened to NPR while I began cleaning the room where I push words around. My computer was at the Mac Doctor’s place all week, so I cleaned behind and beneath the desk where wires breed and computer gremlins unplug the telephone connection when no one’s looking. I was still hoovering up dust bunnies when “Jeopardy” asked its answers and responded its questions without me. Guess I’ll have to do more crossword puzzles to keep my brain cells from atrophying.

Tuesday was tougher because “NYPD Blue” was “all new,” but who knew? So I started filing clips and stuff. This led to a major reshuffling of file boxes and a minor repositioning of furniture. The result is serene order. I’m so inspired I hang up the new mirror and shelf that’s been leaning on the couch, half unwrapped, since Christmas.

Wednesday I was going to cheat and watch “West Wing” and “Law and Order,” but since I hadn’t seen “NYPD Blue” the night before, I forgot it was Wednesday, and besides, I was deeply engrossed in Al Martinez’s book, “The Last City Room.”

By Thursday, I was slipping out of TV mode. The network suits had cause to worry. Their ratings were falling like dot-com stock prices. I never even missed Sally Fields’ return to “E.R.”

Friday was the real test. “Washington Week in Review,” by far, the best of the talking heads in my view. Oh well, instead I caught “Jazz From Lincoln Center” with Billy Taylor on NPR. Then I finished listening to my latest P.D. James mystery on tape while I filed and pushed the furniture around some more.

Saturday TV is as lame as Monday, so I caught a book show on NPR: Joanne Woodward reading a short story, recollections by the mother of a retarded girl who marries a retarded young man. Powerful, poignant and fiercely funny.

Sunday morning came and went without Charles Osgood’s “Sunday Morning,” Wolf Blitzer, Tim Russert, Sam and Cokie, the Capital Gang and all the political pontificators. Blah, blah, blah. I listened to the opera instead: same intrigue, drama, whining and crying but set to glorious music.

By this time I’m so inspired I get out my Real Goods, Gardeners’ Supply and Alston’s catalogs and order a ton of stuff that will keep me outdoors and away from the tube.

Score at week’s end: books read – 3; books on tape – 2, unabridged; newspapers scanned and partially read – 14; crossword puzzles completed – 21, 2 crumpled in the dust bin; file boxes – 4, emptied and contents resorted; minor repairs, picture hanging and miscellaneous chores – 15; articles and columns clipped and put in string books – 146 (I’m up to June, 1994); photos and negatives filed – just begun when TV Turn-Off Week ended. The fact is I’m on a roll. Feeling a bit smug, like Blue Coyote. I don’t think I’ll go back to the TV routine just yet, except possibly just for “Jeopardy.” Got to keep nudging those brain cells.

Trapping light

0
 

Laddie John Dill has been called the “archetypal California artist,” and in a conversation with him, it’s easy to see why.

First off, he is a Malibu native son. He actually folded newspapers for The Malibu Times when he was eight years old and he attended Webster Elementary School. After graduating from Chouinard Art Institute he went on to become a printer with the esteemed L.A. workshop Gemini G.E.L. At Gemini he worked closely with legendary abstract artist Jasper Johns and Bob Rauschenberg, whom he cites as influences.

Dill’s early pieces focused primarily on sand and light, creating what looked like an aerial view of a body of water or mountainous region. He had his first solo exhibition in New York in 1971, and soon after Dill edged toward what would become his own particular style.

His work has been referred to as “beautiful chunks of planet.” Working with earth materials such as sulfur, volcanic ash, blue cobalt oxide, jade oxide and red iron oxide, and incorporating it with silicone and a special cement, he created three-dimensional geological arts forms.

Through the years, his expressionistic sculptures and three-dimensional wall paintings have been exhibited around the world.

Dill says he likes to create using what is “indigenous to certain areas of landscape, so someone looking at [his] work has a literal reference, and hopefully people will be able to connect [with] and have a better understanding of abstract art.”

He spoke about hiking and observing nature and the geography of the canyons, comparing the red rock formations in Solstice Canyon to other canyons. His favorite is Bryce Canyon in Utah. Dill’s work is represented by countless corporate collections and 22 national and international museums. Recently, he has been working with other materials, including aluminum, steel and glass.

His upcoming exhibition, entitled “Light Traps” at the Skidmore Gallery, is a brand new work for Dill, the first one-person exhibition devoted to the artist’s new works in aluminum. The wall hangings, which are welded and polished aluminum, invoke intertwined flowing ribbons of fabric, reflecting light–hence the title of the show. Others look like smooth, wind-blown sand dunes or converging flows of water.

The exhibition opens Saturday and continues to June 17. More information can be obtained by calling the gallery at 456.5070.

Arson Watch needs donations

0

We, the board of directors of Friends of the Arson Watch and Disaster Services, Inc. (F.A.W.D.S.) have voted and passed a motion to solicit funding for the purchase of a four-wheel drive vehicle to be used as an arson watch command vehicle. This vehicle will replace “Old Betsy,” your arson watch coordinator Allen Emerson’s command van.

From 1982 to 1995, Emerson has paid for all maintenance and repairs and has logged over 200,000 miles. Since 1995,.F.A.W.D.S. has paid for all the repairs. Over the past two years, repairs have become more frequent, and “Old Betsy” is on her last legs. Therefore, we have decided it would be financially wiser to purchase a new or late model vehicle.

Recently, many of you have contributed to F.A.W.D.S., Inc., and we greatly appreciate your support. We would not be asking for your help again were it not vitally important and necessary.

Thank you for taking time to read this special appeal. Please make your tax deductible check payable to F.A.W.D.S., Inc. and mail at your earliest convenience to P.O. Box 197, Topanga, CA 90290.

Allen Emerson

School district hires new superintendent

0
 

The Santa Monica-Malibu Unified School District selected a new superintendent, replacing Neil Schmidt who retires early this summer.

John Deasy, 40, who is currently supervising the Rhode Island Coventry Public School District, will take over the job from Schmidt July 5.

Deasy received his B.A. in biology/chemistry and his masters in education administration from Providence College, R.I. He is currently working on a doctorate at the University of Rhode Island.

Deasy has three children who attend elementary and middle school in Rhode Island.

The transition to California will be a bittersweet experience for the new superintendent and his family; they will have to be separated for a while as he begins his work on the West Coast.

Deasy and his oldest daughter, who is about to start high school, will come to California first, while his two younger children and wife, Pat, will arrive January, next year. This will enable Pat Deasy, who is also on the academic track, to complete her studies for a nurse practitioner’s degree in Rhode Island.

“We’ve visited California a few times and we always enjoyed it very much,” said Pat Deasy, as she spoke about the prospect of moving west.

“But it will be hard to be apart until then,” she said.

Another obstacle for the Deasys is that they have not yet found a place to live in California. They hope to find housing within the district so the children can attend local schools.

“But we don’t know where that will be,” said Deasy.

And the cost of housing locally may pose a challenge.

As a point of comparison, current real estate values indicate that a three-bedroom house sells for $100,000 – $200,000 in Rhode Island, while the same three-bedroom house in Malibu could cost significantly more.

The family will receive some assistance from the district. “There will be some relocation funds [available for the family],” said Jeannie Wells, superintendent assistant at SMMUSD.

School board officials are happy he is making the move despite the challenges.

“We selected John Deasy because he believes that every child can succeed,” said Tom Pratt, school board president.

The district selected Deasy after reviewing approximately 60 applications. He will make $150,000 per year as superintendent.

“John is such a perfect fit for our district,” said board member Mike Jordan. “It is impossible to be in a room with him for more than a few minutes and not to feel a sense of excitement and duty. He is a can-do leader.”

Deasy said his number one goal is to improve student achievement and instruction, “providing the opportunities to do the best we can at that.”

When he first arrives, Deasy plans to start working on an entry plan that will document to the community and the board a review of what he has found after hearing parents, administrators and teachers talk about their concerns and objectives for the schools.

Once he has evaluated the needs of the district through listening, he will begin to list the work and major goals for the schools, focusing on accountability.

For the SMMUSD, Deasy already has some ideas about what the current needs are. The purpose of his evaluation is to confirm that these ideas are accurate.

“The schools need to get a handle on the fiscal difficulties of the district,” said Deasy. “Part of my responsibilities, in the short term, will be to explore alternative resources and examine spending practices.”

Deasy will attend the next school board meeting, which will take place tonight, May 3, at 7 p.m. at the HRL auditorium in Malibu.

Coastal Commission under constitutional fire

0

News Analysis

A bombshell was dropped on the California Coastal Commission last Friday when a Superior Court Judge in Sacramento decided that the Coastal Commission is set up in an unconstitutional manner.

If the decision ultimately stands up upon appeal, it could strip the Coastal Commission of its regulatory authority and change the manner in which land use is regulated along the California coast.

Superior Court Judge Charles Kobayashi based his decision on the fact that two-thirds of the Coastal Commission’s membership is appointed by legislative leaders, even though the commission is part of the executive branch of government and the governor is the chief executive officer.

The Coastal Commission, which was originally created by a citizens’ initiative 30 years ago, has four members appointed by the governor of California, four by the speaker of the Assembly, and four members by the president pro tem of the Senate. All serve at the pleasure of their appointing authority, which means they can be replaced anytime, with or without cause.

The Coastal Commission makes many types of land-use decisions along the California coast, which include approval of development permits, and exercises many types of executive powers, which Kobayashi ruled was improper because it violates the separation of powers provision of the California Constitution.

The implications of the decision, which will most certainly be appealed to the Court of Appeals, and probably later the California Supreme Court, could be profound because it might throw every permit application currently before the Coastal Commission into limbo until there is a definitive answer as to whether the commission is legitimate. That process to reach a final decision could take several years.

More likely, it is expected that the judge will grant a stay of his order, which he has not yet officially issued, allowing time for an appeal since this is a major issue.

The question addressed in Kobayashi’s decision is “a very complicated legal question and I’m sure it will be taken up on appeal,” said Christi Hogin, interim city manager for Malibu. “But it does raise important questions that Malibu has asked in the past about the commission.

“This ruling is based upon the idea that the commission is making policy decisions without being accountable to the voters,” she said. “What makes a policy decision legitimate is when it is made by someone who is elected by people and becomes accountable at the ballot box.

“The city’s Local Coastal Plan draft is created that way, whereas the Coastal Commission is very removed from the voters and the electorate,” she explained.

“I know some people argue that it’s a good thing because it means they don’t make political decisions, but that’s not true,” continued Hogin. “They are in fact political appointees and they have to answer to the elected official who appointed them.”

However, Sara Wan, chair of the Coastal Commission, said: “This is just a question of how the commissioners are appointed, not about the way the commission works.”

Wan feels that Kobayashi’s decision will be overturned on appeal. “We’re not the only commission that is appointed this way,” she said. There are many places in the state where city councils appoint planning commissions, which make land-use decisions, said Wan.

Hogin also emphasized that the commission has done important work over the years. “I also think that every Californian would tell you the coast is worth saving — we all agree,” she said. “But on a day-to-day basis, we have to sometimes compromise to protect other important values.

“I think, in the end, we will rally around the California coast to do what it takes to protect it and offer reasonable access,” she finished

In Wan’s opinion, if a stay were not granted, it would have the effect of putting an immediate moratorium on all development along the coastal zone. This is because the Coastal Act requires that all development in the coastal zone must have a coastal development permit; the only agency that can currently grant one is the Coastal Commission.

Additionally, federal law involves the Coastal Commission with decisions relating to offshore drilling; without it, California would lose its voice in such decisions.

Although the decision took place less than a week ago, the California environmental community is already beginning to organize, according to Wan. Environmentalists are beginning to informally discuss a new initiative that would correct some of the possible constitutional problems.

Wan said she believes the decision might even have the effect of closing ranks in the environmental community and reinvigorating the coastal protection movement because of their strong belief that the California public really wants coastal protection and will support it at the polls.

This opinion would appear to be borne out by a poll conducted by the Los Angeles Times that was released on Monday, in which the paper reported that half of all Americans worry that pollution has grown worse over the last decade. The Times also found that 58 percent of those polled thought that protecting the environment was more important than personal property rights.

Mobile home owners vote in favor of Kissel settlement

0

For several years, owners of the Paradise Cove Mobilehome Park, its tenants and the City of Malibu have been embroiled in lawsuits over rent control issues.

The Kissel Co., which owns the mobile home park, has challenged the correctness of the city’s application of its park rent stabilization ordinance No. 48U, denying Kissel a rent increase. Other issues involved sewage spills and coach owners’ responsibilities for maintaining the mobile home park.

But on April 25, a settlement agreement between the city and Kissel Co. was approved by a majority of the mobile home owners and by a unanimous vote of the City Council.

In the agreement, Kissel agreed to use some portion of increased rents to upgrade the common area amenities and facilities of the park. These will include a replacement or upgrade of the wastewater collection.

The rent structure for the Paradise Cove Mobilehome Park has recently been appraised and, based on the agreement, each space has a different value. The lowest space rent costs $321 per month and the highest $1,331. Every time a home is sold, the space rental fee will rise 15 percent for the next owner.

The impact of the rent increases on individual homeowners is not yet known, but it is thought that some low-income homeowners could be impacted negatively.

Kissel also agreed to release and discharge the tenants from all claims and causes of action for back rents, with respect to any time before the effective date of the agreement. Tenants agreed they would not hold Kissel responsible for refunds relating to overpaid rents prior to the agreement.

A group of mobile home owners came to hear the council’s decision, voicing their by-and-large favorable opinion of the settlement.

However, a minority of the 271 Paradise Cove HOA members was not quite as thrilled, with 104 voting in favor and 40 against the settlement agreement.

Frans Bigelow, treasurer for the Paradise Cove HOA, said: “My concerns all along have always been that things should not be verbally agreed upon, but stating everything in writing so that the benefits are in fact realistic.”

Although the council and the city attorney have said they would look at the matters in detail, Bigelow, a developer who has lived in Paradise Cove for just over a year, said: “Some items were negotiated last minute and most board members never saw them in writing before the vote occurred.

“My biggest concern is I don’t believe it should take three years to have a plan and permit to run a septic system,” explained Bigelow, who deals with the same agencies in his line of work.

“It’s an urgent health issue that should not be dealt with lightly,” said Bigelow, as he spoke about the raw sewage allegedly running in the streets of his neighborhood.

But, overall, Bigelow said he does not object to the settlement agreement and the possible rent increases if the community receives the services they have been promised.

Bigelow also wants to ensure that back rents would not be charged after the agreement was signed.

At the quarterly meeting, homeowners expressed their feelings about the discontentment that has existed in their neighborhood over the years because of the pending lawsuits, and about hope for change.

“The silent majority finally let their voices be heard and they approved of the agreement,” she one homeowner.

Another resident said: “I would describe my six years of residency as difficult, neighbor pitted against neighbor, and residents pitted against the landowner, an atmosphere that was stirred by a minority of residents who may not even be there any more.”

“Just think how the lawyers are going be so angry that they don’t get all that money,” joked a resident.

“Let’s not go there,” joked Mayor Pro Tem Jeff Jennings, who is an attorney.

Publisher’s note: The opinions expressed in this guest editorial are not my opinions but the guest editorial does raise some very interesting questions about a political debate currently taking place. What do we protect? Do we protect everything, some of everything, or do we do a balancing test?

0

To put it in local context: Is a steelhead trout swimming up Malibu Creek really worth $4,200 per fish when that could pay for a kid’s schooling for practically a year? Are the skyrocketing prices of energy and gasoline due, in some significant measure, to a set of environmental laws that discourage investment in new power plants or nuclear energy, or is it all just a cover story from a bunch of energy companies out to bleed us dry?

This editorial comes from a conservative property rights think tank, but some of the questions it raises are worthy of debate.

Let me add one of my own. I’ve seen the shrunken Owens River Valley near Mammoth Lake and I’m sure it was once a lush verdant area with abundant water. I’ve watched some people wring their hands and bemoan Los Angeles’ theft of that water. Yet those aqueducts and that water are what made the San Fernando Valley. Without them, the Owens River Valley would still be lush and the San Fernando Valley a desert. Was it worth it?

I encourage others in the environmental movement, on every side of the issue, to write guest editorials of no more than 725 words. E-mail them to us at agyork@malibutimes.com and malibunews@malibutimes.com .

Guest column

What’s Powering California’s Electricity Woes?

California’s power crisis is shedding light on an issue overdue for debate: the high costs of modern environmentalism.

As they ponder whopping utility bills–and worry about brown-outs–Californians are learning that aggressive environmentalism comes with trade-offs.

For instance, it’s thanks in large part to pressure from environmentalists that no new power plant has been constructed in California over the past decade. And some of those power sources that are available are less effective, delivering less electricity than they are capable of providing, because of dubious environmental initiatives.

The federal Endangered Species Act is a prime example. In 1995, Interior Secretary Bruce Babbitt claimed that the Endangered Species Act costs each American an average of only 16 cents per year. But he left out the costs that show up on our utility bills. The Endangered Species Act has had a serious impact on the supply of electricity in the West.

Activists frequently invoke this and related laws to force changes in power-plant policies. Earlier this year, eight environmental groups threatened to sue Washington state’s largest investor-owned utility if its hydroelectric dam is operated in a way that harms fish protected under the Endangered Species Act. Last June several activist groups sued the federal government over management of dams on the Colorado River, including Hoover Dam, a major source of power for Southern California.

Such lawsuits have already had a dramatic effect on power production. Environmental conservation and protection have transformed Glen Canyon Dam, which holds back Lake Powell, from a 1,300-megawatt resource to a 900-megawatt resource, a loss of more than 30 percent of its generating capacity. Production fell to 330 megawatts this past summer, according to Leslie James, executive director of the Colorado River Energy Distributors Association, an organization representing hundreds of power providers in the Colorado River Basin.

“You take that amount of capacity out of the western wholesale market and it’s going to have a serious impact on prices,” he said.

In recent years the main goal of the operating plan for Folsom Dam, which generates about 10 percent of the Sacramento area’s power, has been satisfying environmental concerns and regulations– particularly protection of winter-run Chinook Salmon. Water has been released from the dam when fish needed it most, rather than when the demand for hydroelectric power has been the greatest. Such a focus on non-human needs has become typical of dam management throughout the west.

In California, air quality regulations have also done their part to prevent power plants from generating the electricity we need. The reason there has been a push to relax some regulations in recent weeks is because when they’re enforced inflexibly, clean-air rules limit plants’ operating time.

When generating facilities reach their limit each day, they have been shut down for the day–even though society’s need for power goes on.

Without question, environmental protection is a vital goal. But so is supplying warmth and light– and jobs and incomes.

Under current bureaucratic policies implementing the Endangered Species Act, the Clean Water Act, the Clean Air Act, and other federal and state mandates, everyday pocketbook and social needs are not given weight when measured against environmental protection.

Americans have accepted this skewed approach partly because they haven’t been squarely presented with the costs–until now. Power shortages just might end the shortage of informed discussion of the environment and the economy. While pursuing environmental priorities, we must embrace policies that strike a rational balance–and don’t leave us in the dark.

David Haddock

Pacific Legal Foundation attorney

Sheen gives award to local environmentalist

0

Issues important to Malibu residents such as saving the wetlands, protecting whales and dolphins, and working to provide Americans with pure, arsenic-free drinking water were rallying cries at a celebration at Sierra Club’s Angeles Chapter 90th Anniversary on April 19.

Actor Martin Sheen, who could not attend the event because of filming of the NBC television series “West Wing,” was to receive a Distinguished Environmentalist Award, which he instead gave to Malibu activist Valerie Sklarevsky of the EarthWays Foundation.

In a letter that Sheen sent as an apology for not attending the event, he said of Sklarevsky: “She is the only one more deserving of this award, so please accept it and keep it, in love and gratitude.”

Sheen, who plays the president of the United States on “West Wing,” is also a Malibu environmental activist.

In remarks preceding the awards, Angeles Chapter President Gordon LaBedz lamented the 95 percent loss of California’s coastal wetlands. Sierra Club President Carl Pope optimistically told how it is “not too late,” to save Southern California, and each officer lauded Sheen’s environmental efforts.

LaBedz praised Sheen for working to safeguard Marina del Rey’s Ballona Creek saying, “Martin stuck his neck out when Steven Spielberg wanted to develop it.”

Sklarevsky had joined Sheen, Cordelia Rorick and Malibu resident Mona Loo, and nearly 8,000 other protestors at the controversial U.S. Army School of the Americas in Fort Benning, Ga. in 1998, and has been a high-profile force in the movement to preserve Malibu wetlands.

Sheen’s activism, cited by the Sierra Club, also includes his participation last year among a group of protesters arrested for chaining themselves to the front gate at the Vandenburg Air Force Base protesting missile tests.

Other award recipients included Nell Newman, daughter of actor Paul Newman, Congresswoman Loretta Sanchez, who received the Distinguished Justice Award; and Mikhail Davis, of Earth Island Institute, who received the David Brower Organizational Award.

About 150 people, including Tom Hayden, Congressman Brad Sherman, and actors Jane Kaczmarek (“Malcom in the Middle”) and Rene Auberjonois (“Star Trek: Deep Space Nine”) attended the event.

Trapping light

0

Â