Home Blog Page 6806

British Virgins:

0

Come! Sail with me the Spanish Sea

Deep-strewn with pirate plunder

Now on a tack, now running free,

Now the lee rail rolling under!

Again to hold a wheel on course

With bow wash flying aft,

And match a rainsquall’s sudden force

On a yawing pitching craft

Aboard once more a heeling deck

As trade winds bloat the sails,

We’ll beat close-hauled by Deadman’s Neck

And revel in the gales

That churn the emerald waters white

And, keening through the shrouds,

Scrub clean the sky o’er Norman’s Bight

With clumps of cotton clouds.

Northwest we’ll sail a steady reach

To moor off Jost Van Dyke

Then steer the dinghy from boat to beach.

For a grainy barefoot hike

Along the sand to Foxy’s Bar …

Dirt floor and palm thatch roof …

Foxy’s Ballads … his old guitar,

And rum that’s 200 proof.

We’ll drop our hook in Fat Hogs’ Bay

Where Blackbeard berthed his bunch

We’ll toast the sunset from Sandy Cay

With shipmates and hard rum punch.

Baked by the sun! Caked by spray!

Raked by tropical rain!

Tired of hauling on lines all day!

… Oh, to do it again!

Bill Dowey

The $15 million bond issue — the battle heats up

0

There was token opposition from the public on July 9 when the City Council unanimously approved a ballot measure for next November calling for a $15 million bond issue to purchase land for ball fields, community centers or other public facilities.

But opposition is gearing up, and what now seems like a simple proposition to buy land for noncommercial use is likely to turn into a vigorous debate over what the priorities for the land should be and how to pay for whatever recreational amenities are built. The opposition can kill the bond with a mere one-third no vote.

One opponent of the bond is John Harlow, former city councilmember and longtime Malibu activist. Gathered with other opponents at Lily’s Cafe in Point Dume one recent morning, Harlow and others talked about what they think is wrong with the bond measure.

For one thing, they said it promises too much for the money.

“I can no longer support the bond to buy park land,” said Harlow, “I would like to see specifics about the projects involved.”

He reiterated what he had said earlier before the City Council: “Will the priority be for parks, playgrounds, playing fields, trails, community centers? If so, how many of each do they plan on? Or will it just be to protect natural areas and wildlife habitat?”

All of those things are listed on the ballot measure as “such … as” projects the land is to be used for.

But critics say there will not be enough money in the bond measure to accomplish many of those things. That’s because there is a $2.25 million cap on the amount of money that can be used for construction of any recreational facilities listed in the bond’s ballot measure. But just one 15,000 square foot community center, as envisioned by a city parks and recreation plan, would cost an estimated $4.5 million, twice the cap.

Ball fields are estimated at up to $200,000 each. Add parking at $2,000 per space (250-300 spaces for a 15,000 square foot recreation center), picnic tables and a playground for tots, and the building costs could exceed the cap by $3 million or $4 million dollars. And that doesn’t include money for trails and the protection of wildlife habitats, which are also written into the ballot measure.

“It does not promise to build all of that. We cannot do everything,” said Mona Loo, chair of a citizen’s steering committee that helped draft the language of the measure and a strong backer of the bond. The important thing, she said, is to buy as much property as possible now and build on it later.

“I don’t believe the City Council has the will to build all that,” said Tom Fakehany, a former children’s soccer coach. “I’m not arguing against money for park land, but I don’t want to see periodic taxing of ourselves for whatever it is they or their backers want.”

Loo and most other supporters of the bond, including the entire City Council, say that the city will have to raise more money to build out recreational uses.

That is where the issue becomes more complicated for voters to consider. Will they be asked to dig into their pockets once again?

Raising money

City Treasurer Pete Lippman said there are several possibilities for raising more money, none of them guaranteed. They include:

  • Floating another bond issue. “But that means we’ve got to go back to the voters who are going to say, ‘My God, we just voted for a bond’,” Lippman said. “It is risky politically and chancy, requiring a two-thirds vote.”
  • Grants from county, state or federal agencies. The city often gets matching grants for highway safety, sewage abatement and other projects affecting the general public. But money for parks and recreation centers is generally marked for inner city locations. “Those grants are very competitive, especially with the economy cooling off,” said Lippman. Also, as noted by City Councilmember Tom Hasse, “They look at Malibu and say why don’t they get some of their rich citizens to pay for those things.”
  • Donations from wealthy benefactors. Malibu is graced with many rich and famous residents. Often they give generously and often they lend their fame to fundraising efforts. This is one of Lippman’s favored approaches. “I would much prefer it if the city came together with some of our famous people helping raise the money,” he said.
  • Special allocations. This is money earmarked for special projects through the efforts of state legislators. But money for a soccer field in Malibu might have the same stigma attached to it as grant money.
  • An “amenities” tradeoff. A developer or contractor would donate land or construction money for recreational development in exchange for permission to develop other land parcels in the city. An example is the Malibu Bay Company’s offer, which includes 19 acres and $5 million toward the construction of a recreation center and three sports fields. Strong opposition to the Malibu Bay Company proposal exemplifies the difficulty with this option. “This is the perfect solution,” said bond opponent Doug O’Brien. “This gives us everything the bond promises. But there’s a group of people that just hate the Malibu Bay Company.”

Eminent domain

Another question that comes up is what land to purchase, and how.

“There are no apparent sellers, which means the purchases will have to be litigated,” said Harlow. The city does have the right of eminent domain, which means it can force a landowner to sell at a fair market price, but probably not without a legal challenge.

City Parks and Recreation Director Paul Adams said there is “more than enough” empty land suitable for sports fields and recreation centers in Malibu, but he couldn’t say offhand how much was for sale.

The many uncertainties surrounding the implementation of the bond measure are what drove Harlow and the others at their Lily’s Cafe hangout to oppose it. Their position, as Harlow told the City Council, is that “voters have a right to know and determine how their taxes will be committed and spent by this council or by a future council who may have a different priority than yours.”

He said he would favor a subsequent bond proposal that would include the details.

“I’ve seen bond measures that actually had line items, listing each thing to be done with the money, right down to the exact figure to be spent on the item.”

It is hard to gauge just how strong a campaign these opponents will wage in the weeks and months to come. At the very least, they say, they plan to write an argument against the bond for the voters’ pamphlet.

At the July 23 City Council meeting, the group declared themselves as the Lily’s Cafe Malibu Steering Committee “in keeping with the tradition established within the city of self-appointed and self-selected steering committees.” That was a tongue-in-cheek reference to the citizen’s steering committee that drafted language for the bond measure and strongly backed a cap on construction.

Meanwhile, city councilmembers, the diverse group that made up the bond measure steering committee, and other activist groups will be marshalling their own arguments in favor of the bond.

Body washes up on Malibu shore

0

A decomposed body was discovered by a workman Tuesday afternoon, on the rocks below a home on Malibu Road, according to Lt. Thom Bradstock and Sgt. Cally Barrier of the Lost Hills Sheriff’s Station.

“It appeared to be a mannequin,” Bradstock said, “but on closer inspection [by the witness, who had been working at the house], it turned out to be a body.” The witness went into the house to call 911, and when he returned, the body was gone.

Barrier said the witness told sheriff’s deputies that “a wave had pushed the body into a sitting position on the rocks, which were close to shore.” It appeared to be Caucasian (sex undetermined), with long black hair, and had no clothing on from the waist up. Barrier said she didn’t think any missing persons were currently reported in the area.

Two baywatch boats, divers, a helicopter and lifeguard rescue teams searched for the body for several hours before the search was called off. Barrier said it was a difficult endeavor because of the rocks. The tide was high and large waves probably took it out to sea, she said. “The body could be anywhere. It could end up in Oxnard or the Channel Islands.”

Taking a bite out of danger

0

Three dogs were bitten in the region in the past few weeks when they ventured too close to rattlesnakes. The dogs had to be rushed to the vet but they were saved when antivenin was provided quickly.

And recently, a 4-foot rattler was found near Pacific Coast Highway in the Point Dume area and an 18-inch rattler was also seen sunning itself on the back porch of a home in Latigo Canyon.

Cathy Goldberg, whose dog, Sparky, was bitten recently, recounted the accident.

“We didn’t know what was wrong with her. Her face was puffy and she was bitten on her lower jaw. So we took her to the vet and they told us she had a rattlesnake puncture.”

Once the dog was back home, the Goldbergs called Bo Slyapich, a professional rattlesnake wrangler who clears the sinuous serpents from properties and movie sets.

“We called him because we have three children and we wanted to keep them safe,” said Goldberg. “He was really thorough and informative, showing us problem areas that we can deal with.”

Slyapich said most of his calls come after a family member or pet has been bitten, but he hopes to help people prevent these accidents in the future by clearing properties before an accident takes place.

Slyapich, who captures and relocates the venomous creatures, said he enjoys the challenges of his job.

“Every time is different and the adrenaline is pumping,” said Slyapich, who was in the stunt business and collected marine specimens, specializing in the gathering of baby sharks for the aquarium trade before making a living at snake wrangling.

This unusual professional aspiration began early on. At the age of five, when many are content with Play-Doh or drawing with crayons, Slyapich was out catching snakes.

Growing up in Malibu Canyon, he gathered nonvenomous California snakes, selling them to pet stores to earn money.

It was not until eight years ago that he started making a living at it in the entertainment industry, by clearing filming sites prior to the arrival of the crew.

Before a crew goes out, Slyapich also gives a safety talk, letting them know what to watch for. “As long as you can see where your feet or hands are going, you’re safe,” he says.

Slyapich partners up with his father, Sam, when he goes on dangerous jobs. “He is the only person who I can trust,” said Slyapich.

Recently, Slyapich broadened his services, clearing ranches and backyards prior to holiday barbecues and clearing properties for real estate agents before a home is sold.

“I fell into doing the private sector after a doctor’s son was bit in January,” he said, realizing that there was a demand for this special trade. The one-and-a-half-year-old child went to intensive care after he was poisoned, but he fully recovered.

However, even when an area is cleared, there is no guarantee that snakes won’t return. Education is key. “I will sit and talk with the client, advising of what signs to look for,” said Slyapich.

The busy seasons for snakes are early spring and late fall, before and after they hibernate. They are also outside during the summer and generally hide in the shade to change their temperature, depending on a certain body temperature to survive.

In the heat of the day, they can hide behind washing machines in a garage or in woodpiles. They may lurk in a crawling space and they love to be under homes.

Over the years, snakes have become more problematic because people are moving into areas where the serpents live.

But snakes are not on the offensive. They will only bite to protect themselves when they feel threatened.

As they hike, people can avoid encountering rattlers if they walk heavy. “Take a stick and make lots of noise,” said Slyapich. Rattlers have no ears, but they can feel vibrations through the ground.

If someone sees a snake, the best way to avoid bites is to stay clear from the animal. “A snake can hit anywhere from a quarter to half of its length,” explained Slyapich.

Aside from dogs and people, horses are also curious and at risk of being bitten. If bitten in the face, a horse will suffocate unless they get immediate help.

“Keep a piece of four-inch garden hose in the barn or ranch and if a horse gets bit, put it up the nasal passage to keep the passage open until the vet arrives,” advised Slyapich.

But if a child or a dog is attacked, the only response should be to bring them to the doctor or veterinarian as quickly as possible. “Do not suck the poison out, cut it or put on a tourniquet, just bring them to the vet or doctor,” he cautioned.

The amount of time available before the bite becomes deadly is not precise because it depends on the amount of venom discharged and where a person or pet was bitten.

In many cases, people first call the fire department, animal control or the sheriff’s department about a snake problem. However, these departments do not conduct extensive searches because of time constraints.

“They give me the calls that they don’t want to handle,” said the wrangler.

The cost of hiring a snake wrangler depends on the danger and how far Slyapich has to drive and how much acreage he has to clear.

Despite his expertise with snakes, the risks of being bitten do exist and Slyapich said he has contacted local hospitals to be sure that they do have antivenin available should it happen.

Despite their undesirability, rattlers do have a purpose–they keep the rodent population down. “I do not believe in destroying the rattlesnake. I try to capture it and transport it to an uninhabited area and set it free,” said Slyapich.

A Postcard from Paris

0

I’m sitting at an iMac in Cafe Orbital on Place Edmond Rostand across from Luxembourg Gardens. This is the second of only two days it has not rained since we arrived July 13.

In searching for this cyber cafe a few days ago, my friend Richard finally encountered musicians he knew from the years he lived here playing jazz in front of the Sorbonne. We had searched at all their old pitch places: Rue Mouffetard, where the open-air markets teem with shoppers on Sunday mornings; under the arches at Place des Vosges and the awnings of Galleries La Fayette, both good spots to play when it rains. The Left Bank cafe where musicians used to meet before going out to play has been closed.

Richard had lost all the phone numbers when his wallet was nicked (from a front pocket, no less) in the rush hour crush to board the Metro at Gare du Nord. Straight from the airport, juggling bags and horn cases, he must have looked like a tourist.

There are a few tricks to looking French, besides having brown hair and a prominent nose. French women wear black and dark blue skirts, sans nylons after the third hot day in June, and scarves around the neck and shoulder. Tourists wear plaid shorts, sneakers and carry backpacks and cameras, and read guidebooks on the Metro. American tourists are fat and walk around eating. French people are thin and always sit down to eat, usually for at least an hour. They don’t put butter on bread unless it’s stale–baguettes are fresh only for one day. They don’t use light or nonfat anything. They don’t need to because they have to walk about 10 miles a day. French women have trim ankles and well-developed calves. This is the city of 10,000 steps. Metro stations have anywhere from two to six flights of stairs. Some have escalators but somebody’s law says that it will not be running when you get there. Few houses and apartments, even hotels, have elevators.

The French have to stay thin because everything in the city is tiny. Tiny circular stairs in restaurants lead down to tiny toilettes. Tiny cars line the streets and park with two wheels on the tiny sidewalks. Speedy Rabbit delivers pizza on bikes and motorcycles are more popular than ever. It’s nothing to see a nicely dressed French woman, her scarf neatly arranged, carrying a motorcycle helmet.

We are staying way up in the 19th arrondissement, where there are no tourists, in the room Richard rented on his first trip in 1990. An old brownstone-looking house built in the 1870s, it was left to the current owner, Madame Outters, by her grandparents. Once trs chic, it is now a weathered relic in a working class neighborhood that is culturally diverse. The ground floor is leased as a separate flat, and the second floor, where Madame lives, had two rooms, a small kitchen and a bath that she rented to Richard and then to a string of his American musician friends. Madame no longer rents the rooms as she has redecorated them for her two children, 6 and 10 years. The kitchen is gone along with the peeling wallpaper and flaking plaster. The old vinyl has been scraped away to reveal a magnificent parquet floor with its original wooden pegs still intact. We lucked out because the children are on their summer holiday in the country.

Now most Parisians take five to eight week vacations, leaving their city to the tourists. Those who were still here on Bastille Day trooped to the Eiffel Tower for the fireworks. They picnicked on the grass in Parc du Champs de Mars, with the Eiffel Tower in view through the trees; they clung to lamppost bases and stood three deep along the two bridges east of Pont de l’Alma, which police had closed. The sunset across the Seine was as spectacular in its way as the pyrotechnics that followed. The twinkling white lights decorating the tower for the millennium year were turned down as the show began. Police, always on the alert for terrorists, kept the peace in a friendly, nonconfrontational way. Firecrackers were tossed off the bridges and in the streets, but that’s all within the law here.

Even though we are technically tourists this time, we buy the Carte Orange weekly Metro pass, and the Telecarte for the public phones, shop for wine and food at the Monoprix and walk home carrying our baguettes.

We read the International Herald Tribune every day and the Sunday edition of the London Times or Telegraph, which is a bit livelier. The Telegraph had a wonderful time with the comeuppance of novelist, playwright, philanderer and now convicted perjurer Jeffrey Archer, who four years ago won a libel suit against the Daily Star for exposing his dealings with a prostitute, and his live-in mistress of eight years and other dastardly deeds unbecoming a Peer. Archer was convicted last week of perjury in that case and will be writing his novels from prison for the next four years.

Last week in Paris, President Jacques Chirac faced three journalists on national TV, defending his own Travelgate. It seems several million in public funds were spent on airplane tickets for his private use. And Prime Minister Lionel Jospin admitted he lied for years, denying membership in a hard-core Trotskyist group. People here apparently couldn’t care less. Polls show the two are running virtually even as prospective opponents in next year’s presidential elections. The French are more concerned about the threat of genetically modified grapevines developed by U.S. researchers, which they fear will damage the mystique of their vintages and the varietal purity of their grapes. C’est la vie.

Ballooning pollution

0

I am writing to share my outrage over an event I witnessed on July 22. While enjoying a beautiful Sunday on Leo Carrillo beach, a very large group of people (100+) arrived, holding balloons and flowers. As some individual balloons began to fly I began to get disturbed. My friends and I began collecting Mylar balloons, handing them back to the group organizer, requesting that he ask his group not to release their balloons and litter on the beach. We do have laws about this kind of thing.

This group was here to honor a fellow student after his death. The entire group moved down the beach a few yards and began releasing flowers into the water. This was followed by a most shocking sight-the mass release of dozens upon dozens of balloons into the air. Within 10 seconds they were completely out of sight as the flowers in the water slowly floated out to sea.

My friends and I continued to collect plastic bouquet wraps, balloons and ribbons from all over the beach as this massive group of litterbugs irresponsibly vacated the beach as quickly as they arrived. We were clearly visible to this group, walking between them to put their trash into trashcans but not one even flinched.

As I looked toward Point Dume, I pictured these non-biodegradable balloons falling to the ground in my backyard. What about the fish, birds, dolphins and other animals that those balloons and ribbons will have a direct impact on? How do we honor their deaths? Would this group feel the same way if those balloons were not inflated and strewn all over their own yards? What if their dog choked on an old balloon or their cat on an old ribbon? Would they still think it was a good idea? Releasing flowers into the water is a great way to honor some one but leaving behind countless plastic bouquet wraps is just as irresponsible.

I am sorry for their loss. The untimely death of anyone is a tragedy, but are we as a society still so self-centered that we would honor the life of another by polluting the world of others? Funeral or not, these types of balloon releases are a blatant act of mass littering and should not be tolerated under any circumstance.

Jeffrey Gouda

Ghost shuttle heading for preserve–passengers wanted

0

The City of Malibu is spending $2,016 per week for a shuttle to the Point Dume Headland Preserves, but the bus remains mostly empty of passengers.

This nature bus route, operated by Malibu Shuttle Service, was set up as a result of a settlement agreement between the city and the California Coastal Commission.

The city allegedly violated the Coastal Act of 1972, which resulted in diminished public access to the Point Dume coastal area. Following a cease-and-desist order from the Coastal Commission, the city and the commission agreed to work together to provide public access improvements to Cliffside Drive and the bordering preserve.

The agreement requires the city to initiate and operate a shuttle bus service between the Westward Beach parking lot and the preserve.

But this attempt to make the Point Dume Headlands Preserve accessible to visitors, while minimizing parking that would impactson the neighborhood, has not been as successful a venture as hoped for.

The shuttle, which has been running since May 25, operates seven days a week during the summer and on weekends and holidays during the rest of the year. It runs every half hour from 11 a.m. to 7 p.m. on these days.

The annual cost to the city of operating the shuttle, if the service is provided as currently established, is between $50,000 -$60,000 a year.

But the service appears to be underused and the city may be spending money on a ghost bus.

“The reports are coming in and the usage is kind of light,” said Chuck Bergson, public works director for the City of Malibu.

The agreement also requires the city to review and adjust the frequency and service depending on the actual usage, every three months.

Councilmember Sharon Barovsky said the city is currently conducting an assessment of ridership and results will not be in until the end of the year.

“It looks like we may have to adjust it if it’s not used,” said Bergson. As an option, the city may reduce the size of the vehicle, using a smaller bus that will match the number of people who choose to use the shuttle. A 16- to 18-passenger vehicle is currently in operation.

The agreement with the state to operate the shuttle is not unique.

“Other shuttles exist in numerous cities,” said Sara Wan, Coastal Commission chair. These shuttles are required because some cities have parking issues, and the shuttle route is established in lieu of parking spaces that would normally be required in a particular area, she said.

“Maybe the people need to know about it,” she said, pointing out that young families with children would benefit from the shuttle.

An idea to attract attention to the shuttle is to have high school students paint the vehicle with natural designs, showing the headland’s wildlife and fauna, said Carolyn Van Horn, ex-council member and proponent of the shuttle.

“I do think that if the kids are allowed to paint this bus, it will be eye catching and people will become aware of the service,” said Van Horn.

“It could be used for taking seniors to shop down at the Civic Center and as a shuttle within the city during the off hours to serve school children,” suggested Van Horn.

But regardless of the usage, the city cannot cancel the nature bus service without prior approval from the state as stated in the settlement agreement.

If the City of Malibu terminates the shuttle service prior to the Local Coastal Plan certification or without obtaining an agreement to terminate from the proper agencies, it will have to construct an additional 22 parking spaces within close proximity of the preserve.

Robert Roy van de Hoek, a marine biologist who ran for Malibu City Council last year, is one of the two drivers who takes the shuttle back and fourth on its ghostly nature journey.

Malibu citizens need to unite

0

Having been a minority member of the Local Coastal Plan Committee for four years, I have an insider’s perspective to share. The then City Council (Van Horn & Keller dominated) asked us to use the L.A. County Certified LUP of 1986 as the basis of our work. Even though many of the policies had been proven illegal over the intervening years, the majority of the committee ignored the city planning staff and legal advice provided by the land use attorney during the General Plan adoption hearings and they inserted deleted General Plan policies. They even insisted that the LCP would supersede the Malibu General Plan if there were conflicts in policies.

The city hired an experienced coastal plan consultant to work with the committee but his advice was ignored. It is no surprise the committee also ignored the advice of the coastal staff when they came to give guidance as to the Coastal Act policies. This ignorance resulted in the coastal staff rejection of the preliminary draft at a meeting in Malibu on March 16, 2000. Subsequent to that meeting the committee continued to try to resurrect their ‘very own’ LCP draft. However, they had no concept of working with city staff, consultants or coastal staff. When they submitted the reworked ‘administrative draft’ (without any City Council public hearings) the result was what we are living with today–special state legislation the Coastal Commission pursued–AB988.

Time ran out for Malibu because of the Keller/Van Horn block. AB 988 attempts to take local control from our hands but at the same time it allows consultation with our City. The Malibu Township Council’s legal actions insisting that our City Council does not have the right to submit a Local Coastal Plan of their own was rightly rejected by the judge on Monday. The MTC board is no less than a reconfigured LCP committee dominated by Keller/Van Horn supporters. They are wrong to waste City of Malibu money defending our right of local control. These legal defense funds could be better spent on our schools or playgrounds. This is the same old problem from this same old group of people.

The same Keller/Van Horn clan did not listen to legal counsel on Lunita-Bailard and now we are looking at 38 condos instead of 6 single-family homes. Now we may face a Coastal Commission LCP that we do not support. Malibu citizens need to work together in a united front. The first phase of the LCP is the land use designations. We should all be supporting our City of Malibu designations instead of the L.A. County vision but that same old group will probably fight that even though they are the ones who adopted that zoning just because they are no longer on the council.

Judy Decker

MALIBU SEEN

0

THE RAITT STUFF

Malibu’s Bonnie Raitt and her father, John Raitt, were inducted into the Hollywood Bowl Hall of Fame in an evening that will surely rank among the summer’s most memorable. The Raitts joined fellow inductees Marilyn Horne, Stevie Wonder and the Monty Python comedy troupe for a star-studded opening night gala.

The festivities began with a splashy VIP cocktail party and ended with a fireworks spectacular that could rival anything on the Fourth of July. Jeff Bridges, Kevin Spacey, Robin Williams and Smokey Robinson were among the superstars who took the stage to introduce this year’s nominees. Bonnie delighted fans with her famed “I Can’t Make You Love Me,” while John wowed the crowd with “If I Loved You.” The father-and-daughter honorees then teamed up for a duet of “Anything You Can Do I Can Do Better,” as their closing number.

Robin Williams, as always, provided the laughs, musing on everything from Monty Python–“A group of men who are to comedy what Barbra Streisand is to rap and what George W. Bush is to language”– to the threatened walkout by Hollywood actors: “L.A. is the only place on Earth where the unemployed go on strike.” The introduction of Monty’s Eric Idle was followed by a collection of Python clips and a plaid-clad rendition of “The Lumberjack Song,” complete with a Canadian Mounted Police chorus.

Stevie Wonder rocked the house with the classics “My Cherie Amour,” “Living for the City,” “Overjoyed” and “Superstition.”

The Hollywood Bowl Orchestra, under the baton of John Mauceri, capped off the unforgettable evening with a rousing “William Tell Overture.” It was all topped off by a firecracker of a grand finale, which lit up the night sky. Together with an all-star cast, the Raitts gave ’em “something to talk about” for years to come.

MARRIAGE BOND

It looks as if wedding bells will finally be ringing for Malibu’s Pierce Brosnan and longtime love Keely Shaye Smith. The two reportedly plan to wed next month after Mr. B made a secret trip to Ashford Castle in the west of Ireland. The Bond man met with top celebrity party planners at the estate to make all the first-class arrangements. The actual ceremony is said to be taking place at a quaint country abbey 20 miles away. The star-friendly British glossy Hello! is expected to snare exclusive photo rights.

WEST WINGING IT

Martin Sheen and the cast of the “West Wing” are back to business as usual. Four members of the ensemble cast have returned to work, but are holding out for new contracts. Allison Janney, Richard Schiff, John Spencer and Bradley Whitford reportedly want to triple their current paycheck to approximately $90,000 per episode.

Commander-in-Chief Sheen and co-star Rob Lowe take home six-figure salaries, but to fans they’re worth every penny. The critically acclaimed series captured nine Emmy awards last year and is sure to be a contender in the next round, tying the Sopranos with a whopping 18 nominations.

Funding sought for Las Flores Creek Park

0

A new park serving East Malibu with 30 or so parking spaces, trails, a restored creek habitat and a small playground is in the works, theoretically.

But the practical aspects, including the construction of the park, to be located along Las Flores Canyon just north of Pacific Coast Highway, are still subject to funding that does not yet exist.

The City of Malibu commissioned a Las Flores Advisory Committee to provide input on behalf of the community as to the type, style, nature and location of the park. The new design does not include a community center, which was opposed by the neighboring community.

More importantly, the committee will also help the city obtain funding for the park development project.

The committee hopes to raise funds with a Chili Cook-off booth in the fall and privately through sponsors and service clubs.

At this point, the only expenditure approved by the city is for the design of the park. The council allocated $147,810 for that purpose recently but this amount will be amended because the allocation included the community center design as well.

“We’re trying to go with a natural setting, using what is already there,” said Paul Adams, Malibu Parks and Recreation director, as he presented the new design for the park at the first committee meeting on July 17 at City Hall.

The design elements for the park, bordering the creek at Las Flores Canyon Road and Rambla Pacifico, have changed from a recreational type facility to a more natural setting with an emphasis on creek restoration and native habitat.

Barbara Cameron, Malibu contract grant writer, said the new design might help the city obtain grants because of its focus on the restoration of the creek.

“We have had good support from Assemblymember Fran Pavley and Senator Sheila Kuehl,” said Cameron. “It’s also nice to have letters of support from nearby communities supporting the grant,” she added, indicating that La Costa homeowners are participating in the process.

Tim Maloney, of Community Works Design Group, the company hired to design the park, showed a drawing of the prospective park. The 27 to 30 new parking spaces would be located on Rambla Pacifico and a bridge would be built so pedestrians could cross over into the park.

The new design would also involve shifting the channel of the creek a little, softening the curve of the creek at a mid-point area of the long and narrow park.

“We’re trying to correct some of the flow problems,” said Maloney.

The design would help prevent flooding and filter runoff from the road. Water would be pulled off the street and pooled in five different sections of seasonal wetlands bordering Las Flores Canyon Road before it goes into the stream. This would involve grading a few sections of land throughout the park.

A vacated house that currently sits off Las Flores on part of the property that would be turned into the park, and which was initially considered to be used as a recreation center, would be demolished.

Instead, the new park facilities would include a self-contained restroom and a small children’s playground.

A possible connection to the beach is also under consideration.

“We are considering access because there is a vertical access easement, said Rick Morgan, city engineer. “But I don’t know that it’s feasible.” At this point, council has not directed staff on that matter, he said.

Time wise, Morgan said everything is off to a good start and he hopes the park’s designs will be completed by the end of this year.

The creek element is going to take the longest because it will require multiple special environmental permits from various agencies.

“The minute we get a plan completed we will get this permitting running,” said Morgan.

Other matters under consideration include materials used for park equipment and fencing, taking appearance and durability in mind.

Someone raised concerns about transient problems, suggesting that S-shaped benches should be used to discourage people from sleeping on the benches.

But Adams responded that a well-maintained and active area, like “the Bluffs” is not subject to these kinds of problems. “It’s when you allow a lot of growth that obscure an area and lack of maintenance, that attract them,” he said.

The community members who joined the park advisory committee so far are: Beth Lucas, Cheryl Kugel, Fred Niles, Holly Kinyon, Karin Al-Hardan, Margaret Smith and Paul Grisante.

×