Home Blog Page 6830

They remember Pearl Harbor

0

Jim Cowan was rattled awake by a series of explosions, and when he ran outside he saw an airplane with big red suns painted on its wings flying low overhead. “I could clearly see the pilot talking into the microphone in his helmet,” he recalled.

Margaret “Bunty” Prabhu remembers an artillery shell hitting a house not far up the street from hers in Honolulu’s Pacific Heights neighborhood. Her older sister, Marilyn, wrote of lung-burning gas mask drills in school and fears of a Japanese takeover of Oahu.

Russ Philbrick remembers one of the first U.S. Navy heroes of World War II who would emerge from the ruins of Pearl Harbor after the Japanese attack on December 7, 1941. Philbrick served with the Medal of Honor winner aboard the aircraft carrier, U.S.S. Lexington.

On this Memorial Day the memories of these three eyewitnesses help commemorate the deaths of 2,403 sailors, Marines, soldiers and civilians killed in the attack.

Rumors abound during fateful day

Jim Cowan was an 18-year-old freshman at the University of Hawaii where he was in the Reserve Officer Training Corp (ROTC) when the Japanese struck. The day after the attack he and his friends joined an emergency volunteer unit of the Hawaii Territorial Guard and he was made a squad leader.

“We were all very excited,” he said. “They sent us out with a rifle and a bandoleer of ammunition to guard public buildings . . .and, yes, we also got very nervous. There were rumors everywhere. Someone has seen parachutes coming down, they’ve poisoned the Honolulu reservoir, and they’re coming back for another attack, things like that. In fact, one night, about two a.m., we heard this very low-flying plane coming over our building and one guy grabbed a Thompson machine gun and ran out and started blasting away at the plane when it flew over. Turned out to be one of our own B17s. Luckily, the Thompson wasn’t much good as an anti-aircraft gun.”

However, one rumor that turned out to be true, Cowan said, was reported snipers in the aftermath of the attack. “I heard the shots and heard the bullets whizzing by us. It was someone with a .22 (caliber) rifle.” It’s not known if the sniper was ever caught.

Cowan later joined the Marines and served as a lieutenant with the occupational forces in Tokyo in 1945. But he never saw action until 1950 when he was sent to fight in the Korean War. There he more than made up for what he had missed in WW II. He won a Silver Star for bravery in action while leading an attack on Chinese machine gun nests at the bloody “Frozen” Chosin Reservoir, where Marines and Army units were trapped by 60,000 Chinese troops in one of the most significant battles of that war. He also received a Purple Heart for a shrapnel wound from a Chinese hand grenade.

The civilians

Bunty Thomas (now Prabhu) was just 10 years old on Dec. 7, 1941, but she remembers certain scenes from that day with clarity. “My sister, Marilyn, woke me up that morning and said, ‘I think they’re having maneuvers, let’s go out and see.’ Then I heard this loud screaming noise going past our house. I thought it was a plane that went on to crash somewhere, or a bomb.”

Her father drove the girls up Pacific Heights Road to a lookout point, and there they could see the Japanese were attacking. “We could see huge billows of smoke and flames rising out of Pearl Harbor, and tiny little specks flying around in the sky, Japanese airplanes.”

Farther up the road they came to a house that had been hit by an artillery shell, apparently that was what they had heard whistling over their house. The round had not exploded, but it caved in a wall of the house. There did not appear to be any casualties. They learned afterwards that it was apparently a misfired U.S. Army artillery round.

Months later, Marilyn, who was then 13, wrote a 34-page memoir. She described her feelings during the attack: “How exciting this is, what an experience to tell my friends and children.” But, she wrote, her father was somber, quiet, saying only, “Something’s wrong.” Not until the next day did she learn from newspapers what a tragic scene she had witnessed. “It never dawned on me that many people were being killed–that we could easily be killed.”

Reality would be drilled into every island resident for months to come. Curfews and blackouts were strictly enforced under martial law. There were frequent air raid drills in schools. And gas mask drills, the same as all GI’s experience in basic training. Students were lined up in a room with gas masks on and the room flooded with tear gas. One-by-one each student was told to take the mask off and run from the room. “Ooh!” wrote Marilyn, “My throat stung inside and out–my arms smarted and my eyes stung. I was choking and I felt like snatching wildly at my throat and arms and eyes.” She couldn’t find the door, until someone finally grabbed her arm and led her out.

Providence

By a twist of fate, Russ Philbrick, now 78, was at sea the day of the attack. He was chief electrician aboard the Lexington, which had been ordered out to sea two days earlier, along with its sister carrier, the Enterprise. Leaving port on a weekend was highly unusual, said Philbrick. Normally, Pacific Fleet ships at Pearl Harbor put to sea for maneuvers during the week and returned to port on Friday. The ill-fated battleship, Arizona, for example, docked in Pearl Harbor after sea exercises near Oahu on the same day the Lexington was steaming out. A bomb that dropped down its smoke stack sank the Arizona, killing 1,103 of the 1,400 men aboard.

Five ships were destroyed that day. Had the Lexington been in port it would have berthed right next to one of them, the Utah, a ship used as a target during exercises but of little value as a target for the Japanese. They may have thought they were hitting the Lexington, Philbrick thinks. “I’ve been told they thought we would be where the Utah was,” he said.

What Philbrick didn’t know at the time was that diplomatic tension was rising between Tokyo and Washington, and because of that the Lexington and Enterprise were hurried out to sea to deliver warplanes to Navy and Marine bases on the islands of Wake and Midway, deep in the Pacific.

But they never got there. On their second day out, the Lexington and all ships at sea in the Pacific received a cable from the commander-in-chief of the Pacific: “AIR RAID ON PEARL HARBOR–THIS IS NO DRILL.” The Lexington arrived back in Pearl Harbor two days later.

“Ships were still smoking, they were still finding bodies. Oh, this was terrible, terrible … guys were walking around with that stare, you know, that shock,” Philbrick recalled with a pang of emotion that still wells up even after nearly 60 years.

Outside of those images, the rest is a blur. He remembers only working day and night for the next “two or three or four days,” loading ammunition and stores aboard ship so it would be fully prepared for the war that had now begun. “Chief (the highest enlisted rank in the Navy) or no, everybody had to work, rank didn’t matter,” he said.

In another stroke of fate, Philbrick was transferred off the Lexington only months before Japanese torpedoes in the Battle of the Coral Sea sank the big carrier, but not before one of his shipmates became the Navy’s first air ace. In one of the Lexington’s first major engagements in the Pacific after Pearl Harbor, a young pilot, called Butch by his comrades, flew up against a wave of nine Japanese bombers on a mission to destroy a multi-ship task force led by the Lexington. Butch shot down five of those bombers. He was awarded the Congressional Medal of Honor. “As a result of his gallant action–one of the most daring, if not the most daring, single action in the history of combat aviation–he undoubtedly saved his carrier from serious damage,” the award citation read. Butch was later killed in aerial combat. His full name was Lt. Edward H. O’Hare, the namesake of Chicago’s O’Hare airport.

Into the lions den walked the Ad Hoc Committee.

    0

    The Art of Negotiating for land for ball fields and a community center!

    On the morning following the vote by the City Council to send the Crummer Development Agreement (“the good twin”) on for an EIR, I find it imperative to remind Malibu of “the other deal” (“the bad twin”).

    The Malibu Bay Company owns a substantial amount of land in Malibu and would love to finalize a Development Agreement so that they can be assured of developing all of their land holdings! There is nothing unusual about that because after all, they are developers. Because of their considerable wealth, they hire the most competent negotiators that they can find!

    As we all know the City of Malibu is in need of land for ball fields, a community center, and for other recreational uses. The City hired a very competent appraisal company (Mason & Mason) to appraise the Malibu Bay Company properties.

    Let us examine two properties that might be able to accommodate the city’s needs:

    Property #1 — Point Dume Parcel – 19 acres but only 5.2 acres is usable because the “development is required to be setback from the top of the canyon slope 100-feet…”(Mason & Mason). Appraised value $16,500,000 by Mason & Mason.

    Property #2 — Trancas Canyon Residential — 28 acres (at worst, 15 acres usable). Appraised value $ 1,180,000 by Mason & Mason.

    The Trancas Canyon Residential property is only 2 miles west of the Point Dume Parcel and unquestionably has much more suitable land, with much better traffic conditions, and is valued at 92 1/2 percent less than the Point Dume Parcel, and could accommodate substantially more playing fields as well as a community center and significant park land and open space. It also has much safer ingress and egress.

    “The concept of highest and best use represents the premise upon which value is based.” Mason & Mason. It is on this premise that the parcels were appraised. The value of the Pt. Dume Property, were it to be used for commercial development, may be $16.5 million to the Malibu Bay Company. However, the value for ball fields in Malibu has nothing to do with “highest and best use”. The Trancas Canyon Residential property, appraised at a value of $1,180,000 is a much more appropriate value for land for ball fields and a community center.

    As for the “Art of Negotiating,” let us examine “the bad twin.”

    For “donating” the Point Dume Parcel, “Our Ad Hoc Team” gave the Malibu Bay Company the right to: (1) increase their amount of commercial development in the Civic Center from approximately 200,000 sq. ft. (assuming that they even had that right) to 286,088 sq. ft. (2) increase their commercial development in Trancas by 33,000 sq. ft. and (3) allowed them to increase their residential developments in Trancas by 11 homes, (1 being a beach front property).

    This increase, estimated in added value to the Malibu Bay Company of more than $25,000,000, has been represented by the ad hoc committee as a great deal for the City of Malibu. The inequity of the deal goes far beyond the economic values, the deal will negatively change Malibu, forever!

    Citizens of Malibu, if you value continuing your lifestyle on our American Riviera, please make yourselves aware of what happens in your City. Get active NOW!

    Jay Liebig

    Simplified zoning text amendments proposed

    0

    The possibility of simplifying the zoning code was discussed at Monday night’s Planning Commission meeting as commissioners began to review proposed amendments that were created by planning staff.

    The proposed zoning text amendments would encompass changes to development permit requirements, neighborhood standards parameters, findings for minor modifications and slope density formulas.

    A group of about 10 public speakers came to urge the commission to be cautious as they attempt to simplify the zoning text. “Simplifying it is dangerous,” said Charlene Kabrin, former planning commissioner.

    “There are reasons for almost everything and I would caution you to take the time. There is a lot more here than meets the eye,” she said.

    One of the highlighted topics was a proposed slope density formula change.

    Until now, Malibu’s unique topography has made it difficult for builders to develop, and restrictions are carefully placed on applicants to protect the character of the city.

    Planning Director Barry Hogan said that changing the formula would allow a little bit less stringent density for subdivisions.

    But residents did not like the idea, concerned that the proposed amendments would make it easier for developers to build and cause excessive subdivision.

    The amendments would also direct plot plan review appeals to the city manager instead of the Planning Commission. Again, some residents and even commissioners thought that the Planning Commission is better qualified for the task because requests would be subjected to public input and scrutiny.

    Another proposal is to streamline the development permit process. Hogan recommended a two-year approval and one-year extension for building permits. Currently, after an applicant is granted a one-year permit, they must go to the Coastal Commission for approval, which takes more than a year. They then have to go back and apply for an extension from the commission.

    “I work with this complicated code every day of my life and this code is difficult,” said a planning consultant. “I applaud the planning director for taking a stab at it.”

    “It seems to me that a great deal of authority and responsibility is being transferred to the Planning Department [from the commission], specifically the director,” said Richard Carrigan, who is in favor of holding off any changes to the Interim Zoning Code until the city attorney can review the proposed amendments.

    “I’m feeling very vulnerable without having the city attorney present to answer questions,” echoed commissioner Ed Lipnick.

    The majority of the public speakers had concerns that simplification of the code could mean doom for Malibu’s uniqueness as a rural community.

    Also of concern was newer staff members who may not know the history of the city’s policies and reasoning behind them.

    “I have a real problem with doing major revisions to the code when we have people who don’t understand the code,” said resident Jo Ruggles.

    On the other hand, developers like Norm Haynie favor the idea of reducing requirements.

    “Applying a slope density formula on top of the restrictive zoning that was already imposed created a double whammy for property owners,” he said at the meeting.

    “Many of your concerns are shared by the commission,” said commissioner Lipnick.

    He and other commissioners want to obtain a detailed analysis of the ramifications before they decide on anything.

    The commission also wants to be sure the changes have a rationale and know whether the California Environmental Quality Act requirements apply to the changes or not.

    The amendment proposals are continued until the next commission meeting on June 4.

    In other matters, questions of a history of illegal activity regarding grading were addressed. The matter was continued until the commission’s next meeting.

    Snake bites dog, takes .22 slug on chin

      0

      The hills are alive with the sounds of summer. Songbirds warbling, bees humming, hawks screeching, new leaves rustling in the breeze. And snakes hissing.

      In the past three weeks, I’ve spotted a beautiful big black and white king snake, a tiny red racer and two tan gopher snakes. And four dirt-colored rattlers. The king, the racer and the gophers are still here–the rattlers are toast.

      A dedicated animal control officer once gave me the lecture about the rattlesnakes’ place in the environment, how they keep the rodent population in check. The problem is that our beautiful hillside gardens attract them like magnets. We lure them with water, shade and food, and those beautiful landscape rocks are their living room furniture. Snake sofas. This dedicated herpetologist would capture them from suburban yards, put them in a wooden box and transport them to the wilds of Malibu Canyon, where he would release them–to keep the hiker population in check. Just kidding. They don’t hunt people–too big to swallow whole, snakes can’t chew–and they try to stay out of the way. That hissing sound they make by shaking their tail-tip rattles means, “Back off, Buster, and let me make a strategic retreat. Don’t make me waste my venom on something I can’t eat.”

      Snake will not sneak up on you, but if startled by a hand or a foot or a dog’s nose, its strike is a reflex.

      So it was that early one evening last week, Tucker, our 7-week-old German shorthair puppy, scampered out of sight beneath the lilacs for just a moment. We heard nothing, no hissing, no yelp, but the puppy walked back up on the porch slowly, looking kind of sad. That’s when we saw the two telltale holes, barely a half inch apart, on top of his nose, a tiny drop of blood on each. The bridge of his nose was already beginning to swell.

      We keep a homeopathic remedy, Crotalus Horridus, specifically for rattlesnake bites. Half a dropper (about 10 drops) in the mouth every 10 minutes for the first two hours gives the pup a fighting chance while he is driven to the Kern Animal Emergency Clinic in Bakersfield.

      There he receives antivenin, antibiotics, analgesics, Benedryl (to avert a reaction to the antivenin) and an IV drip with electrolytes. Antivenin is in short supply this year, and while I hoped the clinic would have some, I remember how many dogs we saved without it. Vets are still divided on whether antivenin is indicated–sometimes the reaction can be as bad as the bite–or whether it’s best to use just antibiotics and the rest. The most severe complication is internal bleeding from the anticoagulant in the snake venom.

      This vet says the prognosis is poor: “Small dog, small snake, bad combination.”

      Mature snakes release only enough venom with each strike to immobilize their prey or discourage predators. Young snakes just let go with the full blast. Our best hope is that this young snake had eaten recently, depleting its venom supply.

      While Tucker was in the clinic, I searched for the snake, but it had disappeared in the twilight. Next morning I spied it slithering slowly across the patio toward the water spigot. Time to dash inside for my .22 revolver, which is kept loaded with shot shells.

      I plugged him. Once for Tucker and once more just because. I chopped off its head with a shovel and flushed it down the loo; then I heaved the still-wriggling remains out onto the hillside for the ravens. Bon appetit, birdies.

      Tucker returns from the clinic with the catheter still in his front leg, protected by a stylish blue bandage. The clinic owner, one of my former riding students, has given my daughter a courtesy discount on Tucker’s bill, reducing it to a still hefty $644. Tucker is no longer a free puppy. But he’s made a remarkable recovery. Of all the dogs we’ve had that were bitten: two Labs, one border collie, one Jack Russell and one adult German shorthair (the Queensland heelers were much too smart), Tucker was probably the most vulnerable, and the luckiest.

      Meanwhile, I’m trimming the lilacs, escallonia and roses off the ground and mixing broken wire and pottery shards with the mulch. My regrets to the herpetologist, but I will not be relocating any rattlesnakes (nor brown recluse spiders, for that matter). They’re in my sights and they’re all toast, fodder for the crows.

      Speeders get nowhere

        0

        To those who drive Las Flores Canyon and Hume Road: Please slow down!

        I write this as a concerned parent of several small children. Although I can be 99.99% sure that my children are nowhere near the road, there is always the slightest chance that a small child could wander or dart out. Ask yourself this question – Could you stop?

        I know many will feel it is the responsibility of the parents to watch their children – and I firmly agree. But what about the responsibility of the driver? I am astonished at how fast the majority of people drive through the canyons. Speed bumps cannot be installed because of the possibility of hindering fire trucks in emergency circumstances. (I’ve already inquired.) I have been passed numerous times traveling on Las Flores – with the double yellow lines and curves completely ignored – only to pull up behind the driver at the bottom light and to drive alongside each other on PCH.

        These are not only people in their sport cars “testing out the curves,” but also “mom looking” types with children in their cars. All of this done with utter disregard for safety! Woutd it be so difficult for people to leave 5-10 minutes earlier (if lateness is the excuse) so that we could all live and travel more safely?

        Although I will always watch my children with the utmost care – and then some – ask yourself, could you stop?

        PLEASE SLOW DOWN.

        Concerned Parent

        Roots shoots for alternative to scout program

          0

          The Malibu chapter of Roots and Shoots, an environmental and humanitarian program first established by world-renowned philanthropist Dr. Jane Goodall, is being embraced by many Malibu families in lieu of the Boy Scout program, offering different varieties of community service to people of all ages.

          Established two years ago and led by Malibu mom Gloria Van Santen along with co-organizer Diane Malcha, Roots and Shoots of Malibu works through other organizations to help local canyons and surrounding communities.

          Goodall, whose in-depth work with African chimps brought her global fame, founded the Roots and Shoots program in 1991.

          There are presently 1,400 Roots and Shoots groups in 50 different countries. The organization remains committed to enforcing and raising awareness for the care and concern for the environment, animals and the community.

          The program, since its origin, has been primarily targeted at children and young adults, and though this remains true for the Malibu chapter, Santen says that they embrace people of all ages.

          “Anyone of any age can do most of our outings,” said Santen, adding that some activities are unsuitable for children 5 years of age and younger, for example, working with poisonous plants .

          One of the main catalysts that led to the establishment of the Malibu chapter was Santen’s disapproval of the Boy Scout program of America, which recently declared in court its anti-homosexual policy. Other members of Roots and Shoots joined for the same reason.

          “I chose Roots and Shoots as an alternative to the Boy Scout program because of their politics,” said new member Janet Ettenger.

          This democratic organization holds monthly and often cost-free outings, which are the only opportunities for the group to meet.

          “We keep the talking down and the activity up,” said Santen.

          In the past two years, the Malibu organization, called Zumers, focused on the protection of Zuma Canyon, in addition to sponsoring a clothes drive for children living in the San Fernando Valley, and working at the California Wildlife Center. The organization has helped out at past Dolphin Runs, as well as contributed to a Rotary Book Drive that benefited children in Mexico. Though Santen says the group tries to stay in Malibu, it will commit its time to other causes that are brought to its attention.

          One of its more notable achievements has been its previous work with Save Open Space, a local environmental organization. During February 2000, Roots and Shoots joined S.O.S. in protesting the Ahmanson Ranch project development at a public hearing at the Calabasas/Agoura Hills Community Center. The project proposed the construction of 3,000 homes, and the guarantee of more traffic and more dust into the Malibu Creek.

          Santen’s daughter, Kiri Van Santen, who is now a 7th grader at Malibu High School and the president of the middle school Solutions Club, spoke directly to the council on the subject.

          There are presently 40 members on the Malibu Roots and Shoots mailing list, who receive two to three newsletters each year. Out of these 40, only 20 are active members. Santen says that one of the most prominent obstacles as of yet has been getting a dedicated base.

          Roots and Shoots is planning to meet Jane Goodall on June 2 at a Roots and Shoots festival in Huntington Beach, where the Malibu chapter will have a booth and share its accomplishments with fellow chapters. Though it is easy to get involved, Santen urges people to call the Malibu chapter to sign up prior to coming to an outing.

          In a couple of years, Santen hopes to take a limited group of families to Africa to see the chimps that Goodall has helped protect.

          The Malibu chapter of Roots and Shoots and coordinator Gloria Van Santen can be reached at 310.457.1621 for more information.

          Juan Cabrillo Collection, a children’s art exhibition

            0

            In an effort to encourage their “personal artistic journey,” 360 works of art by the students of Juan Cabrillo Elementary School, grades kindergarten through 5th, will be displayed for two days at the Mc Lean Gallery beginning Saturday.

            The show will include landscapes, cityscapes, seascapes, portraiture, mixed-media collage and block prints.

            This is the second annual art show designed to commemorate the students’ hard work and creative exploration. The students of Juan Cabrillo chose all the work displayed. Last year’s event was at Point Dume Elementary School.

            Sage Laskin, who is the art instructor for Juan Cabrillo and Point Dume, says it is a way for the children to “exhibit their art on a museum wall away from the classroom setting, and say, ‘Oh my gosh, that’s my work.’ “

            Laskin went on to say that the children are so proud to be able to choose the best of their work, without anyone judging them.

            “In celebrating the children’s hard work, it actually encourages them to continue their personal artistic journey,” says Laskin.

            She added that last year’s event was so gratifying for the children, and in viewing their works in progress, it was evident they were having fun.

            McKenna Furgurson, 8, reaffirmed Laskin’s comment, saying: “Art is special, you get to paint, do collages and have fun.”

            In addition to the “fun” aspect, the young art students also gain something else from their work– the ability to communicate in another medium.

            “There are no rules in art, you draw something and just express yourself,” said Sara Crenshaw, 8.

            Cameron Ritchie, 9, finds that “art expresses something to me, it is a story. It’s a great thing to do.”

            Pat Cairns, principal of Juan Cabrillo, is a big supporter of the art effort. “I can’t think of a more wonderful way to showcase all of the children’s artwork,” says Cairns. “Art is such an important part of a child’s total development in school.”

            This view is reflected by Gerardo Resendiz, 8, who says he likes art because “when I see art that I am working on, it’s like I’m really there.”

            Amount of open-land bond measure may be several million too high

            0

            Despite the advice of a seasoned conservation finance consultant who suggested lowering the amount of a proposed $15 million open-land bond measure to something as low as $11 million, a coalition of Malibu residents decided to hold to the $15 million number for the November ballot.

            If the bond measure passes, that $15 million would be used to purchase open land for parks, ballfields, a community center as well as numerous other programs in the Civic Center area.

            The $15 million number could cause the measure to fail, according to Christopher Mann, a conservation finance consultant with Trust for Public Land, a nonprofit organization that works with communities to help protect open land. Asking for an amount that voters will support is the single largest determinant in whether a measure will pass or not, he said.

            Measure O, a $15 million advisory bond measure on last November’s ballot that garnered only 59 percent of the vote, was not successful because voters didn’t understand what it was all about, or the price tag was too high, said Mann. ” A revised measure that provides more information and/or has less money has a good chance of passing,” he said.

            Ozzie Silna, a member of the bond coalition steering committee, said the size of the bond coalition is less important than just getting it passed.

            The Trust for Public Land’s Conservation Finance Program has worked with more than 80 communities in the last few years to assist in successful passage of similar ballot measures. Mann’s services are free of charge and the group intends to continue working with him.

            “We like very much the suggestions he made and we think we’re very close to language the community will also like,” Silna said. The coalition presented the $15 million number to the City Council along with Mann’s suggestions. Ultimately, the amount of the bond and how the bond measure language will read on the November ballot will be up to the City Council.

            The coalition’s steering committee approved the final language at a May 10 meeting. If approved by the City Council, the following language will appear on the November ballot: “Shall the City of Malibu acquire land for parks, playgrounds, playing fields, trails, a community center to serve children, teens, families, adults, and seniors with recreation, social and education programs; to protect natural areas and wildlife habitat; and to limit sprawl and traffic congestion; and issue its general obligation bond in the amount of $15 million? Not more than 10 percent of these funds shall be used for improvements or construction.”

            Incorporating so many diverse interests into the bond language may also cause problems in the future, such as on what or how to spend the funds.

            “Is it going to create an ideal trail?” asked Mann. “No it’s not.” Nor will it create an ideal playground, playing fields, etc., he added. “Nobody’s getting everything they want, but everybody’s getting a lot of what they want.” Mann added that each piece of land could serve multiple purposes. One piece of land can give Malibu residents their trail, their playground, and their playing field, he said.

            City Councilmember Tom Hasse said the $15 million pool would allow Malibu to apply for grants two to three times that amount. ” I think the voters of Malibu will be pleasantly surprised how far $15 million can go,” said Hasse.

            According to Hasse, the land in the Civic Center area is $500,000 to $1 million per acre. It will be up to the City Council to decide how the allotted $15 million will be distributed if the measure is successfully passed.

            Mona Loo, a proponent of keeping the $15 million number, put things into perspective for Malibu residents voting in the November election. According to Loo, the approximate cost to a property owner would be a little less than $30 per hundred thousand dollars of assessed evaluation. Assessed evaluation can be found on one’s tax bill. It is listed as “net taxable value.”

            Loo said it’s important to recognize that assessed evaluation is lower than market value and can be substantially lower depending on how long a person has owned their home. For example, a home with a $600,000 net taxable value would have a $180 increase in the annual tax bill ($30 x 6 = $180).

            The coalition plans to launch an aggressive campaign to earn the support of Malibu residents. The group expects a low voter turnout since there are no other measures on the November ballot. There are 9,000 registered voters in Malibu. According to Loo, there is normally a 40 percent voter turnout. The coalition, however, only expects a 30 to 40 percent turnout this November.

            Bond measure proponents are considering doing a test mailing (to get residents’ reactions to the bond measure language) from a randomly selected group of likely voters (voters who have voted in the last election). The group is also looking into conducting an informal poll in lieu of the test mailing.

            Laureen Sills, founder of PARCs (People Achieving Recreation and Community Services), said Malibu doesn’t own anything of its own. “The city doesn’t even own a swing set or the land to put one on,” said Sills. “The city is 10 years old. It’s time to fish or cut bait.”

            Bluffs deal may go to EIR stage

            0

            News analysis

            By Kristine Hansen/Special to The Malibu Times

            and Arnold G. York/Publisher

            After many months of negotiation, a proposed development deal to solve the problem of where to relocate the ball fields at Bluffs Park may be approaching a solution.

            The baseball and soccer fields located atop Bluffs Park sit on land owned by the State of California, but the lease for those fields expires in May, 2002. The state has said it does not want to extend the lease because it wants to build a visitors center there. Malibu has been hard-pressed to find new suitable land and the dollars to make the move.

            The proposed multi-part development deal brought to the council on Monday was negotiated among the City of Malibu, the state, the Coastal Commission and Roy Crummer. Crummer is a Malibu landowner who owns a major portion of the bluff.

            In the proposed deal, the current ball fields would be removed from state-owned land and new baseball and soccer fields would be built on a 6.2-acre portion of the bluff adjacent to Pacific Coast Highway. Crummer has offered to donate the land to the City of Malibu and he would, in return, earn the right to build eight single-family estate residences on the other end of the bluff. Each lot size would be about two acres, making the total subdivision approximately 18.74 acres.

            According to Planning Director Barry Hogan, the city would waive certain portions of the Interim Zoning Ordinance (IZO) slope density, lot size and total square footage to allow the homes to be constructed.

            Crummer said his father and grandfather, who were early developers of Malibu, “always felt ball fields were important.” Later, the family sold most of its holdings to the Malibu Bay Company, except for a few parcels like those atop the bluffs adjacent to Bluffs Park.

            Others in the government and parks and recreation community spoke out in favor of the proposed deal at Monday’s meeting.

            Russ Dingman, park planner for the State of California, said the city would have to move quickly because the lease on the ball fields expires soon.

            Laureen Sills, parks and recreation commissioner, said she supports the deal but noted that the rough proposed layout might be a problem because foul balls would land in Pacific Coast Highway. She said the Parks and Recreation Commission wants to be more involved in the planning, to perhaps help eliminate problems like these.

            Park Commissioners Doug O’Brien and Dermot Stoker supported the deal. Stoker said, “This is a great day in the history of Malibu parks.”

            Marissa Coughlin, a parks activist, also supported the deal. She said she hoped the community would accept the plan with the intent that it’s given.

            Councilmember Sharon Barovsky voiced some hesitation because of the amount of grading involved in the deal and also echoed some of the concerns of Malibu Road homeowners located below the proposed residential development. “In all fairness I’m not going to support 72,000 cubic yards of grading to fill up a canyon … that’s too much for my tastes,” said Barovsky.

            Councilmember Ken Kearsley was more optimistic. “I think we have a unique opportunity to sort of meld the public and the private sectors into a regional park,” he said.

            The council voted to go the next step and send the proposed Bluffs park development deal out for an Environmental Impact Report (EIR).

            Capt. John O’Brien retires

            The council and audience gave Capt. John O’Brien, the very popular retiring commander of the Lost Hills Sheriffs’ Division, a standing ovation for his years of service to Malibu. O’Brien, who came to the station in 1977, served as a deputy, sergeant, lieutenant and later, captain of the division. Mayor Joan House described O’Brien as “among the finest they have to offer.” See story A6.

            The bond committee reports

            The independent Malibu Bond Measure Coalition Committee gave the council its version of the $15 million open land bond initiative’s language.

            The council placed the item on the agenda for its May 29 meeting. Interim City Manager Christi Hogin said council members are free to campaign for the bond as long as no city funds are used.

            At its next meeting, the council will have to grapple with final ballot wording.

            At Monday’s meeting, the committee said they feel it’s doubtful that the $15 million bond initiative could get the two-thirds vote necessary for passage, based on a survey the city conducted, which revealed that just 58 or 59 percent of Malibu supports it.

            Cross Creek reconstruction

            The city has plans to reconstruct and reconfigure Cross Creek Road.

            A grant in the amount of $500,000 has been recommended, and will help offset the cost, which is estimated at between $800,000 and $900,000.

            Home occupations

            The council introduced the new Home Occupation Ordinance, which covers home businesses in Malibu, but then unanimously approved moving the matter to a hearing on May 29. The new ordinance would permit home business operations like piano lessons, riding lessons and swimming lessons. Planning Director Barry Hogan said, “They still have to be good neighbors. There has to be a compatible use.” The draft ordinance requires that parking be provided on-site, which could pose a serious parking crunch for many hillside neighborhoods.

            In other news, an appeal of a Planning Commission decision to deny construction of a house on 32804 Pacific Coast Highway between Decker and Encinal Canyon roads was returned to the commission for further hearing due to the changes that the applicant made to the original plan.

            Also, the City Council unanimously approved a Flood Mitigation Plan.

            ×