Home Blog Page 7054

Failing spirituality test

    0

    As a resident of Zumirez Drive, I use the beach entrance at the end of our road. To come and go from this entrance, one must pass the three residences of Barbra Streisand. A few days before the Labor Day weekend, I was returning from the beach. As I was going through the beach entrance gate, I noticed several men and a truck outside the gate of one of Ms. Streisand’s homes. I recognized one of the men as one of the grounds keepers hired by Barbra Streisand. As I came through the beach entrance, I noticed the truck drive away. I then saw the other man (who was with the grounds keeper) holding a squirrel by it tail. I observed this man carry the squirrel across the street and throw it on the property directly across from Ms. Streisand’s property in the tall pampas grass.

    I stopped and said to both men, “Don’t you think that was disrespectful both to the squirrel and to your neighbor’s property?” The grounds keeper answered by saying that the squirrel had “fallen from a tree,” indicating the tree in front of one of Ms. Streisand’s homes. I replied, “So what. The least you could do is give the squirrel a decent burial . . . and it’s really terrible to just throw something onto someone else’s property.” Then the grounds keeper said, “It was still alive.” I was shocked and said, “That’s even worse, you could have at least called Wildlife Rescue.” I then tried to look for the squirrel but the grass was too high. I told them I was going to report them for animal abuse. I then left and did report them.

    Now, perhaps many might say, “Oh, it was only a squirrel.” Well, that is just the problem — people don’t understand the “spirituality” of all entities — to respect all beings. Also, in a “practical” way — what about throwing an object onto someone else’s property!

    Life is a reflection — so in this case one reflects on the employer — Barbra Streisand. Environmentally Ms. Streisand fails the test!

    For instance, her last property on Ramirez has cemented sides to a free flowing creek — “to make it pretty” — not to mention certain improvements to her current property. I’m not “bashing” another person, but I am into making people think and become more aware of ecology.

    Every life is precious. Let’s all be more aware of all the life around us and our fortune to be able to live in Malibu where one can still find wildlife and natural environments (even with all the condominiums.)

    Mrs. Michael Rosenthal

    Officials and parents debate Cabrillo school’s test scores

    0

    Parents anxious to know why many of the students at Juan Cabrillo Elementary School posted low scores on a statewide skills assessment test administered last spring packed a meeting with school officials last week. The explanations provided by officials did little to alleviate their concerns.

    Juan Cabrillo’s second- and fourth-graders scored below the national average on most of the test, known as the Stanford 9, which was designed to measure skill levels in reading, mathematics and other basic subjects. The scores of Juan Cabrillo’s third- and fifth-graders were higher, but each grade level at the school almost consistently scored below the average for the Santa Monica-Malibu Unified School District.

    At the same time, students at Point Dume Marine Science School and Webster Elementary School performed substantially better on the test, posting scores well above the national average.

    While not going so far as to say the test results were invalid, Sue Gee, an assistant superintendent for the district, told Juan Cabrillo parents who attended the meeting the test did not accurately reflect what skills students had learned in the classroom because the test was not “aligned” with the classroom curricula designed for California’s public schools.

    Delivered as part of a presentation designed to ease parents’ concerns, Gee’s explanation appeared to have had the opposite effect.

    One father, Mike Scully, sarcastically asked, “If our kids had done fantastically on these tests, would you be here tonight saying, ‘Your kids aren’t that bright?'”

    If the issue was the statewide curriculum, parents asked, why did students at Point Dume and Webster perform so much better on the exam?

    Gee handed off that question to Betty Glass, retiring principal of Juan Cabrillo. Glass said she thought the lower scores at her school may have had to do with the school’s more diverse student population. “But, I don’t have all the answers,” she said.

    Pressed further, Glass said she did not want to make excuses, but she said with the largest number of special education students and students with limited English skills in Malibu, Juan Cabrillo’s scores may have suffered.

    Of the students who sat for the exam at Juan Cabrillo, 8 percent are categorized as having limited English proficiency. At Point Dume, 3 percent of students tested had limited English abilities, but 5 percent of those tested at Webster, not far from the percentage at Juan Cabrillo, had limited English skills. Further, as required by the state Department of Education, scores from many of the special education students were not counted in a school’s total score.

    Julie Scully said her children, in third and fourth grades at Juan Cabrillo, are not limited by any disability. “And their scores were stinky,” she said.

    Glass said her second- and fourth-grade teachers would meet extensively to discuss what the lower scores mean.

    “We’re very concerned, obviously,” she said. “We’ll be examining every student’s score to find out what we did not teach and what we should be.”

    Larry Gray, whose children are in second and fourth grades at Juan Cabrillo, voiced his belief, although not to the meeting at large, that students at other public schools are being better educated.

    “I don’t think they’re being challenged enough here,” he said.

    Bolstering businesses

      0

      The following letter was sent to Councilman Walt Keller regarding comments in the Sept. 3 issue of The Malibu Times.)

      As a business operator in Malibu for the past seven years, I was deeply dismayed to hear that the Business and Finance Subcommittee turned down the $24,000 grant from the county approved to create a new economic plan for the city of Malibu. How sad not to have the support of our local government when all of our businesses have suffered over these many months due to the construction on Pacific Coast Highway and El Nino related closures.

      The Aug. 30, 1998, edition of the Los Angeles Times reports that Malibu’s revenue from her businesses’ tax dollars has declined 11.8 percent in the first quarter of the year. Our sales at Granita were down 45 percent over Labor Day weekend. These are distressing numbers to any business owner, but even more upsetting when you are quoted as saying, “Most people don’t see the need for business. . . . If they were serving the residents, there wouldn’t be that much of a falloff.”

      Perhaps what you say is true, Councilman Keller. We are dependent on patronage outside the immediate area of Malibu. Although our restaurant is extremely popular among the locals, we could never survive with their support alone. Our local sales represent only 20-30 percent of our business. The remainder of our revenue is from the “tourists;” a mixture of residents of the Palisades, Santa Monica, Ventura County, Calabasas, Westlake Village and, of course, some out-of-towners staying at local hotels.

      Even though the local businesses comprise a minor percentage of our sales, Granita is committed to supporting only nonprofit groups that benefit our local community and residents. The following is a partial listing of those groups: Our Lady of Malibu; American Cancer Society, Malibu Branch; American Heart Association, Malibu Branch; The Malibu Methodist Church; The Malibu Presbyterian Church; The Webster School; Juan Cabrillo School; Malibu High School; The Malibu Kiwanis; The Malibu Woman’s Club; The Surfrider Foundation; The Malibu Little League; Pepperdine University; The Curtis School; Malibu Community Aid; The Calmont School; The Malibu Chamber of Commerce; The Malibu Methodist Nursery School; The Malibu Jewish Center & Synagogue; Free Arts for Abused Children; The Children’s Creative Workshop; Leo Cabrillo State Park and The Lost Hills/Malibu Sheriff’s Department.

      Unfortunately, we could not support all of these causes without the business support of “tourists.” As one of many Malibu businesses that puts much back into the local community that it serves, it is discouraging to learn that our government is not interested in our survival. Without their help, many of the businesses that serve the residents will cease to exist. When they fail, I hope that Malibu locals are not treated as unwelcome “tourists” when they find it inconveniently necessary to do their shopping in Santa Monica, Westlake Village or elsewhere.

      Jannis Swerman, general manager

      Granita Restaurant

      A risk worth taking

        0

        Recently several letters to the Times have debated whether the City Council was given appropriate legal advice before it adopted the Mobilehome Park Rent Stabilization Ordinance, including the “rent rollback.” I was a city councilman at the time and voted for the rollback and the ordinance. I also participated in all the briefings provided by the city attorneys. I want to set the record straight.

        The City Council was advised of the legal risks. Without question, City Attorneys Michael Jenkins and Christi Hogin counseled us that the “rollback” provision was legally vulnerable. Jenkins and Hogin told the council that rent rollbacks to a date prior to the adoption of the rent control law were approved by the courts only in situations where the landlords were aware that the rent control law was under consideration. They advised us that courts approved these rollbacks specifically to reverse rent increases that were imposed in anticipation of rent control. We were further told — and told again — that any other justifications for a rollback were untested and therefore legally risky.

        Hogin told the City Council that if rents were rolled back to a date prior to the city’s incorporation date, the park owners would challenge the ordinance’s legality. I considered this advice before I cast my vote in favor of the ordinance.

        The City Council decided the risk was worth taking. During public hearings, the City Council heard considerable testimony from park residents who had been taken advantage of by the park owners. I was moved by the plight of the residents and cast my vote in favor of the ordinance. I understood that my vote was not risk free.

        After the ordinance passed (only Larry Wan voted against it), the park owners took the city to court to try to prove that there was no justification for rent control in Malibu. In spite of their efforts, the city’s ordinance was largely upheld by the court. Although the court struck down a few of the specific provisions relating to the rollback, mobilehome park residents still enjoy the benefits of rent control (and the city taxpayers picked up the tab for the first few years when the residents only paid the “rolled-back” rents).

        Was the risk of trying to roll back rents worth taking? In retrospect, perhaps not. But at the time, the potential benefits of the ordinance seemed worth the legal risk. It is unfortunate that Walt and Carolyn, and their vocal supporters in the parks, are simply not mature enough to take responsibility for the choice they made.

        The decision was well-intentioned and the choice well-informed. Walt and Carolyn should be ashamed of themselves for trying to blame Christi Hogin for the votes they themselves cast. I wonder who they think they are fooling.

        Michael Caggiano

        Scofflaws galore

          0

          Anyone who drives on PCH past the Las Flores light is familiar with the traffic jams which result from two lanes of cars narrowing to one to pass the construction bottleneck. At rush hours, in both directions, the delays and frustrations are inevitable until PCH returns to normal.

          Several hundred residents of the La Costa hills, dependent on using Rambla Vista to enter PCH, are living with an additional hazard — the east-going PCH drivers who use Rambla Vista as an escape mechanism to bypass the traffic jam which backs up from Las Flores to the Fire Station at Carbon Canyon.

          As early as 7 a.m. weekday mornings for hours, hundreds of eastbound PCH drivers “cheat” on more patient PCH drivers by entering Rambla Vista on the west end and literally tear up and down the hill to exit at the east end, saving perhaps five to 10 minutes. In the process they commit at least three violations. The clearly posted sign says, “Road (Rambla Vista) closed to all but residents.” A stop sign at the crest of Rambla Vista says STOP because the two-lane road narrows to one lane skirting a steep canyon. Almost nobody stops and obeys the stop sign direction. In several places speed signs caution drivers to drive no more than 25 miles an hour. Most of the “dodgers” are speeding at 40 to 50 miles to save the previous minutes, heedless of blind curves, ongoing traffic in the opposite direction or pedestrians, not to mention dogs on the leash with their owners. Several residents have told me about narrow escapes from head-on crashes as the speeders run the gauntlet daily.

          The Sheriff’s station has been repeatedly notified and has expressed concern but to date no action has been taken. Just this morning, this writer counted 31 cars running the gauntlet in the space of five minutes (360 an hour). The situation invites disaster and action by law enforcement.

          Zane Meckler

          Fluke saves Gray Whale from fire

          0

          It was 1 a.m. when Tom Averna got the call. Months of hard work were going up in smoke — his brand new restaurant was on fire. But fate, and quick work by engine company 71, saved the day.

          By sheer coincidence, firefighters were on an emergency call in the area. They had just responded to a suicide call and were preparing to leave that location when they noticed smoke pouring from the Gray Whale. Without missing a beat, they broke in and tackled the smoke and flames that were touched off hours earlier by a faulty wire. “We had closed for the night,” Averna recalled. “No one would have been there until the next day.”

          After receiving the early morning call from Westec Security, Averna ran back to work fearing the worst. “By the time I got down there, they had it licked,” he noted in amazement. It was a close call. “They told me that by 8 in the morning, the building would have been gone.”

          When Monroe’s went out of business earlier this year, Averna secured the lease. He spent weeks remodeling, sprucing up, painting and upgrading. The longtime Monroe’s waiter now had a place to call his own and had opened his doors just three weeks ago. “We had everything — great food, great service and we were getting a really good response. People were coming in even though we still have to wait for our liquor license.”

          Had it not been for a strange turn of events and firefighters’ keen eyes, the days of the Gray Whale might have been over almost before they began. “Who’s out there at that time of night?,” asked Averna. “There’s no one on the beach except lovers, and they’re making their own smoke, they’re not going to see ours.”

          As he airs out the kitchen and mops up the floors, Averna spends a lot of time thinking about engine company 71. “It was a total fluke, but those firefighters saved our butts.” After a few days of closure and cleaning, Averna expects to be back in business by the weekend.

          Having to wait for that liquor license doesn’t seem so bad after all.

          Kissel criminal case closer to trial

          0

          The criminal case against the Kissel Co., stemming from alleged sewage overflows on its Paradise Cove property, moved one step closer to trial Friday when the court set a trial-setting conference for Nov. 18.

          Kissel faces 25 counts of misdemeanor violations of environmental codes.

          Kissel attorney Richard Regnier told the court he still hopes the case will be settled and that negotiations are proceeding in good faith. He explained, “There’s a pending civil action that will resolve everything in the criminal case and a lot more.” About 90 residents of the mobile home park in the Cove have filed a suit against Kissel for failure to properly maintain the park.

          At the same time, though, Regnier requested that the court grant Kissel a jury trial, for which he needed ample time to prepare, saying, “This is not a garden-variety case.” Deputy District Attorney Robert Miller, in the middle of another trial, called during the hearing to ask the court for a trial date to be set within the next 30 to 40 days.

          The court decided to postpone the trial until at least after Thanksgiving. How, or even whether, a trial will proceed will be determined at the upcoming readiness conference, the court explained.

          Neither side would discuss what the sticking points are in the plea bargaining.

          Residents of the park who attended the hearing appeared shocked and bewildered by Kissel’s apparent willingness to stand trial. They say they never thought that Kissel would put up such a fight.

          But the residents quickly put on a brave face. “It looks like there’s going to be a trial. The sooner the better,” said Roger Goldingay, president of the Paradise Cove Homeowners Association. Yes, he’s disappointed with another delay, but he’s not surprised. “Kissel has managed to delay everything but cashing rent checks,” he remarked.

          The Kissel Co. had no comment.

          Civic Center plan bogged down in wetlands controversy

          0

          Proposed environmental analysis and designation of wetlands, designed to limit development in the Civic Center, came under fire Monday, with the City Council divided over who should do the review and at what price.

          The council had previously budgeted $33,000 for environmental review of the Civic Center Specific Plan. During budget deliberations, Councilwoman Carolyn Van Horn asked to have an additional $25,000 set aside for wetlands delineation. At that time, the council did not commit the money but agreed to set it aside and asked for more information about the project.

          At Monday’s council meeting, the project was presented to the council in the form of a proposal to do business with Environmental Services Associates, the firm that was awarded the Specific Plan Environmental Review in 1995, and the Wetlands Action Network, a local nonprofit organization, run by environmental activist Marcia Hanscomb.

          “My concern is that the process is not open to all qualified consultants,” said Councilman Harry Barovsky, who said opening the job up to bidders is the traditional way of conducting this type of business. “We have a fiduciary responsibility to handle public funds in a forthright manner.”

          “Put this proposal out to real bidding process, not the one that appears we are trying to tailor the end results,” said former Planning Commissioner Barbara Cameron.

          Mayor Joan House questioned Van Horn about her involvement with Hanscomb and her position, if any, on the land trust that would purchase property in the Civic Center. “I know you traveled with Marcia to Washington (D.C.), and I think it would be very important for you to clear the air about it,” said House.

          “Well, now that you’ve clouded the air, I will clear it,” replied Van Horn. “No. I am not on a land trust. I am in no decision-making position.” Van Horn said she went to Washington D.C. to get “information about where there are grant monies from the Corps of Engineers, from EPA and Boxer, etc.”

          House said Van Horn and Hanscomb were “hand in hand” while making a presentation to the Malibu Township Council. “You were part and parcel of that in that presentation and you were connected at that point.”

          “I have been talking land trust probably for five or six years,” replied Van Horn. “And that was long before I met Marcia Hanscomb.”

          Barovsky made a motion to have the city’s Environmental Review Board prepare a scope of work, rather than pay $25,000 to the Wetlands Action Network. “I don’t see why we need a middle person when we’ve been told by our staff that we have the capability here to be able to direct that kind of a program,” said Barovsky. “I would sure like to see what in the world we’re getting for $25,000.”

          The motion failed in a tie vote, with Barovsky and House in favor and Van Horn and Councilman Tom Hasse against.

          Hasse moved to send the matter back to the Land Use Subcommittee, made up of Van Horn and Councilman Walt Keller, who was absent from the meeting. Barovsky said sending the matter back to the subcommittee would be “marching in time,” but said he would support the motion if it would bring forth more information.

          Hasse’s motion passed unanimously. After review by the Land Use Subcommittee, the matter will return to the council for debate.

          How do they build on those slopes?

          0

          Many architects and property owners say building under Malibu’s current zoning ordinance is somewhat of a gamble. “It’s like rolling the dice,” said architect Ed Niles, claiming the current procedures are arbitrary and confusing. Even on the flattest of lots, Niles said, “There’s no way that you can place a house where you aren’t violating something.”

          Hopes are an upcoming workshop will help smooth the process of building on hillside lots in Malibu. At Monday’s meeting, the Planning Commission voted to hold a public workshop to allow public input on a series of changes proposed by the city’s planning staff to hillside building requirements.

          Staff prepared a set of hillside provisions for lots on an average slope of 15 percent. Once a site has been designated a hillside, building would be subject to the proposed design guidelines and a site plan review. The guidelines are designed to help keep site planning, building mass, architecture, materials, color, landscaping, lighting and walls in line with the objectives of the city’s General Plan.

          Niles said building laws must be sensitive to visual, ecological and mathematical needs, but added they should be straightforward enough for the potential homeowner to understand. Niles said the workshop could help everyone understand the implications of the staff proposals. He said the formality of a Planning Commission hearing doesn’t allow for much debate.

          City Planner Craig Ewing said he hopes the workshop will provide “some solutions that can satisfy the community’s concerns for hillside development and the architects’ concerns for fair regulation.”

          Ewing agreed the less formal setting may allow those concerned to “let their hair down a little bit and talk to each other a little more informally.”

          Niles is urging commissioners to conduct a study of the area’s diverse terrain. According to Niles, the city’s diversities should be identified and logged in topographical maps that deal with issues such as flood plains and ridges.

          The workshop is scheduled for 6:30 p.m. Sept. 23 at City Hall.

          ×