SMMUSD Considers Tearing Down Malibu High, Starting Over

Carey Upton, Santa Monica-Malibu Unified School District (SMMUSD) chief operations officer, once joked that by the time Malibu High construction was due to end, everyone would give up and decide they want a new campus. After the SMMUSD School Board’s last meeting on April 12, it seems one step closer to reality.

Three hours into the meeting, Upton presented updates to the polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) removal progress at Malibu High School. The presentation was originally going to take place sometime in February or March; however, as things “progressed and shifted,” he centered the presentation around this question: “Is it really prudent to continue spending money abating PCBs on buildings that don’t really support the education of our students in Malibu?”

PCB issues aside, the problem stems from the ’60s, when Malibu High was first built as a middle school. Though it was converted to suit high school students, the facilities remain lacking “to support student learning in the 21st century.” 

Upton asked whether Superintendent Dr. Ben Drati and staff should explore tearing down the MHS campus completely to support this goal.

In response, Board Member Maria Leon-Vazquez had this to say: “ … We shouldn’t even be asking that question. I’m hoping that we are building 21st century schools. Because if we’re not, what are we doing?” 

With abatement and modernization in progress, Upton described four plans for the next steps in the process.

Advertisement

Each plan also hinges on a 2016 court case, where SMMUSD was mandated to replace pre-1979 door and window frames at MHS and Juan Cabrillo Elementary School—or cease using the affected buildings completely—by Dec. 31, 2019.

  • The current plan would meet the court order deadline and cost between $10 and $15 million; however, finding new “things,” Upton said, could cost more for the district. Work would need to begin this summer and continue through the next 18 months.
  • The wait plan would entail stopping work completely “with an expectation that we’re going to replace these buildings,” according to Upton. Either the buildings would need to be put out of use by Dec. 31, 2019 or SMMUSD would have to make a request to the judge to give more time “or some other consideration.” The total cost of this plan would not exceed $500,000.
  • The PCB-only plan would require all—not just “court-ordered stuff”—PCB work to be done where the levels are more than 50 parts per million. This would include flooring, the walls in the G building and the air vents in the D building. The court order would be met if work started this summer. The cost would be between $5 and $7 million; similar to the current plan, any new discoveries would drive up the cost.
  • The PCB court order-only plan involves doing work mandated by the court only. If this plan is chosen, the work start date could be pushed to January 2019 to meet the court-ordered date. The total cost would be $3 and $5 million. The plan would likely leave community members who have concerns about PCBs unsatisfied.

Rebuilding Malibu High completely would take around four years, according to Upton’s estimation. It would also most likely require a hearing before the City of Malibu and the California Coastal Commission, both of which have posed challenges to MHS construction in the past.

Through back-and-forth among board members, certain members, including board members Craig Foster and Laurie Lieberman, understood the Malibu perspective better than others due to their involvement in committees involving Malibu representatives. SMMUSD School Board President Dr. Richard Tahvildaran-Jesswein asked for all board members to be brought up to speed, ultimately deciding that Upton and the Facility Division should further explore the implications of these plans.

The item is scheduled to be discussed in detail at the next school board meeting on Thursday, May 3, in Malibu. 

Related Articles

Advertisement

Latest Articles

%d bloggers like this: