Home Blog Page 6828

Malibu Seen

0

CRUISE CONTROL

Talk about pulling off a red carpet coup! Rosie O’Donnell surprised everyone at the 14th Annual Kid’s Circus Awards at the Santa Monica Barker Hangar with her special guest — Tom Cruise. Tom’s top gun appearance was kept top secret till the very end. He did his part for the kids after being whisked in by a private plane and taking a limo straight to the hangar. When the show was over, Rosie and her not- so-tall, but very dark and handsome, hi-profile pal high-tailed it off into the night.

PLAY DAY

Jason Alexander, Carl Reiner and Kirk Douglas were among the theater lovers who trekked down to the Mark Taper Forum for a look at Alan Alda’s new play “QED.” The production depicts the life of eccentric Nobel Prize-winning physicist Richard Feynman with Alda in the starring role, and runs through May 13. Also at the Music Center, the Ahmanson Theater is gearing up for a trio of new one-act musicals called “3hree.” Beau Bridges takes the stage as a ready-for-a-sex-change mid-westerner in “Looking for Normal” at the Geffen. Dame Edna’s Royal Tour is set to open at the Shubert and Gladys Knight will be bringing down the house when “Smokey Joe’s Caf” hits the Wilshire Theater on May 29.

IN THE SPOTLIGHT

Actress Sally Kellerman served as mistress of ceremonies at this year’s TSA awards dinner honoring David E. Kelly. TV’s mega producer was given high praise for his efforts to help raise awareness in the fight against a neurobiological disorder called Tourette’s syndrome.

“This event is the culmination of a dream that combines our commitment to Tourette’s and our responsibility to our children and everyone afflicted with this life-altering syndrome,” said dinner chair Jeffrey Kramer. Kramer explained that last year’s fundraising efforts, together with a $9 million award from the National Institutes of Health, have brought the organization closer than ever to finding a cure. Kelly was singled out for top honors after incorporating the syndrome into several episodes of his hit TV shows — most recently “Ally McBeal,” which featured Anne Heche as a teacher living with Tourette’s.

HOT STUFF

Disco diva Donna Summer will be taking us back to those sensational ’70s at this year’s Rock & Soul to Erase MS on May 18. The Studio 54 icon joins an all-star line-up, which includes Stevie Wonder, Brian McKnight, Tony Danza, Tom Arnold and Bill Maher. The Race to Erase MS was created by Nancy Davis in 1993 and has become one of the largest and most successful annual events funding research for multiple sclerosis. This year’s festivities are expected to raise a whopping $3 million. And chances are it will be an evening to remember on May 19 when Johnny Mathis takes the stage at this year’s Diamond Anniversary Gala to benefit Santa Monica-UCLA Medical Center. The event, which enjoys the generous support of many Malibu docs, is celebrating its 75th year. Happy Birthday!

The Malibu Real Estate Report

0

Early 2001 sales reflect little of last year

By Rick Wallace

In a recent April week, two homes were reported sold for more than $5 million each in the Malibu area Multiple Listing Service. Neither was on the beach. That two such estates, both on the landside of Pacific Coast Highway, would sell the same week is remarkable.

Furthermore, the national news of a $10 million purchase on Carbon Beach by celebrities has made for an encouraging Malibu real estate outlook. That is, if you count on the first three months of the year as your only guide.

A mere 37 homes sold in Malibu the first quarter of the year. At an annualized rate, that is less than half of the production for the year 2000. It’s not quite that selling activity came to a complete halt, but the smell of burning brakes during the January-March period was discernible.

The winter period in Malibu is traditionally a slower selling period. Nevertheless, the same period last year saw double the number of sales local Realtors have participated in thus far in 2001. The same holds true for overall volume. And while the year is still young, and the sampling still thin, the indication for prices is mixed.

The volume for the 37 sales has been just under $60 million (total volume for all of 2000 was nearly $600 million). The average sale price has dropped below the record level of last year, from $1,700,000 to about $1,614,000.

April seems to have been better. In the following neighborhoods, homes sold at virtually the highest price ever: The Saddle Peak ridge, Corral Canyon, Zuma bluffs, De Butts, and the Broad Beach bluffs.

More to the positive side, buyers willing to commit have been also been willing to seize higher-priced properties. The median average of sales thus far has drifted to around $1.4 million, compared to $1.25 last year. Half of local sales through the first three months were at that price or greater.

Impressively, the median average has risen with a virtual absence of the beach market. Only nine beach homes sold in the first four months of the year. In 2000, albeit an extraordinary year, more than 80 beach homes sold.

Landside sales at more than $1 million have been the primary strength of the market, though the overall sum of such sales has also dropped off.

The numbers for Malibu could change during this second quarter, and a growing number of impressive sales are pending a close of escrow. However, in recent years, the activity of the early months has been a strong gauge for the rest of the year.

Unless activity continues to pick up, the sheer aggregate of Malibu home sales this year will not reach 200. Malibu has averaged 300 home sales over the past four years. The last two times the 200 mark was not attained was in 1993 and 1995.

Unless buyer activity increases, the key to the future market will be inventory. While very low traditionally, the number of single-family homes for sale (234 in the Malibu/90265 area as of April 15) is the highest level since December 1999. Already, price reductions seem to be prevalent to compensate for lengthened market times.

Also, interest rates are extremely attractive, inspiring a rash of refinancing and encouraging home buying. Affordability indexes remain strong for Southern California, particularly in contrast to our overpriced neighbors to the north. Los Angeles’ area affordability index, dangling around 37 percent, is sufficient to propel move-up purchasers to reach upper echelon locales such as Malibu. And while the stock market has taken a beating, there remain a number of wealthy parties still flush with cash from the recent eight-year technology-driven economic expansion. Malibu has not lost all of the second-home buyers who drive the beach and estate market.

A market that boasts prices nearly double of 1994 and home sales about half of last year is a market of deep dichotomy. Ultimately, increasing prices cannot help home sales. But decreasing home sales can hurt prices.

Rick Wallace of the Coldwell Banker Company has been a Realtor in Malibu for

13 years. He can be reached at RICKMALIBUrealestate.com

More questions raised

0

The Birenbaums, Sam and Nidia Cota Cookie Cutter Birenbaum, have garnered and created so much hatred with the majority of this Malibu community, particularly their neighbors. And they continue to thrive off this resentment. They camp on the beach because there were no permits issued by the county or the city for a dwelling on their lot, and lack of a permit provides no reason for a septic system.

Further construction is being pursued without a permit, at the same time they are giving praises to Mayor Pro Tem Jeff Jennings on their public access show. Are favors being issued instead of permits?

James “Scottie” Scott

Malibu mothers from various backgrounds share identical objectives

0

Motherhood traverses the boundaries of social and financial circumstances, uniting mothers in the ability to understand what true unconditional love is. Three Malibu mothers speak about the ups and downs of being a parent, revealing what connects them all in the end.

“Being a mother means that I’m never first,” said Kathleen Keifer, mother of three young daughters, Lucy, Emily and Claire, who attend Webster Elementary.

Though the family recently experienced hard times when they all became sick and had to move out of a mold-infested home they had just purchased, leaving everything behind, Keifer continues to have a positive perspective, which she partly credits to being a mother.

In some ways, the tumultuous past few weeks have helped Keifer realize how precious her family really is to her.

Children can accentuate the importance of living in the moment and help preserve a sense of wonder, explained Keifer, an artist whose work is displayed at the Mc Lean Gallery at Cross Creek Road and recently at the Los Angeles County Museum of Art.

“There is so much joy, they (my daughters) add a dimension to life,” said the artist who has been married to her husband, Jim, for 17 years.

But parenting also brings its own set of challenges. “It’s all about love and supporting your children. It’s hard sometimes because I have a tug in me,” said the artist, explaining that sometimes her work pulls her away from her daughters.

“I’d be very happy to be a painter with no responsibilities, yet every year with my daughters is so precious,” the pace at which they grow “gives me such a relentless sense of time.

“It completely changes my life,” said the artist, who grew up in a family with eight children.

As she talked about her own childhood, Keifer said she had a terrific relationship with her mother despite some tough teenage years. The relationship was rekindled in a special way when Keifer had her first child.

“We became peers,” said Keefer, who now understands her mother more and enjoys her advice.

Keifer’s mother was also a painter. “She had a promising career but it was sidetracked in a huge way, so I am trying to learn from that–to do both, be a mother and an artist,” explained Keifer.

Debbie Campbell, a single mother of three, has also undergone hard times of a different sort, but in the end, pulling through for her children.

“Even when things are rough, they’re your life,” said Campbell, as she spoke about Luke, 6, Brittany, 12, and Chelsea, 14.

While Campbell underwent a different set of difficulties because the heavy hand of Malibu’s code enforcement was pounding her out of an affordable guest home she occupied last year, she kept going. “The children have motivated me to keep moving forward no matter what,” she said.

“Mothering,” said Campbell, who now lives in a condo with her father, “has transformed me. I was a career-oriented woman with little patience. Now I have learned to have compassion, love and patience.”

Campbell works full-time as an office manager at Wagner Chiropractics in Malibu. Given that she supports her children on her own, the daily schedule is hectic. She wakes up at 5 a.m. and does not get home until 7 p.m. or 8 p.m. “Being a single mom is unbelievably busy,” she said.

But Campbell still manages to find special time with her children. In a typical Southern Californian fashion, the family spends quality time in the car, as they run from one errand to the next; they listen to music and talk about their day.

As for boundaries, “In my life and with my children, I choose my battles,” said Campbell. “I’m thankful that my kids’ friends are good.”

And even if it seems like a person can have it all–a nice home, financial security–reality can come down hard, leaving one on their own in the worst of circumstances.

Cindy Landon became a single parent when her husband and late actor Michael Landon died when her children, Jennifer and Sean, were only eight and five years old. “It’s tough to go through,” said Landon. “After the loss it’s important to have a role model and as mothers we play both roles.

“Michael was such an incredible father and a strong figure in the house it was hard to lose him, she said. “Michael spent so much time with my son, teaching him. It makes me sad that he has missed that opportunity.

“As a single mom, I’m an involved parent and there is a lot of time that goes into that,” said Landon. “I feel fortunate that I can do that and that I have the resources,” she said, understanding that many mothers do not have the same opportunity to spend time with their children.

As she spoke about her relationship with her two teens, Landon said, “It is important to teach a sense of responsibility and follow through with your words. It has to start at a younger age, overindulging is not a good thing.”

Instead, she explained, “When you don’t allow them to do something, tell them why and follow through, don’t say something and not back it up.”

Moreover, Landon emphasized that it is important to give them a sense of responsibility early on.

“Doing well in school is a big issue for me,” said Landon. Honesty is also a crucial theme for this mother.

And “communication is number one,” said Landon. “Being able to talk about everything–not leaving questions about drugs and sex unanswered. Being a parent, you also have to set boundaries and say no,” she said.

“There are times when I realize they are getting older, and I will have more freedom, but it’s also a tear jerker,” said Landon, realizing that her children are coming to an age when they will start to lead their own lives.

Presently, Jennifer, 17, is about to go to New York University’s Tisch School of the Arts. “I am excited for her because of the opportunity that awaits her,” said Landon.

“Sean, who will be 15, is at that age where I have to be aware of everything in his life. It’s a challenging time, steering them in the right direction, making sure they don’t get involved with the wrong people,” explained Landon.

“But there is no manual; you have to do the best that you can do,” she said.

“The greatest reward is raising your children, despite the challenges,” she said. “My kids are my life.”

Planners say yes to Calvo exemptions

0

Calvo exemptions to the Coastal Act, in place before Malibu became a city but later dropped, were approved in a 5-0 vote by Malibu’s Planning Commission at its Monday night meeting.

Up until 1991, under the exemption, state law stated that applicants for home construction projects on vacant lots in some Malibu neighborhoods–on the landside of Pacific Coast Highway–did not need review by the California Coastal Commission. When Malibu became a city in 1991 it refused to adopt the policy. This forced all projects to go to the Coastal Commission, and has caused numerous delays in construction projects ranging from as simple as putting up a fence to full construction of a new home.

Affected neighborhoods include Big Rock, Malibu Park, Point Dume (the interior), Topanga, Malibu Knolls in the Civic Center area, Malibu Country Estates, Trancas, Sweetwater Mesa, Carbon Canyon, Carbon Mesa and Las Flores Canyon. This is about 25 percent of Malibu’s total land area, said Planning Commission chair Ed Lipnick.

The reinstated exemption expects to reduce the processing time for obtaining building permits by six to eight months.

“There’s always been a hindrance for having development done,” said Commissioner Ted Vaill. “Not only would they have to go before the city, but also the California Coastal Commission.”

In other news, the commission unanimously approved sending the draft Civic Center design guidelines to the City Council. The commission tweaked about 20 typographical errors and sentence-structures, then appointed Lipnick and Vice Chair Andy Stern to review the amended guidelines and then recommend their adoption.

At the City Council’s May 29 meeting, it will likely discuss the guidelines, said Barry Hogan, planning director.

The commission has devoted five hearings to discussion on the guidelines since the council directed it to further revise them.

Also at Monday’s meeting, the Planning Commission voted 4-1 to approve a new two-story, 8,409-square-foot home on a 6.4-acre site on E. Winding Way. At issue was whether the applicant could be granted a variance for grading in excess of 1,000 cubic yards.

Tacked onto the commission’s approval were two conditions–the first to accept applicants offer of two deed restrictions for two separate parcels, thus dedicating them to open space. The other resolution was to incorporate landscape screening the home’s driveway.

Commissioner Richard Carrigan voted against the project, saying he was uncomfortable setting a precedent for other properties.

The city received eight letters from neighbors supporting the project, said Sheila Powers, assistant planner. “This is not your everyday project,” she said, adding that few lots in Malibu offer the flexibility to be subdivided.

Hogan agreed. “When you break this up and look at the pieces, it’s really not that different than any other site-plan reviews,” he said. The property is owned by Marc Gurvitz.

In another vote, the Planning Commission approved, 5-0, an application from Larry Miner for a site owned by a “Mr. And Mrs. Carsey” in the 28000 area of PCH to repair a failing slope covered by gunite, construct retaining walls, and provide access to a guesthouse and a deck at the base of the bluff.

All commissioners questioned why it took more than 14 months for the application to reach the commission. Associate Planner Meredith Elguira said, first a geologist reviewed the site and then the applicant had to slightly revise the project.

Commissioner Carrigan urged the city to do something, “even if it’s just a letter,” to get the California Coastal Commission to support the project.

Also, an agenda item before the Planning Commission to approve the construction of an 8,250-square-foot single-family home in the 6200 block of Porterdale Drive was continued to the commission’s May 21 meeting.

Lower Topanga tenants told to go

0

A relocation company has notified tenants and residents of Lower Topanga Canyon they must move out of their homes and businesses in order for State Parks to take over the land.

Acting as the middleman for State Parks, the American Land Conservancy (ALC) has hired Pacific Relocation Consultants (PRC) to relocate approximately 49 families and 10 businesses, such as the Malibu Feed Bin, Oasis, Reel Inn and the Topanga Ranch Motel.

In previous interviews, State Parks indicated it would not buy the land as long as it was occupied because it doesn’t want to deal with relocation.

“State parks should not be in the business of being landlord,” said Roy Stearns, deputy director for State Parks Communications. “I would hope the ALC would do it first — but there are still negotiations going on as to how this will work.”

The ALC has optioned to buy the 1,640-acre property, owned by LAACO, ltd. (Los Angeles Athletic Club) since the 1920s, for $43 million, with the goal of donating it to State Parks.

The curt relocation notice sent to the residents and businesses has caused uproar.

“It [moving] will kill these people, especially the older people,” said Scott Dittrich, a 30-year resident of the area and president of the newly formed Lower Topanga Community Association. “Old people can’t pick up and move again.”

The selling of the land by LAACO is not the problem, say tenants.

“There is nothing wrong with them selling the land,” said Dittrich. “The problem is State Parks is saying that they have to kick us out to have a park but we only occupy 3 percent of the land. There is no reason we could not co-exist.

“It would take up to three years just to get rid of the buildings and for the ALC to get a plan instrumented,” continued Dittrich. “They don’t have to get the people out until that time. It’s mean-spirited and unprecedented with State Parks acquisitions.”

Carol Winter, a resident who has lived in the area for 32 years, said she understands the particular position of LACCO. “They want to get rid of this land, it’s a pain on their side, but we are human beings and I want all the legal rights for the people, especially the elderly.”

Stearns explained that the ALC is acting as a middle man, which happens a lot with State Parks, because they can move a lot quicker than government entities with all its bureaucracy.

“If State Parks acquires land with tenants they become liable for relocation and then it [relocation costs] will be paid for with tax money,” said Stearns, emphasizing taxpayers will foot the bill if that is the case.

The timing of the letter sent by PRC on April 19, with short notice of meetings regarding the relocation planning process, has also angered residents.

Many did not attend the meetings scheduled for residents on April 25 (with an alternate date of April 27) and April 26 for business owners. They said the notice was too short and would not attend without their attorney.

“We were disappointed by the attendance,” said Julie Benson, spokesperson for LAACO, of the meetings. She said only 11 residents and two businesses total attended the three meetings. So now PRC has begun to contact people individually in an effort to get the relocation plan going, she said.

Although the option agreement calls for closing to occur by July 14, and State Parks does not want the land occupied when the transfer is made, Benson said, “That doesn’t mean the residents have to be gone by then. We expect the relocation process will be done by the end of the year.”

And the possibility of where residents would be relocated to is upsetting to some who have lived in the area for more than 30 years.

State law requires a relocation plan and benefits for eligible residents displaced by the sale of a property to a public entity, but it does not take into account comparable types of areas, e.g. beach proximity and scenic vistas.

“They think they can just move us to Pacoima or something,” said Dittrich. “The State Park system has become ruthless in how they try to deal with this,” he asserted.

Also causing concern, is the legality of relocation procedures and new leases drafted by LACCO just before the transfer, according to Frank Angel, an attorney representing residents.

“What authority does the ALC have to handle relocation?” asked Angel.

“In the past, they said they don’t handle it, but now all of a sudden they are handling it. The state has to do it,” he said. “They don’t have the full range of options, they can’t negotiate.

“To begin with, they have to give us some answers to some basic questions, such as whom did they receive the authority from? If they did, I think it’s illegal for the state to pass on this responsibility,” he added.

When LAACO asked tenants to produce copies of their leases, some of which are decades old, a few tenants could not find them and new ones were then issued.

“They are illegal,” said Angel.

The leases contain language where tenants would have to waive their relocation rights, explained Angel. “It’s unfair and unlawful.”

“The terms in the new leases give all sorts of pretexts to LAACO to get rid of people, introducing terms that are far beyond the earlier leases,” he further explained.

However, Benson said, the new leases gave tenants full relocation rights and benefits. She also said there were as few as six new leases issued.

Another debatable matter is what may be done with the land once it is acquired.

“The ALC has said that they have to make a 25 percent profit in any deal they make,” said resident Dittrich. “Where is the money gonna come?”

“There is obviously a development deal that will affect the area by PCH,” he added.

However, Stearns said: “If we get this land, and we do want this land, it will become a part of the Topanga State Park. That’s probably one of the largest acquisitions we have done in the last 20 years in the area.”

As for the businesses, “There may be some historic structures there that we may want to take a look at,” said Stearns.

“Before they start changing everything they better make sure it’s right because this is a uniquely charming place in Malibu and people may not notice it,” said Lloyd Ahern, a Malibu resident who owned a house on Topanga Beach before it was acquired by the state in the late ’70s. “But when it’s gone they will miss it.”

Afternoon gardens delight

0

Five Malibu homeowners opened their gardens to the Malibu Garden Club for a tour on Saturday. The gardens are a mix of do-it-yourself landscaping to professional jobs. Proceeds from the tour benef its student horticulture scholarships and community projects.

Puppy pays with its life

0

Six weeks ago my wife brought home the most beautiful, bouncy puppy I’ve ever seen. We named her Pearl as she was all white with a brown patch over her left eye. Pearl brought such joy and happiness to our house. Pearl was from the animal shelter and from the moment she arrived she was so happy to be in a fenced yard with loving people and two big dogs that quickly adopted her for her playful ways. We could not have loved her more. But just tonight a stranger came to our door and said a little puppy was lying dead in the street. That street is Fernhill Drive. Our beloved puppy, which was a constant source of joy, had been killed, run over. She’d somehow gotten out of our fenced yard for just a couple of minutes. The driver didn’t stop. My wife, her son and I are utterly heart broken. How she got out of our fenced yard is not clear. We, of course, accept responsibility for her getting out but in my grief I know there is a larger issue.

For years, I have been outraged by the speeding in front of our house at Boniface and Fernhill and have spent hundreds of hours trying to get this city council, this police department and this public works department to do SOMETHING to stop the speeding. Three years ago, after being given a personal inspection of the successful and extensive speed hump program in Portland, Oregon, I created petitions and took them to every house on Fernhill and Dume Drive to attempt to install speed humps on these busy streets. I got over 65 percent of the residents on Fernhill to agree to speed humps and they even agreed to pay for them! A majority of Dume residents signed on as well.

The residents of any residential street should be able to decide on what is right for their street. It is past time for the residents of these two Point Dume streets to reclaim their RIGHT to equal safety and peace.

Speed humps and only speed humps make cars drive at 25 miles per hour. They are tested and they work. They work 24 hours a day, everyday. They work every hour you need them, not occasionally like a patrol car. A very vocal group decided they couldn’t tolerate the humps on this street. The majority of them didn’t live on these streets, they just didn’t want the inconvenience. Why in God’s name can’t we have 25 mile per hour speed limits in this residential neighborhood? Are the neighbors so busy they can’t slow down? Every day the cars race by our house. They go right over the double yellow lines and honk at us as we attempt to leave our driveway. Forty miles per hour all day and night. People view Fernhill and Dume as a county road not a residential street. This city has allowed that to happen. I am determined to change that.

I called Sergeant Mach just last week to request a police presence on this street. He’s our head policeman and he strongly favors the use of speed humps. He can only offer a couple of hour’s vigilance and speeding tickets per day out here. He’s only got six patrol cars at any given time for the whole of Malibu. I’ve called Chuck Bergson at public works for years about what he plans to do to slow the speeding. He keeps assuring me he’s got some plans that are being studied, considered, voted on. He’s well intentioned but he’s hamstrung by committees and several individuals on the public works that are flat out opposed to change.

My neighbors and I have put up signs begging people to slow down but they don’t’ and they won’t, unless we install those humps, put in roundabouts, narrow the streets, whatever it takes. We need full time enforcement. Cities across America use these measures. Why don’t we? Do I think the cops can stop the speeding with their total of six cars for all of Malibu? Not for a minute. I’ve been to the city council numerous times, left them information about speed humps and other traffic abatement methods, methods that work around the clock to slow traffic.

Have any of the council members come to observe at 8 a.m. as the SUV’s speed to the elementary school to drop off their children or when the commuters come flying down the street on their way to their quiet side streets somewhere on the Point or when the AA members race in to make their meetings? Never once! They only seemed truly committed to bringing more development to Malibu, more traffic. That is all they seem to really give a damn about. What about public safety for God’s sake?

I washed Pearl’s blood off the street tonight. She is gone. We will miss her terribly. We loved her. Do I harbor any prospects for the City Council to address the speeding on Point Dume? Only if the families on this Point decide that they want to impose sanity on these residential streets will that happen. If we can’t unite to accomplish something so basic as safe streets what can we achieve? Please don’t tell me a child has to die to finally get a grip on speeding on Fernhill and Dume Drives. Hell, this time it was only a precious, beautiful, little puppy.

Bob Carmichael

×